Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Lauren A. Hovde Report Date: November 5, 2008 Email: Ihovde@cstx.gov Meeting Date: November 14, 2008 For City of College Station Northgate Public Restrooms (DRB) (08-00500283) Zoning District: NG-1 Core Northgate Location: Northgate Promenade, between Church Street and Patricia Street Applicant: Andrew Hawkins, Hawkins, Holster&Associates, Inc. Item Summary: The applicant is requesting to use decorative metal Northgate emblems on the facility as an alternative to the NG-1 zoning district transparency requirements. Item Background: The transparency requirements being discussed can be found in Section 5.6 of the Unified Development Ordinance, which states, "For maximum pedestrian visibility of the non-residential use(s), non-residential structures and the commercial portions of mixed-use structures shall be at least fifty percent (50%) transparent between zero and eight feet above ground level of the primary entrance façade and at least thirty percent(30%)transparent between zero and eight feet on the façade fronting other rights-of-ways." The applicant believes that the addition of transparent material to a public restroom is not an appropriate choice of material. There is a concern that the transparent material may encourage vandalism and increased maintenance for the City. In addition to the large Northgate emblems to the facades facing Boyett Street and Patricia Street, masonry work will be patterned and projected in such a way as to add visual interest for pedestrians. Issues/Items for Review: At this time, DRB is asked to consider the use of decorative metal Northgate emblems as an alternative to meeting the transparency requirements. The DRB does have the authority, according to the Unified Development Ordinance, to approve alternatives to the requirements related to building transparency for new construction if the alternatives substantially provide the same visual interest for the pedestrian. Supporting Materials: 1. Application 2. Copy of elevations 3 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Lauren A. Hovde, Staff Planner Report Date: November 5, 2008 Email: Ihovde@cstx.gov Meeting Date: November 14, 2008 For CORNER BAR(DRB) (08-00500192) Zoning District: NG-1 Core Northgate Location: 401 University Drive Applicant: Barry Ivins, Business Manager Item Summary: The applicant has requested approval of an alternative brick color for the rooftop structure addition on the Sparks Building and the addition of a 42-inch high wainscot to the structure, made up of a brick veneer that matches the stair tower brick. Item Background: This item was first presented to the Design Review Board on March 24th and again on April 25th of this year. At that time, the Design Review Board approved the proposed plan to utilize the roof of the Sparks Building, located at the intersection of College Main and University Drive,for a rooftop bar. The approval included a `brick veneer structure" on the roof. The DRB stated during the discussion that the brick used for the roof addition should match the brick previously used for the stairwell structure addition on College Main. The approved elevations reflected that discussion. Upon completion, it was apparent to staff that the brick used on the rooftop structure did not match the stairwell structure, as required by the Design Review Board. The applicant indicated that an alternative color was chosen to allow for the use of a brick veneer due to structural issues with the matching brick's weight and that a matching brick veneer was not available. The applicant then came back to DRB on September 12th to request that the materials used during the actual construction of the fagade be approved. The DRB tabled the item, asking the Applicant to return to the Board with plans showing additional architectural elements to tie the two brick veneers together. Issues/Items for Review: The Design Review Board is being asked to consider an alternate brick color for the rooftop structure than was previously approved and the addition of a 42-inch high wainscot to the rooftop structure of a brick veneer that matches the stair tower brick. Supporting Materials: 1. Application 2. DRB minutes from September 12, 2008 3. Elevations 4. Brick samples (available at the meeting) 5. Photographs of the structure, as built (available at the meeting)