Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Review s a)LM a sna p/not•x;s) 96 £' 9L'6L6 'XV:I• OLS£'1=9L'6L6"III z1.43 I 8<L• St X2LL• NOIIVIS 3`.)3'I"Io:)• 3I1N]AV SVX[L IO I I • 0966 Wil'O'd sana.cas ivausdopaaq,sa Ziqurtujd Z 6000600-5 L .ON loeIoad Sa'8d ,� woo'auMoagaanpowga}Jal °e!A `buiAananS/6uuaaul6u3 OUMOJ9 '9 aanl3olN 'uospagoH gar :ad s/uawwoo Mainaa}}eJs :s/uewyoe;jy .OLS£ i79L6L6 le aw Ileo aseald `uollewao4ul leuoilippe paau JO suoilsenb Aue anal noA jI 'geld ayl to 6uilij ayl of aoud pue lenoadde Z'8d aalle paainbaa eq Minn geld lull paslnaa ayl to leui6uo aelAn e ley; aloU aseald zd/nob•xlso'MMM//:dlly •buiraaw Z'8d ayl 4o )jeeM aye AepuoL uo alis qeM buiMollo4 ail le pesseooe eq ueo podaa eels pue epuabe ayl '6uiieew Z'8d eql J04 palnpayos uaaq seq wall anon( aou0 'pied Saa4 aleudoadde eq} pue apew uaaq aney suolslneJ ayl He aouo epua6e aanlnj e uo paoeld eq Aew loafoad anoA '6uilaaw uoissiwwoa 6uluoz 'g 6uiuueld e Jo; palnpayos eq lou Him loafoad anon( pessaappe uaaq lou aney slUawwoo He 4i .uiaaay pauleluoo STUawwoo Mainaa eels ay} ssaappe 01 ){aas leg; aolealslulwpy eq; 01 sluawnoop paslnaa pue sluawwoo esuodsaa uaf!M pepinoad lou seg lueolldde ayl 4I `owaw siyl 4o alep all wail sAep 06 ui aaidxa Him uolleolldde sly; leyl alou aseald 'uoilelg e6alloa to 'l!O allyliM palm AIlewao4 paaaplsuoo eq II!M loafoad anon( `6uilaaw 6uiuoZ 'g 6uiuueld ayl Jo; sluewnoop paainbaa ayl to ldiaoaa uodN .nob.xlsolelliwgnslellblpspcf of Hew-a ao efe){sip uo field pull ayl 4o an; lelibip ay; 4o /Woo 4) . aup `(lenoadde Z'8d aage paainbaa) geld leui4 paslnaa ayl 4o aepAJ (L) eu0 ler' leui4 paslnaa aqua saldoo „L Lx„L L (£L) uee Jiyl °geld leull paslnaa aqua Adoo „g£x„;7Z (L) eup :6uileaw uoissiwwo0 6uluoz 6uiuueld aanlnl e Jo; palnpayos eq of pue Mainaa gels aegpnj Jo; uoilewao4u! 6u!Mollo4 ayl liwgns pue sluewwoo eq; ssaappe aseald 'pessaappe eq of paau ley; swali 6uilielep sluewwoo Mainaa eels 10 lsll e si gibed 6uiMollo; ayl 'palsenbaa se geld leui4 peuoiluew-anoge ail peMeinaa j4ej3 (d1) 61. Hd S3>IV1 NVIaNI :103f'8fS aeuueld gels `Negwog >laen :W01d A woo-weypuFMe)pepgslneal `ein ` {euilaeW smell :01 S1-0Z `L lurid :3Iva wnONVIOw2w 4 ... „�fiu.4aarufl pvpysvx?J fo)UWH I�:OI.IVJ S T)17103 Jo AJID STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: INDIAN LAKES PH 19 (FP) - 15-00900012 PLANNING 1. Repeat- Provide a note to the Final Plat stating that lots 1 and 4 on Catori Cove and lots 5- 10 and 16 along Halona Court should only take access from Catori Cove and Halona Court. 2. Please note that you may be required to submit paid tax certificates if they are not current prior to the filing of your plat. 3. Please be aware that County response to comments are still being reviewed at this time. Any further comments will be sent out as soon as possible. Reviewed by: MARK BOMBEK Date: 03-25-2015 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2 4. Remove the 16' PUE shown on the Final Plat. FYI... The easement needs to be dedicated by separate instrument or blanket easement and filed prior the approval of the construction plans. 5. Please show the volume/page for the existing P.U.E.'s outside the Plat boundary. It currently is shown as just P.U.E. which may be misinterpreted as it being dedicated with this plat. 6. The note regarding requirement of compaction of fill or engineered slab for lots that have greater than 2 feet of fill still needs to be added on the Final Plat. Lot 11 appears to going to have greater than 2 feet of fill, and possibly lot 10, 12, 14-16, and 5. This note is still required even if a building permit is not going to be required through the city of College Station. 7. Please double check your 100-storm year Intensity equation. I'm getting a different value. Are you guys using B/CS's Table C-1 when determining the Intensity? Or is something else being used? Since all the years appear to follow the equation except for the 100-year storm event. 8. Please update exhibit B-1 map. The delineation did not change from the previous report but the area size appears to have been changed. 9. Exhibit C-3 appears to use a different wetted perimeter and areas for manning's equation compared the calculated values. 10. Provide sealed engineer cost estimate, and letter regarding Acknowledging City standards. Reviewed by: Kevin Ferrer Date: March 27, 2015 Home of Texas A&M University 41111111§- ' 114 CITY OF COuJ GE STATION � Home of Texas A&M University' MEMORANDUM DATE: February 11, 2015 TO: Travis Martinek, via; travisclarkewyndham.com FROM: Mark Bombek, Staff Planner SUBJECT: INDIAN LAKES PH 19 (FP) Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review and to be scheduled for a future Planning & Zoning Commission meeting: One (1) 24"x36" copy of the revised final plat; One (1) revised set of construction documents; Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project will be considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If all comments have not been addressed your project will not be scheduled for a Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Your project may be placed on a future agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate fees paid. Once your item has been scheduled for the P&Z meeting, the agenda and staff report can be accessed at the following web site on Monday the week of the P&Z meeting. http://www.cstx.qov/pz Please note that a Mylar original of the revised final plat will be required after P&Z approval and prior to the filing of the plat. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. PC: Jeff Robertson, McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, via; jeffrna mcclurebrowne.com P&DS Project No. 15-00900012 Attachments: Staff Review Comments Planning eb'Development Services P.O.BOX 9960 • 1.101 TEXAS AVENUE•COLLEGE STATION •TEXAS •77842 ')TF) .17O 71;4 15711.FAX 079.76;4 1496 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: Indian Lakes PH 19 (FP) (15-00900012) PLANNING 1. Provide a note to the Final Plat stating that lots 1 and 4 on Catori Cove and lots 5-10 and lot 16 along Halona Court should only take access from Catori Cove and Halona Court. 2. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a completely new review. 3. Please note that you may be required to submit paid tax certificates if they are not current prior to the filing of your plat. Reviewed by: Mark Bombek Date: 02-06-2015 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 1. Show a Private drainage easement on the common area between lots 10 & 11. 2. Add a note stating whose responsibility it is to maintain and stating that fences, grading, and landscape cannot impede the flow of the private drainage easement. 3. Add a note regarding requirement for compaction of fill or engineered slab for affected lots that have greater than 2 feet of fill on final plat and construction documents. Also list the lots that would require this. 4. Show the future 10' PUE along the rear of the PUE of Lot 11-16 totaling 20' PUE. 5. Dedicate the 16 feet PUE easement outside the plat by separate instrument. 6. Please make sure that all lot numbers are labeled on the construction sheets. 7. Move WS4.01 to the common lot boundary. 8. Provide a gate valve at the tee with the fire hydrant on Halona Court. Also please confirm that the gate valve spacing between Catori Cove & Kachina Cove does not exceed 800'. 9. Relocate WA-2 in such a way that the clearance between waterline's center line & the PUE's boundary is at least 6' or provide additional easement. 10.It appears another drainage area (south of Holona Court) needs to be taken into accounted for. 11.Check your Rainfall Intensity's equation for the 100 storm event. 12.Please provide calculations showing that the water surface elevation in the ditches are at least 6 "below the top ditch during a 25-year storm. 13.Culvert #1 requires a freeboard of at least 1' during a 100-year storm event. 14.Does the culvert analysis take into account the flow hindrance of the Rock Rip Rap at the discharge location? 15.Specify the length type, and grade on profile for culvert 1 on C3.1 16. Provide Cost Estimate, and B/CS Standard details. Reviewed by: Kevin Ferrer Date: February 5, 2015 SANITATION 1. Sanitation is ok with this project. Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: January 28, 2015 COUNTY Overall Comments: 1. Access concerns are considerable with the development of these phases. Previous commitments need to be executed so that work by others in completing Mesa Verde extension to SH 6 can commence. Please provide detailed estimate of total number of lots to be developed. 2. Provide all approvals from City of College Station Plat Comments: 3. Provide for Private Drainage Easement across back of Lots 11-6. Construction Plan Comments 4. Page C1.1- Typical Section 1 (re: 75' ROW) - Provide 8" Flex Base; Show Section as 34' Primed Base with 38' Subgrade Crown. Indicate Typical Section- Chaco Canyon Drive. 5. Page C1.1- Typical Section 2 (re: 70' ROW) - Provide 6" Flex Base in Roadway and 8" Flex Base at Cul-de-Sac; Show Section as 30' Primed Base with 34' Subgrade Crown. Indicate Typical Section- Catori Cove and Halona Court. 6. Page C1.1- Typical Section 3 (re: 100' ROW) — Provide 8" Flex Base; Show Section as 30' Primed Base with 34' Subgrade Crown. Add 6' Earthen Shoulder, then 8' Front Slope and 19' Back Slope. Indicate Typical Section-Mesa Verde Drive. 7. Page C1.1- Modify Typical Shoulder Detail to be reflective of previous 3 comments. 8. Page C1.2- Correct spelling of"Hay Bail" to "Hay Bale". 9. Page C2.1- Show existing 6" Water Line and Rock Riprap near Kochina Cove (from Phase 16). 10.Page C2.1- Indicate Ditch Slope from Sta. 10+100 to Sta. 10+35/ Indicate Limits of Rock Riprap 11.Page C2.1- C/L elevation at Sta. 10+100 and Profile Grade of Mesa Verde Drive do not match plans provided from Phase 16- Please verify that grades match and that profile grade matches field conditions... 12.Provide Construction Details. Drainage Report Comments: 13.Page 7- There are flows from Phase 19 (depicted in Drainage Area 1) which flow off property. Please analyze Post-Development Flows against Pre-Development Flows for potential effect to adjacent property owner(s). 14.Exhibit B- Drainage Area 1 is incorrectly sized (should be larger). 15.Page 20- Culverts in this phase do serve arterial or Major Collector Streets. Mesa Verde and Chaco Canyon are both functionally classified as such. 16.Page 26- Conclusion should clarify any effects to downstream properties along Deer Park (from Drainage Area 1). Reviewed by: Alan Munger Date: 02-09-2015 (irk CITY OF COLLEGE STATION �,.. Home of Texas A&M University" "$Y C)P MEMORANDUM DATE: January 26, 2015 TO: Travis Martinek, via; travis(a)clarkewyndham.com FROM: Mark Bombek, Staff Planner SUBJECT: INDIAN LAKES PH 19 (FP) Thank you for the submittal of the required documents for your Final Plat - Residential application. Kevin Ferrer, Graduate Engineer, and I have been assigned to review this project. It is anticipated that the review will be completed and any staff comments returned to you on or before Monday, February 9, 2015. If you have questions in the meantime, please feel free to contact us. PC: Jeff Robertson, McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, via; ieffrO,mccl u rebrowne.corn P&DS Project No. 15-00900012 Planning c7 Development Services P.O.BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE •COLLEGE STATION •TEXAS •77842 TEL.979.764..3570 •FAX. 979.764.3496 ,.„4„ (irdr CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home oTexas A&MUniversi MEMORANDUM DATE: January 16, 2015 TO: Travis Martinek, via; travis©clarkewyndham.com v FROM: Jason Schubert, AICP Principal Planner SUBJECT: INDIAN LAKES PH 19 (FP) I reviewed the above-mentioned Final Plat - Residential application and determined it to be incomplete. The following is the preliminary list of items needed to complete the submittal. Please submit the following information so this application can be forwarded for review: Submit a water/fire flow report for the proposed plat. The area in this plat is not part of the original Indian Lakes Master Plan approved in 2002 but part of the Partners in Habitat Preservation Tract 1 Master Plan application that was submitted in December 2007 and approved in February 2008. Therefore, as stated during the Preliminary Plan review, the water/fire flow requirements adopted in 2004 apply to this plat. Please be aware that if this application is not completed before Monday, March 2, 2015, it will expire and a new application and fees will be necessary to continue the platting process. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. PC: Jeff Robertson, McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, via; jeffrAmcclurebrowne.com P&DS Project No. 15-00900012 Planning 6'Development Services P.O.BOX 9960 • 1 101 TEXAS AVENUE•COLLEGE STATION •TEXAS •77842 TEL.979.764.3570•FAX. 979.764.3496 INDIAN LAKES PHASE 19— FINAL. PLAT RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 PLANNING 1. The Applicant intends to allow lot owners to choose where they wish to take access. Chaco Canyon is not an arterial street; therefore, driveway access to this street is permitted. Please note that the lots in Phase 20, as shown on the approved Preliminary Plat, will be required to take access from Chaco Canyon. 2. No comment. 3. No comment. ENGINEERING 1. See revised Final Plat. 2. See revised Final Plat. 3. This note has not been added. It is up to the builder, homeowner, and their engineer to determine the requirements for the slab of the house in this subdivision since no building permits will be required through the City of College Station. Additionally, no lots are intended to have fill in excess of 2 feet. 4. See revised Final Plat. 5. A temporary utility easement will be provided and filed of record prior to the recording of the Final Plat. A permanent utility easement will be provided with the Final Plat for Phase 20. 6. See revised construction plans. 7. See revised construction plans 8. A gate valve at the tee with the fire hydrant on Halona Court is shown on the construction plans. Also, the gate valve spacing between Catori Cove and Kachina Cove measures to be less than 800 feet (approximately 624 feet). 9. See revised construction plans. 10. Water from Phase 19 that will drain to land south of Halona Court onto Phase 21 has been taken into account in Phase 21 design. 11. See revised drainage report. 12. See revised drainage report. 13. See revised construction plans and drainage calculations. 14. Yes, Exhibit C-2 has Outfall Channel Design Criteria, but the culvert is in inlet control in all storm events, so the outfall has little effect on it. 15. See revised construction plans. 16. See revised drainage report. SANITATION 1. No comment. BRAZOS COUNTY 1. The Applicant is in the process of developing towards multiple additional access points, Phase 19 and Phase 25 are extensions within this greater plan. The Applicant is in the process of preparing additional phase submittals for further extensions to obtain additional access points. The total number of lots planned for Indian Lakes is unknown since the Applicant is in the process of acquiring or has acquired several additional tracts of land that have not been fully land-planned to allow for preliminary lot counts to be determined. 3/18/2015 Page 1 of 2 INDIAN LAKES PHASE 19— FINAL PLAT 2. To be provided when available. 3. Drainage is not anticipated to run along these back lot lines. Drainage from these lots will flow to the streets on either side of this block. 4. See revised construction plans. 5. See revised construction plans. 8-inch crushed stone was not added to cul-de-sacs as the 6-inch base has been used throughout the project and in all other subdivisions around the county. 6. See revised construction plans. The typical section has been revised to 30 foot primed based and 42' subgrade to crown. 7. See revised construction plans. 8. See revised construction plans. 9. See revised construction plans. 10. See revised construction plans. 11. See revised construction plans. C/L elevation at Station 10+00 is shown to be 292.38, which matches plans from the previous phase (Phase 16). Previous plans show a grade of 1.43% while proposed plans show a grade of 1.60% on Mesa Verde Drive. Revised plans show a PI (no curve) at Station 10+00. 12. See revised construction plans. 13. Changes in post-development flows from Drainage Area 1 are negligible compared to pre- development flows. 14. See revised drainage map. Drainage Area 1 has been increased to 2.13 acres. 15. See revised drainage report. 16. See revised drainage report. 3/18/2015 Page 2 of 2 SANITATION 1. Sanitation is ok with this project. Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: January 28, 2015 COUNTY Overall Comments: 1. Access concerns are considerable with the development of these phases. Previous commitments need to be executed so that work by others in completing Mesa Verde extension to SH 6 can commence. Please provide detailed estimate of total number of lots to be developed. 2. Provide all approvals from City of College Station Plat Comments: 3. Provide for Private Drainage Easement across back of Lots 11-6. Construction Plan Comments 4. Page C1.1- Typical Section 1 (re: 75' ROW) - Provide 8" Flex Base; Show Section as 34' Primed Base with 38' Subgrade Crown. Indicate Typical Section- Chaco Canyon Drive. 5. Page C1.1- Typical Section 2 (re: 70' ROW) - Provide 6" Flex Base in Roadway and 8" Flex Base at Cul-de-Sac; Show Section as 30' Primed Base with 34' Subgrade Crown. Indicate Typical Section- Catori Cove and Halona Court. 6. Page C1.1- Typical Section 3 (re: 100' ROW) — Provide 8" Flex Base; Show Section as 30' Primed Base with 34' Subgrade Crown. Add 6' Earthen Shoulder, then 8' Front Slope and 19' Back Slope. Indicate Typical Section-Mesa Verde Drive. 7. Page C1.1- Modify Typical Shoulder Detail to be reflective of previous 3 comments. 8. Page C1.2- Correct spelling of "Hay Bail" to "Hay Bale". 9. Page C2.1- Show existing 6" Water Line and Rock Riprap near Kochina Cove (from Phase 16). 10.Page C2.1- Indicate Ditch Slope from Sta. 10+100 to Sta. 10+35/ Indicate Limits of Rock Riprap 11.Page C2.1- C/L elevation at Sta. 10+100 and Profile Grade of Mesa Verde Drive do not match plans provided from Phase 16- Please verify that grades match and that profile grade matches field conditions... 12.Provide Construction Details. Drainage Report Comments: 13.Page 7- There are flows from Phase 19 (depicted in Drainage Area 1) which flow off property. Please analyze Post-Development Flows against Pre-Development Flows for potential effect to adjacent property owner(s). 14. Exhibit B- Drainage Area 1 is incorrectly sized (should be larger). 15. Page 20- Culverts in this phase do serve arterial or Major Collector Streets. Mesa Verde and Chaco Canyon are both functionally classified as such. 16.Page 26- Conclusion should clarify any effects to downstream properties along Deer Park (from Drainage Area 1). Reviewed by: Alan Munger Date: 02-09-2015 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 1. Show a Private drainage easement on the common area between lots 10 & 11. 2. Add a note stating whose responsibility it is to maintain and stating that fences, grading, and landscape cannot impede the flow of the private drainage easement. 3. Add a note regarding requirement for compaction of fill or engineered slab for affected lots that have greater than 2 feet of fill on final plat and construction documents. Also list the lots that would require this. 4. Show the future 10' PUE along the rear of the PUE of Lot 11-16 totaling 20' PUE. 5. Please make sure that all lot numbers are labeled on the construction sheets. 6. Move WS4.01 to the common lot boundary. 7. Provide a gate valve at the tee with the fire hydrant on Halona Court. Also please confirm that the gate valve spacing between Catori Cove & Kachina Cove does not exceed 800'. 8. Relocate WA-2 in such a way that the clearance between waterline's center line & the PUE's boundary is at least 6' or provide additional easement. 9. It appears another drainage area (south of Holona Court) needs to be taken into accounted for. 10. Please provide calculations showing that the water surface elevation in the ditches are at least 6 "below the top ditch during a 25-year storm. 11. Culvert#1 requires a freeboard of at least 1' during a 100-year storm event. 12. Does the culvert analysis take into account the flow hindrance of the Rock Rip Rap at the discharge location? 13. Specify the length type, and grade on profile for culvert 1 on C3.1 14. Provide Cost Estimate, and B/CS Standard details. Reviewed by: Kevin Ferrer Date: February 5, 2015