Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDrawingsCURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT' CHORD BRG. CHORD DIST. Cli 19'53'05" 2450.00' 850.28' 429.46' 1 S 77'00'52" W 846.02' C2 T23'09". 2550.00' 328.71' 164.59' I N 70'40'57" E 328.49' C3 97'01'58" 25.00' 42.34' 28.27' N 30'47'27" E 37.46' C4 48.11'23" 25.00' 21.03' 11.18' N 41'49'13" W 20.41' C5 276'22'46" 65.00' 313.54' =58.14' I N 72"16'28" E 86.67' C6. 48'11'23" 25.00' 21.03' 11.18' S�--6'22'10" W 20.41' C7 80'1.6'05" 25.00' 35.02' 21.08' S 57'51'35" E 32.23' C8 4'57'02" 2550:00' 220.33' 1 ' 0.23' N 8428'54" E 220.26' C9 90'00'00" 25.00' 39.27' 25.00' I N 41'57'25" E 35.36' C10 48'11'23" 25.00' 21.03' 11:18' N 27'08'17" W 20.41' C11 276'22'46' 65.00' 313.54' -58.14' '� S 86'57'25" W 86.67' C12 48'11'23" 25.00' 21.03' 11.18' I I S 21'03'06" W 20.41' C13 90'00'00" 25.00' 39.27' 25.00' S 48'02'35" E 35.36' C1415'37'40" - Building Setback Line ('H.O.A.C.A. = Homeowners Association Common Area 2450.00' 668:25' 336.21' S'79'08'35" W 666.18' C15 4' 15'25"2450.00' 182.03 91.06' ES 69` 12'0 2 " W 181.99' SUBDIVISION, SE II recorded in Volume 5996, Page 199 (O.R.B.C.), said iron rod also being in the Me kommrssloners Court of Brazos Count '- lthe _ provisions y, pursuant' to _the provisions of section 21.084 north line of the said 1037.24 acre Tract Two and the south line of DEER PARK SUBDIVISION recorded in Volume 7356, P9ge 260 (O. R.B.C.) being of the Texas Water Code. 'No .OSSF drain 'field ' is to: encroach on the 100-fo0t sanitary zone and at or near the common line of the said J. M. BARREFtA,URVEY, A-69 aril the S.D. SMITH SURVEY, Abstract No. 210; of feet .of public water wells.. ry private water wells or 150 THENCE: N 86' S7' 25" E along the north line of the said 1037.24 acre tract the b.) All lots will be .required to have a site/soil evaluation on file with the, Brazos County Health Department before on-site sewage facility may be .and south line of said DEER PARK SUBDIVISION for a distance of 1544.89 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod set for corner, constructed. c.) On-site THENCE: S 03' 02' 35" E into the interior of the said 1037.24 acre tract for distance sewage facility disposal areas shall n the 150 foot sanitary zone of a private or of encroach the. 100 foot or P public Well, respectively, a of 400:00 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod set for corner; 7, Wellborn Special Utility District will provide water service for the subdivision. ` 8�1 THENCE: S 86' 57' 25" W for a distance of 250.00 feet to a 3/4 -inch iron set There is a minimum 50' wide Drainage Buffer (25' on each . side of thel: Icenterline of all drainage ways). See the covenants, pipe for corner, conditions, and restrictions for additional information. THENCE: S 03` 02' 35" E for a distance of 100.00 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod set for corner; 9I H•O.A. Easements along all streets run parallel to and adjacent to the THENCE: S 86' 57' 25" W for a distance of 420.88 feet to a 3/4 -inch iron public utility easements shown hereon. H.O.A. Easement activities and/or infrastructure is referenced in the Curvature of a curve to the left; pipe set for the Point of covenants, conditions, and restrictions of the subdivision. THENCE: 668.25 feet along the arc of said curve having a central angle of 15' 37' Q. A street connection along the south side. of Mesa Verde. Drive will be provided in 'a future phase. The street connection 40", d radius of 2450.00 feet, a tangent of 336.21 feet and a long chord bearing S 79' 08' 35" W at a distance 666.18 feet to will be provided in P a manner ',• consistent with the city of College Station's Subdivision of a found 1/2 -inch iron rod marking the north corner of Lot 21, Block 8, INDIAN LAKES SUBDIVISION, PHASE V Regulations with respect to block length requirements. as recorded in Volume 6055, Page 257 (O.R.B.C.); 1 .rAll proposed structures must be no more than 500 feet from a fire hydrant THENCE: 182.03 feet along said PHASE V in a counter clockwise direction along the arc of a 12. having d based on the lay of hose along the street. Unless otherwise indicated 1/2" Iron Rods . curve central angle of 04' 15' 25", a radius of 2450.00 feet; a tangent of 91.06 feet and a long chord bearing S 69' 12' 02" W at are set at all corners. E) - 1/2 Iron Rod Found a distance of 181.99 feet to a found 3/4 -inch iron pipe for: cor in the east line of said INDIAN LAKES SUBDIVISION, PHASE II; ner O - 3/4" Iron Pipe Set O - 3/4" Iron Pipe Found THENCE:.along the sold east line of PHAS : II E for the following three (3) calls: O - PK Nail Conti of Monuments set in of asphalt pavement for reference. 1) N 25' 02' 00" W for a distance of 100.06 feet to a found 3/4 -inch iron pie er-corner 1311 2) 328:71 feet in clockwise Abbreviation: B.S.L. a direction along the arc of a curve having o ce tial angle of 07* 2 3 09", a radius of 2550.00 feet, o tangent of 164.59 feet - Building Setback Line ('H.O.A.C.A. = Homeowners Association Common Area and o long chord bearing N 70' 40' 57" E at a distance of 328.49 feet to a found 1/2 -inch iron rod for come g o ner and � H�O.A.- 0 Ls. E. Homeowners Association Landscape Easement U0 mvihiv LHrttJ SUtfUiVISION, 3 N HO 37 A E _ 40 26 Homeowners own r for a e s Ass ' dist ocra ' once of trop ' 560. Ease PHASE 54 f men SE feet t 7X1rI to tt of - the Brazos County, Texas; .and whose nam OF N POINT. BEGI NTNG and containingP.U.E. ' e is subscribed hereto, COUNTY OF BRAZOS 16.169 acres of land, more or less. - Public Utility Easement hereby, dedicate to the. use ' of the Pr.D.E. - Private Drainage public forever, ail streets, alleys, ,parks;., g Easement - greenways, infrastructure, '. .. Y . cture, easements,. and public laces PP thereon shown for CERTIFICATE OF 7 • the I Karen ..: . .• PLANNING McQueen, Count Clerk, in and f - AND ZONI G COMMISSION i Y or said County, do hereby purpose .and consideration. therein expressed. All such dedications shat � Y certif fee I be in Y Y - (ti?�_tlr' d I n E 11�c1 for sr le unless expressly rovided otherwise: that this plat together t its certificates 1 �-+ BRAZOS COUNTY ' of authentication was , file : : .. d .for '0 ��. recordi Chairman n my office the day of : Zoning Com of the Planning and _ EY ! ;Vi 20 in the 9 mission of the Cit of Y College Station . Official Records � 9 herebycertif that - M ' ecoids of Brazos Count Texas in ttached Plat was of the a - . ' . Y, Volume- P dui a rove C1tt. ,Jan ylr?Ulf at; UJ.•.91_IF _ Page Y PP . by the Commission on the da of Y INAL PEA T Smiling. Mal eve oPment, LTD. Y �',..r Witnes m hand and official Seal, at iii. I , Y As a I.J., By: Smili allard Development Management- y. office in Bryan, Texas. .I. - - - - --- P g crit; LLC. `. - rY r � f � Chats its: General Partner , r �sr r By: Paul Clarke Cha r or e I 249 . D_r_ _ i a u Its: Manager :. County CI r lm .r! 1 hl�n!b _ _ �, k ,_ r 01182494 - Brazos AN LAK -EAS y Angela MlfAcie • _ Brazos C unty, Texas '.. Myomml�i,lon Explrns nm!a!inh at Inl CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR STAT. .�%. _ _ EYOR AND/OR ENGINEER E OF TEXAS. � � • _ TA ILJ V .BDI USIOX PHA,S.L' COUNTY OF BRAZOS fie-_Ir�, r - 897 J� TE S i Number �.I 1 S OF TEXAS CERTIFICATE: OF CITY ENGINEER A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL /� : f COUNTY OF BRAZOS (? y r �^ i,alrr.CrJh1hIQC O Befor e, -the undersigned authority, on this da personally � ... -- �2k�. `L'�er Y P ly appeared I, .GJ .? This subdivision i ---- L CK TS � 8, B O 27 known to me to be the arson wh Cit of C City Engineer of the Plat was du, approved b the I Kevin Y P y Commissioners Court . of R. McClure, Registered Professional Lan ' P ase y ollege Station, exas,, hereb certif Brazos. Count Texas • Land Surveyor No, name is subscribed to the fore foregoing instrument an Y y that this Subdivision y as the Fin I Plat of such ' Plot ch subdiviswn on the 5650, in the State of Texas hereb i. 9 9 d acknowledged :_ao me conforms to the re uirements of t of da y certif that this Y p.�t is true �c, p y ,� CR ES he Subdivision Regulations of the Cit of �t---_, 20_I,i and correct and wa ES s prepared from an octua surve that he :executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein stated. of the College Station. Y �- �. r��5 property and that property markers and mo: a t-8 :are lace 7 Signed this the, -';''da of 1(i, �lGi Given under my hand and seal on this ��day of 2. �ti� `. '( ( Y M - 20 rl`�' under my superv' non the round. " f€ p d . M. SARRERA SURVEY A=69 e!�rea, �- - �q � SRA COU City ,' ngineer �.-.�-,..-��' •`.=.�� rr �,,,� ��.. �� ��, T,, TEXAS City of College. Station Count U i y Judge Kevin R. McClure 'R.P.'. .er?. DUNE 2013 650 ." L S. No. (5 P m. oin e Vit: SCALE " Brazos County, Texc � i� mmmomm..om ��,.K LE.• 1 _ Notary Public, Brazos County, Texas I;, .° °° P:,:�� = 60' 2 =CEViiN °R. 9UIa?���ai:R�� s .. •.1� a rib °m nmoemnc:.:c�nm .m �Fj . 0 5f�50 e Owner: ry , r: . Smiling II nO . �AemSfC;�rrt� g Mallard Development. Ltd. McClure & mg Browne En ineerin p 'P+�i.;1,%,!£�F'�'i�'�a'�!ng?lt•l�ir�`F�°X14.'�&L�aL�ur?69`L'7kn<.-.'i3• :..... _- EQs Street , -Mao-go •°'.. 3608 t 29th 1008 Woodcreek Y g' ""9 9 9/ rve in Inc ����� � _ _ - - _-, � � .• Dr. Suit , cr£a�.rs`rrr•-.���r7.�,� ,, - -,= ^y a� e 103 - ---„rarn,z�mcylczumo-rrr, -. ,�x ^ ., Bryan, eXaS 77802 -...........__...- - ---- _.__. ::�-::�-,, .���• T College Station, Texas 77845 'I (979) 693 3838 _(979) 46 4384 i __. _ 10670038 fp.dwg QV�• r � r� "�` � �, � � shy, W5, F1, a '••r Fr i'.:� iii h k� dSM h e. L3,��: ._... z+�4.�z�lS.�•a_.�.Rrta�c'�",'.f:�L��..Y�.'c's°k' vl. All { 'F vg m s�•.' SOURCE: CIN OF COLLEGE STATION 2011 AERIAL CONTOURS PROVIDED BY CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ii "F. �`(�� - 22 4as`n l:u ,3 L '3+'�" '�". a�•F. 4y.>-`�h��a �'..u',�, a•w • ,i� t ti ;j` F rs^'» ^�l''%Z.�' ��sK, �. �.. �•-' :.-e: .-sea,... may„ 55vd'X_. PLAN OF BORINGS CLAY, with numerous very small pocketsil and thin seams of light gray sand, 84.8 15 slightly moist OUND WATER OBSERVATION NOTES: Borehole dry during drilling on /04/13. Soils caved into borehole at 13' ptb, water level at 10' depth on 105/13 (24 hrs after drilling). COMPLETION DEPTH- 20' DATE: 04/04/2013 DEPTH TO WATER' IN BORING: See Ground Water DATE: Observation Notes Above''iI mental onsu an s_ n6. -- BRIDGE SUMMARY Connector Pedestrian Bridge 3U' Span x 6' Width Deck Type: IPE (Hardwood) Bridge Finish: Weathering Steel _30' TOP,, , STIRRUPS - CONCRETE ABUTMENT BOTTOM CHORD —FLOOR BEAM SUPPORTING PIER ( NOT SHOWN) SEE FOUNDATION PLAN AND U) ELEVATION) w 5 c af 1 l BRIDGE ELEVATION z- NOT TO SCALE � o CL L 0' U D 1— O V U sl F 5^, 1, ) "'Tt '•'t 4. � �, , �-'•� fir � C nf?---g; Al �c- r moi'••'. KEY 100 0 100 FEET ®B-1 BORING LOCATION, (20) DESIGNATION AND DEPTH CONTOURS OF EXISTING ELEVATION KEY TO SYMBOLS AND SOIL CLASSIFICATION Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D 2487) SAMPLE TYPES COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS AND LABORATORY TEST DATA �{ ® + 0 0 Thin-wall Split -Barrel Rock Core Cone No Cuttings No Hand Torvane Unconfined Compression U -U Tube w/Testable Penetrometer Recovery Sampling Penetrometer Recovery Triaxial Sample 3D% Finer - Percent Finer than No. 200 Selve Major Divisions Group Symbols Typical Names Relative Density of Coarse Strained Soils g Well -Graded Gravels; Gravel -Sand Penetration Resistance d > z GW N Value Descriptive m z m Mixtures, Little or No Fines (Blows/Ft') Term o = m a 04 Very Loose H (A n r- ro m Poorly Graded Gravels, Gravel -Sand 4-10 loose o in — GP Mixtures, Little or No Fines 10-30 Medium Dense in Q z m 30-50 Dense J X m g m m GM Silty Gravels, Gravel -Sand -Sift Over 50 Very Dense Uj z m o " Matures ' Based on driving a split -barrel. 0 IE O � .,. - „ n. samplerwith a 140 to weight �u ma W � = � �` � g o Clayey Gravels, Gravel -Sand -Clay dropped 30 inches `- GC Mixtures (9 Well -Graded Sands, Gravelly Sands, Soil Modifiers a cz SW W .� z... Lithe or No Fines cn o N LL 5P Poorly Graded Sands, Gravelly CLAYEY C) = p o w rn Sands, Little or No Fines U z Q ¢ :Em � SILTY _ `o (13 o . v c m p SM Silty Sands, Sand -Silt Mixtures SANDY LL C Q O "ty Sc Sands, Sand Clay Mixtures at •, H ML Inorganic Silts with Slight Plasticity Consistency Terms of Fine -Grained Soils d J Compressive U) C Inorganic Clays of Low to Medium Strength, qu Descriptive Js :3m CI- Plasticity, Gravelly Clays, Lean Clays (toNsq ft) Tenn U) W �'" a' 1 1 1 1 0 to 0.25 Very ,}aft 0 m + 1 1 1 10.25 to 0.50 Soft Organic Silts and Organic Silty OL 1 I t 1 0.50 to 1.00 Firm W r1D I I t t Clays of low Plasticity Z a3 1.00 to 2.00 Stiff Q vin Ca Inorganic Silts, Micaceous or 2.00 to 4.00 Very Puff IYM o U o MH Diatomaceous Fine Sand or Silty Over 4:00 Hard o " F- vii Soils, Elastic Silts W 2 -� Z 2 W F Inorganic Clays of High Plasticity, LL o E m CH Fat Clays Groundwater Levels STATIC WATER LEVEL o OHHNN Organic Clays of Medium to High Plasticity, Organic Silts V- HYDROSTATIC WATER LEVEL HARDNESS CLASSIFICATION OF INTACT ROCK Rock Classification APPROX. RANGE OF UNIAXIAL COMPRESSION STRENGTH I I I -I; HARDNESS (P.S.I.) SHALE 1,1.1;1 SILTSTONE EXTREMELY HARD >13,900 VERY HARD 6,940 - 13,900 LIMESTONE + CLAYSTONE HARD 3,470 - 6,940 SOFT 1,740 - 3,470 SANDSTONE COAL VERY SOFT 70 - 1,740 CCSG Engineering & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Y2"0 SMOOTH DOWEL BAR x 12" LONG DRILL 6" INTO EXISTING SIDEWALK AND EPDXY, GREASE OTHER END OF BAR IN ABUTMENT EXISTING SIDEWALK _ (NORTHSIDE ONLY) ABUTMENT PLAN VIEW ENDS BARS i LOG OF BORING NO. B-1 o PROPOSED ARBORETUM PEDESTRIAN BRIDGEI'II -1" AIR SPACE END OF ANDERSON STREET - SOUTH OF SOUTHWESTLPARKWAY Y2" FIBER BOARD ISOLATION JOINT MATERIAL WITH CAP 0'-9" �-- 1'-2" U COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Q W (PER BRIDGE SUPPLIER) TYPE: 3-1/2" 0 Solid Flight Dry Auger DRILLER: REQUENA/HWD LOCATION: See Plan of Borings 4 - #3 TIES @ 6" O.C. @ TOP OF PIER t~� �+ W O O CKING N Z @ (� N -- POCKET PENETROMETER O -- UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST WOOD DF v asurvey a ,00 to p DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL Surface elevations obtained from GPS by Advantage Excavation; Inc. SURFACE ELEVATION: Not Known +'. D o Eq •'"q m � � a PQ a A -- TRIAIXIAL SHEAR TEST COHESION, TON/SQ. FT. 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 Plastic water Liquid Limit Content, % Limit 1p) 20 30 -4®Q- 50 60 +70 Cwl (PROVIDED BY Stiff to very stiff, dark gray, fat CLAY, moist LONGITUDINAL BARS W 4' - #6 VERTICAL 1:4 f, .. STEEL REINFORCEMENT (SEE BRIDGE 69.8Fin ® CONNECTOR ABUTMENT DETAIL) Medium dense, brown, very clayey slightly moist PEDESTRIAN o' ® BRIDGE BEAM .� 0 —with decreasing clay content becoming slightly moist to moist below. 4' —vnth a thick seam of blown, sandy, lean clay at 5.25' 0 47. 1 % R tes o Very stiff, brownish—tan to grayish—tan, sandy, lean CLAY, slightly moist � 34 R Fineft Medium dense, brownish—tan to tan, very clayey SAND, slightly moist to moist H.93.9 0.10A 10 CLAY, with numerous very small pocketsil and thin seams of light gray sand, 84.8 15 slightly moist OUND WATER OBSERVATION NOTES: Borehole dry during drilling on /04/13. Soils caved into borehole at 13' ptb, water level at 10' depth on 105/13 (24 hrs after drilling). COMPLETION DEPTH- 20' DATE: 04/04/2013 DEPTH TO WATER' IN BORING: See Ground Water DATE: Observation Notes Above''iI mental onsu an s_ n6. -- BRIDGE SUMMARY Connector Pedestrian Bridge 3U' Span x 6' Width Deck Type: IPE (Hardwood) Bridge Finish: Weathering Steel _30' TOP,, , STIRRUPS - CONCRETE ABUTMENT BOTTOM CHORD —FLOOR BEAM SUPPORTING PIER ( NOT SHOWN) SEE FOUNDATION PLAN AND U) ELEVATION) w 5 c af 1 l BRIDGE ELEVATION z- NOT TO SCALE � o CL L 0' U D 1— O V U sl F 5^, 1, ) "'Tt '•'t 4. � �, , �-'•� fir � C nf?---g; Al �c- r moi'••'. KEY 100 0 100 FEET ®B-1 BORING LOCATION, (20) DESIGNATION AND DEPTH CONTOURS OF EXISTING ELEVATION KEY TO SYMBOLS AND SOIL CLASSIFICATION Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D 2487) SAMPLE TYPES COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS AND LABORATORY TEST DATA �{ ® + 0 0 Thin-wall Split -Barrel Rock Core Cone No Cuttings No Hand Torvane Unconfined Compression U -U Tube w/Testable Penetrometer Recovery Sampling Penetrometer Recovery Triaxial Sample 3D% Finer - Percent Finer than No. 200 Selve Major Divisions Group Symbols Typical Names Relative Density of Coarse Strained Soils g Well -Graded Gravels; Gravel -Sand Penetration Resistance d > z GW N Value Descriptive m z m Mixtures, Little or No Fines (Blows/Ft') Term o = m a 04 Very Loose H (A n r- ro m Poorly Graded Gravels, Gravel -Sand 4-10 loose o in — GP Mixtures, Little or No Fines 10-30 Medium Dense in Q z m 30-50 Dense J X m g m m GM Silty Gravels, Gravel -Sand -Sift Over 50 Very Dense Uj z m o " Matures ' Based on driving a split -barrel. 0 IE O � .,. - „ n. samplerwith a 140 to weight �u ma W � = � �` � g o Clayey Gravels, Gravel -Sand -Clay dropped 30 inches `- GC Mixtures (9 Well -Graded Sands, Gravelly Sands, Soil Modifiers a cz SW W .� z... Lithe or No Fines cn o N LL 5P Poorly Graded Sands, Gravelly CLAYEY C) = p o w rn Sands, Little or No Fines U z Q ¢ :Em � SILTY _ `o (13 o . v c m p SM Silty Sands, Sand -Silt Mixtures SANDY LL C Q O "ty Sc Sands, Sand Clay Mixtures at •, H ML Inorganic Silts with Slight Plasticity Consistency Terms of Fine -Grained Soils d J Compressive U) C Inorganic Clays of Low to Medium Strength, qu Descriptive Js :3m CI- Plasticity, Gravelly Clays, Lean Clays (toNsq ft) Tenn U) W �'" a' 1 1 1 1 0 to 0.25 Very ,}aft 0 m + 1 1 1 10.25 to 0.50 Soft Organic Silts and Organic Silty OL 1 I t 1 0.50 to 1.00 Firm W r1D I I t t Clays of low Plasticity Z a3 1.00 to 2.00 Stiff Q vin Ca Inorganic Silts, Micaceous or 2.00 to 4.00 Very Puff IYM o U o MH Diatomaceous Fine Sand or Silty Over 4:00 Hard o " F- vii Soils, Elastic Silts W 2 -� Z 2 W F Inorganic Clays of High Plasticity, LL o E m CH Fat Clays Groundwater Levels STATIC WATER LEVEL o OHHNN Organic Clays of Medium to High Plasticity, Organic Silts V- HYDROSTATIC WATER LEVEL HARDNESS CLASSIFICATION OF INTACT ROCK Rock Classification APPROX. RANGE OF UNIAXIAL COMPRESSION STRENGTH I I I -I; HARDNESS (P.S.I.) SHALE 1,1.1;1 SILTSTONE EXTREMELY HARD >13,900 VERY HARD 6,940 - 13,900 LIMESTONE + CLAYSTONE HARD 3,470 - 6,940 SOFT 1,740 - 3,470 SANDSTONE COAL VERY SOFT 70 - 1,740 CCSG Engineering & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Y2"0 SMOOTH DOWEL BAR x 12" LONG DRILL 6" INTO EXISTING SIDEWALK AND EPDXY, GREASE OTHER END OF BAR IN ABUTMENT EXISTING SIDEWALK _ (NORTHSIDE ONLY) ABUTMENT PLAN VIEW ENDS BARS r W 1 a- in W 00 Y rn Q_m U1 R 'wUzo az o zo m .0 Tw =lo- 'W .0 01. ZQ �ooZ ¢o 3:'W WO > W W Z Z Z Z W W a Z OU W U, W Wo; OLL�Zo a' �Om J Wz o WWw nc0° 3Z ¢oQ o¢mZp o t7V C7aZ� ac7< a z Y Z Q W Q Z O Q . ir Z ^ a:� W a'ZZtn W d. a.J�. to ¢. 11 , O- 5; 01 W Z W a.OZ W W It Z� Yv W W W WU�—J d W00 Ota WD WLL mWOU¢� a_WJZ a:¢ Z Ox~OW OxZO pz F g LLO.0 LL h C' U LL LL o El M r' OF•TE s 0 1 C 9 ­�Z^ ANCHOR BOLTS PER BRIDGE E SUPPLIER - TYPICALLY 2 - 3/4"0 x 18" ANCHOR BOLTS, TYPE A36 �- OR A307 GALV. WITH 2 NUTS AND ONE WASHER EACH BEAM (4 PER ABUTMENT - TYP.) _ EXTEND PIER STEEL 1'-3" INTO ABUTMENT i o -1" AIR SPACE Y2" FIBER BOARD ISOLATION JOINT MATERIAL WITH CAP 0'-9" �-- 1'-2" U PIER SHAFT Q W (PER BRIDGE SUPPLIER) 4 - #3 TIES @ 6" O.C. @ TOP OF PIER t~� �+ W O O CKING N Z @ (� WOOD DF STEEL SHOE J" w w -v ANCHOR BOLTS Q (PROVIDED BY LONGITUDINAL BARS W 4' - #6 VERTICAL 1:4 f, .. STEEL REINFORCEMENT (SEE BRIDGE ® CONNECTOR ABUTMENT DETAIL) PEDESTRIAN o' ® BRIDGE BEAM .� r W 1 a- in W 00 Y rn Q_m U1 R 'wUzo az o zo m .0 Tw =lo- 'W .0 01. ZQ �ooZ ¢o 3:'W WO > W W Z Z Z Z W W a Z OU W U, W Wo; OLL�Zo a' �Om J Wz o WWw nc0° 3Z ¢oQ o¢mZp o t7V C7aZ� ac7< a z Y Z Q W Q Z O Q . ir Z ^ a:� W a'ZZtn W d. a.J�. to ¢. 11 , O- 5; 01 W Z W a.OZ W W It Z� Yv W W W WU�—J d W00 Ota WD WLL mWOU¢� a_WJZ a:¢ Z Ox~OW OxZO pz F g LLO.0 LL h C' U LL LL o El M r' OF•TE s 0 1 C 9 ­�Z^ ANCHOR BOLTS PER BRIDGE E SUPPLIER - TYPICALLY 2 - 3/4"0 x 18" ANCHOR BOLTS, TYPE A36 �- OR A307 GALV. WITH 2 NUTS AND ONE WASHER EACH BEAM (4 PER ABUTMENT - TYP.) _ EXTEND PIER STEEL 1'-3" INTO ABUTMENT n \ ' 4 D e a� FILL SOILS - (AS NECESSARY 1 ) O (SOUTH SIDE ONLY) EXISTING DIRT TRAIL 2 #6's (SOUTHSIDE ONLY) 4 - #6's NATURAL SOILS 4 - #6's 7 - #4 STIRRUPS Col 6" O.C. ON EITHER END; _ REMAINDER OF STIRRUPS @ 12" O.C. EXTEND PIER STEEL 1'-3" INTO ABUTMENT 2" CLR TYP. i o -1" AIR SPACE Y2" FIBER BOARD ISOLATION JOINT MATERIAL WITH CAP 0'-9" �-- 1'-2" U (PER BRIDGE SUPPLIER) 4 - #3 TIES @ 6" O.C. @ TOP OF PIER t~� �+ W O O CKING N Z @ (� n \ ' 4 D e a� FILL SOILS - (AS NECESSARY 1 ) O (SOUTH SIDE ONLY) EXISTING DIRT TRAIL 2 #6's (SOUTHSIDE ONLY) 4 - #6's NATURAL SOILS 4 - #6's 7 - #4 STIRRUPS Col 6" O.C. ON EITHER END; _ REMAINDER OF STIRRUPS @ 12" O.C. EXTEND PIER STEEL 1'-3" INTO ABUTMENT 2" CLR TYP. 14" ANCHOR BOLTS t° EXISTING GROUND SURFACE o to I DRILLED PIER (SEE DETAIL 3) 2 BRIDGE ABUTMENT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE •t4 U UU) BEAR PIERS IN VERY STIFF SHEET TITLE: GRAYISH—BROWN SANDY CLAY SOIL @ 15' BELOW EXISTING ARBORETUM GROUND SURFACE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOUNDATION PROJ. NO.: 13049-250 DRAWN BY: AEA DATE: 06/28/13 24" SCALE: AS SHOWN APPR: MFC PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ABUTMENT DRAWING: FOUNDATION PLAN AND ELEVATION S-2 TO SCALE i o -1" AIR SPACE U (PER BRIDGE SUPPLIER) 00 O CKING N Z @ (� WOOD DF STEEL SHOE J" w w -v ANCHOR BOLTS (PROVIDED BY ' BRIDGE SUPPLIER) " --- 4' - #6 VERTICAL 1:4 f, .. STEEL REINFORCEMENT ® CONNECTOR PEDESTRIAN o' ® BRIDGE BEAM .� 0 0 14'• o 14" ANCHOR BOLTS t° EXISTING GROUND SURFACE o to I DRILLED PIER (SEE DETAIL 3) 2 BRIDGE ABUTMENT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE •t4 U UU) BEAR PIERS IN VERY STIFF SHEET TITLE: GRAYISH—BROWN SANDY CLAY SOIL @ 15' BELOW EXISTING ARBORETUM GROUND SURFACE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOUNDATION PROJ. NO.: 13049-250 DRAWN BY: AEA DATE: 06/28/13 24" SCALE: AS SHOWN APPR: MFC PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ABUTMENT DRAWING: FOUNDATION PLAN AND ELEVATION S-2 TO SCALE GENERAL FOUNDATION NOTES E. DRILLED PIER EXCAVATIONS: 12) Concrete shall have an air entrainment agent approved by the engineer. 5) 1) The installation of deep pier foundation elements should be pursued in accordance with procedures :outlined in The Deep Foundations Institute, Drilled 13) A curing compound shall be applied to the exposed concrete immediately after placement and according to mam 17) All exposed corners shall have a tooled joint or a Y4"chamfer as directed by the Contractor, unless otherwise notes A. GENERAL Shaft lnspector`s Manual, Second Edition, 2004, or a more current edition if applicable, and also as outlined in the previously referenced Publication No. concrete to prevent any loose excavated soil from entering the excavation. between 15 and 30, inclusive, with a maximum liquid limit (LL) values of 49. 1) The structural items and seal indicated on these indicated on these drawings apply only to the foundation system as performed by CSGEngineering & FHWA-NHI-10-016 entitled "Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and LRFD Design Methods." 14) All abutment reinforcement shall be adequately supported by chairs. 18) Concrete and grout shall not be poured if ambient air temperature is 40 degrees Fahrenheit and falling or 95 degr Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CSC) for the indicated bridge. The bridge structure itself; including all beams, base plates, anchor rods (bolts), decking and 2) The drilled pier excavations should be checked to ensure that the shaft and bell size and the founding depth(s) specified on the plans have -been achieved. 4) Prompt placement of concrete into the pier excavation as soon as the drilling is completed and the excavation cleaned and inspected is strongly safety railing, associated therewith are being designed by others and are not the responsibility of CSC. Verification of the construction process, the plumbness, and the dimensional characteristics of the piers or footings should be performed as part of the 1S) Reinforcing bars shall be secured at every intersection with wire -ties. 8) The fill soils shall be placed in lifts with a maximum compacted thickness of 6 inches. project quality assurance (QA) program. specifications. 2) The foundation design currently shown on the drawings is. based on assumed bridge length, beam boring locations, beams depths, anchor bolt (or anchor 16) The excavation for the abutments shall be cleaned of all debris including soil cave-in and standing water before placing concrete. Fahrenheit and rising. embedments, and projections above the o m t j O J Q 0 //�� O a- <Z Ow- W. �/W 0T, w0En a. (9En 0o ~i2S6 z, —0— OW i_0 W �ZT��% Q ~ ww0z °-� O ¢ F' Z - z o� Wp0z ¢O zv RP -0 <-O � H S- RP -9 — O ¢ F - o w > 000 WZ euwZ� ly O a F r� z V o w'L WUJZZ ¢w ZW° W~~U w w� 0�0 ��Nw wz �awo wair0� �Z. ¢0¢° 0¢?0 z <m0 ma. zm3U O � 00 Z2Z� JC7¢m =1)21 LL a z� 3cYi 3�ym >3�W �3 QA.w 71jzw0~ (L 0(L0zw Zo ww IXWf_ 2 w�z W_¢ x O= oxo TZO O? LL f �0 0 L$- 0U IL LL El ❑ rod) locations), and the assumption that the bridge would be subject only to pedestrian loads and not vehicle loads. Some adjustments.in the dimensions of the bridge abutments may have to be made depending upon the bridge selected b the Contractor and the related actual length of the; brid a and the g y P g P g Y g 3) The drilled pier excavations should be inspected to ensure that all loose material greater than 3 inches in dimension and all standing water over 2 inches in 5) associated details concerningthe bridge beams supported b the abutment. Prior to the commencement o an construction o the oundation system,, g PP y f Y f foundation depth have been removed from the excavations prior to placement of the concrete. Precautions should betaken during placement of the reinforcement and 17) All exposed corners shall have a tooled joint or a Y4"chamfer as directed by the Contractor, unless otherwise notes that classify as SC OR CL type soils under the Unified Soils Classification System (USCS, ASTM D 2487), and in addition shall have a plasticity index (PI) value " t 'A shown on these drawings, CSC must receive verification that the final bridge lengths and other details concerning the bridge bean)s'are compatible uvifl; ; concrete to prevent any loose excavated soil from entering the excavation. between 15 and 30, inclusive, with a maximum liquid limit (LL) values of 49. 1, the dimensions of the foundation system shown on the drawings. CSC will then review the submitted information in order to determine if the final 7) Sods containing an excessive amount of silt i.e., greater than approximately 20 to 25percent) without a corremonding amount of clays shall not be used as 18) Concrete and grout shall not be poured if ambient air temperature is 40 degrees Fahrenheit and falling or 95 degr building superstructure design necessitates changes to the foundation system depicted in these drawings. ; ; ; ; : 4) Prompt placement of concrete into the pier excavation as soon as the drilling is completed and the excavation cleaned and inspected is strongly present. If the existing organic soils and weak surficial soils present at the site are not removed' prior to construction of the proposed approach trail to the deep root systems of the plants can help alleviate potential bank erosion. 6) Placement of all reinforcing steel, including laps, bends, and splices, shall conform to CRS1 Standards and the latest issue of the ACI 318 code and the recommended. Under no circumstances should a pier be drilled that cannot be filled with concrete before the end of the workday. 8) The fill soils shall be placed in lifts with a maximum compacted thickness of 6 inches. 4) The foundation system shown on these plans was designed in general conformance with the. requirements of the 2012 Version of the international Building indicated in the contract documents or approved by the structural engineer. Code (IBC). ( ) 5 )strong! There is a ty g p p p J sloughing pier possibili that round water will enter the o en ler excavations at the ro'ect site and will cause excessive slou hip of the G. STRUCTURAL STEEL:. should either be removed from the site or alternately, stockpiled and used as fill materials in proposed landscaped areas that will not have to support^J compaction test, ASTM D 698, at moisture contents in the range of the previously referenced OMC to a maximum of 4 percent above the OMC, inclusive. excavation sidewalls. Therefore, the contractor should be prepared to use casing in order to ensure the integrity of the excavation and to permit pouring of 10) Compaction characteristics of the compacted fill shall be verified by in-place moisture -density tests. The tests shall be performed on each 6 -inch thick lift of 5) All foundation plan dimensions are dependent upon the,final dimensions of the prefabricated bridge selected for the project. The contractor shall pier concrete in a dry condition. 1) The bridge steel superstructure and base plate installation requirements (including anchor rod layouts, size, segment of corner bar equal to 40 bar diameters. Alternately, provide standard ACI hooks for top and bottom bars at discontinuous ends of all grade beams. coordinate the foundation plans with the plans of the bridge supplier and shall contact the foundation engineer if adjustments in the bridge foundation: �-+ finished abutment) shall be the responsibility of the bridge designer and are not a part of these drawings. system are necessary to accommodate the bridge. Coordination and compatibility of dimensions is the responsibility of the Contractor and not the Owner or 6) The'reinfordrig steel cage placed in the pier shaft excavation should extend to no closer than 3 inches of the base of the shaft. The cage should be designed t the foundation design engineer. The foundation design engineer shall be notified if any discrepancies exist between the foundation plans and any other from the standpoint of meeting three requirements: (1) structural requirements for any uplift loads imposed- by the supporting structure; (2) structural The abutments excavations shall be checked to ensure that all loose materials have been removed from the excavations prior to placement of concrete'!a. plans prior to commencement of construction. It is particularly important that all base plates and anchor rods be located so that no anchor rod be any 'elements requirements for resistance of potential tensile forces attributable to swelling of foundation soils along the upper portion of the pier; and (3) stability Concrete cast against and permanently exposed to earth - 3” closer that 4 inches to the edge of the abutment. The fabrication of any superstructure 'bridge shall not beinitiated until all bridge dimensions are Some of the soils at the site may be somewhat difficult to excavate as part of the construction of the abutments if the upper soils are wet due to antecedent requirements of the cage structure during construction placement. checked and verified for conformance with the foundation plans. b. Concrete exposed to backfilled earth and weather: O � P slough or slide into excavations until more stable side slopes are formed at shallower angles than vertical. Any such fall -in should be removed from the i 5) The Contractor shall coordinate all foundation drawings with any site drawings. Underground plumbing and electrical elements shali'be installed before U excavation. The Contractor should take whatever actions are necessary, including the use of wooden forms, to maintain the stability of the abutment i ' i. #6 bars and larger - 2" placing reinforcing steel for the foundation systems. Conflicts between the foundation systems layout and the utilities shall be brought to the attention of O U U the foundation engineering prior to construction to determine if any modifications to the foundation plans.are warranted.: F. GENERAL SITE DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL: � M n ►-`1 44 0 6) The finished elevation of the bridge above the existing surface rade immediate) surrounding the bridge shall be verified b the Owner prior to the g Y g g Y P 1) it is critical to the performance of the bridge foundation that an adequate storm water drainage management Ian be formulated for the overall project site g g P p J 3) commencement of construction. band for the brid a are in paicular. Poor brid a foundatiand-superstructure performheen experienced when storm water run-off has not and inspection of the excavation is strongly recommended. Precautions should be taken during placement of the reinforcement and concrete to prevent any been controlled.,Site grading plans shall include the elevation of the bridge d a atas' n' t height above the surrounding ground surface elevations s so that loose excavated soil from entering into the excavation. Any clods of earth that slump into the footing excavation during concrete placement should be 7) The details designated as typical shall apply generally to the drawings in all areas where conditions are similar to those described'in the details. final grades around the structure can be established to promote storm water moving by gravity flow away from and from around the P erimeter of the rainfall event. Otherwise, the storm water run-off could flood the excavations and result in the creation of a weak saturated soil layer or the collection of bridge. 8) Construction methods, procedures, and sequences are the responsibility of the Contractor. The Contractor shall take all necessary means to maintain and ; increase the magnitudes of abutment movement or even undermine the stability of the abutments and the backfilled soils behind the abutments. protect the integrity of all structural elements at all stages of construction. 2) Finished grades surrounding the bridge should be established so as to promote positive drainage away from the bridge area. Verification of the construction process and the dimensional characteristics of the abutments shall be performed by an independent testing laboratory as B. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL STUDY: 3) Roof gutters should be routed to established drainage channels or patterns down -gradient from the building prior to discharging: No trees or other plantings requiring irrigation watering shall be placed in the area immediately surrounding the building so that additional sources of moisture loss (tree root systems) 1) A site and project specific subsurface exploration and geotechnical study was performed for the project by CSC. ,The study consisted of the drilling of a single or gain (landscape watering) are introduced around the foundation system. If moisture is introduced into the building area, it may accumulate and boring to 20 feet on the northern side of the drainage way that the bridge will be crossing and the laboratory testing of soils recovered from the boring.. The subsequently and within the building ad, especially since the ad will be constructed of relative) permeable soils. Such ponding within the building ad q. Y P P P Y P y P P g g P log of boring is presented in Sheet S-1. will cause water to migrate downward and produce swelling of foundation clays beneath the building pad to a greater magnitude than was anticipated in the design. 2) The Contractor shall verify that the subsurface soil conditions at both ends of the bridge conform to those described in the above referenced geotechnical log 3) The storm water management plan shall also consider the use of perimeter interceptor ditches and/or berms so that surface water that would normal) flow Y of boring prior to the construction of the foundation system for the bridge. If actual subsurface conditions differ from the conditions described in the towards the bridge area from the higher elevations of the site is intercepted before the water migrates through the structure area. The intercepted storm geotechnical study the foundation engineer shall be contacted to determine if adjustments in the foundation design are necessary. water should be routed to drainage ways in the area of the site before discharging at down -gradient locations. 4) The storm water management plan should incorporate the use of various soil erosion control features to minimize the erosion potential of the surface soils C. GENERAL SITE PREPARATION AND FILL PLACEMENT: across the site, especially in areas of channelized storm water flows. It is especially important that temporary and/or permanent vegetation be established during construction or as soon as possible following construction to minimize soil loss. Site grading features such as terracing and the use of slope diversion Fahrenheit and rising. embedments, and projections above the o m t j O J Q 0 //�� O a- <Z Ow- W. �/W 0T, w0En a. (9En 0o ~i2S6 z, —0— OW i_0 W �ZT��% Q ~ ww0z °-� O ¢ F' Z - z o� Wp0z ¢O zv RP -0 <-O � H S- RP -9 — O ¢ F - o w > 000 WZ euwZ� ly O a F r� z V o w'L WUJZZ ¢w ZW° W~~U w w� 0�0 ��Nw wz �awo wair0� �Z. ¢0¢° 0¢?0 z <m0 ma. zm3U O � 00 Z2Z� JC7¢m =1)21 LL a z� 3cYi 3�ym >3�W �3 QA.w 71jzw0~ (L 0(L0zw Zo ww IXWf_ 2 w�z W_¢ x O= oxo TZO O? LL f �0 0 L$- 0U IL LL El ❑ PROJ. NO.: 13049-250 DRAWN BY: AEA DATE: 06/27/13 SCALE: AS SHOWN APPR: MFC DRAWING: S-1 berms to slow water flows at the top of the steep slopes in the area of the bridge should also be strongly evaluated for inclusion in erosion control plans. 1) Some limited volume of fill soils may have to be placed on the southern bank of the drainage way to provide'for'the approach of the trail to the bridge. 3) Mixing, transporting, and placing of concrete shall conform to ACI 301. 5) Other erosion control features that may be considered for use in any existing or newly established drainage ways where flow velocities are high include the that classify as SC OR CL type soils under the Unified Soils Classification System (USCS, ASTM D 2487), and in addition shall have a plasticity index (PI) value following: rock, timber, stone dams at various points along the route of the drainage ways, synthetic or natural fiber matting along the sides and bottoms of between 15 and 30, inclusive, with a maximum liquid limit (LL) values of 49. 2) All vegetation, organic matter, and topsoils should be stripped and removed from the areas of planned fill plac ement. The removal of the vegetation should the entire length of the drainage ways, ri ra , concrete pads, sedimentation basins or drop structures at discharge points where high velocity could produce 7) Sods containing an excessive amount of silt i.e., greater than approximately 20 to 25percent) without a corremonding amount of clays shall not be used as 5 All reinforcing steel shall be fabricated in accordance with the latest issue of the ACi 318 Code. - include all roots. Special attention should be directed to the removal of any existing weak surficial soils and all organic materials or "muck" that may be problems. In addition; stabilization zones of bush or shrub vegetation along the upper banks of channelized drainage ways should be established so that the select fill. Soils classifying as ML, CL -ML, MH, OL, OH, CH, OR SM type soils under the previously referenced USCS shall not be used as select fill. present. If the existing organic soils and weak surficial soils present at the site are not removed' prior to construction of the proposed approach trail to the deep root systems of the plants can help alleviate potential bank erosion. 6) Placement of all reinforcing steel, including laps, bends, and splices, shall conform to CRS1 Standards and the latest issue of the ACI 318 code and the 8) The fill soils shall be placed in lifts with a maximum compacted thickness of 6 inches. bridge, it is possible that these existing soils could interfere with the proposed construction and could potentially adversely impact the future performance indicated in the contract documents or approved by the structural engineer. of the proposed approach trail. In any event, all excavated organic materials and topsoils and any potentially unsatisfactory existing weak surficial soils 9) The select fill shall be compacted to densities corresponding at a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum density determined in the Standard Proctor 7) Reinforcing steel designated as continuous„ shall lap a minimum of 40 bar diameters at splices unless noted otherwise. Reinforcing steel splices in grade should either be removed from the site or alternately, stockpiled and used as fill materials in proposed landscaped areas that will not have to support^J compaction test, ASTM D 698, at moisture contents in the range of the previously referenced OMC to a maximum of 4 percent above the OMC, inclusive. Q� 10) Compaction characteristics of the compacted fill shall be verified by in-place moisture -density tests. The tests shall be performed on each 6 -inch thick lift of structural elements. F. CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL: f� fill at an aver rate of one (1) test for every 2,000 square feet of fill placement area, but -not less than three (3) tests per lift of fill. segment of corner bar equal to 40 bar diameters. Alternately, provide standard ACI hooks for top and bottom bars at discontinuous ends of all grade beams. 3) The subgrade soils in the areas of planned fill placement which are exposed after stripping of the existing surficial organic materials and weak soils shall be 1 g P g P • Yaggregatew Concrete for the foundations shall be normal weight and reach a minimum compressive strength of 3 500 psi at 28 days, with a maximum size of proof rolled with a light to medium weight vehicle. All soils failing the -rolling test be �-+ 10) All construction joints not indicated on the plans shall be approved in advance by the structural engineer. proof shall excavated and replaced with compacted select fill soils as one inch. t subsequently defined. W H The abutments excavations shall be checked to ensure that all loose materials have been removed from the excavations prior to placement of concrete'!a. l' H Concrete cast against and permanently exposed to earth - 3” 2) The compressive strength of the concrete shall be verified by making test sets of cylinders during placement. Each test set should consist of four cylinders 4) The subgrade soils passing the proof -rolling test shall then be compacted. The subgrade soils shall be compacted to between 95 and 100 percent of the Some of the soils at the site may be somewhat difficult to excavate as part of the construction of the abutments if the upper soils are wet due to antecedent with one set being cast during each placement at a rate of one set for every 50 cubic yards of concrete placed_ At least one set of cylinders should be cast maximum density determined in the Standard Proctor compaction test (ASTM D 698) at moisture contents in the range of the optimum moisture content during each day. The first cylinder of the set should be tested for compressive strength at 7 days following two be b. Concrete exposed to backfilled earth and weather: O � P slough or slide into excavations until more stable side slopes are formed at shallower angles than vertical. Any such fall -in should be removed from the i placement placement and cylinders should (OMC) OMC to 4 above the OMC inclusive. Compaction the be b in-place The U excavation. The Contractor should take whatever actions are necessary, including the use of wooden forms, to maintain the stability of the abutment i ' i. #6 bars and larger - 2" percent characteristics of subgrade soils shall verified moisture -density tests. P P g Y -p y tested at 28 days following placement. The fourth cylinder should be held in reserve pending the evaluation of the compression test results for the other tests be O U U shall performed.at.an average rate of one test for every 2,000. square feet of planned fill area, with a minimum of three (3) tests being performed three cylinders and may be either tested or discarded upon the completion of the evaluation. for the subgrade in individual fill areas. immediately after periods of heavy rainfall, there may be problems with temporarily high or perched groundwater. The possible need for storm water' � M n ►-`1 44 0 PROJ. NO.: 13049-250 DRAWN BY: AEA DATE: 06/27/13 SCALE: AS SHOWN APPR: MFC DRAWING: S-1 3) Mixing, transporting, and placing of concrete shall conform to ACI 301. 5) Any fill soils required to adjust the grades in the area of the planned bridge shall consist of soils that are defined as clayey sands or very sandy, lean clays that classify as SC OR CL type soils under the Unified Soils Classification System (USCS, ASTM D 2487), and in addition shall have a plasticity index (PI) value 4) Reinforcing bars shall conform to ASTM A615, Grade 60 deformed bars. between 15 and 30, inclusive, with a maximum liquid limit (LL) values of 49. 7) Sods containing an excessive amount of silt i.e., greater than approximately 20 to 25percent) without a corremonding amount of clays shall not be used as 5 All reinforcing steel shall be fabricated in accordance with the latest issue of the ACi 318 Code. - select fill. Soils classifying as ML, CL -ML, MH, OL, OH, CH, OR SM type soils under the previously referenced USCS shall not be used as select fill. 6) Placement of all reinforcing steel, including laps, bends, and splices, shall conform to CRS1 Standards and the latest issue of the ACI 318 code and the 8) The fill soils shall be placed in lifts with a maximum compacted thickness of 6 inches. requirements of the Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute. Unless otherwise noted, reinforcing steel shall not be tack welded, welded; heated; or cut, unless indicated in the contract documents or approved by the structural engineer. 9) The select fill shall be compacted to densities corresponding at a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum density determined in the Standard Proctor 7) Reinforcing steel designated as continuous„ shall lap a minimum of 40 bar diameters at splices unless noted otherwise. Reinforcing steel splices in grade compaction test, ASTM D 698, at moisture contents in the range of the previously referenced OMC to a maximum of 4 percent above the OMC, inclusive. beams shall be located mid -span of supports for bottom bars and at centerline for top bars. Splices in slab reinforcing shall be staggered: 10) Compaction characteristics of the compacted fill shall be verified by in-place moisture -density tests. The tests shall be performed on each 6 -inch thick lift of 8) Provide top and bottom corner bars at all discontinuous ends of beams. Use corner bars corresponding to largest bar size being lapped with length of each fill at an aver rate of one (1) test for every 2,000 square feet of fill placement area, but -not less than three (3) tests per lift of fill. segment of corner bar equal to 40 bar diameters. Alternately, provide standard ACI hooks for top and bottom bars at discontinuous ends of all grade beams. 10) All construction joints not indicated on the plans shall be approved in advance by the structural engineer. D. ABUTMENT EXCAVATIONS: t 11) Concrete cover for deformed reinforcement: 1) The abutments excavations shall be checked to ensure that all loose materials have been removed from the excavations prior to placement of concrete'!a. Concrete cast against and permanently exposed to earth - 3” 2) Some of the soils at the site may be somewhat difficult to excavate as part of the construction of the abutments if the upper soils are wet due to antecedent precipitation at the time of construction. Low cohesive and granular materials that comprise the sidewalls of vertical cut excavations have a tendency to b. Concrete exposed to backfilled earth and weather: slough or slide into excavations until more stable side slopes are formed at shallower angles than vertical. Any such fall -in should be removed from the i excavation. The Contractor should take whatever actions are necessary, including the use of wooden forms, to maintain the stability of the abutment i ' i. #6 bars and larger - 2" excavations so as to complete placement of reinforcing steel within the planned abutment cross section. In addition, if the excavations occur during or immediately after periods of heavy rainfall, there may be problems with temporarily high or perched groundwater. The possible need for storm water' Vii. #5 bars and smaller -1 %" 0 interceptor ditches, sumps, and sump pumps should be anticipated. 3) Prompt placement of reinforcing steel and concrete into the abutment excavations following completion of digging, cleaning, setting of reinforcing steel, and inspection of the excavation is strongly recommended. Precautions should be taken during placement of the reinforcement and concrete to prevent any loose excavated soil from entering into the excavation. Any clods of earth that slump into the footing excavation during concrete placement should be promptly removed. Under no circumstances should an abutment be excavated that cannot be filled with concrete before the occurrence of a significant rainfall event. Otherwise, the storm water run-off could flood the excavations and result in the creation of a weak saturated soil layer or the collection of eroded soils across the bottoms of the excavations. The presence of a layer of weak, saturated soils or of loose, eroded soils beneath the abutment could increase the magnitudes of abutment movement or even undermine the stability of the abutments and the backfilled soils behind the abutments. �g 4) Verification of the construction process and the dimensional characteristics of the abutments shall be performed by an independent testing laboratory as part of the Contractor's quality assurance program. PROJ. NO.: 13049-250 DRAWN BY: AEA DATE: 06/27/13 SCALE: AS SHOWN APPR: MFC DRAWING: S-1