Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Drawings
0. .0 / / \ Exis DW / LOT 2, BLOCK 7 / PPLAT 345/711 //�\\ / Iv FOUND/2 INCH IRON / V \ \ CURRENTLY ZONED C-1 . � Not a Part Cross Access JACK IN THE BOX EASTERN DIV Poiht 30,000 SQUARE FOOT TRACT / 4016/319 ♦ s SO° LOT 1, BLOCK 7 PPLAT 345/711 \ CORNERDF CO RETAIN \ \ / � ETAINING WALL PROPERTY / FALLS IN / Mrr V94M LOT IA / BLOCK 3 / PLAT 1794/73 / N/F �\ RICHARD AND DORTHEA ROBINSON 2029/3 LOT 2A BLOCK 3 / PLAT 1794/73 PLA CURRENTLY ZONED R-1 ' N/F ROBERT C. SHIPLEY 3970/320 ' / CURRENTLY ZONED R-1 . \ I REDMOND DRIVE 50' R.O.W. to M r U F fy�'9U, SOAP SCALE: 199 - 50' 50 0 50 100 150 Feet J� 9� \O 3 riveways will be studied for consolidation for shared access to Redmond. Vicinity Map Not to Scale Approximate tions of existing Curb Cuts RSK MITCHELL IMPROVING YOUR (WORLD ` ' Reynolds, Smith and Hils, Inc MORGAN 11011 Richmond Avenue, Suite 700 Houston, Texas 77042 Mitchell & Morgan 713-914-4433 511 University Drive East, Suite 204 College Station, Texas 77840 Architect of Record: Jerry Tipps, AIA, TX Registration 18756 979.260.6963 © 2007. RS&H. All Rights Reserved Veronica J.B. Morgan, P.E., C.F.M. Not a Part December 20, 2007 Proposed Redevelopment -- Ramada Inn Tract. and Adjacent Parcels A Proposed Development of MEGACLOSE USA December 19, 2007 This Concept Plan is submitted in conjunction with the Statement of Purpose and Intent and other Rezoning application papers prepared by Mitchell and Morgan Engineers. While it is the intent of the authors of these documents to be complete, certain elements can not be fully and finally defined until addition diligence is performed, and actual surveys taken for all of the involved parcels. Please consider the following stipulations: 1. This document was compiled: from a variety of sources, including a Zoning Survey for the principle Tract, City GIS records and aerial photos. As such, final dimensional control and absolute accuracy can not be warranted. The plan is subject to revision when the entire area is surveyed 2. It is the intent of the developer to comply with the City's landscape and streetscape requirements for developments along the Texas Avenue Corridor. The final scope and nature of these improvements is subject to further development, review and approval. 3. This development keys upon the refurbishment of the existing hotel building on the adjacent P -MUD parcel, the construction of a new multi -story building with retail and student apartments, and the construction of Structured Parking to accommodate the mixed uses. Parking on the ground has been largely considered for the use of the retail/commercial users, with resident parking in the structure. 4. Proposed Development Heights: Existing re -modeled hotel tower (dorms) to remain at current height a. Proposed Residential over Commercial to be not more than 150' tall 5. The Existing Utilities and Easements running along the property line and under the proposed amenities of the adjacent parcels shall be relocated to the front drive along the building front crossing the -property from Milliff to Redmond, as directed and coordinated with the City of College Station. 6. Structured parking shall be provided on the parcel south of Redmond ------- 18 -Dec -07 - -- MegaClose, College Station, Texas Area Calculation after Site Plan Revision for Rezoning of Combined Ramada and Texas Ave/Redmond Comer Parcel 1 Commercial Area Calculation 1 Hotel Base Floor Area Calculation _ a. Gross Floor Area 15,126 15,126 2 New Construction a. New Floor Area "A" 30,790 b. New Floor Area "B" 3,7951 1 �^ c. Gross Floor Area, New Building 1 34,585 i �I 3 Total Commercial Floor Area, Ramada and Panera Tract 49,711 _ II lResidential Area calculation 1 Residential Total Allowed Area Calculation a. 20% Commerciat/80% Residential 1 198,844 111 Total Buildable Area Calculation and Area Analysis 1 Total Developable Area Calculation (100%) 248,555 2 Building Area Breakdown, Plan "A" M. First Floor (Commercial) 49,711 see 2.c. above b. Second Floor (Residential) 32,113 c. Third Floor (Residential) 32,113 d. Fourth Floor (Residential) 32,113 e. Fifth Floor (Residential) 20,358 f. Sixth Floor (Residential) 20,358 3 Remodeled Existing Hotel Tower (4 residential floors) 60,504 Total Area 247,270 sf 3 Area Summary Allowed % Designed % a. Total Area 248,555 100% b. Total Commercial 49,711 20% 49,711 20% c. Total Residential -New Construction 198,844 80% 137,055 55% d. Total Residential -Remodel Hotel Tower 60,504 24% e. Total Area 248,555 1000/6 247,270 99% IV lRoom and Bed Tabulation Units/Floor Beds/Floor Units/Total Beds/Total 1 Hotel Tower Remodel - �— a. One BR Efficiency 11 11 44 44 b. One BR vv/Living Room 3 3 12 12 c. Two BR 6 12 24 48 d. Total, Hotel Tower Remodel 20 26 80 104 e. Unit Efficiency: One unit per x sf 15,126 756 square feet per unit f. Bed Efficiency: One bed per x sf 15,126 582 square feet per bed 21 New Construction a. Units 152 IV b. Beds 228 _ Prior Case Comparison First Rezoning This Application This is a comparison between this plan. and the initial application for the rezoning of the Ramada Tract Units Beds Units Be:js 1 Hotel Tower Remodel 178 312 801 104 2 New Residential Construction 96 192 152 22811 Total 274 504 232 332 3 Reduction achieved in this application over first rezoning 42 172 a. Reduction as a percentage of the first application -150/0 -34%I _ SF Increase/SF Increase/% 41 First Rezoning 36,990 5 This Application 47,910 10,920 23% r� i VI Summary -Comparative 1 This zoning application reduces residential beds when compared to the first rezoning application by... 340/6 2 This zoning application increases commercial square footage when compared to the first rezoning application by... 23%