Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Misc
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASENO.: 14 DATE SUBMITTED: \0 I 15 I I (1:Arril TIME: 1, (_10 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A&M University' STAFF: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal. ❑ New Project Submittal Incomplete Project Submittal-documents needed to complete an application. Case No.: ❑ Existing Project Submittal. Case No.: Project NameNt/O\A�j 1V�7t"', f 6-11R-6+ r� �, Contact Name a Phone Number c�n—'{, ) � 1-L j 11i 5 We are transmitting the following for Planning& Development Services to review and comment(check all that apply). E. Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Non-Residential Architectural Standards ❑ Rezoning Application ] Irrigation Plan ❑ Conditional Use Permit _ Variance Request ❑ Preliminary Plan FrA Development Permit Final Plat ❑ Development Exaction Appeal ❑ Development Plat ❑ FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR ❑ Site Plan _ Grading Plan Q�� �` – ❑ Special District Site Plan Other- Please specify below 1_1 1- ❑ Special District Building/Sign .40 4 / CAA s `���� / / tL ►� Landscape Plan • 1L. . / .ire l■ /.�l�'/ �� Id ODPIS '� ti;?‘ 5416 U6 v`" F- •STRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Waterline Construction Documents ❑ TxDOT Driveway Permit ❑ Sewerline Construction Documents ❑ TxDOT Utility Permit ❑ Street Construction Documents ❑ Drainage Letter or Report ❑ Easement Application ❑ Fire Flow Analysis in Other- Please specify Special Instructions: Carol Cotter To: Katie Burch Subject: RE: plans/permit app Hi Katie, I have forwarded the Electrical Plan to Gilbert for his review. Was curious if the black dots represent light poles? One of them looks like it is to be placed on top of the storm sewer. This should be relocated outside the PUE or as close to easement edge as possible. Landscape Plan does not need to be revised, but trees should be planted as far to the easement edge as possible so as to not interfere with storm sewer. People get upset when mature trees are removed or damaged when utilities have to be worked on. Thanks, Carol From: Katie Burch [mailto:katie@collierconstruction.com] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 11:09 AM To: Gerardo Cuaron Cc: Carol Cotter Subject: plans/permit app Good morning Jerry, I am attaching a copy of our building permit application to this email. If you would not mind forwarding it on to the proper authorities, I would be very appreciative. Darcee Haveman from our office will be over just after lunch to drop off the sets of building plans for Ben, in addition to a printed copy of this application. We will drop off the updated landscape plan, and electrical site plan, in addition to the other copies of the approved civil plans, by Wednesday, as well as the items needed for DRB. Thanks, Katie Burch,AIA COLLIER CONSTRUCTION construction Managers Genera!Contractors Ph (979)836-4477 Fx(979)836-4940 1 ATTACHMENT 1: ELEVATION SQUARE FOOTAGES Total vertical square footage minus openings (for each building façade separately) SOUTH 1809 sq. ft. NORTH 1505 sq. ft. EAST 1906 sq. ft. WEST 1915 sq. ft. Total vertical square footage of each building material (for each façade separately) SOUTH CMU 489 sf Stone 221 sf Hardi-board siding 1099 sf NORTH CMU 0 sf Stone 220 sf Hardi-board siding 1285 sf EAST CMU 0 sf Stone 521 sf Hardi-board siding 1385 sf WEST CMU 0 sf Stone 564 sf Hardi-board Siding 1351 sf Total vertical square footage of each color (for each façade separately) <SAME AS CMU> Fellowship Church: The Next Step Project ATTACHMENT 2: MATERIALS LIST AND RENDERING 1. GALVALUME METAL ROOF 2. SPLIT FACE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT 3. NATURAL QUARRY-CHOPPED STONE 4. GALVALUME GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS, TRIM 5. EXTERIOR PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS 7016 (MINDFUL GRAY) > z ' .,i 7.,„ " ' 3 5 , . , ' ,..1. w, " y ;, , .'47. ,r # sX :: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: �PZt�1 � '91 DATE SUBMITTED: Q (itir I 11 TIME: CITY OF COI LEGE STATION STAFF: J Home of Texns AerM University' PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal. New Project Submittal Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application.� Case No.: Existing Project Submittal. Case No.: p �-I 20 -9 Qat1 Project Name CrW M.e�rAo\Jvs Sec. .J PY1 3 Contact Name Phone Number We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment(check all that apply): ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Non-Residential Architectural Standarcs ❑ Rezoning Application ❑ Irrigation Plan ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Variance Request Preliminary Plan _ Development Permit [ Final Plat _ Development Exaction Appeal Development Plat ❑ FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR ❑ Site Plan ] Grading Plan [ Special District Site Plan _ Other- Please specify below ❑ Special District Building /Sign ❑ Landscape Plan INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment n Waterline Construction Documents ❑ TxDOT Driveway Permit ❑ Sewerline Construction Documents ❑ TxDOT Utility Permit ❑ Street Construction Documents ❑ Drainage Letter or Report ❑ Easement Application ❑ Fire Flow Analysis [► Other- Please specify 6 6re&L-1Special Instructions: 10/10 Print Form www.OldhamGoodwin.com • IGROUP BROKERAGE I DEVELOPMENT I MANAGE/,^E,- Alan Gibbs Planning&Development ServiVes 1101 Texas Avenue College Station,TX 77842 agibbs@cstx.gov April 15, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Re: Creek Meadows-S 2ction 5, Phase 3 Letter of r lit Mr.Gibbs, The attached amendment to the Letter of Credit for remaining infrastructure related to Creek Meadows Section 5, Phase 3 reduces the amount to a total of$3,000.00 which covers vegetation establishment on lots which have not been affected by home builder activity as well as cleanup of silt accumulation in streets and storm sewer systems. Your consideration in this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, / / 2'J. Chris Rhodes Vice President I Construction Management Development Services Oldham Goodwin Development, LLC Esryc;(C Y--A.:r Station ^union 25222 Northwest Freeway,Suite 1"185 1" 2800 SouthBryTexas Texas 77 0S2ite 401 Cypress,Texas 177429 Br68. 000I ! x.979.846.7020 Phone:281.256.2300 i Fox 281.213.2095 Phone:979.268.2000 I Fax: PROSPERITY BANK' 41,41. STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT AMENDMENT Date: February 20, 2015 Letter of Credit Number: 1889 Amendment No: 1 Beneficiary: City of College Station Attention: Director of Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue College Station,Texas 77840 Applicant: Creek Meadows Partners, L.P. 2800 S.Texas Avenue, Suite 401 Bryan,Texas 77802 Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 1889 Issued on February 20, 2015 for the account of Creek Meadows Partners, L.P., in favor of City of College Station, in the amount of USD $238,573.23 is hereby amended as follows: AMOUNT: From: $238,573.23 To: $3,000.00 All other terms and conditions remain unchanged. Please acknowledge acceptance and return the copy of this amendment in the envelope provided. Prosperity Ba By: l/l John . Flynn, Ba ng Center President Acknowledgement: City of College Station hereby accepts this amendment and all changes as described herein. By: "fr "6<- v geS rt-ril 6)-v of riz" (printed name and title) Prepared by: ydiaz 4/15/2015 • • f TH�pIFFEREt2CE tS YOU February 18, 2015 Investigation#: 1407S25187 Mr. Chris Rhodes Oldham Goodwin Group 2800 South Texas Ave, Suite 401 Bryan, TX 77802 Dear Mr. Rhodes: Your request for service to Creek Meadows Section 5 Phase 3 has been investigated. As the developer,you are responsible for paying the Aid in Construction (AIC) to provide the electric facilities and street lighting and for installing the conduits for the underground electric distribution at Creek Meadows Subdivision. Included in this cost is Underground Primary& Secondary Distribution, 8 padmount transformers with secondary pedestals,with(6)30' 100w HPS streetlights. Please note that this AIC amount is based on the line routing we discussed and is subject to change 90 days from the date of this letter. A summary of the charges is listed below. Underground primary $ Overhead primary $ Street lighting $9851.26 TOTAL AIC $9,861.26 In addition,you are responsible for providing and installing the conduit system per BTU's design and specifications. Before your project can be scheduled for construction, I need the following items returned to me: Executed subdivision service contract,AIC invoice and payment with investigation number referenced on the check, easement with notarized signature(s), damage waiver BTU's Information Desk, located at 205 E. 28th Street, is open between the hours of 8AM and 5PM, Monday through Friday. They will be happy to assist you with accepting your AIC payment and any other requested paperwork. Please use your assigned investigation number, 1407S25187, to identify any correspondence you may have with our office. Contact BTU Line Design at(979) 821-5770 to schedule a meeting to review your project design and cost. We appreciate the opportunity to answer any questions you may have and look forward to providing you with competitive reliable electric service. Sincerely, • David ering Senior Line Designer Office: 979-821-5865 Cell: 979-450-3519 Fax: 979-821-5796 Email:dhering@btutilities.com / - ~ - � - _ ____��� ^-` ^ � � } ./ CHARGE TO: MAIL INVOICE AND REMITTANCE TO: ��[. <���� R�0d8S Bryan Texas i1tiliU8S 0dhm[DGoodVVnGroup /#�D�� D8Vd Hering 2800 South Texas Ave, Suite 401 Inv. #: 1407S25187 Bryan, TX 77802 P. 0. Box 1000 Bryan, Texas 77805 _ QUANTITY DESCRIPTION OF ITEM UNIT AMOUNT PRICE Underground primary $ Overhead primary $ Street lighting $9851.26 TOTAL AIC $9,851.26 � 1 � � um \] _~» ' / �� ����-7Uo _ ED FROM ffee,. ...meabm afteers_. ___ _ ... __________ _..______ ADDReeiI _____ _____ � E DoLIARs $ \tB5L,2.Ag_. , ACCOUNT 1 HOW PAID ------ PAIDC--' ` | ° DUE / | ORDER | | «200RF,PIFOYinms,^srw^cL mow —gym MISE MIN t vim AMP a E I CONSTRUCTION SITE NOTICE FOR THE Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Storm Water Program TPDES GENERAL PERMIT TXR150000 The following information is posted in compliance with Part II.D.2. of the TCEQ General Permit Number TXR150000 for discharges of storm water runoff from construction sites. Additional information regarding the TCEQ storm water permit program may be found on the internes at: http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/permitting/water_quality/stormwater/TXR 15_AIR.html l Contact Name and Phone Number: Chris Rhodes (979)260-2800 Creek Meadows-Section 5, Phase Three Project Description: Located southeast of Greens Prairie Trail and north of Royder Road. (Physical address or description of the site's location, estimated start date and projected end Estimated Start Date:8/114 date, or date that disturbed soils will be Estimated End Date:9/1/15 stabilized) RME Consulting Engineers Location of Storm Water Pollution P.O.Box 9253 Prevention Plan : College Station,TX 77842 For Construction Sites Authorized Under Part II.D.2. (Obtaining Authorization to Discharge) the following certification must be completed: I Chris Rhodes (Typed or Printed Name Person Completing This Certification)certify under penalty of law that I have read and understand the eligibility requirements for claiming an authorization under Part II.D.2.of TPDES General Permit TXR150000 and agree to comply with the terms of this permit. A storm water pollution prevention plan has been developed and implemented according to permit requirements. A copy of this signed notice is supplied to the operator of the MS4 if discharges enter an MS4 system. I am aware there are significant penalties for providing false information or for conducting unauthorized discharges,including the possibility of fine and im risonme for knowing violations. Ails i ‘/5//z71 Signature and Title Date .4 Itt , 9 • • • ISI ... • SECTION IX _ APPENDIX D — TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 2 — Proiect Administration Start (Page 2.1) Engineering and Design Professionals Information _ Engineering Firm Name and Address: Jurisdiction 2ME C014.5%3LTC c n1(7 1 N—S City: Bryan O. Q)(' X, College Station CO L-U -k _` l (7k12- s • Date of Submittal: J 121 `'I I Lead Engineer's Name and Contact Info.(phone, e-mail, fax): Other: r 1 A. ►MV)-(CP�, Supporting Engineering/Consulting Firm(s): Other contacts: Developer I Owner/Applicant Information _ Developer I Applicant Name an ddress: Phone and e-mail: cmc �nc�-l<cb-. N , Le. cH-eAS . 4AotoFS e © 4f cau ".%I til . CcvY\ _ Property Owner(s) if not Developer/ Applicant(&address): Phone and e-mail: Project Identification Development Name: 1 jZ-Fi r%-s , 3 F S Is subject property a site project, a single-phase subdivision, or part of a multi-phase subdivision? --T�or1 If multi-phase, subject property is phase -' of S Legal description of subject property(phase) or Project Area: (see Section II, Paragraph B-3a) If subject property(phase) is second or later phase of a project, describe general status of all earlier phases. For most recent earlier phase Include submittal and review dates. 1�L4_4„,,5 55 P2 wt-41c -\ 2 a - ZL--I uFr(Z-b,JC, Cof -c,(Loc.-i coa Conn P l_Frc►oo J , General Location of Project Area,or subject property(phase): C1(ZF-F' 1 \ cou3s I s t o•� In City Limits? Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (acreage): Bryan: acres. Bryan: College Station: College Station: c'7(CM acres. Acreage Outside ETJ: STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 3 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 2— Project Administration Continued (page 2.2) Project Identification (continued) Roadways abutting or within Project Area or Abutting tracts, platted land, or built subject property: developments: A‘(24 e SeCircty , PPri F� 2 C'o-r-zo,�ti sc Ce-r( Lt Named Regulatory Watercourse(s) &Watershed(s): Tributary Basin(s): V&PCArk GSR-r--FL,ta . X2-1✓ l ls>.<4 Plat Information For Project or Subject Property (or Phase) Preliminary Plat File#: Final Plat File#: Date: Name:62..az,{C, 1 V 1P,..."-£%v fS Status and Vol/Pg: If two plats, second name: File#: Status: Date: Zoning Information For Project or Subject Property(or Phase) Zoning Type: f M) Existing or Proposed? Case Code: Case Date Status: Zoning Type: Existing or Proposed? Case Code: Case Date Status: Stormwater Management Planning For Project or Subject Property (or Phase) Planning Conference(s) & Date(s): Participants: Preliminary Report Required? Submittal Date Review Date Review Comments Addressed? Yes No In Writing? When? Compliance With Preliminary Drainage Report. Briefly describe(or attach documentation explaining) any deviation(s)from provisions of Preliminary Drainage Report, if any. STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 4 of 26 APPENDIX. D:TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX _ APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 2— Project Administration Continued (page 2.3) Coordination For Project or Subject Property (or Phase) _ Note: For any Coordination of stormwater matters indicated below, attach documentation describing and substantiating any agreements, understandings, contracts, or approvals. Coordination Dept. Contact: Date: Subject: With Other Departments of 1.3/A Jurisdiction — City (Bryan or College Station) — Coordination With Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts&dates): Non jurisdiction City Needed? z Yes No Coordination with Summarize need(s) &actions taken (include contacts&dates): Brazos County Needed? I/Yes No Coordination with Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts&dates): TxDOT Needed? Yes No '/ Coordination with Summarize need(s) &actions taken (include contacts&dates): TAMUS Needed? Yes No ✓ Permits For Project or Subject Property (or Phase) As to stormwater management, are permits required for the proposed work from any of the entities listed below? If so, summarize status of efforts toward that objective in spaces below. Entity Permitted or Status of Actions (include dates) Approved ? US Army Crops of Engineers No ✓ Yes US Environmental Protection Agency No Yes Texas Commission on M SSP. Environmental Quality ✓ No Yes r' Brazos River Authority No ✓Yes STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 5 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 AIM SECTION IX APPENDIX D — TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 3- Property Characteristics Start (Page 3.1) Nature and Scope of Proposed Work Existing: Land proposed for development currently used, including extent of impervious cover? Site Redevelopment of one platted lot, or two or more adjoining platted lots. Development Building on a single platted lot of undeveloped land. Project Building on two or more platted adjoining lots of undeveloped land. (select all Building on a single lot, or adjoining lots, where proposed plat will not form applicable) a new street(but may include ROW dedication to existing streets). Other(explain): Subdivision Construction of streets and utilities to serve one or more matted lots. Development ,/ Construction of streets and utilities to serve one or more proposed lots on Project lands represented by pending plats. Site proiects: building use(s), approximate floor space, impervious cover ratio. Describe Subdivisions: number of lots by general type of use, linear feet of streets and Nature and drainage easements or ROW. Size of 2J`1 Ls'CS — 5 t "FerrYtAt_y Proposed Project ^'P--125 Lf OF- Loc-k-e.. S--taWT Is any work planned on land that is not platted If yes, explain: or on land for which platting is not pending? - 1-�-LI L 119 No 1/Yes FEMA Floodplains Is any part of subject property abutting a Named Regulatory Watercourse No 4/. Yes (Section II, Paragraph B1) or a tributary thereof? -- Is any part of subject property in floodplain area of a FEMA-regulated watercourse? No Yes Rate Map_ 32SE✓ Encroachment(s) Encroachment purpose(s): Building site(s) Road crossing(s) into Floodplain areas planned? Utility crossing(s) Other(explain): No V Yes If floodplain areas not shown on Rate Maps, has work been done toward amending the FEMA- approved Flood Study to define allowable encroachments in proposed areas? Explain. STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 6 of 26 APPENDIX. D:TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX _ APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 3— Property Characteristics Continued (Page 3.2) Hydrologic Attributes of Subject Property (or Phase) Has an earlier hydrologic analysis been done for larger area including subject property? Yes Reference the study(&date) here, and attach copy if not already in City files. V £ --- - G yvl r.IN:Co,,s , 3 s P2- ( .12.)-ri =fv2/5)tL--1\) Is the stormwater management plan for the property in substantial conformance with the earlier study? Yes IV' No If not, explain how it differs. No If subject property is not part of multi-phase project, describe stormwater management plan for the property in Part 4. If property is part of multi-phase project, provide overview of stormwater management plan for Project Area here. In Part 4 describe how plan for subject property will comply therewith. f O0 k-ri Pit_ r0C-c11-4•rt to•J U34-1- rye_ P2o./c pc2A U PST & L O Pon►O. e Do existing topographic features on subject property store or detain runoff? ✓No Yes Describe them (include approximate size, volume, outfall, model, etc). Any known drainage or flooding problems in areas near subject property? /7-No Yes Identify: Based on location of study property in a watershed, is Type 1 Detention (flood control) needed? (see Table B-1 in Appendix B) ✓ Detention is required. Need must be evaluated. Detention not required. What decision has been reached? By whom? 21(�,v Cc»Su L t C' �.NCTt(' S If the need for How was determination made? Type 1 Detention must be evaluated: I,4C.Cz / E.XD I Yv1,P \lto0S Cc 4- L, STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 7 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D — TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 3— Property Characteristics Continued (Page 3.3) Hydrologic Attributes of Subject Property(or Phase) (continued) Does subject property straddle a Watershed or Basin divide? No ✓ Yes If yes, describe splits below. In Part 4 describe design concept for handling this. Watershed or Basin Larger acreage Lesser acreage VA ..Kt" !x2' ► og •o0 33<1o Above-Project Areas(Section II, Paragraph B3-a) Does Project Area (project or phase) receive runoff from upland areas? No ✓ Yes Size(s)of area(s) in acres: 1) 10 8•c7 2) 3) 4)_ Flow Characteristics(each instance) (overland sheet, shallow concentrated, recognizable concentrated section(s), small creek(non-regulatory), regulatory Watercourse or tributary); ►�S lA?v4._."L. 12)1241,-. Flow determination: Outline hydrologic methods and assumptions: —5 Does storm runoff drain from public easements or ROW onto or across subject property? L✓ No Yes If yes, describe facilities in easement or ROW: Are changes in runoff characteristics subject to change in future? Explain FL)--eY(2 4 V-l.L PrWTS t)P&tY2 -rn. "/A1: 1-"r,ons i\ Pen. -t . Conveyance Pathways(Section II, Paragraph C2) Must runoff from study property drain across loweryroperties before reaching a Regulatory Watercourse or tributary? No ✓ Yes Describe length and characteristics of each conveyance pathway(s). Include ownership of property(ies). �2)s/pftr I Qv CVAN is.1p► 5�I5-tr�N� . STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 8 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX - APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 3— Property Characteristics Continued (Page 3.4) Hydrologic Attributes of Subject Property(or Phase) (continued) Conveyance Pathways (continued) Do drainage If yes, for what part of length? % Created by? plat, or easements instrument. If instrument(s), describe their provisions. exist for any part of pathway(s)? ✓No Yes Where runoff must cross lower properties, describe characteristics of abutting lower property(ies). (Existing watercourses? Easement or Consent squired?) Pathway ✓x(STcnl(r N 0Nr4i� I)24C Areas vaptrs» !- Describe any built or improved drainage facilities existing near the property(culverts, bridges, lined channels, buried conduit, swales, detention ponds, etc). R& - 8 Nearby Drainage Do any of these have hydrologic or hydraulic influence on proposed stormwater Facilities design? No V Yes If yes, explain: STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 9 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Start (Page 4.1) Stormwater Management Concept Discharge(s)from Upland Area(s) If runoff is to be received from upland areas, what design drainage features will be used to accommodate it and insure it is not blocked by future development? Describe for each area, flow section, or discharge point. "..-xlrtr.(C. 1=>RJ4%N S-cvven,S Discharge(s)To Lower Property(ies) (Section II, Paragraph El) Does project include drainage features(existing or future) proposed to become public via platting? (/-No Yes Separate Instrument? No Yes Per Guidelines reference above, how will Establishing Easements(Scenario 1) runoff be clischarged to neighboring v Pre-development Release(Scenario 2) property(ies)? N Combination of the two Scenarios Scenario 1_ If easements are proposed, describe where needed, and provide status of actions on each. (Attached Exhibit# Scenario 2: Provide general description of how release(s)will be managed to pre-development conditions(detention, sheet flow, partially concentrated, etc.). (Attached Exhibit# ft NTcu" Zo P - c 2.9z, krzlz, 1ST( Combination: If combination is proposed, explain how discharge will differ from pre- development conditions at the property line for each area (or point)of release. If Scenario 2, or Combination are to be used, has proposed design been coordinated with owner(s)of receiving property(ies)? No Yes Explain and provide documentation. STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 10 of 26 APPENDIX. D:TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.2) Stormwater Management Concept(continued) Within Proiect Area Of Multi-Phase Project Identify gaining Basins or Watersheds and acres shifting: Will project result in shifting runoff between Basins or _ between What design and mitigation is used to compensate for increased runoff Watersheds? from gaining basin or watershed? /No Yes How will runoff from Project 1. With facility(ies) involving other development projects. Area be mitigated to pre- 2. Establishing features to serve overall Project Area. development conditions? Select any or all of 1, 2, 3. On phase(or site) project basis within Project Area. and/or 3, and explain below. 1. Shared facility(type &location of facility; design drainage area served; relationship to size of Project Area): (Attached Exhibit# 2. For Overall Project Area (type&location of facilities): (Attached Exhibit# ) pin g , l�flt�,—r��.aP _ c c (G. , ��, Purr\ -rrtcfv �rlo2/tc�c� �- VJ 1 t=2 S—f�CL U2F 3. By phase(or site)project: Describe planned mitigation measures for phases(or sites) in subsequent questions of this Part. Are aquatic echosystems proposed? No Yes In which phase(s)or project(s)? a- C • r Are other Best Management Practices for reducing stormwater pollutants proposed? a. No Yes Summarize type of BMP and extent of use: CD N O O Z •° If design of any runoff-handling facilities deviate from provisions of B-CS Technical Specifications, check type facility(ies) and explain in later questions. Detention elements Conduit elements Channel features 22 Swales Ditches Inlets Valley gutters Outfalls Culvert features Bridges Other STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 11 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.3) Stormwater Management Concept(continued) Within Project Area Of Multi-Phase Project(continued) Will Project Area include bridge(s) or culvert(s)? ✓ No Yes Identify type and general size and In which phase(s). If detention/retention serves(will serve)overall Project Area, describe how it relates to subject phase or site project (physical location, conveyance pathway(s), construction sequence): Within Or Serving Subject Property(Phase, or Site) If property part of larger Project Area, is design in substantial conformance with earlier analysis and report for larger area? t/ Yes No, then summarize the difference(s): Identify whether each of the types of drainage features listed below are included, extent of use, and general characteristics. Typical shape? Surfaces? �. 21) a Steepest side slopes: Usual front slopes: Usual back slopes: (0 > a) mac.; Flow line slopes: least Typical distance from travelway: a o typical greatest (Attached Exhibit# z o X Are longitudinal culvert ends in compliance with B-CS Standard Specifications? Yes No, then explain: At intersections or otherwise, do valley gutters cross arterial or collector streets? 3 �. No Yes If yes explain: iL I _ w Are valley gutters proposed to cross any street away from an intersection? mrnzo No Yes Explain: (number of locations?) STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 12 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.4) Stormwater Management Concept(continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site)(continued) Gutter line slopes: Least 0-1201- Usual 0.RO/- Greatest 2-.22'/ Are inlets recessed on arterial and collector streets? Yes No If"no", identify where and why. Will inlets capture 10-year desigD..stormflow to prevent flooding of intersections(arterial with arterial or collector)? V Yes No If no, explain where and why not. -a -o a) Will inlet size and placement prevent exceeding allowable water spread for 10-year m design storm throughout site(or phase)? Yes No If no, explain. rn a' c Saq curves:Are inlets placed at low points? Yes No Are inlets and 3 . con it sized to prevent 100-year stormflow from ponding at greater than 24 inches? Yes No Explain"no" answers. U) a) ) a) Will 100-yr stormflow be containecj.in combination of ROW and buried conduit on whole length of all streets? V Yes No If no, describe where and why. Do deigns for curb, gutter, and inlets comply with B-CS Technical Specifications? V Yes No If not, describe difference(s) and attach justification. Are any 12-inch laterals used? I✓No Yes Identify length(s) and where used. aN Pipe runs between system Typical l o u Longest l o n a) access points(feet): aEi,�I Are junction boxes used at each bend? ✓ Yes No If not, explain where and why. c 1 - Z E _ y Are downstream soffits at or below upstream soffits? Least amount that hydraulic j Yes V No If not, explain where and why: grade line is below gutter line (system-wide): 1, -71 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 13 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 +�rrru..r.r SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.5) Stormwater Management Concept(continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site)(continued) Describe watercourse(s), or system(s) receiving system discharge(s) below U (include design discharge velocity, and angle between converging flow lines). 1) Watercourse(or system),velocity, and angle? 1-6 'c I - — S--t"52mr. "A\ E 2) Watercourse(or system),velocity, and angle? •- c c a cci c — �.4 S�sem✓` ���� a) E 3)Watercourse(or system), velocity, and angle? it O — - E For each outfall above,what measures are taken to prevent erosion or scour of receiving and all facilities at juncture? CD 1) Co L Co 2) Ct. a) 3) Are swale(s) situated along property lines between properties? No Yes Number of instances: For each instance answer the following questions. Surface treatments(including low-flow flumes if any): cs. U) a) U) - -4 } Flow line slopes(minimum and maximum): 0 Z Outfall characteristics for each (velocity, convergent angle, &end treatment). 2 Will 100-year design storm runoff be contained within easement(s)or platted drainage ROW in all instances? Yes No If"no"explain: STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 14 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX _ APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.6) Stormwater Management Concept(continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site)(continued) Are roadside ditches used? No Yes If so, provide the following: a) Is 25-year flow contained with 6 inches of freeboard throughout? Yes No Are top of banks separated from road shoulders 2 feet or more? Yes No Are all ditch sections trapezoidal and at least 1.5 feet deep? Yes No a) — N For any"no"answers provide location(s) and explain: 0 cc If conduit is beneath a swale, provide the following information(each instance). Instance 1 Describe general location, approximate length: >- Is 100-year design flow contained in conduit/swale combination? Yes No If "no" explain: O �cm, Space for 100-year storm flow? ROW Easement Width Z c Swale Surface type, minimum Conduit Type and size, minimum and maximum ( c and maximum slopes: slopes, design storm: vi c 0 Inlets Describe how conduit is loaded (from streets/storm drains, inlets by type): c a3 c s ti c 0 o Access Describe how maintenance access is provided (to swale, into conduit): w is o E 0 = c .g- .0 Instance 2 Describe general location, approximate length: V E c m O � c v Is 100-year design flow contained in conduit/swale combination? Yes No o o If "no" explain: irs c E a0i Space for 100-year storm flow? ROW Easement Width o• c Swale Surface type, minimum Conduit Type and size, minimum and maximum ro and maximum slopes: slopes, design storm: c m o Inlets Describe how conduit is loaded (from streets/storm drains, inlets by type): a) To c 3 � Access Describe how maintenance access is provided (to swale, into conduit): STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 15 of 26 APPENDIX. D:TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D — TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.7) Stormwater Management Concept(continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property(Phase, or Site)(continued) If'yes" provide the following information for each instance: Instance 1 Describe general location, approximate length, surfacing: E x o w w _ Is 100-year design flow contained in swale? Yes No Is swale wholly c j within drainage ROW? Yes No Explain "no"answers: Access Describe how maintenance access is provide: 0 Z 1?(I Instance 2 Describe general location, approximate length, surfacing: a) �. o E a� .3 m Is 100-year design flow contained in swale? Yes No Is swale wholly a �' within drainage ROW? Yes No Explain"no" answers: 0 3 � w Access Describe how maintenance access is provided: .o a Instance 3,4,etc. If swales are used in more than two instances, attach sheet providing all above information for each instance. "_New" channels: Will any area(s) of concentrated flow be channelized (deepened, widened, or straightened) or otherwise altered? No Yes If only slightly shaped, see"Swales" in this Part. If creating side banks, provide information below. a. .c Will design replicate natural channel? Yes No If"no",for each instance o n. describe section shape&area, flow line slope(min. &max.), surfaces, and 100-year E9-, w design flow, and amount of freeboard: 0 Instance 1: c a> E a� o Instance 2: n E o • Z El( Instance 3: ca U STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 16 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DIESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.8 Stormwater Management Concept(continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site)(continued) Existing channels(small creeks): Are these used? No Yes If"yes" provide the information below. Will small creeks and their floodplains remain undisturbed? Yes No How many disturbance instances? Identify each planned location: For each location, describe length and general type of proposed improvement (including floodplain changes): For each location, describe section shape&area, flow line slope(min. &max.), surfaces, and 100-year design flow. v a) C c Watercourses(and tributaries): Aside from fringe changes, are Regulatory Watercourses proposed to be altered? No Yes Explain below. Submit full report describing proposed changes to Regulatory Watercourses. Address existing and proposed section size and shape, surfaces, alignment, flow line changes, > length affected, and capacity, and provide full documentation of analysis procedures 2and data. Is full report submitted? Yes No If"no"explain: 0.E m All Proposed Channel Work: For all proposed channel work, provide information requested in next three boxes. If design is to replicate natural channel, identify location and length here, and describe design in Special Design section of this Part of Report. Will 100-year flow be contained with one foot of freeboard? Yes No If not, identify location and explain: Are ROW/easements sized to contain channel and required maintenance space? Yes No If not, identify location(s) and explain: STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 17 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.9) Stormwater Management Concept(continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property(Phase,or Site)(continued) How many facilities for subject property project? I For each provide info. below. For each dry-type facilitiy: Facility 1 Facility 2 Acres served&design volume+ 10% 1 I 100-yr volume:free flow&plugged !19 (p �,`j(2 Design discharge (10 yr&25 yr) -4.07 `Icnc°t(P Spillway crest at 100-yr WSE? 4/7.yes no _yes no Berms 6 inches above plugged WSE? (- yes no _yes no Explain any"no"answers: U, a) >- x, For each facility what is 25-yr design Q, and design of outlet structure? Facility 1: 3'j2 • ( c-C-S 0 Z Facility 2: Do outlets and spillways discharge into a public facility in easement or ROW? Facility 1: Yes cr No Facility 2: Yes No a If'no"explain: a.0 a. For each, what is velocity of 25-yr design discharge at outlet? &at spillway? ca Facility 1: .`"5-C.) & 's DFe5 Facility 2: & Ti Are energy dissipation measures used? No ✓ Yes Describe type and ca u_ location: ° de_ ��P — e a> a> o For each, is spillway surface treatment other than concrete? Yes or no, and describe: Facility 1: jR0c_Nc.- R,P RA P Facility 2: For each, what measures are taken to prevent erosion or scour at receiving facility? Facility 1: CcD►se-0Tom- rt t--UT 6-,1-141m►SPt... Facility 2: If berms are used give heights, slopes and surface treatments of sides. Facility 1: ,‘,ja l @ s-i F{ : 1\.l F P&---cH., 'S Facility 2: STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 18 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.10) Stormwater Management Concept(continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property(Phase, or Site)(continued) Do structures comply with B-CS Specifications? Yes or no, and explain if"no": U) Facility 1; a> Facility 2: C ---- o C U --. For additional facilities provide all same information on a separate sheet. Are parking areas to be used for detention? No Yes What is maximum depth due to required design storm? Roadside Ditches:Will culverts serve access driveways at roadside ditches? No Yes If"yes", provide information in next two boxes. Will 25-yr. flow pass without flowing over driveway in all cases? Yes No Without causing flowing or standing water on public roadway? Yes No Designs&materials comply with B-CS Technical Specifications? Yes No Explain any"no" answers: U) rn • c _ oAre culverts parallel to public roadway alignment? Yes No Explain: U � a) (d a Creeks at Private Drives: Do private driveways, drives, or streets cross drainage ways that serve Above-Project areas or are in public easements/ ROW? z No Yes If"yes" provide information below. _ NX I How many instances? Describe location and provide information below. Location 1: C) U Location 2: Location 3: For each location enter value for: 1 2 3 Design year passing without toping travelway? Water depth on travelway at 25-year flow? Water depth on travelway at 100-year flow? For more instances describe location and same information on separate sheet. STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 19 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2C12 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.11) Stormwater Management Concept(continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property(Phase, or Site)(continued) Named Regulatory Watercourses(&Tributaries): Are culverts proposed on these facilities? No Yes, then provide full report documenting assumptions, criteria, analysis, computer programs, and study findings that support proposed design(s). Is report provided? Yes No If"no", explain: �, Arterial or Maior Collector Streets: Will culverts serve these types of roadways? No Yes How many instances? For each identify the a, location and provide the information below. m m Instance 1: • Q. Instance 2: o Instance 3: c O _ oo .73 Yes or No for the 100-year design flow: 1 2 3 o Headwater WSE 1 foot below lowest curb top? X •u, Spread of headwater within ROW or easement? E _ Is velocity limited per conditions(Table C-11)? mExplain any"no" answer(s): w o c U .� N U 3 O -a Minor Collector or Local Streets: Will culverts serve these types of streets? ( No Yes How many instances? for each identify the v location and provide the information below: ao T Instance 1: CInstance 2: • m U o Instance 3: aria 0 For each instance enter value, or"yes"/"no"for: 1 2 3 • nDesign yr. headwater WSE 1 ft. below curb top? Q .E) 100-yr. max. depth at street crown 2 feet or less? E Product of velocity(fps) &depth at crown (ft) = ? o Is velocity limited per conditions(Table C-11)? Limit of down stream analysis(feet)? Explain any"no"answers: STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 20 of 26 APPENDIX. D:TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.12) Stormwater Management Concept(continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property(Phase, or Site)(continued) All Proposed Culverts: For all proposed culvert facilities(except driveway/roadside ditch intersects) provide information requested in next eight boxes. Do culverts and travelways intersect at 90 degrees? Yes No If not, identify location(s) and intersect angle(s), and justify the design(s): Does drainage way alignment change within or near limits of culvert and surfaced approaches thereto? No Yes If"yes"identify location(s), describe change(s), and justification: Are flumes or conduit to discharge into culvert barrel(s)? No Yes If yes, identify location(s) and provide justification: Are flumes or conduit to discharge into or near surfaced approaches to culvert ends? No Yes If"yes" identify location(s), describe outfall design treatment(s): 0 U U) a Is scour/erosion protection provided to ensure long term stability of culvert structural (,j components, and surfacing at culvert ends? Yes No If"no" Identify locations and provide justification(s): Will 100-yr flow and spread of backwater be fully contained in street ROW, and/or drainage easements/ROW? Yes No if not, why not? Do appreciable hydraulic effects of any culvert extend downstream or upstream to neighboring land(s) not encompassed in subject property? No Yes If "yes"describe location(s) and mitigation measures: Are all culvert designs and materials in compliance with B-CS Tech. Specifications? Yes No If not, explain in Special Design Section of this Part. STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 21 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX - APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.13) Stormwater Management Concept(continued) _ Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site)(continued) Is a bridge included in plans for subject property project? >( No __Yes If"yes" provide the following information. Name(s) and functional classification of the roadway(s)? What drainage way(s) is to be crossed? U) rn m - A full report supporting all aspects of the proposed bridge(s) (structural, geotechnical, hydrologic, and hydraulic factors) must accompany this summary report. Is the report provided? Yes No If"no" explain: Is a Stormwater Provide a general description of planned techniques: Pollution Prevention 1 -F>z.McA tS c - 12-oc'c. R.‘ 7-9-- t co Plan (SW3P) o established for CprS-c20GT t ►J -P---P-s-Vt2C. project construction?ctt �` bg�_ Sok T CoN� RF No I/ Yes IN Special Designs-Non-Traditional Methods Are any non-traditional methods(aquatic echosystems, wetland-type detention, natural stream replication, BMPs for water quality, etc.) proposed for any aspect of subject property project? X No Yes If"yes" list general type and location below. Provide full report about the proposed special design(s) including rationale for use and expected benefits. Report must substantiate that stormwater management objectives will not be compromised, and that maintenancepost will notexceed those of traditional design solution(s). Is report provided? ✓ Yes No If"no"explain: STORMWATEFt DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 22 of 26 APPENDIX. D:TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.14) Stormwater Management Concept(continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site)(continued) Special Designs—Deviation From B-CS Technical Specifications /•-1/p. If any design(s) or material(s) of traditional runoff-handling facilities deviate from provisions of B-CS Technical Specifications, check type facility(ies) and explain by specific detail element. Detention elements Drain system elements Channel features Culvert features Swales Ditches Inlets Outfalls Valley gutters Bridges(explain in bridge report) In table below briefly identify specific element,justification for deviation(s). Specific Detail Element Justification for Deviation (attach additional sheets if needed) 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Have elements been coordinated with the City Engineer or her/his designee? For each item above provide"yes"or"no", action date, and staff name: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Design Parameters Hydrology / _ Is a map(s) showing all Design Drainage Areas provided? V Yes No Briefly summarize the range of applications made of the Rational Formula: What is the size and location of largest Design Drainage Area to which the Rational Formula has been applied? ^'2 acres Location (or identifier): STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 23 of 26 APPENDIX. D:TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.15) Design Parameters (continued) Hydrology(continued) In making deterrOnations for time of concentration, was segment analysis used? No V Yes In approximately what percent of Design Drainage Areas? ) % As to intensity-duration-frequency and rain depth criteria for deterpining runoff flows, were any criteria other than those provided in these Guidelines used? V No Yes If"yes" identify type of data, source(s), and where applied: For each of the stormwater management features listed below identify the storm return frequencies(year)analyzed(or checked), and that used as the basis for design. Feature Analysis Year(s) Design Year Storm drain system for arterial and collector streets Storm drain system for local streets ) 0 Open channels Swale/buried conduit combination in lieu of channel Swales Roadside ditches and culverts serving them Detention facilities: spillway crest and its outfall Detention facilities: outlet and conveyance structure(s) Detention facilities: volume when outlet plugged p o I o Culverts serving private drives or streets Culverts serving public roadways Bridges: provide in bridge report. Hydraulics What is the range of design flow velocities as outlined below? Design flow velocities; Gutters Conduit Culverts Swales Channels Highest(feet per second) S.e y )0,-73 Lowest(feet per second) -91 I.-7 5 Streets arid Storm Drain Systems Provide the summary information outlined below: Roughness coefficients used: For street gutters: 0 •C l e For conduit type(s) i\-9S Coefficients:D 0113 01'012 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 24 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.16) Design Parameters(continued) Hydraulics(continued) Street and Storm Drain Systems (continued) For the following, are assumptions other than allowable per Guidelines? Inlet coefficients? V No Yes Head and friction losses 1"No Yes Explain any"yes" answer: In conduit is velocity generally increased in the downstream direction? (/ Yes No Are elevation drops provided at inlets, manholes, and junction boxes? i/Yes No Explain any"no" answers: Are hydraulic grade lines calculated and shown for design storm? ✓ Yes No For 100-year flow conditions? c.%es No Explain any"no"answers: What tailwater conditions were assumed at outfall point(s)of the storm drain system? Identify each location and explain: Po NVQ Open Channels If a HEC analysis is utilized, does it follow Sec V1.F.5.a? Yes No Outside of straight sections, is flow regime within limits of sub-critical flow? Yes No If"no"list locations and explain: Culverts If plan sheets do not provide the following for each culvert, describe it here.'-/Pr For each design discharge, will operation be outlet(barrel) control or inlet control? Entrance, friction and exit losses: .fll '„rS <.. �. Bridges!provic)e allin bridge reportiot N/iNc ? �ry STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 25 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH, DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4— Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.17) Design Parameters(continued) _ Computer Software What computer software has been used in the analysis and assessment of stormwater management needs and/or the development of facility designs proposed for subject property project? List them below, being sure to identify the software name and version,the date of the version, any applicable patches and the publisher kNi 1 KSS-cc Q -y \ Part 5— Plans and Specifications Requirements for submittal of construction drawings and specifications do not differ due to use of a Technical Design Summary Report. See Section III, Paragraph C3. Part 6— Conclusions and Attestation Conclusions Add any concluding information here: Attestation Provide attestation to the accuracy and completeness of the foregoing 6 Parts of this Technical Design Summary Drainage Report by signing and sealing below. "This report(plan) for the drainage design of the development named in Part B was prepared by me (or under my supervision) in accordance with provisions of the Bryan/College Station Unified Drainage Design Guidelines for the owners of the property. All licenses and permits required by any and all state and federal regulatory agencies for the proposed drainage improvements have been issued or fall under applicable general permits." (Affix Seal) grow%o T %, "gAre=c).1 . „BA, • • Licensed Professional Engineer j t' •i� •:• State of Texas PE No. ge)s� � -3• ��83 • f STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 26 of 26 APPENDIX. D:TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised August 2012 FOR OFFICE S-•ONV- CASE NO.: '(CCS' DATE SUBM TEl _ IAL = TIME: , CITY OF COIj.E,GF:STATION STAFF: Hone of Texas Ad Al University" PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal. ❑ New Project Submittal ❑ Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application. Case No.: Existing Project Submittal. Case No.: Project Name S SFS -762 / Contact Name//� ---4't-" c M / i i Phone Number (2?-79) 1-0 7 b`L1 We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all than.apply): ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ] Non-Residential Architectural Standards ❑ Rezoning Application ❑ Irrigation Plan ❑ Conditional Use Permit ] Variance Request Preliminary Plan ❑ Development Permit final Plat ❑ Development Exaction Appeal Development Plat ❑ FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR ❑ Site Plan ❑ Grading Plan ❑ Special District Site Plan n Other- Please specify below ] Special District Building /Sign Landscape Plan INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Waterline Construction Documents ❑ TxDOT Driveway Permit ❑ Sewerline Construction Documents ❑ TxDOT Utility Permit ❑ Street Construction Documents n Drainage Letter or Report ❑ Easement Application ❑ Fire Flow Analysis ❑ Other-Please specify Special Instructions: 10/10 Print Form R OFFICEq ONLY CASE NO. I D 4•Krifil441 DATE SUBMITTED: _f� )5' TIME: 1:30 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION STAFF: G-Sr Home of Texas Ad'M University' PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal. I J New Project Submittal Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application. Case No.: Existing Project Submittal. Case No.: Project Name (-to 44e54,3 ID/p51 3 Contact Name �A/'/S /?A '- Phone Number 2C 2 2 ' We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment(check all that apply): Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Non-Residential Architectural Standards Ft Rezoning Application ❑ Irrigation Plan n Master Development Plan ❑ Variance Request Preliminary Plat ❑ Development Permit n Final Plat ❑ Conditional Use Permit n Development Plat ❑ FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR n Site Plan ❑ Grading Plan I 1 Special District Site Plan Other-Please specify below 1 1 Special District Building /Sign ---FOX (er� , £;icj CQ71 Es 1 Landscape Plan INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment n Waterline Construction Documents E TxDOT Driveway Permit ❑ Sewerline Construction Documents 1 TxDOT Utility Permit ❑ Street Construction Documents n Drainage Letter or Report ❑ Easement Application ❑ Fire Flow Analysis ❑ Other-Please specify Special Instructions: 10/10 Prrnt Form 3800 SH No.6 South,Ste.108G<77845> •� P.O.Box 9253,College Station,TX 77842 Off/Fax: (979) 764-0704 t. Csrra' email:civil@rmengineer.com r September 10, 2014 Erika Bridges,E.I.T. Graduate Civil Engineer City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue South College Station, TX 77842 RE: Creek Meadows—Section 5,Phase Three Acknowledgement of City Standards RME No.260-0532 Erika Bridges: The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge that the construction plans for the public infrastructure improvements, for the above referenced project, to the best of my knowledge, do not deviate from the latest B/CS Design Guideline Manual. With the exception of the following items: •• Some segments of sanitary sewer line installed for this phase of construction, do not meet the minimum flow velocity of 2.0 ft/s at peak flow conditions. The design of these lines comply with minimum size, type and slope (per TCEQ requirements), however, the low number of dwelling units discharging to these lines prevent peak flows from reaching a flow velocity of 2.0 ft/s; I also acknowledge, to the best of my knowledge that the details provided in the construction plans are in accordance with the B/CS Standard Details. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, ESE nr Tr �1 S_ qs1� 1:: ION A ETCA . I1 s/oNA� EN ../ 1 Rabon A. Metcalf, P.E. No. 88583 Texas Firm Registration No. F-4695 rabon@rmengineer.com CD1-260-0532-L01.docx Page 1 of 1 41111(511 3800 SH No.6 South,Ste.108G<77845> P.O.Box 9253,College Station,TX 77842 Off/Fax: (979) 764-0704 email:civil@rmengineer.com f � September 10, 2014 Louis Heron III,P.E. Texas Commission of Environmental Quality Plans& Specification Review MC 148 P.O. Box 13087 Austin, TX 78711-3087 RE: Chapter 217 Summary Transmittal Letter Permittee: City of College Station Permit Number: Lick Creek WWTP: WQ0010024-006 Project Name: Creek Meadows(Section 5, Phase Three)—College Station, TX County: Brazos County Grant No.: N/A Mr. Louis Heron: The purpose of this letter is to provide the TCEQ with the information necessary to comply with the requirements of Chapter 217.8(c) of the TCEQ's rules entitled, Design Criteria for Sewerage Systems. The necessary information includes: 1. Engineering Firm: RME Consulting Engineers 3800 SH No. 6 South, Suite 108G<77845> P.O. Box 9253 College Station, TX 77842 2. Design Engineer: Rabon A. Metcalf, P.E. Off/Fax: (979) 764-0704 3. Location: Brazos County, TX 4. Project Identifier: Creek Meadows: Section 5,Phase Three—Paving, Drainage &Utility Improvements 5. Operator: City of College Station CD1-260-0532-L03.docx Page 1 of 2 3800 SH No.6 South,Ste.108G<77845> P.O.Box 9253,College Station,TX 77842 .11140kagi Off/Fax: (979) 764-0704 email:civil@rmengineer.com f 11 6. Collection System: City of College Station—Public Utilities Department 7. Plan & Specification Compliance: Design and construction of these improvements are in accordance with the Bryan/College Station Unified Water & Sewer Specifications, Design Guidelines Manual, and Chapter 217 of the TCEQ Rules & Regulations. This sanitary sewer improvement project will be constructed with the City of College Station performing a technical review. The plans and specifications which describe the project identified in this letter are in substantial compliance with all the requirements of Chapter 217. 8. Variances: Some segments of sanitary sewer line installed for this phase of construction, do not meet the minimum flow velocity of 2.0 ft/s at peak flow conditions. The design of these lines comply with minimum size, type and slope, however, the low number of dwelling units discharging to these lines prevent peak flows from reaching a flow velocity of 2.0 ft/s; 9. Project Scope: The above referenced project will install the following sanitary sewer improvements within the CCN of the City of College Station(CoCS): ❖ Approximately 1,685 linear feet of gravity sewer: o 8"& 6"PVC (SDR 26,D3034); ❖ Applicable manholes, cleanouts, and service leads; If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact Mr. Rabon A. Metcalf, P.E. (Off/Fax: 979.764.0704 or rabon@rmengineer.com). Sincerely, ,.f P-`� .cr T6 v-�'1 s i * \I • *I�' —_�� _ .�:... N .. 88583 1411 `r•j Rabon A. Metcalf,P.E.No. 885: Its,s'S/ONAL E��-�`r Texas Firm Registration No.F-4695 •��������� rabon@rmengineer.com 4 101(i xc: Erika Bridges,E.I.T. Graduate Civil Engineer City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue South College Station,TX 77840 CD1-260-0532-L03.docx Page 2 of 2 3800 SH No.6 South,Ste.108G<77845> P.O.Box 9253,College Station,TX 77842 1416591; _ Off/Fax: (979) 764-0704 inesssatlittirat Digi s -, email:civil@rmengineer.com I w September 10, 2014 David Loflin Texas Commission of Environmental Quality Water Supply Division MC 153 P.O. Box 13087 Austin,TX 78711 RE: Creek Meadows(Section 5,Phase Three)—College Station,TX TCEQ Exception Letter for Utility Improvements RME No.260-0532 Mr. David Loflin: The above referenced project will install the following improvements within the distribution system of the Wellborn S.U.D.: ❖ The following footages of water line: o 1,197 L.F. of 8"PVC (C900,DR14); o 534 L.F. of 6"PVC (C900,DR 14); ❖ Applicable fire hydrants, services,valves& fittings. Design and construction of these improvements will be in accordance with the latest Bryan/College Station Unified Water & Sewer Design Guideline Manual, Standard Details, and Specifications and Chapter 290 of the TCEQ Rules & Regulations. This quantity of water line is less than 10% of the total length of water line within the City's current distribution system. Therefore, an exception for plan review is being requested for this project and its water system improvements. Please call should you have any questions or require assistance. Sincerely, ..,....;,\v_ of rE >>tttt - 'NO' ••••ic Rabon A. Metcalf,P.E. i* 00� „, Texas Firm Registration No. F-469. 7' - .yl" ` rabon@rmengineer.com �1 88583 4 i ,•j 4 ... ICE NS �•'� xc: Erika Bridges,E.I.T. 1� FS ......•Vic` —' Graduate Civil Engineer h. ONAl City of College Station (o I(�/ 1101 Texas Avenue South College Station,TX 77840 CD I-260-0532-L02.docx Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC ITER SYSTEM PLAN REVIEW SUBI TAL FORM (Complete and Attach to Submittal Package) Date: September 10, 2014 TCEQ PWS Identification No.*: 0210016 CCN No. or Application No.**:11340 Water System Name: Wellborn S.U.D. Water System Owner: Wellborn S.U.D. Type of Entity: S.U.D. Address: P.O. Box 250,Wellborn,TX 77881 Phone: (979) 690-9799 Responsible Official: Steven Cast Title: Manager County (system location) : Brazos County Subdivision Sec., Phase, Unit, etc. Creek Meadows—Section 5. Ph 3 Mechanism &Source of Financing: Private Engineer: Rabon A. Metcalf, P.E. Registration Number: 88583 Firm Name: RME Consulting Engineers Phone: (979) 764-0704 Firm Address: P.O. Box 9253, College Station,TX 77842 Fax: (979)764-0704 * If no PWS Number exists,the owner must submit a business plan,if required, in accordance with§290.39(f)and(g). **If a required CCN number does not exist,an acceptable application to obtain a CCN number must be made before a project submittal can be technically reviewed. In addition,if a submittal is for a project located outside the CCN area,a CCN amendment application must be submitted before a project may be reviewed for construction approval. Please refer to 30 TAC Chapter 291 for additional information regarding CCNs. If this is a new(proposed) system, you must attach the following with this submittal: NOT APPLICABLE ❑ Attach a list of all water utilities within 1/2 mile of the proposed service area boundaries ❑ Copies of formal applications for service from each of the following ❑ any municipality if the system is within its ETJ; ❑ any district or other political subdivision whose corporate boundaries are within 1/2 mile of the proposed service area boundaries ❑ any other water service provider whose certificated service area boundary is within 1/2 mile of the proposed service area boundaries ❑ Documentation that all application requirements including payment of fees were complied with. ❑ Copies of written responses from each of the entities listed above. ❑ Business plan, if required by 30 TAC 290.39(f) & (g). The business plan financial requirements for non-community water systems must confirm capital availability to construct the system according to TCEQ requirements. This would consist of a balance sheet that shows liabilities as well as assets, not just a bank confirmation of a deposit account. Alternatively, if the project is being constructed with loan funds, then a loan commitment letter from the lender specific to that project will suffice. ❑ Justification for constructing a separate system (unless none of the entities listed above exist) ❑ Plans and specifications with an engineering report all sealed by design engineer. Type of Project(please check the appropriate boxes): ✓ Distribution System Modifications 0 Storage Capacity Modifications ❑ Well completion data on previously approved well 0 Water Well Construction, Proposed ❑ Pressure Maintenance Facilities Modifications 0 Proposed Innovative Process Study ❑ Disinfection Facilities or Other Modifications 0 Ground Water Treatment Plant, New ❑ Preliminary Engineering Report w/o plans 0 Surface Water Treatment Plant, New ❑ Modification of Surface Water Treatment Plant 0 Tex. Water Dev. Board Proj. No._ 0 Other(PleaseExplain) IF THIS SUBMITTAL IS A REVISION OF PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED PLANS, PLEASE ENTER THE ASSIGNED TCEQ LOG NUMBER: . Please call (512) 239-6960 if you have questions regarding this form. Your cooperation will help us provide better service. Additional helpful information and rules are available at our website: http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/permitting/waterperm/ud/planrev.html I hereby certify that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge, true and correct,. -\-c of Tfk st�l) • i r / Rabon A. Metcalf, P.E. September 10 2014 / "�'`' "`-_ '.'� . i Printed Engineer's Name Date 88583 • �r t '--•••�ENS;��� bt0 (`L Revised 9/12/02 �,ll;\NAL`.� C:\USERS\RABON METCALF\RME\PROJECTS\260-0532 OGG-CREEK MEADOWS-S5P3\ENGINEERING\TCEU FORM 10233- FOR OFFICEUSE'NLx CASENO.: ��11 uG �f DATE SUBMITTED: 0q I j VI N I TIME: 0.00 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION STAFF: Home of Texas A6'14University" PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal. ❑ New Project Submittal ❑ Incomplete Project Submittal-documents needed to complete an application. Case No.: 2/. Existing Project Submittal. Case No.: _ C�L- Project Name CXea- meadot/us 5 G 5 F+ 3 Contact Name Phone Number We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment(check all that apply). ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Non-Residential Architectural Standards Rezoning Application ❑ Irrigation Plan ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Variance Request 0 Preliminary Plan U Development Permit 0 Final Plat I Development Exaction Appeal ❑ Development Plat ❑ FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR ❑ Site Plan ❑ Grading Plan Special District Site Plan ❑ Other- Please specify below ❑ Special District Building/Sign ❑ Landscape Plan INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: — Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Waterline Construction Documents ❑ TxDOT Driveway Permit ❑ Sewerline Construction Documents ❑ TxDOT Utility Permit ❑ Street Construction Documents ❑ Easement Application Drainage Letter or Report ❑ Fire Flow Analysis H Other- Please specify Special Instructions: - 10/10 yolk o PROSPERITY BANK` FROM: Creek Meadows Partners,L.P. ISSUER: Prosperity Bank 1298 Arrington Rd, College Station,TX 77845 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT DATE: February 20,2015 TO BENEFICIARY: City of College Station Attention: Director of Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue College Station,Texas 77840 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO.: 1889 ISSUE DATE: 12:00 Noon Central Standard Time,February 20,2015 EXPIRATION DATE: 12:00 Noon Central Standard Time, February 20, 2016, or upon the completion and final payment to all contractors,whichever occurs first. LOCATION OF PROJECT: Creek Meadows Subdivision,College Station,TX AMOUNT: TWO HUNDRED THIRTY-EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY-THREE AND 23/100 DOLLARS($238,573.23) ACCOUNT OF: Creek Meadows Partners,L.P.,(herein"DEVELOPER") 2800 S.Texas Avenue,Ste 401 Bryan,TX 77802 GENERAL TERMS&CONDITIONS: The Issuing Bank set out above hereby issues its IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 1889 in favor of the CITY OF COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS,in accordance with CHAPTER 5,V.T.C.A.TEXAS BUSINESS AND COMMERCE CODE as varied by and pursuant to the CITY OF COLLEGE STATION UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE for the Account of DEVELOPER for an aggregate amount of up to TWO HUNDRED THIRTY-EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY-THREE AND 23/100 DOLLARS($238,573.23). This amount is available by your draft(s)payable at sight when accompanied by the following: 1. Sworn Statement by a duly authorized representative of the City of College Station,Texas,stating that Developer(s)has/have defaulted and failed to complete the performance and construction of the improvements described below in accordance with the UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE of the CITY OF COLLEGE STATION,Texas,and that the proceeds from this Letter of Credit will either be utilized by the City of College Station,Texas,to complete such construction or will be returned by the City of College Station to the Issuing Bank: Creek Meadows Subdivision Section 5,Phase 3,Paving,Drainage and Utility Improvements. Prepared by: ydiaz 2/20/15 SPECIAL TERMS&CONDITIONS: 1. All banking fees/expenses/charges incurred are for the account of Developer. The City of College Station is not responsible for any charges in connection with a drawing under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit is issued in conjunction with the development of Developer in the City of College Station,Texas,specifically for the following: To guarantee the payment and performance of the proposed construction improvements in Creek Meadows Subdivision Section 5, Phase 3, a proposed subdivision in the City of College Station,Texas, for a period not to exceed one (1)year from the date hereof. 2. Disbursements pursuant to this Letter of Credit will never exceed the above-stated amount,less any amount released by the City of College Station,Texas. The amount of credit under this Letter of Credit may be reduced upon approval and acceptance by the City of College Station of completed improvements,which reduction may only be made with the written authorization of the Director of Planning and Development Services of the City of College Station. 3. In accordance with SECTION 5.106 of the TEXAS BUSINESS AND COMMERCE CODE, this Letter of Credit may be modified, upon the execution and delivery to Issuer of a sworn statement giving consent to modification by the Director of Planning and Development Services of the City of College Station. 4. The Issuer of this Letter of Credit has caused this Letter to be signed by the undersigned officer who has attached proof of his authorization to sign, together with attestation by Issuer's authorized attesting officer and sealed with the seal of Issuer. ISSUER: Pros.er;, Bank BY: L ed/ John , .Flyn. Yanking Center President Attested By: Aft STATE OF TEXAS * COUNTY OF BRAZOS * This instrument was acknowledged before me on February 20,2015,by John A.Flynn, III,Banking Center President,the authorized officer of Prosperity Bank,Issuer, a Texas Banking Corporation,on behalf of said Banking Corporation and in the capacity stated. ,; �;,���•. � � Notary Pylic—State Texas My Commission Expires MORGAN TAYLOR MCCALL Notary•Public, State of Texas ; ; NOVEMBER 10, 2018 Prepared by: ydiaz 2/20/15 ��M www.OldhamGoodwin.com r GROUP BROKERAGE j DEVELOPMENT I MANAGEMENT Alan Gibbs Planning&Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue College Station,TX 77842 agibbs@cstx.gov February 20, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Re:Creek Meadows-Section 5,Phase 3 Letter of Credit Mr. Gibbs, The attached Letterof Credit for remaining infrastructure related to Creek Meadows Section 5, Phase 3 in the amount of$238,573.23 including contingency covers the following items: $213,884.75 for remaining Curb,Compacted Limestone Base, HMACand Sidewalks $3,000.00 forvegetation establishment. Your consideration in this matter isgreatly appreciated. Sincerely, Chris Rhodes Vice President Construction Management Development Services Oldham Goodwin Development, LLC Bryan/College Station Houston 2800 South Texas Avenue,Suite 401 25222 Northwest Freeway,Suite 1-185 Bryan,Texas 177802 Cypress,Texas 177429 Phone:979.268.2000 I Fax:979.846.7020 Phone:281 256.2300 I Fax 281.213.2095