Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWater Design ReportKLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors 4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A Bryan, Texas 77802 Post Office Box 4234 Bryan, Texas 77805 B.J. Kling, P.E., R.P.L.S. S.M. Kling, R.P.L.S. Telephone 979/846-6212 Fax 979 I 846-8252 Date: December 14, 2006 To: From: Re: Allan Gibbs, P .E. City of College Station Planning & Development Fred Paine, P .E. ~ Jeremy Peters, E.l.T. flt : Gateway Phase 4 -Water Design Report Amendment The November 2006 Water Design Report for Gateway Phase 4 analyzed the fire flow as ifthe subdivision was single-family residential. The purpose ofthis amendment is to re-analyze the project fire flow demands using the 2003 International Fire Code (IFC) on a per building basis. The largest building on the site is approximately 9,000 SF. According to the owner/developer, each building will be TyPe V-A construction. Using the IFC Appendix B "Fire Flow Requirements for Buildings", the fire flow for each building is determined to be 1,750 gpm. Using the 1,750 gpm fire flow requirement, the IFC Appendix C "Fire Hydrant Locations & Distribution" specifies a minimum of one hydrant be placed within a maximum distance from any point on the street of 250'. An additional 150' arc for coverage is allowed by Chapter 6, Section l.B(l) of the City of College Station Code of Ordinances. The fire hydrant placement depicted on the November 20, 2006 Site Plan meets these spacing and distribution requirements. The five different demand scenarios analyzed are as follows: • Average Daily Demand: • Peale Hourly Demand: • Fire 1: • Fire 2: • Fire 3: Calculated per building based on number of bedrooms in each building Average Daily Demand * 4 1750 gpm @ HYD-1 +Average Daily Demand 1750 gpm@HYD-2 +Average Daily Demand 875 gpm @ HYD-1 + 875 gpm @ HYD-2 + Average Daily Demand pg 1 of3 i • The following table summarizes the demands placed on each node in each of the four scenarios. Table 3(amended) Average Daily Peak Hourly Demand (gpm) Demand (gpm) Fire-1 (gpm) Fire-2 (gpm) Fire-3 (gpm) BLDG-1 1.68 6.72 1.68 1.68 1.68 BLDG-2 1.68 6.72 1.68 1.68 1.68 BLDG-3 0.56 2.24 0.56 0.56 0.56 BLDG-4 1.68 6.72 1.68 1.68 1.68 BLDG-5 0.84 3.36 0.84 0.84 0.84 BLDG-6 1.68 6.72 1.68 1.68 1.68 BLDG-7 1.68 6.72 1.68 1.68 1.68 BLDG-8 0.84 3.36 0.84 0.84 0.84 BLDG-9&12 3.08 12.32 3.08 3.08 3.08 BLDG-10&13 3.36 13.44 3.36 3.36 3.36 BLDG-11 1.40 5.60 1.40 1.40 1.40 BLDG-14 1.68 6.72 1.68 1.68 1.68 BLDG-15 1.68 6.72 1.68 1.68 1.68 HYD-1 --1750 -875 HYD-2 ---1750 875 *Refer to Appendix 2 of Water Design Report -Design Criteria for graphical representation of system node locations *Refer to Appendix 5 of Water Design Report for domestic demand calculations A complete list of results for both junctions and pipes can be found in the attached output tables. pg 2 of3 Table 4(amended) shows the minimum pressures and maximum velocities occurring in each scenario as well as the link or node where it occurs. Table 4(amended) Minimum Pressure Maximum Velocity Scenario ll!ill @ Node ill!.tl In Line Avg. Daily 104.90 J-5, J-9 0.3 2 P-8 Peak Hourly 104.81 J-5, J-9 1.29 P-8 Fire-1 92.36 HYD-1 11.31 P-1 Fire-2 97.39 HYD-2 11 .30 P-1 Fire-3 96.92 J-5, J-9 11 .30 P-1 *Refer to Appendix 2 of Water Design Report-Design Criteria for graphical representation of system node locations *Refer to Appendix 5 of Water Design Report for domestic demand calculations The B/CS Unified Design Guidelines for Domestic Water requires velocities within pipes not to exceed 12 feet per second (fps) and the residual pressure be at least 20 psi during fire flow. In all four scenarios shown above, these requirements are met. The minimum pressures for the average daily, peak hourly, and Fire-3 scenarios occur at nodes J-5 and J-9. Node J-5 is the connection point of Waterlines 'D' and 'E', and J-9 is the end point of Waterline 'E' where a blowoffvalve is proposed. For the Fire-I and Fire-2 scenarios, the minimum pressures occur at the HYD-1 and HYD-2 nodes, respectively. Both pressures are significantly higher than the minimum required. All other minimum pressures are significantly greater than the required minimum. The maximum velocity for the average daily and peak hourly scenarios occurs in pipe P-8 . Pipe P-8 is a 3" segment of Waterline 'B' that connects to Waterline 'E'. In the Fire-1 , Fire-2, and Fire-3 scenarios, the maximum velocity occurs in pipe P-1. Pipe P-1 is the 8" waterline that runs through the creek crossing and connects to the existing 12" waterline at North Forest Drive. Approximately 178 LF of this line is existing, the additional length is proposed as part of this project. In all cases, the maximum velocity is less than the allowable maximum. Gateway Phase 4 includes a total of 78 three to four bedroom condominium units. As shown by the analysis, using the IFC to determine fire flow demands, the proposed water distribution system is adequate. In all scenarios, the pressures are greater than the required minimum of 20 psi and the velocities are less than 12 fps. pg 3 of3 Node Elevation Demand Label (ft) Type J-1 273.55 Demand J-2 275.37 Demand J-3 276.56 Demand HYD-1 276.56 Demand J-5 278.93 Demand J-6 275.48 Demand HYD-2 275.27 Demand J-8 275.48 Demand J-9 278.93 Demand BLDG-3 274.50 Demand BLDG-1 274.58 Demand BLDG-2 274.98 Demand BLDG-4 276.01 Demand BLDG-6 275.92 Demand BLDG-9&12 278.71 Demand BLDG-10&13 276.81 Demand BLDG-8 273.55 Demand BLDG-14 275.48 Demand BLDG-11 275.48 Demand BLDG-15 275.48 Demand BLDG-5 273.55 Demand BLDG-7 273.55 Demand Scenario: AVG. DAILY Steady State Analysis Junction Report Demand Demand Calculated Calculated (gpm) Pattern Demand Hydraulic (gpm) Grade (ft) 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521 .52 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521 .52 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521 .52 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521 .52 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521 .50 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521 .50 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521 .52 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521 .50 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521 .50 0.56 Fixed 0.56 521 .51 1.68 Fixed 1.68 521 .51 1.68 Fixed 1.68 521 .51 1.68 Fixed 1.68 521 .52 1.68 Fixed 1.68 521 .52 3.08 Fixed 3.08 521 .50 3.36 Fixed 3.36 521 .50 0.84 Fixed 0.84 521.52 1.68 Fixed 1.68 521 .50 1.40 Fixed 1.40 521 .50 1.68 Fixed 1.68 521 .50 0.84 Fixed 0.84 521 .52 1.68 Fixed 1.68 521 .52 Pressure Fire Flow (psi) ~pper Limit {gpm) 107.23 0.00 106.44 0.00 105.93 0.00 105.93 0.00 104.90 0.00 106.39 0.00 106.49 0.00 106.39 0.00 104.90 0.00 106.82 0.00 106.78 0.00 106.61 0.00 106.16 0.00 106.20 0.00 104.99 0.00 105.81 0.00 107.23 0.00 106.39 0.00 106.39 0.00 106.39 0.00 107.23 0.00 107.23 0.00 Project Engineer: S. M. KLING h:\ ... \gateway phase 4\waterline\wtr-2.wcd Kling Engineering & Surveying Cybernet v3.1 [071] 12/12/06 05:28:51 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Node Elevation Demand Label (ft) Type J-1 273.55 Demand J-2 275.37 Demand J-3 276.56 Demand HYD-1 276.56 Demand J-5 278.93 Demand J-6 275.48 Demand HYD-2 275.27 Demand J-8 275.48 Demand J-9 278.93 Demand BLDG-3 274.50 Demand BLDG-1 274.58 Demand BLDG-2 274.98 Demand BLDG-4 276.01 Demand BLDG-6 275.92 Demand BLDG-9&12 278.71 Demand BLDG-10&13 276.81 Demand BLDG-8 273.55 Demand BLDG-14 275.48 Demand BLDG-11 275.48 Demand BLDG-15 275.48 Demand BLDG-5 273.55 Demand BLDG-7 273.55 Demand Scenario: PEAK HOURLY Steady State Analysis Junction Report Demand Demand Calculated Calculated (gpm) Pattern Demand Hydraulic (gpm) Grade (ft) 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521.47 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521.46 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521.46 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521.46 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521 .31 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521.30 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521.47 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521 .20 0.00 Fixed 0.00 521.31 2.24 Fixed 2.24 521.43 6.72 Fixed 6.72 521.41 6.72 Fixed 6.72 521.41 6.72 Fixed 6.72 521.46 6.72 Fixed 6.72 521.46 12.32 Fixed 12.32 521 .27 13.44 Fixed 13.44 521.26 3.36 Fixed 3.36 521 .47 6.72 Fixed 6.72 521 .26 5.60 Fixed 5.60 521 .21 6.72 Fixed 6.72 521 .20 3.36 Fixed 3.36 521.47 6.72 Fixed 6.72 521.47 Pressure Fire Flow (psi) Upper Limit (gpm) 107.21 0.00 106.42 0.00 105.90 0.00 105.90 0.00 104.81 0.00 106.30 0.00 106.46 0.00 106.26 0.00 104.81 0.00 106.78 0.00 106.74 0.00 106.57 0.00 106.14 0.00 106.18 0.00 104.89 0.00 105.71 0.00 107.21 0.00 106.28 0.00 106.26 0.00 106.26 0.00 107.21 0.00 107.21 0.00 Project Engineer: S. M. KLING h:\ ... \gateway phase 4\waterline\wtr-2.wcd Kling Engineering & Surveying Cybernet v3.1 [071] 12/12/06 05:29:01 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1 666 Page 1 of1 Node Elevation Demand Label (ft) Type J-1 273.55 Demand J-2 275.37 Demand J-3 276.56 Demand HYD-1 276.56 Demand J-5 278.93 Demand J-6 275.48 Demand HYD-2 275.27 Demand J-8 275.48 Demand J-9 278.93 Demand BLDG-3 274.50 Demand BLDG-1 274.58 Demand BLDG-2 274.98 Demand BLDG-4 276.01 Demand BLDG-6 275.92 Demand BLDG-9&12 278.71 Demand BLDG-10&13 276.81 Demand BLDG-8 273.55 Demand BLDG-14 275.48 Demand BLDG-11 275.48 Demand BLDG-1 5 275.48 Demand BLDG-5 273.55 Demand BLDG-7 273.55 Demand Scenario: FIRE-1 Steady State Analysis Junction Report Demand Demand ~alculated (gpm) Pattern Demand (gpm) 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 1,750.00 Fixed 1,750.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.56 Fixed 0.56 1.68 Fixed 1.68 1.68 Fixed 1.68 1.68 Fixed 1.68 1.68 Fixed 1.68 3.08 Fixed 3.08 3.36 Fixed 3.36 0.84 Fixed 0.84 1.68 Fixed 1.68 1.40 Fixed 1.40 1.68 Fixed 1.68 0.84 Fixed 0.84 1.68 Fixed 1.68 Calculated Pressure Fire Flow Hydraulic (psi) Upper Limit Grade (gpm) (ft) 507.13 101 .01 0.00 501 .69 97.87 0.00 491.43 92.92 0.00 490.09 92.34 0.00 494.82 93.36 0.00 504.73 99.14 0.00 507.08 100.24 0.00 504.73 99.13 0.00 494.82 93.36 0.00 499.46 97.28 0.00 495.06 95.34 0.00 496.48 95.78 0.00 497.22 95.66 0.00 497.70 95.91 0.00 496.06 93.99 0.00 500.53 96.74 0.00 507.12 101 .00 0.00 504.73 99.14 0.00 504.73 99.13 0.00 504.73 99.13 0.00 504.30 99.78 0.00 504.55 99.89 0.00 Project Engineer: S. M. KLING h:\ ... \gateway phase 4\waterline\wtr-2.wcd Kling Engineering & Surveying Cybernet v3.1 [071] 12/12/06 05:29:05 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Node Elevation Demand Label (ft) Type J-1 273.55 Demand J-2 275.37 Demand J-3 276.56 Demand HYD-1 276.56 Demand J-5 278.93 Demand J-6 275.48 Demand HYD-2 275.27 Demand J-8 275.48 Demand J-9 278.93 Demand BLDG-3 274.50 Demand BLDG-1 274.58 Demand BLDG-2 274.98 Demand BLDG-4 276.01 Demand BLDG-6 275.92 Demand BLDG-9&12 278.71 Demand BLDG-10&13 276.81 Demand BLDG-8 273.55 Demand BLDG-14 275.48 Demand BLDG-11 275.48 Demand BLDG-15 275.48 Demand BLDG-5 273.55 Demand BLDG-7 273.55 Demand Scenario: FIRE-2 Steady State Analysis Junction Report Demand Demand Calculated (gpm) Pattern Demand (gpm) 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 1,750.00 Fixed 1,750.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.56 Fixed 0.56 1.68 Fixed 1.68 1.68 Fixed 1.68 1.68 Fixed 1.68 1.68 Fixed 1.68 3.08 Fixed 3.08 1.68 Fixed 1.68 0.84 Fixed 0.84 1.68 Fixed 1.68 1.40 Fixed 1.40 1.68 Fixed 1.68 0.84 Fixed 0.84 1.68 Fixed 1.68 Calculated Pressure Fire Flow Hydraulic (psi) Upper Limit Grade (g pm) (ft) 507.15 101.02 0.00 507.14 100.22 0.00 507.11 99.70 0.00 507.10 99.70 0.00 504.96 97.74 0.00 501 .14 97.58 0.00 500.49 97.39 0.00 501 .14 97.58 0.00 504.96 97.74 0.00 507.12 100.59 0.00 507.11 100.55 0.00 507.11 100.38 0.00 507.12 99.94 0.00 507.12 99.98 0.00 504.41 97.60 0.00 502.63 97.65 0.00 505.67 100.38 0.00 501 .14 97.58 0.00 501 .14 97.58 0.00 501 .14 97.58 0.00 507.14 101.01 0.00 507.14 101.01 0.00 Project Engineer: S. M. KLING h:\ ... \gateway phase 4\waterline\wtr-2.wcd Kling Engineering & Surveying Cybernet v3.1 [071] 12/12/06 05:29:1 0 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Node Elevation Demand Label (ft) Type J-1 273.55 Demand J-2 275.37 Demand J-3 276.56 Demand HYD-1 276.56 Demand J-5 278.93 Demand J-6 275.48 Demand HYD-2 275.27 Demand J-8 275.48 Demand J-9 278.93 Demand BLDG-3 274.50 Demand BLDG-1 274.58 Demand BLDG-2 274.98 Demand BLDG-4 276.01 Demand BLDG-6 275.92 Demand BLDG-9&12 278.71 Demand BLDG-10&13 276.81 Demand BLDG-8 273.55 Demand BLDG-14 275.48 Demand BLDG-11 275.48 Demand BLDG-15 275.48 Demand BLDG-5 273.55 Demand BLDG-7 273.55 Demand Scenario: FIRE-3 Steady State Analysis Junction Report Demand Demand Calculated (gpm) Pattern Demand (gpm) 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 875.00 Fixed 875.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 875.00 Fixed 875.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.00 Fixed 0.00 0.56 Fixed 0.56 1.68 Fixed 1.68 1.68 Fixed 1.68 1.68 Fixed 1.68 1.68 Fixed 1.68 3.08 Fixed 3.08 1.68 Fixed 1.68 0.84 Fixed 0.84 1.68 Fixed 1.68 1.40 Fixed 1.40 1.68 Fixed 1.68 0.84 Fixed 0.84 1.68 Fixed 1.68 ~alculated Pressure Fire Flow Hydraulic (psi) Upper Limit Grade (gpm) (ft) 507.15 101 .02 0.00 505.63 99.57 0.00 502.74 97.81 0.00 502.39 97.66 0.00 503.07 96.92 0.00 504.63 99.09 0.00 505.05 99.36 0.00 504.63 99.09 0.00 503.07 96.92 0.00 504.98 99.67 0.00 503.72 99.09 0.00 504.11 99.09 0.00 504.34 98.74 0.00 504.48 98.84 0.00 503.24 97.09 0.00 503.96 98.23 0.00 506.70 100.82 0.00 504.63 99.09 0.00 504.63 99.09 0.00 504.63 99.09 0.00 506.35 100.67 0.00 506.42 100.70 0.00 Project Engineer: S. M . KLING h:\ ... \gateway phase 4\waterline\wtr-2.wcd Kling Engineering & Surveying Cybernet v3.1 (071] 12/12/06 05:29: 15 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Link Length Diameter Material Label (ft) (in) P-1 255.00 8 PVC P-40 11.00 8 PVC P-15 117.00 3 PVC P-41 37.00 8 PVC P-5 4.00 8 PVC P-22 99.00 8 PVC P-6 165.00 3 PVC P-26 39.00 3 PVC P-45 36.00 3 PVC P-8 54.00 3 PVC P-34 36.00 3 PVC P-32 110.11 8 PVC P-20 166.00 3 PVC P-19 215.00 3 PVC P-21 79.00 3 PVC P-24 15.00 8 PVC P-25 123.00 8 PVC P-28 168.00 3 PVC P-46 139.00 3 PVC P-36 102.00 3 PVC P-38 37.00 3 PVC P-39 105.00 3 PVC P-43 7.00 8 PVC P-44 53.00 8 PVC h:\ ... \gateway phase 4\waterline\wtr-2.wcd 12/12/06 05:29:32 PM Roughness Minor Loss 150.0 2.03 150.0 0.59 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.70 150.0 1.67 150.0 1.67 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.35 150.0 1.67 150.0 0.35 150.0 0.59 150.0 0.40 150.0 0.75 150.0 0.39 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.39 Scenario: AVG. DAILY Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Initial Current Discharge Status Status (gpm) Open Open 21 .84 Open Open 7.97 Open Open 2.04 Open Open -11 .35 Open Open 4.07 Open Open -5.94 Open Open 4.07 Open Open 4.07 Open Open 0.00 Open Open -7.13 Open Open 4.76 Open Open -7.13 Open Open 1.48 Open Open -1 .88 Open Open -0.20 Open Open -7.62 Open Open -9.30 Open Open 0.99 Open Open -2.37 Open Open 3.08 Open Open 1.68 Open Open 0.00 Open Open -12.19 Open Open -13.87 Kling Engineering & Surveying Start End Calculated Calculated Hydraulic Hydraulic Grade Grade (ft) (ft) 521 .52 521 .52 521 .52 521 .52 521 .52 521 .51 521 .52 521 .52 521 .52 521 .52 521 .52 521 .52 521 .52 521 .50 521.50 521 .50 521 .50 521 .50 521 .50 521 .52 521 .50 521 .50 521 .52 521.52 521 .51 521 .51 521 .51 521 .52 521 .51 521 .51 521 .52 521 .52 521 .52 521 .52 521 .50 521 .50 521 .50 521 .50 521 .50 521 .50 521 .50 521 .50 521 .50 521 .50 521 .52 521 .52 521 .52 521.52 © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Head loss (ft) 0.37e-2 0.61e-4 0.21e-2 0.18e-3 0.00 0.18e-3 0.01 0.29e-2 0.00 0.01 0.33e-2 0.18e-3 0.16e-2 0.33e-2 0.00 0.00 0.31 e-3 0.79e-3 0.34e-2 0.39e-2 0.43e-3 0.00 0.61e-4 0.31 e-3 Friction Velocity Slope (ft/s) (ft/1 OOOft) 0.01 0.14 0.01 0.05 0.02 0.09 0.49e-2 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.18e-2 0.04 0.07 0.18 0.07 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.32 0.09 0.22 0.17e-2 0.05 0.01 0.07 0.02 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.25e-2 0.06 0.47e-2 0.04 0.02 0.11 0.04 0.14 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.01 0.09 Project Engineer: S. M . KLING Cybernet v3.1 [071] Page 1 of 1 Link Length Diameter Material Label (ft) (in) P-1 255.00 8 PVC P-40 11 .00 8 PVC P-15 117.00 3 PVC P-41 37.00 8 PVC P-5 4.00 8 PVC P-22 99.00 8 PVC P-6 165.00 3 PVC P-26 39.00 3 PVC P-45 36.00 3 PVC P-8 54.00 3 PVC P-34 36.00 3 PVC P-32 110.11 8 PVC P-20 166.00 3 PVC P-19 215.00 3 PVC P-21 79.00 3 PVC P-24 15.00 8 PVC P-25 123.00 8 PVC P-28 168.00 3 PVC P-46 139.00 3 PVC P-36 102.00 3 PVC P-38 37.00 3 PVC P-39 105.00 3 PVC P-43 7.00 8 PVC P-44 53.00 8 PVC h:\ ... \gateway phase 4\waterline\wtr-2.wcd 12/12/06 05:29:39 PM Roughness Minor Loss 150.0 2.03 150.0 0.59 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.70 150.0 1.67 150.0 1.67 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.35 150.0 1.67 150.0 0.35 150.0 0.59 150.0 0.40 150.0 0.75 150.0 0.39 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.39 Scenario: PEAK HOURLY Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Initial Current Discharge Status Status (gpm) Open Open 87.36 Open Open 31 .80 Open Open 8.18 Open Open -45.48 Open Open 16.36 Open Open -23.87 Open Open 16.36 Open Open 16.36 Open Open 0.00 Open Open -28.44 Open Open 19.04 Open Open -28.44 Open Open 5.94 Open Open -7.50 Open Open -0.78 Open Open -30.59 Open Open -37.31 Open Open 4.04 Open Open -9.40 Open Open 12.32 Open Open 6.72 Open Open 0.00 Open Open -48.84 Open Open -55.56 Kling Engineering & Surveying Start End Calculated Calculated Hydraulic Hydraulic Grade Grade (ft) (ft) 521 .52 521.47 521.47 521.47 521.46 521.43 521.46 521.47 521.46 521.46 521.46 521.46 521.46 521 .31 521 .31 521 .27 521 .31 521 .31 521 .30 521.47 521 .30 521 .26 521.47 521.47 521.43 521.41 521.41 521.46 521.41 521.41 521.46 521 .46 521.46 521 .46 521 .27 521.26 521 .26 521.30 521.26 521 .21 521 .21 521 .20 521 .20 521 .20 521.47 521.47 521.47 521 .47 © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Head loss (ft) 0.05 0.61e-3 0.03 0.27e-2 0.12e-3 0.2e-2 0.15 0.04 0.00 0.17 0.04 0.24e-2 0.02 0.04 0.24e-3 0.31e-3 0.4e-2 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.37e-3 0.43e-2 Friction Velocity Slope (ft/s) (ft/1 OOOft) 0.19 0.56 0.06 0.20 0.24 0.37 0.07 0.29 0.03 0.10 0.02 0.15 0.92 0.74 0.99 0.74 0.00 0.00 3.11 1.29 1.21 0.86 0.02 0.18 0.13 0.27 0.20 0.34 0.31 e-2 0.04 0.02 0.20 0.03 0.24 0.06 0.18 0.31 0.43 0.49 0.56 0.16 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.31 0.08 0.35 Project Engineer: S. M. KLING Cybernet v3.1 [071) Page 1 of 1 Link Length Diameter Material Label (ft) (in) P-1 255.00 8 PVC P-40 11 .00 8 PVC P-15 117.00 3 PVC P-41 37.00 8 PVC P-5 4.00 8 PVC P-22 99.00 8 PVC P-6 165.00 3 PVC P-26 39.00 3 PVC P-45 36.00 3 PVC P-8 54.00 3 PVC P-34 36.00 3 PVC P-32 110.11 8 PVC P-20 166.00 3 PVC P-19 215.00 3 PVC P-21 79.00 3 PVC P-24 15.00 8 PVC P-25 123.00 8 PVC P-28 168.00 3 PVC P-46 139.00 3 PVC P-36 102.00 3 PVC P-38 37.00 3 PVC P-39 105.00 3 PVC P-43 7.00 8 PVC P-44 53.00 8 PVC h:\ ... \gateway phase 4\waterline\wtr-2.wcd 12/12/06 05:29:43 PM Roughness Minor Loss 150.0 2.03 150.0 0.59 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.70 150.0 1.67 150.0 1.67 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.35 150.0 1.67 150.0 0.35 150.0 0.59 150.0 0.40 150.0 0.75 150.0 0.39 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.39 Scenario: FIRE-1 Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Initial Current Discharge Status Status (gpm) Open Open 1,771 .84 Open Open 115.55 Open Open 85.30 Open Open -1,653.77 Open Open 1,646.49 Open Open -1,565.10 Open Open -103.51 Open Open -103.51 Open Open 0.47e-3 Open Open -114.71 Open Open 4.76 Open Open -114.71 Open Open 84.74 Open Open 81 .38 Open Open 83.06 Open Open -1,566.78 Open Open -1,568.46 Open Open -106.59 Open Open -109.95 Open Open 3.08 Open Open 1.68 Open Open 0.00 Open Open -1,654.61 Open Open -1 ,656.29 Kling Engineering & Surveying Start End Calculated Calculated Hydraulic Hydraulic Grade Grade (ft) (ft) 521 .52 507.13 507.13 507.12 501.69 499.46 501 .69 504.30 491.43 490.09 491 .43 497.22 490.09 494.82 494.82 496.06 494.82 494.82 504.73 507.08 504.73 504.73 507.08 507.12 499.46 496.48 495.06 491.43 496.48 495.06 497.22 497.70 497.70 501.69 496.06 500.53 500.53 504.73 504.73 504.73 504.73 504.73 504.73 504.73 504.30 504.55 504.55 507.13 © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Head loss (ft) 14.39 0.01 2.23 2.60 1.34 5.79 4.73 1.24 0.00 2.35 0.33e-2 0.03 2.98 3.63 1.41 0.49 3.99 4.47 4.20 0.39e-2 0.46e-3 0.00 0.25 2.58 Friction Velocity Slope (ft/s) (ft/1 OOOft) 56.45 11 .31 0.71 0.74 19.10 3.87 70.37 10.56 335.56 10.51 58.44 9.99 28.68 4.70 31 .71 4.70 0.00 0.21e-4 43.51 5.21 0.09 0.22 0.30 0.73 17.97 3.85 16.90 3.69 17.87 3.77 32.37 10.00 32.43 10.01 26.62 4.84 30.25 4.99 0.04 0.14 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 35.81 10.56 48.64 10.57 Project Engineer: S. M. KLING Cybernet v3.1 (071] Page 1 of 1 Link Length Diameter Material Label (ft) (in) P-1 255.00 8 PVC P-40 11 .00 8 PVC P-15 117.00 3 PVC P-41 37.00 8 PVC P-5 4.00 8 PVC P-22 99.00 8 PVC P-6 165.00 3 PVC P-26 39.00 3 PVC P-45 36.00 3 PVC P-8 54.00 3 PVC P-34 36.00 3 PVC P-32 110.11 8 PVC P-20 166.00 3 PVC P-19 215.00 3 PVC P-21 79.00 3 PVC P-24 15.00 8 PVC P-25 123.00 8 PVC P-28 168.00 3 PVC P-46 139.00 3 PVC P-36 102.00 3 PVC P-38 37.00 3 PVC P-39 105.00 3 PVC P-43 7.00 8 PVC P-44 53.00 8 PVC h:\ ... \gateway phase 4\waterline\wtr-2.wcd 12/12/06 05:29:48 PM Roughness Minor Loss 150.0 2.03 150.0 0.59 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.70 150.0 1.67 150.0 1.67 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.35 150.0 1.67 150.0 0.35 150.0 0.59 150.0 0.40 150.0 0.75 150.0 0.39 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.39 Scenario: FIRE-2 Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Initial Current Discharge Status Status (gpm) Open Open 1,770.16 Open Open 1,692.65 Open Open 5.03 Open Open -74.99 Open Open 67.71 Open Open -66.60 Open Open 67.71 Open Open 67.71 Open Open 0.00 Open Open 58.19 Open Open 4.76 Open Open -1,691.81 Open Open 4.47 Open Open 1.11 Open Open 2.79 Open Open -68.28 Open Open -69.96 Open Open 64.63 Open Open 62.95 Open Open 3.08 Open Open 1.68 Open Open 0.00 Open Open -75.83 Open Open -77.51 Kling Engineering & Surveying Start End Calculated Calculated Hydraulic Hydraulic Grade Grade (ft) (ft) 521 .52 507.15 507.15 505.67 507.14 507.12 507.14 507.14 507.11 507.10 507.11 507.12 507.10 504.96 504.96 504.41 504.96 504.96 501.14 500.49 501 .14 501 .14 500.49 505.67 507.12 507.11 507.11 507.11 507.11 507.11 507.12 507.12 507.12 507.14 504.41 502.63 502.63 501 .14 501 .14 501.14 501 .14 501 .14 501 .14 501 .14 507.14 507.14 507.14 507.15 © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Head loss (ft) 14.37 1.48 0.01 0.01 0.24e-2 0.01 2.14 0.56 0.00 0.65 0.33e-2 5.18 0.01 0.13e-2 0.26e-2 0.15e-2 0.01 1.77 1.49 0.38e-2 0.46e-3 0.00 0.82e-3 0.01 Friction Velocity Slope (ft/s) (ft/1 OOOft) 56.35 11.30 134.55 10.80 0.10 0.23 0.19 0.48 0.60 0.43 0.14 0.43 12.98 3.07 14.28 3.07 0.00 0.00 12.03 2.64 0.09 0.22 47.01 10.80 0.08 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.03 0.13 0.10 0.44 0.10 0.45 10.55 2.93 10.72 2.86 0.04 0.14 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.48 0.15 0.49 Project Engineer: S. M. KLING Cybernet v3.1 [071] Page 1 of 1 Link Length Diameter Material Label (ft) (in) P-1 255.00 8 PVC P-40 11.00 8 PVC P-15 117.00 3 PVC P-41 37.00 8 PVC P-5 4.00 8 PVC P-22 99.00 8 PVC P-6 165.00 3 PVC P-26 39.00 3 PVC P-45 36.00 3 PVC P-8 54.00 3 PVC P-34 36.00 3 PVC P-32 110.11 8 PVC P-20 166.00 3 PVC P-19 215.00 3 PVC P-21 79.00 3 PVC P-24 15.00 8 PVC P-25 123.00 8 PVC P-28 168.00 3 PVC P-46 139.00 3 PVC P-36 102.00 3 PVC P-38 37.00 3 PVC P-39 105.00 3 PVC P-43 7.00 8 PVC P-44 53.00 8 PVC h:\ ... \gateway phase 4\waterline\wtr-2.wcd 12/12/06 05:29:52 PM Roughness Minor Loss 150.0 2.03 150.0 0.59 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.70 150.0 1.67 150.0 1.67 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.35 150.0 1.67 150.0 0.35 150.0 0.59 150.0 0.40 150.0 0.75 150.0 0.39 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.74 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.00 150.0 0.39 Scenario: FIRE-3 Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Initial Current Discharge Status Status (gpm) Open Open 1,770.16 Open Open 921 .82 Open Open 44.02 Open Open -845.82 Open Open 838.54 Open Open -798.43 Open Open -36.46 Open Open -36.46 Open Open 0.47e-3 Open Open -45.98 Open Open 4.76 Open Open -920.98 Open Open 43.46 Open Open 40.10 Open Open 41 .78 Open Open -800.11 Open Open -801 .79 Open Open -39.54 Open Open -41 .22 Open Open 3.08 Open Open 1.68 Open Open 0.00 Open Open -846.66 Open Open -848.34 Kling Engineering & Surveying Start End Calculated Calculated Hydraulic Hydraulic Grade Grade (ft) (ft) 521 .52 507.15 507.15 506.70 505.63 504.98 505.63 506.35 502.74 502.39 502.74 504.34 502.39 503.07 503.07 503.24 503.07 503.07 504.63 505.05 504.63 504.63 505.05 506.70 504.98 504.11 503.72 502.74 504.11 503.72 504.34 504.48 504.48 505.63 503.24 503.96 503.96 504.63 504.63 504.63 504.63 504.63 504.63 504.63 506.35 506.42 506.42 507.15 © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Head loss (ft) 14.37 0.45 0.65 0.72 0.35 1.59 0.67 0.17 0.00 0.42 0.33e-2 1.65 0.86 0.98 0.39 0.14 1.15 0.71 0.68 0.38e-2 0.46e-3 0.00 0.07 0.73 Friction Velocity Slope (ftls) (ft/1 OOOft) 56.35 11.30 40.97 5.88 5.58 2.00 19.40 5.40 88.01 5.35 16.10 5.10 4.09 1.66 4.47 1.66 0.00 0.21e-4 7.71 2.09 0.09 0.22 14.99 5.88 5.21 1.97 4.54 1.82 4.98 1.90 9.34 5.11 9.37 5.12 4.25 1.79 4.88 1.87 0.04 0.14 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 10.37 5.40 13.75 5.41 Project Engineer: S. M. KLING Cybernet v3.1 (071] Page 1 of 1