HomeMy WebLinkAboutBusiness Center Quality Circle Development Informational MeetingBusiness Center
Quality Circle Development
Informational Meeting
February 12, 2002
6:00 PM
Business Center
• Exchange of property between the City and
Pebble Creek Development
— City received the business center property
— Pebble Creek Development received residential
property
• 1992 -Business Center Zoned M-1
1
Business Center con't
• Master planned to be adjacent to Pebble
Creek and incorporate Pebble Creek
Elementary and Park
• 200 Total Acres
• 137 acres to be developed; the balance is
right of way, public areas, and greenways
• 15% of each lot must be preserve area
Business Center Tenants & Available
vow vcs xW-Ma I) xj �- sIn uN:
N
3
E
2
Zoning History
• Pebble Creek
(adjacent to
development site)
— Was R 3 (townhome)
and A-O (agri)
— Rezoned to R-1 in
1996
• Business Center
MKOW-wel
— Rezoned to M-1 in
1992
3
Site Plan Overview
• Status of site plan
— Site plan has been submitted and is under review
— Site plan does not currently meet all code
requirements
• Parking Space Count
• Buffer Width
— Location of utility/drainage easement
— Possible Revisions
• Protected Area Location
• Lighting
Buffer Ordinance Requirements
• Approved by City Council on May 10, 2001
• Requirements for industrial uses abutting
Single Family Residential:
— Buffer Space - 25 foot buffer width measured from
property line
— Buffer Wall - A solid EFIS (Exterior Finish
Insulation System), masonry or concrete wall with
a minimum height of 6 feet and a maximum height
of 8 feet shall be placed on the common boundary
line.
El
Buffer Ordinance Require. Con't
— Landscaping - Minimum of one 5-gallon shrub
at a minimum of 3 feet in height shall be
provided per 3 linear feet of landscape buffer.
A Minimum of one 2-inch caliper canopy tree
shall be provided per 25 linear feet of landscape
buffer.
— Maintenance - All landscaping materials and
fences shall be maintained by the owner of the
property that was required to install such
landscaping materials and fence.
Buffer Ordinance Require. Con't
— Parldng - When off-street parldng areas
containing 5 or more spaces or service or utility
areas serving non-residential uses do not share
a common boundary but are visible from and
within 200 feet of residential uses, the parking
area shall be screened from view.
— Hei t - Any nonresidential structure within
100 feet of a developed residential use or
existing single-family structure shall maintain a
height equal to the maximum allowable height
of the residential district. (35 feet for R-1)
5
News Paper Articles
• Articles Published in The Eagle
— September 25, 2001
— September 28, 2001
Resident Questions
• "When were decisions made and was a public
hearing held regarding the new development?"
— A public hearing was held for Tax Abatement on the
property on September 27, 2001
— Economic Development Agreements regarding the
property and information on location and nature of
the development were discussed and approved by
City Council on September 27, 2001
— The Ordinance approving zoning for the business
center went into effect on June 11, 1992
n.
Resident Questions Con't
• "When and how were homeowners in the
area informed of the development?"
— Notice of the public hearing was published in
the Bryan -College Station Eagle on September
18, 2001 and posted as a public hearing in
accordance with state law
— City Council agenda was published in The
Eagle and on television Channel 19
Resident Questions Con't
• What are the plans for the new
development?"
— Plans for the site include a 100,000 square foot
two story office building; additional land was
provided for future development
Resident Questions Con't
• "Was a meeting held and/or scheduled for
discussion among property owners about
the construction?"
— Not in advance of this meeting. All zoning and
master planning were previously discussed in
public meetings and construction is regulated
by the City's zoning and subdivision
ordinances.
Resident Questions Con't
• "Is the rush of activity to build designed to
finish the job before homeowners have a
chance to voice their concerns?"
— The schedule for development is determined by
the owner/business. However the company is
required, by contract, to compete the facility by
December 31, 2002
0
Resident Questions Con't
"Why was one property owner informed
that she had no say in the matter when, in
fact, her property value is being
diminished?"
— At this point, there is no public review process
for the development. As long as the
development meets City code, by law, it has to
be approved.
Resident Questions Con't
• "I was told by developers/real estate agents
that this tract would never be developed.
Why is it being developed?"
— The property was planned and designed for
development. However, on a 1995 plat a small
portion of the northeast corner of the lot was
designated as "reserve". This means that at the
time it was platted it had not yet been
determined how the tract would be subdivided.
Subsequent plats (1996 forward) do not have a
reserve area noted.