The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutStaff Review C *ks . * '41144 CITY OF COLLEGE GE STATION Home of Texas A&M University' MEMORANDUM DATE: December 31, 2014 TO: Rusty Richards, via; duddle s77 • ahoo.com FROM: Mark Bombek, Staff Planner SUBJECT: ROUGH DRAUGHT (NG) lowing Staff reviewed the above-mentioned Northgate Build that ingneed to be addreview as uested. The essed. Pleasereview page is a list of staff review comments detailing items the following at your convenience. Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the e applicant has not provided written responsecomments comments contained hrevised dereun.efts to there are Administrator that seek to address the staff reviewons, please er attach a leave omments that you are. If outhavveranying with questionshe revised or need additional information, please call me explaining the details y at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments PC: Letty Benning, via; bennin• • suddenlink.net Phillip Thomas, via; not thomas • hotmail.com P&DS Project No. 14-00900233 Planning er Development Services P.O.BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE •COLLEGE STAFION •TEXAS •77842 TEL.979.764.3570 •FAX. 979.764.3496 cstx.gov/devservices STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 4 Rough Draught (NG) — Northgate Building Review 14-00900233 PLANNING 1. The tables for both façades located at the bottom of the drawing are still indicating percentage calculations for all materials between 0 and 8 feet. Transparency is the only material that is calculated between 0 and 8 feet. All other material percentages listed should be calculated using the entire façade area. An example of the table needed is as follows: Stucco (amount in square feet) = % of total façade Brick (amount in square feet) = % of total façade Transparency (amount in square feet) = % of facade between 0 and 8 feet Total facade (amount in square feet) = 100% Please change the tables for both façades to reflect the above table. 2. As discussed on the phone, the front façade facing Church Street is meeting the requirement to apply for an administrative adjustment of 7.43% which is 16.31 square feet less than the required 219.62 square feet. 3. The Second Street façade, with° the additional brick, is also still deficient. façade is currently meeting 20% of the required 25% masonry. This percent deficit equates to 14.55 square feet of brick missing. In order to meet the maximum request for an administrative adjustment, being 10% of the required 25%, an additional 7.275 square feet of brick needs to be added to the building. This will leave you with an administrative adjustmenttherequest r addition and the includeull de Othe which is also 7.275 square feet. Please make adjustment in your application with the main façade. Reviewed by: Mark Bombek Date: 12-29-2014 0 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 4-ff" College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 CITY OF COII.F;GI.STATION Hone ofTexas AdM university MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 2014 TO: Rusty Richards FROM: Mark Bombek, Staff Planner SUBJECT: Rough Draught(Ng) NRA Review Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site do be addressed. Please addres planowing tge is a he commient and t of staff review comments detailing items that nee submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) revised set of elevation drawings Color Samples Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments containedons, herein. in.atIf therch a e sed tter omments that youaare, If ouothavveranylggwith uestionshe or need additional information, please call me explaining the details. y at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments pc: Case file #14-00900233 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Rough Draught (Ng) — NRA Review 14-00900233 PLANNING 1. As noted in the Unified Devepmentexrdinance in Section 5.8cept those within fifteen es(g5)DfeetDistricts of for Exterior Building Materials. All facades, ) another building that screens the faradeo�sn allnmaterials. Parking garages ist of a minimum of twenty-five (ase percent of on (1) or more of the following building excluded from this requirement. All other materials except as authorized herein or by the Design Review Board, are prohibited. a. Fired brick; b. Natural stone; c. Marble; d. Granite; e. Tile; and/or f. Any Concrete product so long as it is an integrated color and is textured or patterned (not aggregate material or split-face CMU) to look like brick, stone marble, granite, tile, or a mater fabricated to simulate brick, stone, marble, granite, or tile. Please modify the amount of brick material on the building to reflect this requirement. FYI... some of the calculations of the percentages within the materials tables are off. Please review those calculations and change as needed. The ones that I noted were the Side elevation brick percentage and stucco percentage. The brick percentage states it as 19%, but when calculated as a percentage of the total façade it comes out as 7.6%. The stucco says it is 55% when it computes to 66%. 2. Reviewed by: Mark Bombek Date: 10-04-2014 (kr CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas Ad M University' MEMORANDUM DATE: September 12, 2014 TO: Rusty Richards, via; duddle s77 • ahoo.com FROM: Mark Bombek, Staff Planner SUBJECT: ROUGH DRAUGHT (NG) Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to raddressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff ew: One (1) revised set of elevation drawings Color Samples te is Please note that this application will expire I response 90 commentsom and the revased fdohcumentsmemo, to the if the applicant has not provided written p Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments containedons, plehe herein.atIf theree explainingetter are comments that you not tveanyquestions or need additional information, please call me addressing with the details. If youhave at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments PC: Case file #14-00900233 Planning&Development Services P.O.BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE •COLLEGE STATION •TEXAS •77842 TEL.979.764.3570 •FAX. 979.764.3496 STAFF REVIEW COM NRA S NO. Rough Draught (Ng) — w 14-00900233 PLANNING 1. . Please add to the title block on all pages; the address of the property, and e licant. name, address, and phone number of the app 2. On sheets A-2.1 and A-2.2 showing the elevation plans of the building please provide a table showing the building materials percentage calculations for those material colors. materials, and proposed Date: 09-12-2014 Reviewed by: Mark Bombek .ftwo- CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A&M University MEMORANDUM DATE: September 5, 2014 TO: Rusty Richards, via; duddleys77@yahoo.com ✓ FROM: Mark Bombeck, Staff Planner SUBJECT: ROUGH DRAUGHT (NG) Thank you for the submittal of your Northgate Building Review application. I have been assigned to review this project and it is anticipated that the review will be completed and any staff comments returned to you on or before Friday, September 12, 2014. If you have questions in the meantime, please feel free to contact me. PC: Letty Benning, via; benning@suddenlink.net ✓ Phillip Thomas, via; rptthomas@hotmail.com P&DS Project No. 14-00900233 Planning er Development Services P.O.BOX 9960 • 1101'1TXAS AVENUE •COLLEGE STATION •TEXAS •77842 ...... ...... .... ,�-.n r•U' nen -ycx ,snr