The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutStaff CommentsTO: FROM: SUBJECT: ,7 CITY OF C01,1.I3GE STATION Home ofTnm A&M Univmigv' 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM October 7, 2009 J,' Mark R. Johnson, Bury + Partners; via fax 210-525-0529 v/err o 1-0q Molly Hitchcock, AICP Planning Administrator HEB #2 (SP) I reviewed the above -mentioned site plan/development permit/non-residential architectural standards application turned in for the October 7, 2009 deadline and determined it to be incomplete. The following is the preliminary item needed to complete the submittal so that staff may conduct a thorough review. Please submit the following information by 10 a.m. on any Monday for review that week: A Traffic Impact Analysis. I understand that this is to come under separate cover, but it has not yet been submitted. Please be aware that if this application is not completed before November 23, 2009, it will expire and a new application and fees will be necessary to continue the site planning process. If you have any questions or need additional information, please callmeat 979.764.3570. cc: Mike Coontz, Weiner Development; via fax 713-623-0178✓K4. t01 Kurt Vanderwalle/HEB Grocery Co; via fax 210-938-8091 J tt)=itc - Kathy Strimple PE/HEB Grocery Co; via fax 210-938-8091L�}Q-'Totj Case file No. 09-00500206 Case file No. 09-00500207 Case file No. 09-10500057 hMcryl� ��% T 5" l AG CITY Or COLLF,GE STaTiON Home ofTevasA MUnivzriry"' 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM October 12, 2009 TO: Mark R. Johnson, Bury + Partners; via fax 210-525-0529 , �u tu. Z. o� FROM: Jason Schubert, AICP Senior Planner SUBJECT: HEB #2 (SP) Thank you for your submittal of the Traffic Impact Analysis, which completes the above - mentioned site plan / development permit / non-residential architectural standards applications. This project met the October 7, 2009 submittal deadline and will be distributed to staff this week for their review. cc: Mike Coontz, Weiner Development; via fax 713-623-0178 % 1 p. rZ-o ff Kurt Vanderwalle/HEB Grocery Co; via fax 210-938-8091-%p 1Z po/ Kathy Strimple PE/HEB Grocery Co; via fax 210-938-8091✓/D Case file No. 09-00500206 Case file No. 09-00500207 Case file No. 09-10500057 (*1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 CIT)' Of CCII I.kGI( STATION 9,—,fTs A'Wunn v„ Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM October 23, 2009 TO: Mark R. Johnson, Bury + Partners; via fax 210-525-0529 FROM: Lauren A. Hovde, Staff Planner SUBJECT: Heb #2 (NRA) NRA Review Staff reviewed the above -mentioned Non -Residential Architectural plans as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) revised set of elevation drawings If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised elevations, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Mike Coontz, Weiner Development; via fax 713-623-0178A1 Kurt Vanderwalle/HEB Grocery Co; via fax 210-938-8091 Kathy Strimple PE/HEB Grocery Co; via fax 210-938-8091 Case file #09-00500207 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Heb #2 (NRA) — NRA Review 09-00500207 PLANNING Downy SW 7002 is not actually an approved color. A comparable color that could be used is Alabaster SW 7008 Please remove signs from the elevations or add a note that all signs are permitted separately. Most of the material legends do not have any calculations in them. Please add cast stone to the materials legend for the main building and conprete to the carwash materials legen Sr wrm 05 Any fagade may have a maximum of 20% architectural metal. Please identify what type of metal is being proposed. �! It appears that the "future" retail space labeled on the south elevation of the main building is part of the site plan. If this is correct, please remove the word "future'. If this is the future retail space on the abutting property, please revise the graphic. The orange EFIS on the west elevation is labeled as PT-2 but is actually PT-5. Please revise. The stone below the Fresh Food sign on the west elevation is labeled as Metal PT-1. Please remove this label. Are roll -up doors being used on the south elevation? 10. This building plot is estimated to be over 150,000 SF. Therefore the following apply: Accent colors must be limited to 5% of any fagade, ® Fagades facing a public right-of-way must consist of 50% stone, other facades maybe 10% stone, 5ev.W ik ' Facade facing a public right-of-way are limited to 50% EFIS, other facades may �-, be 75% EFIS, rjp LJ No more than 33% of facades facing a public right-of-way should be on the same plane, v,p! No more than 66% of the roofline on a facade facing a public right-of-way should have the same elevation. „bc / 11. The carwash elevations do not appear to reflect what is shown on the site plan. Paint colors Del Sol, HEB TX Red, and Stop are exceeding the maximum 5% of accent V colors. You have the option of seeking a waiver from the Design Review Board. 13. The following comments are regarding the minimum standards for architectural relief elements founding in Section 7.9.B.2 of the Unified Development Ordinance: CThe fueling station kiosk is not meeting this standard. Fj! The carwash needs 1 additional element on the northwest and southeast fagade, V and it needs two on the southwest fagade. The northeast fagade appears to be meeting this standard with awnings and pilasters, but please verify. 6The fueling area canopy is meeting the requirement on all facades. d. Each facade of the main building should have 12 architectural relief elements each. Staff was not able to distinguish any elements on the east and south facade. The north facade needs 1 more elements and the west facade needs 4 more. The south elevation of the main building is considered facing a public right-of-way. Please revise accordingly. lt. - FYI ... A 20,000 SF future addition to the north side will cause the rear facade to be considered "facing a public right-of-way" and will then have to come into compliance with associated standards. Due to the nature of the comments above, new information submitted on the second review may result in additional comments. Reviewed by: Lauren A. Hovde, Staff Planner Date: October 22, 2009 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 CITY or Coi.u+.Gl: SrnnoN -"- vlT_'A 24�h ", Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM November 18, 2009 TO: Mark R. Johnson, Bury + Partners; via fax 210-525-0529.•-Vtw (•�(j FROM: Lauren A. Hovde, Staff Planner SUBJECT: Heb #2 (NRA) NRA Review 2 Staff reviewed the above -mentioned Non -Residential Architectural plans as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) revised set of elevation drawings If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised elevations, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Mike Coontz, Weiner Development; via fax 713-623-0178 II-Xr3671 Kurt Vanderwalle/HEB Grocery Co; via fax 210-938-8091 '20.t �t Kathy Strimple PE/HEB Grocery Co; via fax 210-938-8091 Case file #09-00500207 i STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Heb #2 (NRA) — NRA Review 09-00500207 PLANNING 1. Please add the square footage and percentage of cast stone to the materials legends. 2. Any fagade may have a maximum of 20% architectural metal. Please identify what type of metal is being proposed. Canopies and awning do not count toward the amount of metal on a building. 3. What material is "cooler panel wall'? 4. Plain concrete is not an approved material. Smooth face, tinted CMU may make up 10% of each fagade. Otherwise, concrete must be treated with a high -build textured paint to simulate the appearance of stucco or EIFS. This type of treated concrete may makeup 75% of each fagade. 5. The south fagade must consist of 10% stone. 6. No more than 33% of the northeast facade should be on the same plane. 7. The following comments are regarding the minimum standards for architectural relief elements founding in Section 7.9.6.2 of the Unified Development Ordinance: a. The fueling station kiosk is not meeting this standard. Only the canopy in the front fagade of the kiosk projects enough to be considered an overhang. However, this cannot qualify as a stoop as well. b. The east fagade of the main building should have 12 architectural relief elements each, but is currently showing 10. An awning can be placed over the door at the top of the ramp. Also, there is an EFIS screen wall on the site plan that is not shown on this elevation. Architectural Relief elements were not added to the south fagade. The west fagade needs 2 more elements because several of the elements that were labeled cannot be counted. For example, there are several wall plane recessions that are labeled individually, but function as a single recessed entry. The wall offset labeled as 12 is not shown on the site plan. 8. Please add a note that states that the building and site lighting will comply with Section 7.10 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The fueling station appears to have an exposed light source which does not comply. 9. Just an FYI, you are not limited on the amount of SW 6178 Clary Sage and SW 6629 Jalapeno that can be used if you would like to carry those colors throughout the development. Reviewed by: Lauren A. Hovde, Staff Planner Date: November 17, 2009 rn �v lou si apgl upld al!s ay} uo Venn ueens Sd13 up s! ejegl'osly •dwea Gyl to dol Gyl le poop Gyl aano paoeld aq ueo buluMe uy •0 G bulnnoys AIluaamo s! anq 'gopa sluawala;allej leinloallgoap Z G eAuq pinogs 6u!pl!nq ulew ayl jo epe6e; }sea ayl •suollenalG aaS •passnoslp osle am se >IsoiN aql jo joeq oql ap pup aP1s aayl!o uo pappe uaeq aney sJelsepd -euogd ay; uo passnoslp Aisnolnaad aM sp „e G yo gldep e of paseaaoul Mou We s6up14aan0 ap!s aql •Ilem se dools p se r4!lenb louueo s!yl 'janannoH •6uegaano up peieplsuoo eq of g6noue sloafoid Nsoi� agl jo apu6e; luoal ayl ul Adoueo ay; r(luO piepuels slyl 6ullaaw lou s! Nso!�l uo!apas 6ullanl ayl :aoueulpaO luawdolanaa pall!un agl yo Z•8.6•L uolloaS ul punol awala }anal leinloeilgoje jol spiepuels wnwlulw eql bu1Piebai aae sluawwoo bulnnollol ayl L -pualuo aql laaw of Gaols IIpaGAo ano of abelool ejenbs 1puolllppe pappe pue uogenala glaou eql 6uole slulod S/L ap slesyyo bu1P11nq ,b pappe anpq a/A •aueld awes ay} uo aq pinoys ape6e} aseNlaou aql to %66 upyl Glow oN �1 •uo!}enala aaS •auoIs Mou S! Venn nnol Noop Nona} age grmy? au 7rfW S� o/ ols %0 G yo lslsuoo asnw epe6py ganos agl _ b •suogenGla pup sleualpw aaS •laued peM alanuoo to lunowe aql oonpaa of auols pappe spq uolapnala gspMaeo isaMylnos agl -SId3 ano alpinwls of lulpd painaxel pl!nq-g614 e gIIM paleaal aq p1M pasn alaaouoo agl •9pu6vj goes 10 %9L do a3Iew r(ew alaaouoo paleail to adr(l s!yl •Sd13 ao 000nis jo aouujueddp agl alelnwls of lined painixal pl!nq-q6!q a yllM paleail aq asnw ejaaouoo 'eslntiGylO •epuNal goue to %Ol do 9>luw Auw nvgo palull `eoel gloowS •leualew anaddp up lou sl alaaouoo uiuld •dd ys!u!l palnaxal e ql!M laued lipM lelaw leinloallgoae palelnsul — lejalnl / L,,Ilem leupd aa0000„ sl Ipualew legM S . 0 53 C;" -suollenala aaS 'laals We s6u!uMe pup saldoueo aaglo Ile pup suwnloo uollels lany aql 'wws Aod `leualpIN ellsodwoo wnulwnly p s,ll `slaued IelaW Ieanloallgoay aae Adoueo uollels lany aql pup s11eM Nso'N [plow aql �I'p �OLU •6u!pllnq a uo Ielaw ;o lunowe ayl piennol lunoo lou op 6uluMp` up sa!doue •posodoid 6u!aq si lelaw;o edfi4 jugm f4!juepl aseald •Ielaw leanloal!goae %Oe jo wnw!xpw a aneq fipw epe3py Auy Z •SId3 ql!m l! peoeldai pup euols aseo poleulwlle aneq aM 'alepdn aol olgel sleualpW 90S •spue6al slpualpw eql of auols ISpo 10 a6pluecued pup e6elooj ejunbs eql ppe aseald ( ` ONINMdId jinN s�Iuegl '8L85-6LZ 047, `Ilao r(w uo awllr(ue Ileo p aw aA16 aseald `sbulMpap aql uo uolasenb Aue aneq nor( 11 •luawdolanap ano gIIM pierouol avow ueo aM os 1pnoidde leuly of sn lab IIIM slgl AllnladoH •s6ulMeap ano of sa6uego eql paaagwnu pup papnolo aneq am �lupp and sau11ap1n6 yaN aql laaw of Molaq sluawwoo asuodsaa aql Gad s6ulMeap ano palylpow aneq aM •Molaq pal ul sluawwoo }yeas anon( of popuodsaa aney aM 'uaari2-1 LOFOOS00-60 Ma1A9» VHN — (VHN) Z# 8-3-H Z 'ON SIN3WWO3 M31A3H djtl1S 6003`L l aagwanoN :GIB(] aauueld diplS `apnoH .d uaane-1 :Aq pamainaa -suolienala aaS saoualxa alagl olui ouadelef fiZ99 MS pajeaodmul aneq gsehueo pup uollPIS land aql 'pajoN -luewdolanap eql inog6noagl sioloo asogi iGaeo of mill pinom nog(11 pasn eq upo legl ouedeler 6Z99 MS pup abeS Aielo 8L l9 MS to Iunowe eql uo poliwll lou aae nog( `Ikd up isnr -alou slgl to uoillppe all aol s6ulMeap aag -Aidwoo lou seop golgm aoinos igbil posodxe UP aneg of sieedde uollels 6ullonl aql •eoupulpao luawd0lan94 pal}IuN aql 10 0l'L uoiloaS Blinn Aldwoo Ilim 6uilg6ll ails pup 6uiplinq aql legl salpis lBgl alou e ppe aspaid g� uollenala aaS -palllluapl uaaq seq Ilplai slgl to dol aql le Ias}}o Ilene aql pup `uollenala ISOM aql to apls uaaglnos aql uo Ilelaa eql of pappe uaaq aneq sialselld auols oml 'sluewala lailaa leinioallgoae sp paipluepl aae saulue all to aps aagila uo saldoupo all -sluawa13 laijaa leanloallgoay al6uis se palilluapl Mou We saulua passaoaa aql •upld ails eql uo umogs lou Si Z1l'f se polagel las}}o ileM aql -AGlue passaoaa al6uis a se uollounl Inq `Ajjenpinl pelegei aae legl suoisseoei eueld lleM aqi to leaanas asnpoeq sluawale avow Z speou ape6el Isom agl -sluawal3 lallaa enioailgoay Z l to uolllppe all aol uolienala aaS -ape6e} glnos eqi of pappe lou aaam sluawaiD dollop lemloallgojV �- 'uolienala aaS 'IIeM U9910S poom aql 6ulM0gs Mou aie aM -dwei agl to dol agl le coop aqi aano pooeld uaaq seq 6ulume uy -uoilpnala slgl uo uMogs (*-�� 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 CUY ON HOruJl.A,'MUrST�\\ ' omPhone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM December 28, 2009 TO: Mark R. Johnson, Bury + Partners; via fax 210-525-0529 FROM: Lauren A. Hovde, Staff Planner SUBJECT: Heb #2: NRA Review 3 Staff reviewed the above -mentioned Non -Residential Architectural plans as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) revised set of elevation drawings If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised elevations, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Mike Coontz, Weiner Development; via fax 713-623-0178 Kurt Vanderwalle/HEB Grocery Co; via fax 210-938-8091 Kathy Strimple PE/HEB Grocery Co; via fax 210-938-8091 Case file #09-00500207 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 3 Heb #2 (NRA) — NRA Review 09-00500207 1. The elevation sheets are labeled as the 5'" Review, but this is only the third. 2. Main building - The east facade is lacking one architectural relief element. An awning could me mounted over the door at the top of the ramp. 3. Main building - The south facade is lacking four architectural relief elements. Some of the ARE that are being numbered are actually being used to satisfy this requirement on other facades. This facade also only has 9% stone on the materials legend. 4. Main building — Cast stone is still being shown on the elevations. 5. Not all of the total percentages for color and materials equal 100%. Also, the percentage for stone is different on the materials legend and color legend. For instance, the NW facade on the fuel station shows 41 % stone on the materials legend, but the color legend shows 13%. This may be because canopies are already not being counted toward the percentage of metal on the materials legend, but I am not sure. Please clarify or revise. 6. The percentage for windows and openings has been left as N/A. Please revise. 7. Main building - What color is the stain being used for the wood screen wall? 8. Fuel Station — There is more than 20% metal on each facade. Please be aware that roofs and canopies do not count toward the amount of metal to be included in this calculation. 9. Fuel Station — The lighting standards note was added to the elevation sheet; however, there is still lights being shown on each fuel pump (yellow circles) that would not meet this standard. 10. Please provide a note that states, "All roof and ground -mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right-of-way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance." Thank you. Reviewed by: Lauren A. Hovde, Staff Planner Date: December 23, 2009 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO.3 HEB # 2 (NRA) — NRA REVIEW 09-00500207 DRAFT 1-7-09 L . The elevation sheets are labeled as the 5th Review, but this is only the third. This is our HEB reference number not a NRA submittal number. t�!XMain building —The east fagade is lacking one architectural relief element. An awning could be mounted over the door at the top of the ramp. We adjusted/modified the ARE elements on the east fagade which includes the one additional relief element over the door at the top of the door. Main building — The south facade is lacking four architectural relief elements. Some of the ARE that are being numbered are actually being used to satisfy this requirement on other facades. We adjusted/modified the ARE elements on the south fagade and eliminated the duplicated ones. We have a revised elevation which includes the four additional relief elements. This fagade also only has 9% stone on the materials legend. We adjusted the stone and our table now reflects the required 10% stone. Main building — Cast stone is still being shown on the elevations. Cast stone is our material of choice and is reflected in our schedules. Please note that to get to our 50% and 10% requirements, the stone and cast stone need to be added together which is not reflected in our table. of all of the total percentages for color and materials equal 100%. We made the adjustments and corrected our numbers to get the 100%. Also, the percentage for stone is different on the materials legend and color legend. For instance, the NW fagade on the fuel station shows 41 % stone on the materials legend, but the color legend shows 13%. This may be because canopies are already not being counted toward the percentage of metal on the materials legend, but I am not sure. You are correct; the canopies are not being counted so the percentages will be different. Please clarify or revise. The percentage for windows and openings has been left as N/A. As we discussed on the phone, our table now reflect the "Total minus the Openings" only Please revise. Main building — What color is the stain being used for the wood screen wall? The color is "Light Brown 005 AmeriStain" to compliment the stone color. We have added it to the Color and Materials legend. Ug-'Fuel Station —There is more than 20% metal on each fagade. Please be aware that roofs and canopies do not count toward the amount of metal to be included in this calculation. We deducted the metal roofs and canopies from our totals and also replaced the metal wall panel with a EIFS veneer. Fuel Station — The lighting standards note was added to the elevation sheet; however, there is still lights being shown on each fuel pump (yellow circles) that would not meet this standard. As we discussed, these are non illuminated signs. �0/Please provide a note that states, "All roof and ground -mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right-of-way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance." The note has been added. Thank you. Thank you. Reviewed by: Lauren A. Hovde, Staff Planner Date: December 23, 2009 Response by: Kurt Vandewalle, Senior Design Architect Pecernber2n, 2009 •01 Drawings Attached: 1) 88K College Station 2-Store Elevations Dated t2Y3Tt09• 1 • 'P .0 q 2) 88K College Station 2-Store Floor Plan Dated 9 f, • I -0 9 3) 88K College Station 2-Fuel Station Carwash Dated. '^.�rzi3;;va L• •7.0Ck