Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNationwide Permit Pre-Construction Notification Form~ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Fort Worth District Nationwide Permit (NWP) Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form This form integrates requirements of the Nationwide Permit Program within the Fort Worth District, including General and Regional Conditions. Please consult instructions included at the end prior to completing this form. Contents • Description of NWP 29 • Part I: NWP Conditions and Requirements Checklist o General Conditions Checklist o NWP 29-Specific Requirements Checklist o Regional Conditions Checklist • Part II: Project Information Form • Part Ill: Project Impacts and Mitigation Form • Part IV: Attachments Form • Instructions DESCRIPTION OF NWP 29 -RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS Residential Developments. Discharges of dredged or fill material into non-tidal waters of the United States for the construction or expansion of a single residence, a multiple unit residential development, or a residential subdivision. This NWP authorizes the construction of building foundations and building pads and attendant features that are necessary for the use of the residence or residential development. Attendant features may include but are not limited to roads, parking lots, garages, yards, utility lines, storm water management facilities, septic fields, and recreation facilities such as playgrounds, playing fields, and golf courses (provided the golf course is an integral part of the residential development). The discharge must not cause the loss of greater than 1/2-acre of non-tidal waters of the United States, including the loss of no more than 300 linear feet of stream bed, unless for intermittent and ephemeral stream beds the district engineer waives the 300 linear foot limit by making a written determination concluding that the discharge will result in minimal adverse effects. This NWP does not authorize discharges into non-tidal wetlands adjacent to tidal waters. Subdivisions. For residential subdivisions, the aggregate total loss of waters of U.S. authorized by this NWP cannot exceed 1/2-acre. This includes any loss of waters of the U.S. associated with development of individual subdivision lots. Notification: The permittee must submit a pre-construction notification to the district engineer prior to commencing the activity. (See general condition 31.) (Sections 10 and 404) Part I: NWP Conditions and Requirements Checklist To ensure compliance with the General Conditions {GC), in order for an authorization by a NWP to be valid, please answer the following questions: 1. Navigation (Applies to Section 10 waters [i.e. navigable waters of the U.S.], see instruction 4 for link to list): a. Does the project cause more than a minimal adverse effect on navigation? D Yes D No [8J N/A Page 1of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 b. Does the project require the installation and maintenance of any safety lights and signals prescribed by the U.S. Coast Guard on authorized facilities in navigable waters of the U.S.? D Yes D No IZI N/A c. Does the Applicant understand and agree that if future operations by the U.S. require the removal, relocation, or other alteration of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the Applicant will be required, upon due notice from the USACE, to remove, relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the U.S.; and no claim shall be made against the U.S. on account of any such removal or alteration? D Yes D No IZI N/A If you answered yes to question a. or b. above, or if you answered no to question c. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 2. Aquatic Life Movements: a. Does the project substantially disrupt the necessary life cycle movements of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody, including those species that normally migrate through the area? D Yes 1Z1 No b. Is the project's primary purpose to impound water? D Yes IZI No c. Will culverts placed in streams be installed to maintain low flow conditions to sustain the movement of those aquatic species? D Yes D No IZI N/A If you answered yes to question a. or b. above, or if you answered no to question c. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 3. Spawning Areas: a. Does the project avoid spawning areas during the spawning season to the maximum extent practicable? D Yes D No IZI N/A b. Does the project result in the physical destruction (e.g., through excavation, fill, or downstream smothering by substantial turbidity) of an important spawning area? D Yes D No IZI N/A If you answered no to question a. above, or if you answered yes to question b. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 4. Migratory Bird Breeding Areas: a. Does the project avoid waters of the U.S. that serve as breeding areas for migratory birds to the maximum extent practicable? D Yes D No IZI N/A If you answered no to question a. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable Page 2of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 s; Shellfish Beds: a. Does the project occur in areas of concentrated shellfish populations? D Yes cg] No If you answered yes to question a. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 6. Suitable Material: a. Does the project use unsuitable material (e.g., trash, debris, car bodies, asphalt, etc.)? D Yes cg] No b. Is the material used for construction or discharged in a water of the U.S. free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts (see Section 307 of the Clean Water Act)? cg] Yes D No If you answered yes to question a. above, or if you answered no to question b. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 7. Water Supply Intakes: a. Does the project occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake? D Yes cg] No If you answered yes to question a. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 8. Adverse Effects From Impoundments: a. Does the project create an impoundment of water? D Yes cg] No b. If you answered yes to question a. above, are the adverse effects (to the aquatic system due to accelerating the passage of water, and/or restricting its flow) minimized to the maximum extent practicable? D Yes D No cg] N/A If you answered no to question b. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 9. Management of Water Flows: a. Does the project maintain the pre-construction course, condition, capacity, and location of open waters to the maximum extent practicable, for each activity, including stream channelization and storm water management activities? cg] Yes D No b. Will the project be constructed to withstand expected high flows? cg] Yes D No c. Will the project restrict or impede the passage of normal or high flows? D Yes cg] No If you answered no to question a. orb. above, or if you answered yes to question c. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 10. Fills Within 100-Year Floodplains: a. Does the project comply with applicable FEMA-approved state or local floodplain management requirements? D Yes D No cg] N/A Page 3of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 If you answered no to question a. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 11. Equipment: a. Will heavy equipment working in wetlands or mudflats be placed on mats, or other measures be taken to minimize soil disturbance? D Yes D No ~ N/A If you answered no to question a. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 12. Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls: a. Will the project use appropriate soil erosion and sediment controls and maintain them in effective operating condition throughout construction? ~Yes D No b. Will all exposed soil and other fills, as well as any work below the ordinary high water mark or high tide line, be permanently stabilized at the earliest practicable date? ~Yes D No c. Be aware that if work will be conducted within waters of the U.S., Applicants are encouraged to perform that work during periods of low-flow or no-flow. If you answered no to question a. or b. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 13. Removal of Temporary Fills: a. Will temporary fills be removed in their entirety and the affected areas returned to pre- construction elevations? D Yes D No ~ N/A b. Will the affected areas be revegetated, as appropriate? ~Yes D No D N/A If you answered no to question a. or b. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 14. Proper Maintenance: a. Will any authorized structure or fill be properly maintained, including maintenance to ensure public safety? D Yes ~ No If you answered no to question a. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: The existing channel is natural and prestine, both upstream and downstream. Once realigned the tributary will be stablized and continue to operate with natural growth conditions. 15. Single and Complete Project: a. Does the Applicant certify that the project is a "single and complete project" as defined below? ~Yes D No Single and complete project: Single and complete linear project: A linear project is a project constructed for the purpose of getting people, goods, or services from a point of origin to a terminal point, which often involves multiple crossings of one or more waterbodies at separate and distant locations. The term "single and complete project" is defined as that portion of the total linear project proposed or accomplished by one owner/developer or partnership or Page 4of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 other association of owners/developers that includes all crossings of a single water of the United States (i.e., a single waterbody) at a specific location. For linear projects crossing a single or multiple waterbodies several times at separate and distant locations, each crossing is considered a single and complete project for purposes of NWP authorization. However, individual channels in a braided stream or river, or individual arms of a large, irregularly shaped wetland or lake, etc., are not separate waterbodies, and crossings of such features cannot be considered separately. Single and complete non-linear project: For non-linear projects, the term "single and complete project" is defined at 33 CFR 330.2(i) as the total project proposed or accomplished by one owner/developer or partnership or other association of owners/developers. A single and complete non-linear project must have independent utility (see definition of "independent utility''). Single and complete non-linear projects may not be "piecemealed" to avoid the limits in an NWP authorization. Independent utility: Defined as a test to determine what constitutes a single and complete non-linear project in the Corps regulatory program. A project is considered to have independent utility if it would be constructed absent the construction of other projects in the project area. Portions of a multi-phase project that depend upon other phases of the project do not have independent utility. Phases of a project that would be constructed even if the other phases were not built can be considered as separate single and complete projects with independent utility. 16. Wild and Scenic River: There are no Wild and Scenic Rivers within the geographic boundaries of the Fort Worth District. Therefore, this GC does not apply. 17. Tribal Rights: a. Will the project or its operation impair reserved tribal rights, including, but not limited to, reserved water rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights? D Yes [8J No D N/A If you answered yes to question a. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: 18. Endangered Species (see also Box 8 in Part III): a. Is the project likely to directly or indirectly jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered species or a species proposed for such designation, as identified under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), or will the project directly or indirectly destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such species? D Yes [8J No b. Might the project affect any listed species or designated critical habitat? D Yes [8J No c. Is any listed species or designated critical habitat in the vicinity of the project? D Yes [8J No d. If the project "may affect" a listed species or critical habitat, has Section 7 consultation addressing the effects of the proposed activity been completed? D Yes D No [8J N/A If you answered yes to question a. orb. or c. above, or if you answered no to question d. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 19. Migratory Birds and Bald and Golden Eagles: Does the project have the potential to impact nests, nesting sites, or rookeries of migratory birds, bald or golden eagles? D Yes [8J No D N/A Page 5of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 If you answered yes to question above, you are responsible for contacting the appropriate local office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to obtain any "take" permits required under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's regulations governing compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. 20. Historic Properties (see also Box 9 in Part III): a. Does the project have the potential to cause effects to any historic properties listed, determined to be eligible for listing on, or potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, including previously unidentified properties? 0 Yes r8:l No 0 N/A If you answered yes to question a. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application: Not Applicable 21. Discovery of Previously Unknown Remains and Artifacts: If you discover any previously unknown historic, cultural or archeological remains and artifacts while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify the district engineer of what you have found, and to the maximum extent practicable, avoid construction activities that may affect the remains and artifacts until the required coordination has been completed. The district engineer will initiate the Federal, Tribal and state coordination required to determine if the items or remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 22. Designated Critical Resource Waters: a. Will the project impact critical resource waters, which include NOAA-designated marine sanctuaries, National Estuarine Research Reserves, state natural heritage sites, and outstanding national resource waters or other waters officially designated by a state as having particular environmental or ecological significance and identified by the district engineer after notice and opportunity for public comment? 0Yes [8J No If you answered yes to question a. above, be aware that discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S. are not authorized by NWP 29 for any activity within, or directly affecting, critical resource waters, including wetlands adjacent to such waters. 23. Mitigation (see also Box 10 in Part III): a. Will the project include appropriate and practicable mitigation necessary to ensure that adverse effects on the aquatic environment are minimal? 0 Yes [8J No If you answered no to question a. above, please include an explanation in Box 10 of why no mitigation would be necessary in order to be in compliance with this GC or be aware that the project would require an individual permit application. 24. Safety of Impoundment Structures: a. Has the impoundment structure been safely designed to comply with established state dam safety criteria or has it been designed by qualified persons? 0 Yes 0 No r8J N/A If you answered yes to question a above, non-federal applicants may be required to provide documentation that the design has been independently reviewed by similarly qualified persons with appropriate modifications to ensure safety. If you answered no, please include an explanation in Page 6of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 Box 10 of why the structure is exempt from state dam safety criteria or be aware that the project may require an individual permit application. 25. Water Quality (see also Box 11 in Part III): a. If in Texas, does the project comply with the conditions of the TCEQ water quality certification for NWP 29? [2] Yes D No ON/A b. If in "Indian Country," does the project comply with the conditions of the EPA water quality certification for NWPs? D Yes D No [2] N/ A c. If in Louisiana, does the project comply with the conditions of the TCEQ water quality certification for NWP 29? D Yes D No [2]N/A If you answered no to question a. orb. above, please be aware that the project would require an individual permit application. 26. Coastal Zone Management: The Fort Worth District does not cover any Coastal Zone; therefore, this GC does not apply. 27. Regional and Case-By-Case Conditions: See the Regional Conditions checklist below to ensure compliance with this GC. 28. Use of Multiple Nationwide Permits: a. Does the project use more than one NWP for a single and complete project? D Yes [2] No b. If you answered yes to question a. above, be aware that unless the project's acreage loss of waters of the U.S. authorized by the NWPs is below the acreage limit of the NWP with the highest specified acreage limit, no NWP can be issued and the project would require an individual permit application. If you answered yes to question a. above, please explain how the project would be in compliance with this GC and what additional NWP number you intend to use: 29. Transfer of Nationwide Permit Verifications: a. Does the Applicant agree that if he or she sells the property associated with the nationwide permit verification, the Applicant may transfer the nationwide permit verification to the new owner by submitting a letter to the appropriate USACE district office to validate the transfer? [2] Yes D No 30. Compliance Certification: a. Does the Applicant agree that if he or she receives the NWP verification from the USACE, they must submit a signed certification regarding the completed work and any required mitigation (the certification form will be sent by the USACE with the NWP verification letter)? [2] Yes D No 31. Notification: a. Does the Applicant agree that he or she will not begin the project until either: 1) He or she is notified in writing by the district engineer that the activity may proceed under the NWP with any special conditions imposed by the district or division engineer; or 2) 45 calendar days have passed from the district engineer's receipt of the complete PCN and the prospective permittee has not received written notice from the district or division engineer. However, if the permittee was required to notify the Corps pursuant to general condition 18 that listed species or critical habitat might be affected or in the vicinity of the project, or to Page 7of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 notify the Corps pursuant to general condition 20 that the activity may have the potential to cause effects to historic properties, the permittee cannot begin the activity until receiving written notification from the Corps that there is "no effect" on listed species or "no potential to cause effects" on historic properties, or that any consultation required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (see 33 CFR 330.4(f)) and/or Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation (see 33 CFR 330.4(g)) has been completed. !ZI Yes 0 No b. Does the Applicant agree that if the district or division engineer notifies the Applicant in writing that an individual permit is required within 45 calendar days of receipt of a complete PCN, the Applicant cannot begin the activity until an individual permit has been obtained? !ZI Yes 0 No Page 8of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 To ensure compliance with the NWP 29-specific requirements please answer the following questions: 1. Does the project involve the construction or expansion of a single residence, a multiple-unit residential development, or a residential subdivision? ~Yes 0 No If you answered no to question 1. above, be aware that discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S. are not authorized by NWP 29 and would require an individual permit application. 2. Does the project (for residential subdivisions, including the development of individual subdivision lots) cause the loss of greater than 1/2-acre of non-tidal waters of the U.S ? 0 Yes ~ No If you answered yes to question 2. above, be aware that discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S. are not authorized by NWP 29 and would require an individual permit application. Note: For residential subdivisions, the aggregate total loss of waters of the U.S. authorized by this NWP cannot exceed 1/2-acre, including any loss of waters of the U.S. associated with development of individual subdivision lots. 3. Does the project cause the loss of more than 300 linear feet of perennial stream bed? 0Yes ~No If you answered yes to question 3. above, be aware that discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S. are not authorized by NWP 29 and would require an individual permit application. 4. Does the project cause the loss of more than 300 linear feet of intermittent or ephemeral stream bed? 0 Yes ~ No If you answered yes to question 4. above, unless the district engineer waives the 300 linear foot limit by making a written determination concluding that the discharge will result in minimal adverse effects, otherwise would require an individual permit application. 5. Does the project cause a discharge into non-tidal wetlands adjacent to tidal waters? 0Yes ~No If you answered yes to question 5. above, be aware that discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S. are not authorized by NWP 29 and would require an individual permit application. Page 9of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 R:EGIONAL CONDITIONS CHECKLIST To ensure compliance with the Regional Conditions within the Fort Worth District, in the State of Texas, in order for an authorization by a NWP to be valid, please answer the following questions (for projects in Texas only): 1. Will the project include required compensatory mitigation at a minimum one-for-one ratio for all special aquatic sites that exceed 1/10 acre and require pre-construction notification, and for all losses to streams that exceed 300 linear feet and require pre-construction notification (unless the appropriate District Engineer determines in writing that some other form of mitigation would be more environmentally appropriate and provides a project-specific waiver of this requirement)? 0Yes D No ~ N/A If you answered no to question 1 above, be aware that the project would not be authorized by a NWP and would require an individual permit application. 2. Does the project involve a discharge into habitat types that are wetlands (typically referred to as pitcher plant bogs) that are characterized by an organic surface soil layer and include vegetation such as pitcher plants (Sarracenia sp.), sundews (Drosera sp.), and sphagnum moss (Sphagnum sp.) or wetlands (typically referred to as bald cypress-tupelo swamps) comprised predominantly of bald cypress trees ( Taxodium distichum), and water tupelo (Nyssa aquatica), that are occasionally or regularly flooded by fresh water with common associates including red maple (Acer rubrum), swamp privet (Forestiera acuminata), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), water elm (Planera aquatica), lizard's tail (Saururus cernuus), water mermaid weed (Proserpinaca spp.), buttonbush ( Cephalanthus occidentalis), and smartweed (Polygonum spp.)? D Yes D No If you answered yes to question 2. above, notification of the District Engineer is required in accordance with NWP GC 31, and the USACE will coordinate with other resource agencies as specified in NWP GC 31(d). 3. Is the project in the area of Caddo Lake within Texas that is designated as a "Wetland of International Importance" under the Ramsar Convention? D Yes ~ No If you answered yes to question 3. above, notification of the District Engineer is required in accordance with NWP GC 31, and the USACE will coordinate with other resource agencies as specified in NWP GC 31(d) 4. a. Is the project in an area of Dallas, Denton, or Tarrant counties that is within the study area of the "Final Regional Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Trinity River and Tributaries" (May 1986)? D Yes ~ No b. If Yes, does the project meet the criteria and follow the guidelines specified in Section III of the Record of Decision for the Regional EIS, including the hydraulic impact requirements? 0Yes D No ~ N/A If you answered no to question 4b. above, be aware that the project would not be authorized by a NWP and would require an individual permit application. S. Would the proposed work result in the modification or alteration of any completed Corps of Engineers projects that are either locally or federally maintained or if work would occur within the conservation pool or flowage easement of any Corps of Engineers lake project? D Yes ~ No If you answered yes to question 5 above, the applicant shall notify the Fort Worth District Engineer in accordance with NWP GC 31. PCNs are not deemed complete until such a time as the Corps has Page 10of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 made a determination relative to 33 USC Section 408, 33 CFR Part 208, Section 208.10, 33 CFR Part 320, Section 320.4. If you answered yes to question 3. above, notification of the District Engineer is required in accordance with NWP GC 31, and the USACE will coordinate with other resource agencies as specified in NWP GC 31(d) 6. Is there is the risk of transferring invasive plants to or from your project site? D Yes D No If you answered yes to the question above, information concerning state specific lists of invasive species and threats can be found at: http://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/unitedstates/tx.shtml. Best management practices can be found at Information concerning state specific lists and threats can be found at: http://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/unitedstates/tx.shtml. Known zebra mussel waters within can be found at: http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/zmbyst.asp. 7. Would your project meet the scope of work and conditions of NWPs 51or52? D Yes ~No If you answered yes, the Corps will provide the PCN to the US Fish and Wildlife Service as specified in NWP General Condition 3l(d)(2) for its review and comments. To ensure compliance with the Regional Conditions within the Fort Worth District, in the State of Louisiana, in order for an authorization by a NWP to be valid, please answer the following questions (for projects in Louisiana only): 1. Does the activity cause the permanent loss of greater than 1/2 acre of seasonally inundated cypress swamp and/or cypress-tupelo swamp? D Yes ~No If you answered yes to question 1. above, be aware that the project would not be authorized by a NWP and would require an individual permit application. 2. Does the activity cause the permanent loss of greater than 1/2 acre of pine savanna, pine flatwoods, and/or pitcher plant bogs? D Yes ~ No If you answered yes to question 2. above, be aware that the project would not be authorized by a NWP and would require an individual permit application. 3. Has the activity been determined to have an adverse impact upon a federal or state designated rookery and/or bird sanctuary? D Yes ~ No If you answered yes to question 3. above, be aware that the project would not be authorized by a NWP 29 and would require an individual permit application. 4. Does the activity fell or impact by soil compaction any existing den or candidate den trees within areas known to be occupied by the threatened Louisiana black bear? (Existing den trees are those known to be used or have evidence of being used by a denning Louisiana black bear, regardless of size, species, or proximity to water. Candidate den trees are defined as bald cypress and/or tupelo gum with visible cavities, having a minimum diameter-at-breast-height of 36 inches, and associated with rivers, lakes, streams, bayous, sloughs, or other waterbodies.) Additionally, does the activity involve clearing within Louisiana black bear critical habitat? D Yes ~ No If you answered yes to question 4. above, be aware that the project would not be authorized by a NWP and would require an individual permit application. Page 11of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 5. Does the project involve instream activities in the following waterways: Abita River and tributaries; Abita River and tributaries; Amite River (LA Highway 37 at Grangeville to Port Vincent); Bayou Bartholomew in Morehouse Parish; Bayou Boeuf and Bayou Rapides Tributaries in Rapides Parish: (Bayou Clear, Brown Creek, Burney Branch, Castor Creek, Clear Creek, Haikey's Creek, Little Bayou Clear, Little Brushy Creek, Loving Creek, Little Loving Creek, Long Branch, Mack Branch, Patterson Branch, Valentine Creek, and Williamson Branch), Bayou Rigolette tributaries in Grant Parish (Beaver Creek, Black Creek, Chandler Creek, Clear Branch, Coleman Branch, Cress Creek, Cypress Creek, Glady Hollow, Gray Creek, Hudson Creek, James Branch, Jordon Creek, Moccasin Branch, and Swafford Creek); Bogue Falaya River and Tributaries, Bogue Chitto River and Tributaries, Lake Borgne, Lake Ponchartrain and its tributaries, Lake Saint Catherine, Little Lake, Tchefuncta River, Little Tchefuncta River, the Rigolets and West Pearl River? D Yes [g] No If you answered yes to question 5. above, notification of the District Engineer is required in accordance with NWP GC 31 due to the occurrence of threatened or endangered species. 6. To the best of the applicant's knowledge, is any excavated and/or fill material to be placed within wetlands free of contaminants? D Yes D No [g] N/A If you answered no to question 6. above, be aware that the project would not be authorized by a NWP 29 and would require an individual permit application. 7. Regional Condition 7 applies to work within the Louisiana Coastal Zone and/or the Outer Continental Shelf off Louisiana, and therefore does not apply in the USACE Fort Worth District. Work in these areas may require coordination with the USACE Galveston or New Orleans districts. 8. Does the activity adversely affect greater than 1/10 acre of wetlands, and/or adversely impact a designated Natural and Scenic River, a state or federal wildlife management area, and/or refuge? D Yes [g] No If you answered yes to question 8. above, notification of the District Engineer is required in accordance with NWP GC 31. 9. For activities involving the installation of a culvert, is twenty percent (20%) of the culvert diameter (20 percent of the height of elliptical culverts) installed below the natural grade of the stream. D Yes D No If you answered no to question 9 above, be aware that the project would not be authorized by a NWP and would require an individual permit application. 10. Be aware that NWP 29, via disavowal of water quality certification by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, is considered denied without prejudice. Individual requests for approval under NWP 29 will be conditioned to require the applicant to obtain a water quality certification, waiver, or other approval by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources before the NWP is valid. Also, be aware that NWP 29, via disavowal of Coastal Zone certification by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, is considered denied without prejudice within the Louisiana Coastal Zone. Individual requests for approval under NWP 29 will be conditioned to require the applicant to obtain a Louisiana Department of Natural Resources determination/certification before the NWP is valid. Page 12of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 The DA Authorization shall be conditioned to require that sewerage generated at the site will be processed through a municipal sewage treatment system or, in areas where tie-in to a municipal system is not practicable, the on-site sewage system must be approved by the local parish sanitarian before any housing is constructed. Note: This specific regional condition for NWP 29 applies to work within the Louisiana Coastal Zone and/or the Outer Continental Shelf off Louisiana, and therefore does not apply in the USACE Fort Worth District. Work in these areas may require coordination with the USACE Galveston or New Orleans districts. Additional Discussion: Part II: Project Information Box 1 Project Name: Creek Meadows -Section 7, Phase One &Two Applicant Title VP Construction Services Mailing Address 2800 South Texas Ave, Ste 401 B an TX 77802 (Project No. SWF- Applicant Name Chris Rhodes ) Applicant Company, Agency, etc. Oldham Goodwin Grau Applicant's internal tracking number (if any) Work Phone with area Home Phone with Fax # E-mail Address code area code 979 268-2000 Relationship of applicant to property: 0 Owner 0 Purchaser 0 Lessee chris. rhodes@oldhamgoodwin.com Application is hereby made for verification that subject regulated activities associated with subject project qualify for authorization under a USACE nationwide permit or permits as described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, such information is true, complete, and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the proposed activities. I hereby grant to the agency to which this application is made the right to enter the above-described location to inspect the proposed, in-progress, or completed work. I agree to start work only after all necessa ermits have been received. Signature of applicant Page 13 of 19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 Box 2 Authorized Agent/Operator Name and Signature: (Ifanagentisactingfortheapplicant during the permit process) Rabon A. Metcalf PE Agent/ Operator Title Owner Agent/Operator Company, Agency, etc. RME Consultin En ineers Mailing Address PO Box 9253 -Colle e Station TX 77842 E-mail Address rabon@rmen ineer.com Work Phone with area code Home Phone with area code Fax # 979 764-0704 Cell Phone# I hereby authorize the above-named agent to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental infor tion in support of this permit application. I understand that I am bound by the actions of m a ent and I understand th if a federal or state ermit is issued I or m a ent must si n the rmit. I certify that I am familiar with the · formation contained in this application, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, such information is tru com lete and accurate. Signature of authorized agent Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Box 3 Name of property owner, if other than applicant: D MU lti pie Current Owners (If multiple current property owners, check here and indude a list as an attachment) Owner Title Owner Company, Agency, etc. Creek Meadow Partners, LP Mailing Address 2800 South Texas Ave, Ste 401 Brvan, TX 77802 Work Phone with area code Home Phone with area code (979) 268-2000 Box 4 Project location, including street address, city, county, state, and zip code where proposed activity will occur: Creek Meadows Subdivision Nature of Activity (Description of project; indude all features; see instructions): Residential development Project Purpose (Description of the reason or purpose of the project; see instructions): Has a delineation of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, been completed? (see instructions) ~Yes, Attached 0No If a delineation has been completed, has it been verified in writing by the USACE? D Yes, Date of approved or preliminary jurisdictional determination (mm/dd/yyyy): USACE project: ~No Are color photographs of the existing conditions available? ~ Yes, Attached LJ No Are aerial photographs available?~ Yes, Attached 0No D Multiple Waters of the U.S. {If multiple waters of the U.S., check here and complete the table in Attachment DJ Page 14of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 Waterbody(ies) (if known; otherwise enter "an unnamed tributary to''): Tributary(ies) to what known, downstream waterbody(ies): Peach Creek South Tributary 16.4.3. Latitude & longitude (Decimal Degrees): 30°31'37.12"N 96°17'0.lO"W USGS Quad map name(s): Wellborn Watershed(s) and other location descriptions, if known: Discharges into the water body of Wood Lake. Directions to the project location: Part III: Project Impacts and Mitigation Box 5 Reason(s) for Discharge into waters of the U.S.: Realignment of approximately 164 LF of tributary. Type(s) of material being discharged and the amount of each type in cubic yards: Common fill and approximately 462 CY. Total surface area (in acres) of wetlands or other waters of the U.S. to be filled: 0.07 acres Indicate the proposed impacts to waters of the U.S. in ACRES (for wetlands and impoundments) and LINEAR FEET (for rivers and streams), and identify the impact(s) as permanent and/or temporary for each waterbody type listed below. The table below is intended as a tool to summarize impacts by resource type for planning compensatory mitigation and does not replace the table of waters of the U.S. in Attachment D for those projects with impacts to multiple waters of the U.S. Permanent Temporary Waterbody Type Acres linear feet Acres linear feet Non-forested wetland Forested wetland Perennial stream Intermittent stream 0.07 164 Ephemeral stream Impoundment Other: Total: Potential indirect and/or cumulative impacts of proposed discharge (if any): Required drawings (see instructions): Vicinity map:~ Attached To-scale plan view drawing(s): ~Attached To-scale elevation and/or cross section drawing(s): ~Attached Is any portion of the work already complete? D Yes ~No If yes, describe the work: Page 15of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 Box 6 Authority: (see instructions) Is Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act for projects affecting navigable waters applicable? D Yes ~ No (see Fort Worth District Navigable Waters list) Is Section 404 of the Clean Water Act applicable? D Yes D No Box 7 Larger Plan of Development: Is the discharge of fill or dredged material for which Section 10/404 authorization is sought intended for a residential development project which is part of a larger plan of development? 0Yes ~ No (IF ye.s; please provide the lnronnation In the remainder oF Box 7) Does the residential development project have independent utility in addition to the larger plan of development? D Yes ~No If yes, explain: If discharge of fill or dredged material is part of development, name and proposed schedule for that larger development (start-up, duration, and completion dates): Creek Meadows: Start 4/1/15 & Finish 12/1/15 Location of larger development (If discharge of fill or dredged material is part of a plan of development, a map of suitable quality and detail for the entire project site should be included): Total area in acres of entire project area (including larger plan of development, where applicable): 28 Box 8 Federally Threatened or Endangered Species (see instructions) Please list any federally-listed (or proposed) threatened or endangered species or critical habitat potentially affected by the project (use scientific names (i.e., genus species), if known): See Delination Report Have surveys, using U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) protocols, been conducted? D Yes, Report attached D No (explain): If a federally-listed species would potentially be affected, please provide a description and a biological evaluation. D Yes, Report attached D Not attached Has Section 7 consultation been initiated by another federal agency? D Yes, Initiation letter attached D No Has Section 10 consultation been initiated for the proposed project? D Yes, Initiation letter attached D No Has the USFWS issued a Biological Opinion? D Yes, Report attached 0No If yes, list date Opinion was issued (mm/dd/yyyy): Box 9 Historic properties and cultural resources Please list any historic properties listed (or eligible to be listed) on the National Register of Historic Places which the project has the potential to affect: See Delination Report Has an archaeological records search been conducted? D Yes, Report attached D No (explain): Page 16 of 19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 Are any cultural resources of any type known to exist on-site? 0Yes 0No Has an archaeological pedestrian survey been conducted for the site? D Yes, Report attached D No (explain): Has Section 106 or SHPO consultation been initiated by another federal or state agency? D Yes, Initiation letter attached 0No Has a Section 106 MOA been signed by another federal agency and the SHPO? D Yes, Attached 0No If yes, list date MOA was signed (mm/dd/yyyy): Box 10 Proposed Conceptual Mitigation Plan Summary (see instructions) Measures taken to avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the U.S. (if any): Realignment of channel Applicant proposes combination of one or more of the following mitigation types: D Mitigation Bank D On-site D Off-site (Number of sites: ) D None Applicant proposes to purchase mitigation bank credits: D Yes LJ No Mitigation Bank Name: Number of Credits: Indicate in ACRES (for wetlands and impoundments) and LINEAR FEET (for rivers and streams) the total quantity of waters of the U.S. proposed to be created, restored, enhanced, and/or preserved for purposes of providing compensatory mitigation. Indicate mitigation site type (on-or off-site) and number. Indicate waterbody type (non- forested wetland, forested wetland, perennial stream, intermittent stream, ephemeral stream, impoundment, other) or non-jurisdictional (uplands1). Mitigation Waterbody Type Created Restored Enhanced Preserved Site Type and Number Totals: 1 For uplands, please indicate if designed as an upland buffer. Summary of Mitigation Work Plan (Describe the mitigation activities listed in the table above): If no mitigation is proposed, provide a detailed explanation of why no mitigation would be necessary to ensure that adverse effects on the aquatic environment are minimal: Has a conceptual mitigation plan been prepared in accordance with the USACE regulations and guidelines? D Yes, Attached D No (explain): Mitigation site(s) latitude & longitude (Decimal USGS Quad map name(s): Degrees): Page 17of 19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 Other location descriptions, if known: Directions to the mitigation location(s): Box 11 Water Quality Certification (see instructions): For Texas: Does the project meet the conditions of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Clean Water Act Section 401 certification for NWP 29? ~Yes 0 No Does the project include soil erosion control and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs)? ~ Yes 0No Does the project include BMPs for post-construction total suspended solids control? ~Yes 0No For Louisiana: Individual water quality certification issued by LDEQ? D Yes, Attached 0 No Water quality certification waiver or other approval by LDEQ? D Yes, Attached 0No Explain: For Tribal Lands C'Indian Country']: Does the project meet the conditions of the EPA water quality certification for NWPs? 0Yes 0No Box 12 List of other certifications or approvals/ denials received from other federal, state, or local agencies for work described in this application: Agency Approval Identification Date Applied Date Date Denied Type2 No. Aooroved Page 18of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 Part IV: Attachments A. Delineation of Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands B. Color Photographs C. Table of Waters of the U.S. Impacted by the Proposed Project D. Required Drawings/Figures E. Threatened or Endangered Species Reports and/or Letters F. Historic Properties and Cultural Resources Reports and/or Letters G. Conceptual Mitigation Plan H. Other: End of Form Included rg] rg] rg] rg] D D D D Page 19of19 SWF Recommended Application Form -NWP 29 Attachment D: Table of Waters of the U.S. Impacted by the Proposed Project Latitude and Linear Feet Acres in Waterbody Longitude Resource in Project Project Impact ID1 (Decimal Degrees) Type2 Area Area Type3 PC 30°31'37.12"N IS 164 0.07 96°17'0.lO"W 1 Waterbody ID may be the name of a feature or an assigned label such as "W-1" for a wetland. 2 Resource Types: NFW -Non-forested wetland, FW -Forested wetland, PS -Perennial Stream, IS -Intermittent Stream, ES -Ephemeral Stream, I -Impoundment D/P Linear Feet of Impact 164 Cubic Yards of Acres of Material to be Impact Discharged 0.07 462 3 I mpact Types: D/P -Direct* and Permanent, D/T -Direct and Temporary, I/P -Indirect** and Permanent, I/T -Indirect and Temporary * Direct impacts are here defined as those adverse affects caused by the proposed activity, such as discharge or excavation. ** Indirect impacts are here defined as those adverse affects caused subsequent to the proposed activity, such as flooding or effects of drainage on adjacent waters of the U.S. Instructions: [please do not include these pages when submitting form] 1) Complete Part I of the form first to determine if the project meets the conditions and requirements of NWP 29, including the General and Regional Conditions as well as the notification requirements. Additional information on the general conditions is available at the following website: http://www.swf.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatorv/Permitting/GeneralPermits.aspx 2) Boxes 1to3: Provide contact information for the Applicant, Agent, Owner, etc. 3) Box4: a. Nature of Activity: Describe the overall activity or project. Give appropriate dimensions of structures such as wingwalls, dikes (identify the materials to be used in construction, as well as the methods by which the work is to be done), or excavations (length, width, and height). Indicate whether discharge of dredged or fill material is involved. Also, identify any structure to be constructed on a fill, piles, or float-supported platforms. The written descriptions and illustrations are an important part of the application. Please describe, in detail, what you wish to do. If more space is needed, attach a separate sheet marked "Box 4 Nature of Activity." b. Proposed Project Purpose: Describe the purpose and need for the proposed project. What will it be used for and why? Also include a brief description of any related activities to be developed as the result of the proposed project. c. Delineation of waters of the U.S.: Waters of the U.S. are defined under 33 CFR part 328.3 (a) as: (1) All waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide; (2) All interstate waters including interstate wetlands; (3) All other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds, the use, degradation or destruction of which could affect interstate or foreign commerce including any such waters: (i) Which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes; or (ii) From which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce; or (iii) Which are used or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce; (4) All impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the U.S. under the definition; (5) Tributaries of waters identified in paragraphs (a) (1) through (4) of this section; (6) The territorial seas; (7) Wetlands adjacent to waters (other than waters that are themselves wetlands) identified in paragraphs (a) (1) through (6) of this section. In addition, 33 CFR part 328.3 (b) states: The term wetlands means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, the ordinary high water mark, as well as any adjacent wetlands, demarcate the limits of non-tidal waters of the U.S. Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology) as well as any applicable interim regional supplements. Applicants should follow the USACE Fort Worth District procedures for jurisdictional determinations found at the following website: http://media.swf.usace.army.mil/pubdata/environ/regulatorv/jurisdiction/jurisdictionaldetermi nationprocedures.pdf d. Multiple Waters of the U.S.: If the project impacts multiple waters of the U.S., include information for each water in the table in Attachment D. 4) Box 5: Required drawings (see examples in separate file): Submit one legible copy of all drawings (8 1/2 x 11-inch or 11 x 17-inch) with a 1-inch margin around the entire sheet. The title box shall contain the title of the proposed project, date, and sheet number. i. Vicinity map: Cover an area large enough so the project can be easily located; include arrow marking the project area, identifiable landmarks (e.g., named waterbody, county, city), name or number of roads, north arrow, and scale. ii. Plan view: Include features such as existing bank lines, ordinary high water mark line(s), average water depth around the activity, dimensions of the proposed project, dimensions of any structures immediately adjacent to the proposed activity, north arrow, and scale. iii. Elevation and/ or cross-section views: Include features such as water elevation as shown on plan view drawing, existing and proposed ground level, dimensions of the proposed project, dimensions of any structures immediately adjacent to the proposed activity, and scale. 5) Box 6: A list of navigable waters in the Fort Worth District can be found at the following website: http://media.swf.usace.army.mil/pubdata/environ/regulatory/introduction/navlist.pdf Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the USACE regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S. More information on regulated activities can be found at the following website: http://www.swf.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/RegulatedActivities.aspx 6) Box 8: Information on federally threatened or endangered species may be found on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service website and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department website. Include an attachment if additional space is required for listing species or critical habitat potentially affected by the project. http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/ES ListSpecies.dm http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/huntwild/wild/species/endang/index.phtml http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/landwater/land/maps/gis/ris/endangered species/index.phtml 7) Box 10: When completing this box, be aware that the USACE will consider if the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the U.S. to the maximum extent practicable at the project site when determining appropriate and practicable mitigation necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. The USACE may also require compensatory mitigation at a minimum one-for-one ratio for losses of wetlands, streams, and open waters to ensure that the project results in minimal adverse effects on the aquatic environment. See the USACE Fort Worth District Regulatory Branch website for a mitigation plan template and requirements. http://www.swf.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/Permitting/Mitigation.aspx 8) Box 11: Projects in Texas should meet the conditions of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Clean Water Act Section 401 certification for NWP 29. The TCEQ conditions of Section 401 certification for NWP 29 as well as a description of Best Management Practices can be found at the following website: http://media.swf.usace.army.mil/pubdata/environ/regulatory/permitting/nwp/2012 TCEQ401.pdf Projects in Texas associated with the exploration, development, and production of oil, gas or geothermal resources of the State of Texas should meet the conditions of the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC) Clean Water Action Section 401 certification. The RRC conditions of Section 401 certification as well as a description of Best Management Practices can be found at the following website: http://media.swf.usace.army.mil/pubdata/environ/regulatory/permitting/nwp/2012 RRC401.pdf Projects in Louisiana require water quality certification from the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ). LDEQ has issued water quality certification for NWP 29 without conditions. Information about water quality certification from LDEQ can be found at the following website: http://media.swf.usace.army.mil/pubdata/environ/regulatory/permitting/nwp/2012 LA401cert.pdf The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the agency required to address water quality certification of the 2012 NWPs in "Indian Country" where a tribe has not received treatment in the same manner as a state for the Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 program. "Indian Country," as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151, means: (1) all land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the U.S. government, not withstanding the issuance of any patent, and including rights-of-way running through the reservation; (2) all dependent Indian communities within the borders of the U.S. whether within the original or subsequently-acquired territory thereof, and whether within or without the limits of a state; and (3) all Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-of-way running through the same. At this time, no Indian tribes in Texas or Louisiana have CWA Section 401 authority. The EPA has developed a list of conditions that must be met in order for water quality certification of NWPs in "Indian Country" lands. The list of "401 Certification Conditions of Nationwide Permits for Tribal Lands in Texas" can be found at the following website: http: //media .swf. usace .army. mil/pubdata/ envi ron/regulatory/permitting/nwp/2012 EPA401. pdf The list of "Water Quality Regional NWPs Conditions for 'Indian Country' Lands" in Louisiana can be found in Part III of the document at the following website: http://www.mvk.usace.army.mil/Portals/58/docs/regulatorv/2012%20NWP%20RCs%20- %20Louisiana.pdf 9) Attachments: Check the boxes in Part 'IV for those attachments that are included, and place a cover sheet or tab with each attachment behind the last page of the form. If Attachment Dis not needed, discard this page, but if more room is necessary, include an additional table.