HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff CommentsCITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning d Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
January 24, 2012 1 L_V, � 91
TO: Charles Ellison, via email: chuck@ellisonlaw.comv/ (�'C
V FROM: Erika Bridges
SUBJECT: Engineering Document Comments for Tower Point Ph. 12 Lot 1-4, Block 2
Staff reviewed the above -mentioned engineering documents as requested. The following page
is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the
comments and submit the following information by Monday, DATE, at 10:00 a.m. for further staff
review and approval of the plans:
One (1) set of revised construction documents.
Please note that the Development Permit Balance (Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection
Fee), will be calculated and requested once the construction documents and engineer's
estimates have been reviewed and approved.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Erika Bridges at
979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
PC:
Case File No. 11-500184
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
1. FYI ... A Development Permit Fee in the amount of 1% of the total public infrastructure cost is
required. The remaining balance based on the cost estimate is $1,334.61.
2. FYI...Offsite easements need to be dedicated prior to issuance of the Letter of Completion
or Certificate of Occupancy.
3. C4.0 — Please identify how the private drive will be terminated. There should at least be a
Type III barricade at the end in the interim between developments.
4. C6.0 — Please add an Inlet Protection Barrier at the outfall to the creek.
5. C7.4 — Please provide 3 valves at the 12x8 cross.
6. C7.4 — Show and label the proposed fire hydrant in profile.
7. C7.5 — Add a note regarding TCEQ water and sanitary sewer crossing requirements and
note locations where these rules will be applicable.
8. C7.5 — It looks like there are several discrepancies between the plan and profile. Please
revise.
9. C7.6 — Please show an outfall treatment for the 42-inch storm sewer pipe.
10. C7.7 — Please match soffits.
11. C7.6/7.7 — If there is less than 2-ft of cover over the storm, the pipe needs to be Class IV
RCP.
12. Drainage — Please provide additional information on assumptions made to size the storm
sewer pipes.
13. Drainage —What was the basis for the projected HGL?
14. Water— Please provide analysis of system under Normal (average demand) conditions.
Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: 1/23/12