HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Review MITCHELL
....................
MORGAN
Jason Schubert June 26, 2015
City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
RE: Cottages of College Station (SPR)
Dear Jason,
Attached please find the following:
• Brazos County driveway location and Driveway approval email;
• Two (2) 24"x36"copies of the site plan;
• One (1) 24"x36"copy of the landscape plan;
• One (1) 24"x36"copy of the grading erosion control plans; and
• Nine (9) complete sets of site civil construction plans for stamping.
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project Cottages of College Station Phase 1 (SPR)—(SPR 2015-900098)
PLANNING
1. General Construction Note 16 regarding COs of buildings was not revised as provided in the
response comments. Please revise.
Response: This note has been revised.
2. Provide additional detail regarding the material of the trash compactor enclosed on Sheet
A1.1.
Response: Sheet A1,1 has been revised.
3. Label the gate at the North Dowling Road driveway as an exit only gate. Also, provide
documentation regarding Brazos County approval of the driveway location and design.
Response: The gate has been labeled accordingly. Please see attached for Brazos
County driveway location and Driveway approval email.
4. The buffer fence appears to be depicted into the North Dowling Road driveway on the site
plan. Also, stop or taper the fence on the west side of the driveway to reduce sight
obstruction the fence causes between outbound vehicular traffic and pedestrian/bicycle
traffic on the sidewalk.
1
3204 EARL RUDDER LWY.S. COLLEGE STATION,TX 77845 • t'979:260.6963 • 1979.260.3564
CIVIL ENGINEERING - HYDRAULICS HYDROLOGY - UTILITIES STREETS SITE PLANS - SUBDIVISIONS
info4mItche-3andrroTgan_cnr' • - •,V.I ItcI)LllandiCCffian cern
Response: The fence in this area has been modified to reduce from 6-feet to 4-feet in
height to provide better vehicular line of site and to connect the fence with the gate.
5. Revise the points for the 30-gallon Spartan Juniper species to be 10 points each instead of
1 point each.
Response: This has been revised as requested.
ENGINEERING
1. The response letter indicated that the County was still reviewing the plans. Did they have
any comments besides those regarding the sidewalk within the ROW'?
Response: The sidewalk was the County's only comment,
2. Show revised sidewalk along Dowling.
Response: The sidewalk has been revised accordingly.
3. WL1 — It is my understanding that Veronica discussed meter locations for Ph.2 with the
Water Dept. recently. Water meters may be located at the edge of the sidewalk as long as
they are a minimum of 10-ft from the buildings and are within special meter boxes that are
Bowled in. Please show revised meter locations and provide a detail for the box installation.
Response: The meter locations have been adjusted. We have added Note 21 on the
site plan that specifies Old Castle Bl017 as the concrete meter boxes. These are
traffic rated.
4. The DP Fee Balance due when DP is issued=$1,384.20.
Response: Understood.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call our office at 979-260-6963.
i cerely,
Veronica J... Mo 4,'. n, P.E.,C.F.M.
Managing Partner
cc: File
3
2
MITC HELL
K
MORGAN
Jason Schubert May 22, 2015
City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
RE: C3 Development PH 1(SPR)
Dear Jason,
Attached please find the following:
• Revised Construction Planset;
• Revised site plan;
• Revised landscaping plan;
• Engineer's cost estimate;
• Interior island calculation drawing; and
• Grasscrete paving specification information.
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 7
Project: C3 Development PH 1 (SPR) SPR2015-900098
PLANNING
1. Please note the Final Plat needs to be recorded before the site plan can be approved.
RESPONSE: Understood.
2. Provide documentation from Brazos County that the North Dowling Road driveway location
and design is acceptable.
RESPONSE: This is currently under review.
3. A gate is not shown for the North Dowling Road driveway like the Junction Boys Road
driveway. Please depict the gate area. Please note that gate posts and equipment may not
be located in public utility easements.
RESPONSE: The gate is now shown and the equipment is located outside the public
utility easement.
}
4. Provide interior island calculations to demonstrate this requirement has been met.
}
RESPONSE: Please see the attached interior island calculation drawing which shows
we have complied with the interior island requirements.
5. Provide the landscape berms and fence in the buffer yard area as required on the PDD
Concept Plan. These should be depicted on the site plan and landscape plan.
1
3204 EARL RUDDER MWY.S. • COLLEGE STATION,TX 77845 • 979 260.6963 • F 979 260 3564
CML ENGINEERING HYDRAULICS HYDROLOGY - UTILITIES STREETS StTE PLANS SUBDIVISIONS
a€e3 ,nIiCI';ellalrim°yae,La . w', ma.chellah:dlnorgan coon
RESPONSE: The landscape berms and fence are now shown on the grading and
landscape plans. The site plan shows the fence but not the berms because it is too
crowded to show the berms.
6. Please confirm the existing private trail that connects to the adjacent development will be
removed and there is no obligation for its access or use from them.
RESPONSE: Please refer to the Irrigation & Drainage Easement Agreement which
was submitted with the preliminary plan. That agreement is the only one between
Capstone and The Cottages of College Station. There is no reference to the trail in
this agreement so there is no requirement for The Cottages to retain access to this
system.
7. Revise General Construction Note 16 regarding COs of buildings. To receive a CO for a
particular building, more than a water line and hard road surface needs to be provided.
Other factors such as required parking, landscaping, fire and sanitation access and routes,
and separation between the remaining construction site and public accessible areas must
be also provided. If not providing a phasing plan where these items are identified, this note
will need to be further developed.
RESPONSE: This was intended to refer to a building permit. The note has been
revised to state in order to "receive a building permit".
8. Revise General Construction Note 16 to refer to the section as 12-7.11 instead of 7.10.
RESPONSE: This note has been revised as requested.
9. Revise Site Plan Note 5 to state the PDD ordinance number is 2015-3651.
RESPONSE: This note has been revised as requested.
10. Provide an enclosure and details for the trash compactor area similar to the requirements of
a dumpster.
RESPONSE: The enclosure and details for the trash compactor are now shown on
Sheet A1.1 Compactor Enclosure.
11. Revise the paving plan to shade the pavement by the trash compactor to be darker to
indicate heavy duty pavement.
RESPONSE: This shade has been corrected and the trash compactor is now shown
as heavy duty pavement.
12. Provide additional detail or specification to demonstrate the proposed grasscrete/airpave
meets the fire lane specifications to be able to support a fire apparatus.
RESPONSE: The grasscrete details is now shown on the paving plan sheet. Please
see the attached documentation regarding Airpave strength.
13. Revising the depiction of Junction Boys Road, sidewalk, etc. to be in accordance with the
revised final plat construction documents.
2
RESPONSE: These details now match those shown on Junction Boys Road plans.
14. Revise the label of Dowling Road to be named North Dowling Road.
RESPONSE: Dowling Road has been relabeled as North Dowling Road.
15.As per the PDD, additional parkland dedication fees above the minimum of$731 per unit will
be required prior to the issuance of each building permit. Given 801 bedrooms in 186 units
over Phases 1 & 2, an additional $59 per multi-family unit will be required, bring the total to
$790 per unit.
RESPONSE: Understood.
16. It is my understanding that the 2012 IBC code regulates the number of handicap parking
spaces for multi family parking lots as being at least 2% of the parking spaces. Given that
one handicap space is added for access to the compactor, this could result in the reduction
of 1 of the handicap spaces provided,
RESPONSE: Yes, but the TAS also applies which requires 7 handicap spaces on this
site.
17. Please note that engineering comments may affect the site plan.
RESPONSE: Understood.
LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER
1. Clearly depict the proposed property lines on the landscape plan,
RESPONSE: The property lines are shown in bold on the revised plan.
2. All plantings must be located on private property to meet landscape requirements and be
count for points. Extra plantings proposed in the right-of-way (ROW) are to be removed from
the plans and considered separately through the Private Improvement in a Public Right-of-
Way (PIP) application. There appears to be plantings in this plan that are in the ROW and
plantings in the PIP landscape plan that are located on private property. Please revise as
needed.
RESPONSE: All plantings are shown within the property lines on revised plan.
3. Clearly depict access easements, utility easements and existing and proposed utilities on
the landscape plan to help identify potential conflicts. Proposed canopy trees are to be
located at least 10 feet from a public water or sanitary sewer mains. At a minimum, a live
oak is proposed between Buildings 4&5 where a water line is proposed. Also, existing
overhead lines are located along North Dowling Road. Please depict and adjust canopy tree
plantings as needed.
RESPONSE: All utilities and easements are shown on revised plan. All canopy trees
have been relocated 10' clear of waterlines and overhead power lines.
3
4. The frontage length provided for streetscape calculations is 1,189 feet. The frontage on the
site plan adds to 1,409 feet (which includes driveways and sight triangles that can be
subtracted from the streetscape frontage). Provide additional information to verify the
calculation and/or adjust accordingly.
RESPONSE: The frontage length has been re-calculated on the revised plans.
5. Break the streetscape calculation into separate frontages for Junction Boys Road and North
Dowling Road. Also, provide a calculation of the number of canopy trees required within 50
feet of each frontage (length/32, rounded up). The streetscape requirement does not appear
to be met though the calculations need to be revised/made and all plantings shown to
determine if that is the case.
RESPONSE: Streetscape Trees have been separated per frontage and re-calculated
on revised plans,
6. Trees used to meet streetscape may be planted in the buffer area but they cannot be
counted toward the minimum buffer yard plantings as these are two separate requirements.
RESPONSE: Buffer and Streetscape Trees have been re-calculated separately on
revised plans.
7: Depict the buffer yard area of at least 35 feet along North Dowling Road on the landscape
plan along with the berms and fence.
RESPONSE: Bufferyard limits have been shown and labeled on the revised plans.
8. The proposed Spartan Juniper species is to be classified as a shrub instead of a non-
canopy. Revise the calculations accordingly.
RESPONSE: This plant has been reclassified on revised plans.
9. Please note that irrigation plans are approved by a separate permit and are not approved
through the construction document set with a Development Permit.
RESPONSE: Understood. C3/CBI makes note of staff's comment and will seek
permitting for irrigation plans separately.
10. Please note that engineering comments may affect the landscape plan.
RESPONSE: Understood. All Engineering comments pertaining to Landscape plans
have been adjusted on revised plans.
ENGINEERING
1. Please submit an Engineer's cost estimate and NOI.
RESPONSE: The engineer's cost estimate is attached. The NOl will be submitted by
the contractor.
4
2. SPO — Did the County have any comments regarding the proposed driveway connection to
Dowling Rd.?
RESPONSE: It is still under review by County.
3. SPO—The current contacts should be updated in General Note#1.
RESPONSE: The contacts have been updated.
4. SP1 — Please add note on the plans that the fire suppression line shall have a lockable lid
on the isolation valve. The lockable lid shall supply the same protection as the AMP or
USA, LL562 Locking Lid at a minimum. An alternate lockable lid shall be approved by
College Station Utilities Director or his designee.
RESPONSE: This note has been added to the site plan as well as the waterline sheet.
5. SP1 — Fire previously indicated that if the FDC is located on the side of the building not
easily viewable from the fire lane, additional signage would be needed.
RESPONSE: FDC placards are now indicated on the site plan.
6. SP1 — Per previous discussions with Fire, a way-finding sign is needed for Bldgs. 8 & 9.
RESPONSE: Please see the wayfinding plan in the planset.
7. SP2 — Label the fire lane within the grasscrete area. Also, add a note regarding fire lane
pavement striping in this area.
RESPONSE: This fire lane is now shown and the ribbon curb is noted as "with fire
lane striping."
8. SP2 —Water meters should be at the edge of the PUEs (i.e. Bldgs. 2, 11).
RESPONSE: The 2 water meters have been moved to the edge of the PUE.
9. WL1 —Label the isolation valves.
RESPONSE: All isolation valves are now labeled.
10. WL1 —The waterline material should be labeled as C900-DR14 (CL200 may be omitted).
RESPONSE: This label has been modified as requested.
11. WL1 — Although the sanitary sewer is private, TCEQ rules still apply at water and sanitary
sewer crossings.
RESPONSE: All sewer line/water line crossings have been modified to meet TCEQ
requirements.
5
12.WL1 —Please provide a detail of a typical water manifold for multiple services.
{
RESPONSE: Per our telephone conversation this comment may be disregarded.
13. WL1 — Provide plan and profile drawings for the fire lines, fire hydrants and associated
waterlines.
RESPONSE: All fire lines that are longer than 20 feet have been profiled.
14. WL1 -Another gate valve is required at the tee at Sta.5+41.
RESPONSE: This gate valve has been added.
15. WL1 -All of the PUEs for the waterlines need to be at least 15-ft wide.
RESPONSE: All PUE's have been modified to meet the 15 foot width requirement.
16.WL1 —Waterlines should be located at least 15-ft from any building. It looks like a public
waterline is a little too close to Building 15.
RESPONSE: The isolation valve on this fire line has been moved to the back of curb
so that all portions of the public line are no closer than 15 feet to a building.
17. SWP-Please revise the title to"Erosion Control Plan."
RESPONSE: This title has been changed as requested,
18. SWP-Show and label the location of the stabilized construction entrance.
RESPONSE: A construction entrance has been added to this sheet and it is labeled
and a detail provided.
19, LS1-3-The waterlines shown do not match the alignment on other sheets.
RESPONSE: The waterlines are now shown correctly.
20. LS2/3 — Please shift canopy trees such that there is at least a 10-ft separation from the
waterlines.
RESPONSE: The landscaping has been shifted to achieve the 10-FT separation
distance from waterlines.
21. Drainage Report — Exhibit 7.2- It looks like there will be more than 0.5-ft of ponding at
several inlets.
RESPONSE: Yes, the ponded depth in a 10-year storm is no more than 6". In the 100-
year storm it is greater than 6" (0.65-ft max) and that depth is checked to assure that
there is room for that ponded depth without any flooding concerns. We checked the
Drainage Ordinance and cannot find where the 6" max depth is related to the 100-year
event.
6
[fr
g4
22. FYI...The Junction Boys Rd. water and street infrastructure needs to be accepted prior to
issuance of the LOC or COs for this phase. Also, based on the Water Report, the water
infrastructure associated with Phase 2 of the project will need to be accepted prior to
issuance of any GOs in this phase.
RESPONSE: Understood.
23. FYI...Additional Development Permit Fee in the amount of 1% of the total public
infrastructure cost may be required.
RESPONSE: Understood.
ADDRESSING
1. The address for this project will be 2415 Junction Boys Road.
RESPONSE: Understood.
FIRE
1. Fire lane shall start at the South Entrance/Exit as soon as combustibles are on site.
RESPONSE: Understood.
2. A turn a round will be needed.
RESPONSE: We have made a note on the site plan study if all pavement is not
completed prior to bringing combustibles on site then a turnaround will be required.
3. Parking spaces can be used for laydown. All fire lanes shall stay open while combustibles
are on site.
RESPONSE: Understood.
4. City accepted Fire Hydrants will need to cover all combustibles on site. (450')
RESPONSE: Understood.
GREENWAYS
1. It appears that the multi-use path on Junction Boys Road is back of curb. Since it is adjacent
to the roadway, there needs to be a minimum of 5 feet separating the path from the
roadway. Please refer to UDO Section 12-8.3c for additional information.
RESPONSE: The multi-use path has been separated from the back of curb to provide
separation.
7
I
SANITATION
i
1. Dumpster enclosure (s) does not meet sanitation dimension standards. The width for a roll-
off compactor needs to be 16 feet.
RESPONSE: The dumpster enclosure has been revised to assure a 16 foot clear
inside dimension.
Please note that site lighting and low voltage (telecom) has been added to this set of
plans.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call our office at 979-260-6963.
i cerely,
i1 ,
!roti V4,(. , t„------1
Veronica J.-.Mor an, ',E,, C.F.M.
Managing Partner '
cc: File
a
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. Please submit an Engineer's cost estimate and NOI.
2. SPO - Did the County have any comments regarding the proposed driveway connection
to Dowling Rd.?
3. SPO-The current contacts should be updated in General Note #1.
4. SP1 - Please add note on the plans that the fire suppression line shall have a lockable
lid on the isolation valve. The lockable lid shall supply the same protection as the AMP
or USA, LL562 Locking Lid at a minimum. An alternate lockable lid shall be approved by
College Station Utilities Director or his designee.
5. SP1 - Fire previously indicated that if the FDC is located on the side of the building not
easily viewable from the fire lane, additional signage would be needed.
6. SP1 - Per previous discussions with Fire, a way-finding sign is needed for Bldgs. 8 & 9.
7. SP2 - Label the fire lane within the grasscrete area. Also, add a note regarding fire
lane pavement striping in this area.
8. SP2 -Water meters should be at the edge of the PUEs (i.e. Bldgs. 2, 11).
9. WL1 - Label the isolation valves.
10. WL1 - The waterline material should be labeled as C900-DR14 (CL200 may be
omitted).
11. WL1 - Although the sanitary sewer is private, TCEQ rules still apply at water and
sanitary sewer crossings.
12. WL1 - Please provide a detail of a typical water manifold for multiple services.
13. WL1 - Provide plan and profile drawings for the fire lines, fire hydrants and associated
waterlines.
14. WL1 -Another gate valve is required at the tee at Sta.5+41.
15. WL1 -All of the PUEs for the waterlines need to be at least 15-ft wide.
16. WL1 - Waterlines should be located at least 15-ft from any building. It looks like a
public waterline is a little too close to Building 15.
17. SWP - Please revise the title to "Erosion Control Plan."
18. SWP - Show and label the location of the stabilized construction entrance.
19. LS1-3 -The waterlines shown do not match the alignment on other sheets.
20. LS2/3 - Please shift canopy trees such that there is at least a 10-ft separation from the
waterlines.
21. Drainage Report - Exhibit 7.2- It looks like there will be more than 0.5-ft of ponding at
several inlets.
22. FYI...The Junction Boys Rd. water and street infrastructure needs to be accepted prior
to issuance of the LOC or COs for this phase. Also, based on the Water Report, the
water infrastructure associated with Phase 2 of the project will need to be accepted prior
to issuance of any COs in this phase.
23. FYI...Additional Development Permit Fee in the amount of 1% of the total public
infrastructure cost may be required.
Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: 5/18/15
70444401
Gri
CITY OF COIJJ!:GE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University'
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 15, 2015
TO: Mitchell & Morgan, LLP do Veronica Morgan; via: v( mitchellandmorgan.com
FROM: Jason Schubert, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: C3 DEVELOPMENT PH 1 (SPR)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the following information in eTRAKiT for further staff review:
Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments;
Attach electronic copies of the construction documents, site plan, and landscape
plans that were submitted with the application in eTRAKiT. Name them as first
round or original submittal documents and name the revised versions as second
round documents;
Complete set of site civil construction documents for the proposed development
with the revised site and landscaping plans attached;
Revised site plan;
Revised landscaping plan; and
Other documents as requested in the forthcoming engineering comments.
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Jason Schubert at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff Review Comments
PC: Capstone-CS, LLC do Rob Howland; via: rhowlandcapstonemail.com
Amanda Wallis; via: awallis@capstonemail.com
Eric McNair; via: emcnaircapstonemail.com
P&DS Project No. SPR2015-900098
Planning er.Development Services
P.Q.BOX 9960 • 1 101 11-XAs AVFNLE • COI I S IAITON •"I ERAS •77812
11-1 979764.3%'0 •IAN. 979 764.3496
cstx.govidevservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: Sterling Heights Apartments (SPR) SPR2015-900098
PLANNING
1. Please note the Final Plat needs to be recorded before the site plan can be approved.
2. Provide documentation from Brazos County that the North Dowling Road driveway location
and design is acceptable.
3. A gate is not shown for the North Dowling Road driveway like the Junction Boys Road
driveway. Please depict the gate area. Please note that gate posts and equipment may not
be located in public utility easements.
4. Provide interior island calculations to demonstrate this requirement has been met.
5. Provide the landscape berms and fence in the buffer yard area as required on the PDD
Concept Plan. These should be depicted on the site plan and landscape plan.
6. Please confirm the existing private trail that connects to the adjacent development will be
removed and there is no obligation for its access or use from them.
7. Revise General Construction Note 16 regarding COs of buildings. To receive a CO for a
particular building, more than a water line and hard road surface needs to be provided.
Other factors such as required parking, landscaping, fire and sanitation access and routes,
and separation between the remaining construction site and public accessible areas must
be also provided. If not providing a phasing plan where these items are identified, this note
will need to be further developed.
8. Revise General Construction Note 16 to refer to the section as 12-7.11 instead of 7.10.
9. Revise Site Plan Note 5 to state the PDD ordinance number is 2015-3651.
10. Provide an enclosure and details for the trash compactor area similar to the requirements of
a dumpster.
11. Revise the paving plan to shade the pavement by the trash compactor to be darker to
indicate heavy duty pavement.
12. Provide additional detail or specification to demonstrate the proposed grasscrete/airpave
meets the fire lane specifications to be able to support a fire apparatus.
13. Revising the depiction of Junction Boys Road, sidewalk, etc. to be in accordance with the
revised final plat construction documents.
14. Revise the label of Dowling Road to be named North Dowling Road.
15. As per the PDD, additional parkland dedication fees above the minimum of$731 per unit will
be required prior to the issuance of each building permit. Given 801 bedrooms in 186 units
over Phases 1 & 2, an additional $59 per multi-family unit will be required, bring the total to
$790 per unit.
16. It is my understanding that the 2012 IBC code regulates the number of handicap parking
spaces for multi-family parking lots as being at least 2% of the parking spaces. Given that
one handicap space is added for access to the compactor, this could result in the reduction
of 1 of the handicap spaces provided.
17. Please note that engineering comments may affect the site plan.
Reviewed by: Jason Schubert Date: February 9, 2015
LAN DSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER
1. Clearly depict the proposed property lines on the landscape plan.
2. All plantings must be located on private property to meet landscape requirements and be
count for points. Extra plantings proposed in the right-of-way (ROW) are to be removed from
the plans and considered separately through the Private Improvement in a Public Right-of-
Way (PIP) application. There appears to be plantings in this plan that are in the ROW and
plantings in the PIP landscape plan that are located on private property. Please revise as
needed.
3. Clearly depict access easements, utility easements and existing and proposed utilities on
the landscape plan to help identify potential conflicts. Proposed canopy trees are to be
located at least 10 feet from a public water or sanitary sewer mains. At a minimum, a live
oak is proposed between Buildings 4&5 where a water line is proposed. Also, existing
overhead lines are located along North Dowling Road. Please depict and adjust canopy tree
plantings as needed.
4. The frontage length provided for streetscape calculations is 1,189 feet. The frontage on the
site plan adds to 1,409 feet (which includes driveways and sight triangles that can be
subtracted from the streetscape frontage). Provide additional information to verify the
calculation and/or adjust accordingly.
5. Break the streetscape calculation into separate frontages for Junction Boys Road and North
Dowling Road. Also, provide a calculation of the number of canopy trees required within 50
feet of each frontage (length/32, rounded up). The streetscape requirement does not appear
to be met though the calculations need to be revised/made and all plantings shown to
determine if that is the case.
6. Trees used to meet streetscape may be planted in the buffer area but they cannot be
counted toward the minimum buffer yard plantings as these are two separate requirements.
7. Depict the buffer yard area of at least 35 feet along North Dowling Road on the landscape
plan along with the berms and fence.
8. The proposed Spartan Juniper species is to be classified as a shrub instead of a non-
canopy. Revise the calculations accordingly.
9. Please note that irrigation plans are approved by a separate permit and are not approved
through the construction document set with a Development Permit.
10. Please note that engineering comments may affect the landscape plan.
Reviewed by: Jason Schubert Date: May 15, 2015
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. Comments will be forthcoming.
Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: May 15, 2015
ADDRESSING
1. The address for this project will be 2415 Junction Boys Road.
Reviewed by: Robin Krause Date: April 23, 2015
FIRE
1. Fire lane shall start at the South Entrance/Exit as soon as combustibles are on site.
2. A turn a round will be needed.
3. Parking spaces can be used for Iaydown. All fire lanes shall stay open while combustibles
are on site.
4. City accepted Fire Hydrants will need to cover all combustibles on site. (450')
Reviewed by: Steve Smith Date: April 23, 2015
GREENWAYS
1. It appears that the multi-use path on Junction Boys Road is back of curb. Since it is adjacent
to the roadway, there needs to be a minimum of 5 feet separating the path from the
roadway. Please refer to UDO Section 12-8.3c for additional information.
Reviewed by: Venessa Garza Date: May 6, 2015
SANITATION
1. Dumpster enclosure (s) does not meet sanitation dimension standards. The width for a roll-
off compactor needs to be 16 feet.
Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: April 23, 2015
*-1( emosacrlii,
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas AerM University*
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 22, 2015
TO: Mitchell & Morgan, LLP do Veronica Morgan; via: vamitchellandmorgan.com
FROM: Jason Schubert, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: C3 DEVELOPMENT PH 1 (SP)
Thank you for the submittal of the required documents for your Site Plan — Residential
application. Erika Bridges, Graduate Engineer II, Madison Thomas, Staff Planner, and I have
been assigned to review this project. It is anticipated that the review will be completed and any
staff comments returned to you on or before Tuesday, May 5, 2015. If you have questions in the
meantime, please feel free to contact us.
PC: Capstone-CS, LLC do Rob Howland; via: rhowland(a�capstonemail.com
Amanda Wallis; via: awallis@capstonemail.com
Eric McNair; via: emcnair(a�capstonemail.com
P&DS Project No. SPR2015-900098/15-00900098
Planning 6 Development Services
1'.O.IBOX.9060 • 1 101 1 XAS AVENUE •COLLEGE IAI ION •TEXAS •77 42
1E1..079.764.3570 •FAX. 979.764.3496
c s tx.govid ev s e rvi c e s
3204 Earl Rudder Fwy S Letter Of Transmittal
MITCHELL College Station, TX 77845
(979) 260-6963 Phone
MIV
(979) 260-3564 FaxDate:4/16/2015 Job: 1445
info@mitchellandmorgan.com
www.mitchellandmorgan.com
MORGAN Attention: Jason Schubert
To: City of College Station Re: C3 Development Phase 1
We are sending you: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following:
❑ Drawings ❑ Plans ❑ Prints ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Letter ❑ Order ❑ Other
Item Date #of Copies Description
1 4/7/2015 1 Sewer Analysis
2 4/16/2015 1 Fire Flow Analysis
3 4/16/2015 1 Drainage Analysis
Transmitted as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected copies
2 For review ❑ Other
Remarks:
Jason,
Please see attached for the items required to complete our site plan submittal for
the C3 Development Phase 1 project.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at 979-260-6963.
Copy to: File Signed: Kerry Pillow
CI'T'Y OF COLLEGI ST.vTION
Home of Texas A&M University
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 2, 2015
TO: Mitchell & Morgan, LLP do Veronica Morgan; via: v a>mitchellandmorgan.corn
FROM: Jason Schubert, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: C3 DEVELOPMENT PH 1 (SP)
I reviewed the above-mentioned Site Plan - Residential application and determined it to be
incomplete. The following is the preliminary list of items needed to complete the submittal.
Please submit the following information so this application can be forwarded for review:
Submit the water/fire flow, sanitary sewer, and drainage reports associated with
the proposed public infrastructure and site development.
Please be aware that if this application is not completed before Monday, May 18, 2015, it will
expire and a new application and fees will be necessary to continue the site plan process.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570.
PC: Capstone-CS, LLC do Rob Howland; via: rhowland capstonernail.com
Amanda Wallis; via: wallis@c apsturaemii cop-i
Eric McNair; via: emenair(acapstonernail.Corn
P&DS Project No. 15-00900098
Planning c."Development Services
I'.0 P,t)V,)960 . 1 101 I I y\S A\I V 1 • t,0L:i I(A S 1:A'11O\ • 11 \\,, S :'
cstx.gov/devservices