HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc y_.e,k\-V) 9y - D08 -7
Jessica Bullock
From: Keith Sewell <keithsewell@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 3:31 PM
To: Jessica Bullock
Subject: Fwd: 105 Richards
Qanno3r ,-eanr`e kk
Jessica, here is what I had sent to Jennifer-just FYI , Jam} drOP;- op c=0-Peri-Pc "
Thanks,
eri-Pc .-
Thanks, aty J ' rok-- reed
Keith Cr{-Irp-k t f- ca,n be decreosect
Forwarded message
From: Keith Sewell <keithsewell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: 105 Richards
To: Jennifer Prochazka<jprochazka@cstx.gov>
Jennifer,
We actually discovered the remaining area needed to get the 4th lot over 5000 ft could be taken from the other
3. See rough sketch attached. This will still leave the first 3 lots with at least 50x100 dimensions and will
bump the 4th up enough to have over 5000 ft without counting the area in the private drainage easement. I will
have the surveyor modify and resubmit.
N 41°38'19"E N 41'38'19"E N 41°38'19"E N 41'38'19"'E
Ii 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' ( 58.44'
I
a.
EN
4 i i , ,s1
LOT 3A % LOT 38 ,.:i..-..,.71,%\,-" LOT 4:
t�:LOCK ES 1 3 1 BLOCK 1 " ' --1
`v ' 74 1 0.1'•7 ACRES a. 0 1. 7 ACi2 V 0 1:LOCAft r
N �30. SO FT 5430_ 's F 1 a ' 5434 51 SO P,, Alim 4350.'jAtj
111111 z co
co
0 !FT
r 9,
'S lammo /s,.
50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 58.44'
S 41.3819"W S 41°3819"W I S 41°3819"W - S 41°38'19"W
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Keith Sewell <keithsewell@gmail.com>wrote:
Okay, thanks Jennifer. Yes, it is a private easement. We will look into reducing the width.
1
4 t
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Jennifer Prochazka<Prochazka@cstx.gov> wrote:
Good morning!
Thanks for sending that over. I've looked further into this and the requirement actually comes from the Subdivision
Regulations—Section 12.8.3.l.1.c that is specific to drainage easements. The section requires that the lot meet the
minimum lot area (not buildable area)outside of the drainage easement. Staff cannot waive this requirement. Doing
a couple of very rough calculations, it seems that if the easement is reduced to 10',the lot may be able to meet the
minimum 5,000 sf outside of the easement. Is it possible to reduce this easement width? Is it a private drainage
easement?
Jennifer Prochazka,AICP
Principal Planner
Planning& Development Services
City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station,TX 77842.
Office: 979.764.3570
Fax: 979.764.3496
Email:jprochazka@cstx.gov
Website:www.cstx.gov
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University
From: Keith Sewell [mailto:keithsewell@gmail.com]
Sent:Wednesday,January 21, 2015 4:41 PM
To:Jennifer Prochazka
Cc:Trey
Subject: 105 Richards
Jennifer,
2
• •
Trey asked me to get you some information per yalls conversation regarding 105 Richards.
See attached. These are the comments received on the replat submission. I have also attached a revised site
layout that should meet the standards. The new layout would give 50'to each of the first 3 lots on the west
side, leaving 58+ feet on the last lot with the drainage easement. This will actually give the last lot 2487 sq ft
of buildable area which is even more than the 2423 sq ft of buildable area on the first 3 lots.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks!
Keith
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University ®
3
i'ti . e