Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWater Report Water Line Design Report Fire Flow Analysis for Caprock Crossing 12" Waterline Extension College Station, Texas March 2015 Prepared For: Brazos Texas Land Development, LLC C/O CapRock Texas 110 Lincoln Avenue, Suite 103 College Station, Texas 77840 Prepared By: Schultz Engineering, LLC TBPE Firm Registration No. 12327 2730 Longmire, Suite A ,,�,.,►„ College Station, Texas 77845 10 OF 979.764.3900 • .. _ • ,*1 1'‘ %* :* tDEVEN L. DOYEN e \i •> o /IS FIRM # 12327 SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC General Information Location: Caprock Crossing is located on the south side of State Highway 40 between State Highway 6 and Arrington Road in southern College Station. The 12"water line extension will extend south from the Greens Prairie West&Public Way intersection General Note: The proposed 12" waterline will connect to the existing 12" waterline along to Greens Prairie West. Land Use: Commercial Design Criteria/Analysis Primary Water Supply: Existing 12"waterline along Greens Prairie Road West&Old Arrington Road. Existing System Pressure Tests: (See Exhibit B) Flow Hydrant: Existing Hydrant on Old Arrington Road Flowrate: 1455 gpm Static Pressure: 84 psi Residual Pressure: 83 psi Fire Hydrant Flow: 2,500 gpm for Commercial A future fire hydrant will be needed for the future commercial developments and has been modeled,but will not be constructed until development of the commercial lots. Domestic Use The estimated domestic demands used for the commercial lots were set to 50 GPM at all 8"stub outs. The domestic demand for Greens Prairie Center Phase 2A Lot 15R is set to 100 GPM and 250 GPM for Lot 1R. Water System Analysis: WaterCad was used to model the proposed water system. Exhibit A shows the layout of the proposed waterlines. The proposed 12"water lines are in accordance with the BCS Water Design Guidelines. This report provides the results of the water system analysis under the domestic demand and domestic demand with fire hydrant flow. The lowest pressure in the system, 70.5 psi, is a result of the Domestic and Fire Flow at FH-5 and FH-6. With the domestic demand only,the lowest residual pressure is computed to be 83.6 psi. Each of these pressures exceeds the 20 psi and 35 psi minimum pressure requirements, respectively. The maximum velocity in all pipes is less than 12 fps for all scenarios. Exhibits: Exhibit A—Water Layout Exhibit B—Fire Hydrant Test Report Exhibit C—WaterCad Analysis Summary—Domestic Demand Exhibit D—WaterCad Analysis Summary—Domestic and Fire Flow Demand Conclusion The proposed public water lines meet or exceed all of the design criteria for the City of College Station. It will provide adequate water pressure and flowrate for domestic and fire flow demands. Exhibit A Water Layout Exhibit B Fire Hydrant Test Report cfCollege Station Utilities lir Reliable,Affordable, Community Owned Date test completed Wednesday June 20,2012 Time completed 2:00 P.M. Test completed by Vincent Rodriquez Witness Lawrence Chavarria '..,1;24r ;t;11,11VAV44.., FLOW HYDRANT Location Old Aron Rd, Nozzle size Hydrant number R-08.1 Pitot reading in PSI 71 Flow in G.P.M. 'l STATIC HYDRANT Location 985 William D, Fitch Hydrant number R-014 Static PSI iti Residual PSI Comments Requested Exhibit C WaterCAD Analysis Summary— Domestic Demand Exhibit C WaterCAD Analysis Summary Pipe Analysis- Domestic Flow Hazen- Pipe William C- Pipe Flow Velocity Number Length (ft) Start Node End Node Size(in) Pipe Material Value (GPM) (ft/s) P-1 250 1-1 FH1 12 PVC 150 600 1.7 P-2 139 FH1 J-3 12 PVC 150 600 1.7 P-3 504 J-3 J-4 12 PVC 150 550 1.56 P-4 14 J-4 FH2 12 PVC 150 500 1.42 P-5 427 FH2 1-6 12 PVC 150 500 1.42 P-6 186 J-6 FH3 12 PVC 150 350 0.99 P-8 299 J-8 J-9 12 PVC 150 50 0.14 P-9 13 J-9 J-10 12 PVC 150 50 0.14 P-10 612 1-11 1-1 8 PVC 150 0 0 P-12 61 J-12 J-3 8 PVC 150 -50 0.32 P-13 61 J-13 J-4 8 PVC 150 -50 0.32 P-14 66 J-14 J-6 8 PVC } 150 -50 0.32 P-15 78 J-15 1-8 8 PVC 150 -50 0.32 P-RES 20 R-1 J-1 12 PVC 150 600 1.7 P-17 31 FH3 J-16 12 PVC 150 350 0.99 P-18 326 1-16 1-8 12 PVC 150 100 0.28 P-19 434 J-16 J-17 12 PVC 150 250 0.71 P-20 101 1-17 FH 12 j PVC 150 0 0 Exhibit C WaterCAD Analysis Summary Junction Analysis- Domestic Flow Demand Junction Elevation(ft), (GPM) Pressure(PSI) 1-1 317.05 0 83.6 _ FH1 314.73 0 84.6 1-3 312.56 _ 0 85.5 1-4 311.27 0 85.9 FH2 311.32 0 85.9 J-6 314.26 100 84.5 FH3 311.87 0 85.5 1-8 308.48 0 87 J-9 303.41 0 89.1 J-10 303.41 50 89.1 J-11 306 0 88.4 1-12 313.38 50 85.1 1-13 311.93 50 ! 85.6 J-14 314.41 50 84.4 J-15 307.8.6 50 87.2 1-16 312 0 85.4 1-17 310 250 86.3 FH 313.02 0 85 Exhibit D WaterCAD Analysis Summary— Domestic and Fire Flow Demand Exhibit D WaterCAD Analysis Summary Pipe Analysis- Fire Flow- Fire Hydrant Hazen- Pipe William C- Pipe Flow Velocity Number Length(ft) Start Node End Node Size(in) Pipe Material Value (GPM) (ft/s) P-1 250 1-1 I FH1 12 PVC 150 3,100 8.79 P-2 139 FH1 J-3 12 PVC 150 3,100 8.79 P-3 504 J-3 J-4 12 PVC 150 3,050 8.65 P-4 14 1-4 FH2 12 PVC 150 3,000 8.51 P-5 427 FH2 1-6 12 PVC 150 3,000 8.51 P-6 186 J-6 FH3 12 PVC 150 2,850 8.08 P-8 299 J-8 J-9 12 PVC 150 50 0.14 P-9 13 1-9 1-10 12 PVC 150 50 0.14 P-10 612 J-11 J-1 8 PVC 150 0 0 P-12 61 J-12 J-3 8 ! PVC 1 150 -50 0.32 P-13 61 J-13 J-4 8 PVC 150 -50 0.32 P-14 66 1-14 J-6 8 PVC 150 -50 0.32 P-15 78 1-15 J-8 8 PVC 150 -50 0.32 P-RES 20 R-1 J-1 12 PVC 150 3,100 8.79 P-17 31 FH3 1-16 12 PVC 150 1,600 4.54 P-18 326 J-16 J-8 12 PVC 150 100 0.28 P-19 434 146 147 12 PVC 150 1,500 4.26 P-20 101 1-17 FH 12 PVC 150 1,250 3.55 Exhibit D WaterCAD Analysis Summary Junction Analysis- Fire Flow Analysis Demand Junction Elevation(ft) (GPM) Pressure(PSI) 1-1 317.05 0 79.7 FH1 314.73 0 79 J-3 312.56 0 78.9 1-43 11.27 0 76.2 FH2 311.32 0 76 J-6 314.26 100 72 FH3 311.87 1,250 72 J-8 308.48 0 73.4 J-9 303.41 0 _ 75.6 J-10 303.41 50 75.6 J-11 306 0 84.4 J-12 313.38 50 78.6 J-13 311.93 50 75.9 J-14 314.41 50 72 J-15 307.86 50 _73.6 J-16 312 0 71.9 J-17 310 250 71.9 FH 313.02 1,250 70.5