HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondencePage I of 2
Trey Fletcher - RE: The Woodlands
From: <hugo.morales@kimley-horn.com>
To: <Tfletcher@cstx.gov>, <Agibbs@cstx.gov>
Date: 5/19/2006 8:59 AM
Subject: RE: The Woodlands
CC: <Larry@thedovetailcompanies.com>, <Kevin.Gaskey@kimley-horn.com>
Trey/Alan,
I noticed you have included a couple of comments regarding "Phases"
There will be no phases. We will show the location of the secondary access. On the FEMA side, we will add a note
reflecting that "Construction shall not begin upon FEMA approval" as we discussed on the phone call.
Feel free to call with any questions.
Thank you
Hugo Morales, EIT
KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES
9300 Wade Boulevard, Suite 320
Frisco, Texas 75035
P. 972-335-3580
F. 972-335-3779
The electronic data files ("Files") furnished by Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. to the intended receiver of the Files ("Receiving Party")
are provided only for the convenience of Receiving Party and only for its
sole use.
From: Trey Fletcher [mailto:Tfletcher@cstx.gov]
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 8:16 AM
To: Alan Gibbs; Morales, Hugo
Subject: Re: The Woodlands
The Woodlands of College Station Site Plan
The following comments are based on submittal received May 15, 2006, and given verbally in conference call yesterday
morning.
1. Show the 40' Hike / Bike Easement on Site Plan sheets as indicated on the plat
2; Amend parking table to reflect phases
Provide table to indicate compliance with interior island requirements
4: Show temporary 2nd entrance location
5. Remove reference to access easement via the former Christine Lane area
L,,6. Provide sidewalk and other paving (it was mentioned that this would be shown the on the'hardscape' plan)
YT: Show phase line for phase 2 that includes area associated with pending floodplain issues
Provide updated landscape plan which will also include buffer yard requirements along east property line
file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\tfletcher.CSTX\Local%20Settings\Temp\XPGrpWise\44... 5/22/2006
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact me.
...................................................................
Trey Fletcher, AICP
Senior Planner
Dept. of Planning & Development Services
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77840
979.764.3570 / 979.764.3496 Fax
tfletcher@cstx.gov
www.cstx.gov
>>> Alan Gibbs 5/18/2006 6:37 pm >>>
Hugo,
The attached are my comments and fire comments. Trey has additional comments to add , but I wanted to put
most comments in your hands sooner than later due to the turn around.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
Sr. Asst. City Engineer
City of College Station
College Station. Heart of the Research Valley.
file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\tfletcher.CSTX\Local%20Settings\Temp\XPGrpWise\44... 5/22/2006
Page 1 of 1
Alan Gibbs - Butler/Hill Tracts: Case no. 05-06-A462P (Formerly 05-06-2100462P)
From: "Rupeet Malhotra"<Rupeet.Malhotra@mapmodteam.com>
To: <agibbs@cstx.gov>
Date: 1/20/2006 1:38 PM
Subject: Butler/Hill Tracts: Case no. 05-06-A462P (Formerly 05-06-2100462P)
Mr. Gibbs:
I have copied the paragraph from the additional data letter that mentions the property owner notification
requirement. The link to the sample notification letters is also provided. I hope that this information will
be helpful. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Please submit documentation of individual legal notices that were sent to property owners who are
adversely impacted by any increases in and/or shifting of the 1 -percent annual chance floodplain and any
increases in the 1 -percent annual chance water -surface elevations fohj Cree Legal notice may
take a form of certified mailing receipts or certification that all property owners have been notified, with
an accompanying mailing list and a copy of the letter sent. Examples of individual notices can be found
on pages 12 through 17 of the MT -2 instructions, which can be accessed at
http//www.fema.goy/pdf/fhm/mt2 ilst.pdf.
Regards
I'upeet Malholxa \_` / w2— w �
Civil Associate II
Michael Nker Jr. Corp,
3601 Fi5enhower Ave,, --
Alexandria VA 22304
Phone: 103960 8800 x 5339
® '-VI.t@
f
Ik _ CO
()ag WCA G��IL fS
file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\agibbs\Local%2OSettings\Temp\GW}000O1.HTM 1/30/2006
From: Alan Gibbs
To: blanders@thedovetailcompanies.com; Municipal Development Group
Date: 2/9/2006 1:35:12 PM
Subject: Woodlands - WL Plans
Lee,
Attached are comments from the subject plans:
V/1. Note that the encasement for creek crossings, casing spacers, etc. shall be in accordance with
Technical Specification No. 110 and standard detail W4-01. Additionally, the creek crossing should have
v/a minimum of 2 ft of cover from the encasement to the creek flowline.
0 In reaches of waterline that are in excess of 8 ft of cover, please provide a 20 ft PUE. The minimum
PUE width is 15 ft (some are depicted as 10 ft).
)3) In reaches of waterline where the existing cover is less than 4 ft and outside the regulatory floodway,
either fill to proposed depth to achieve required cover and associated compaction, or design the line with a
minimum of 4 ft of existing cover.
t/4. Depict the fire hydrants "off' the main as opposed to inline in plan view.
/5. As discussed, provide double water services. Verify the domestic demands in that doubles may can be
accommodated with 2 in taps. Additionally, 2 in taps are constructed with saddles distinct from the 3 in
and larger that require tees. cbft -0It ,A jp„l '7' PNVZ-,)
6. Loop the waterline as discussed in the "bend" of the creek and locate the hydrant(s) and FDCs
according.
7. Note that water mains on grade should be deflected horizontal in reaches to enable the valve stems
installed vertically.
v1 8. Provide a bend at Sta. 52+00.
V 9. The connection at Southwest Pkwy should be by a tee, 2 -valves, and a bend. �r
nThe western extension off the main at Sta. 42+00 should be reflected as private.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
Sr. Asst. City Engineer
City of College Station
Trey Fletcher - Re: The Woodlands of CS Page 1
From: Wally Urrutia
To: Trey Fletcher
Date: 3/14/2006 8:54 am
Subject: Re: The Woodlands of CS
The locations look fine for us.
Thanks Trey!
Wally Urrutia
Sanitation Superintendent
(979)764-3841
Fax(979)764-3822
>>> Trey Fletcher 3/13/2006 4:17 pm >>>
Wally -
Please take a look at the two proposed compactor locations. They are shown in green near each entrance.
Tks, Trey
Page 1 of 4
Alan Gibbs - RE: The Woodlands of CS
From:
Alan Gibbs
To:
Ellison, Chuck
Date:
3/27/2006 9:27 AM
Subject:
RE: The Woodlands of CS
Chuck,
A conflict arose on our end. How does Wednesday at 11am look for you? I have the Administrative Conference
Room by the City Manager's office booked.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
Sr. Asst. City Engineer
City of College Station
>>> "Chuck Ellison" <Chuck@ellisonlaw.com> 3/27/2006 8:28 AM >>>
Thank you Alan. 11:00 is great for me. I'll see you then.
Chuck
The Ellison Firm
302 Holleman Dr. East, Suite 76
College Station, TX 77840-7000
(979) 696-9889 ext. 106
(979) 693-8819(fax)
chuck@ellisonlaw.com
From: Alan Gibbs [mailto:Agibbs@cstx.gov]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 7:17 AM
To: Chuck Ellison
Subject: RE: The Woodlands of CS
Chuck,
The pending plat is titled: A Final Plat and Replat of The Woodlands of College Station being comprised
of a 73.45 acre Tract Volume 3003 Page 269 and Tracts 7 and 9, K.W. Schick Subdivision Volume 542 Page 131
and the 2.48 acre Christine Lane Abandonment
I will collect a complete list of items for filing the plat. Tentatively, how does meeting tomorrow at 11am look
for you?
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
Sr. Asst. City Engineer
City of College Station
file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\agibbs\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW}00005.HTM 3/27/2006
Page 2 of 4
>>> "Chuck Ellison" <Chuck@ellisonlaw.com> 3/25/2006 11:27 AM >>>
Alan
Sorry I was not more clear.
I need the legal description (the platted description) for other work I am doing for them. They seemed to think
they were very close to getting the plat filed. They thought from other meetings with you that because Lot 1
had the water line on its boundary, they would not have to provide a bond for the water line serving the
development (or actual construction).
Time is getting very critical. Can I set a meeting with you to discuss what other items need to be defined? In
order to make the market, construction needs to begin very quickly. If they are failing to do what needs to be
done, I can help. I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible. Thanks
Chuck
The Ellison Firm
302 Holleman Dr. East, Suite 76
College Station, TX 77840-7000
(979) 696-9889 ext. 106
(979) 693-8819(fax)
chuck@ellisonlaw.com
From: Alan Gibbs [mailto:Agibbs@cstx.gov]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 5:00 PM
To: Chuck Ellison
Subject: RE: The Woodlands of CS
Chuck,
I am unclear if you are requesting me to provide you the legal description? Bob did call and indicated he would
like to bond the waterline. However, the construction plans, fire report, and engineer's estimate are not yet
approved to define the amount of the bond.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
Sr. Asst. City Engineer
City of College Station
>>> "Chuck Ellison" <Chuck@ellisonlaw.com> 3/24/2006 2:38 PM >>>
Alan
Thank you. I need the legal description for some lien waiver forms I am working on for them. I'll pass this on.
Chuck
The Ellison Firm
302 Holleman Dr. East, Suite 76
College Station, TX 77840-7000
(979) 696-9889 ext. 106
file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\agibbs\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW}00005.HTM 3/27/2006
Page 3 of 4
(979) 693-8819(fax)
chuck@ellisonlaw.com
From: Alan Gibbs [mailto:Agibbs@cstx.gov]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:46 AM
To: Chuck Ellison
Subject: Fwd: The Woodlands of CS
Chuck,
I understand you had spoke with Deborah requesting the plat filing status. The required waterline is not under
construction yet and bond has not been provided. Fyi, I've asked Bob Landers his intent as attached. I'll let
you know upon his response. There may be other minor filing items that need to be defined and resolved as
well as we get closer to the filing.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
Sr. Asst. City Engineer
City of College Station
>>> Alan Gibbs 3/24/2006 10:40 AM >>>
Bob,
I wanted to touch base with you on the plat filing status. Was your intent to construct the waterline main
required by the Master Utility Plan or provide surety? As previously discussed, the construction or bond will be
required for this infrastructure to file the Final Plat.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
Sr. Asst. City Engineer
City of College Station
College Station. Heart of the Research Valley.
College Station. Heart of the Research Valley.
College Station. Heart of the Research Valley.
file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\agibbs\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW}00005.HTM 3/27/2006
Page 1 of 1
Alan Gibbs - The Woodlands
From: Alan Gibbs
To: DeLuca, Angela; Dunn, Joey; Fletcher, Trey; George, Bridgette; Mosley, Bob; Simms, Lance;
Smith, Mark
Date: 3/27/2006 12:00 PM
Subject: The Woodlands
FYI, a meeting is scheduled with Chuck Ellison at his request to discuss the filing of the plat. I have informed
them that the waterline in accordance with the Master Utility Plan (detail 3 attached) needs to be built or
bonded before filing - this is noted in the attached memos and emails. He contends since the lots have utilities
existing the 12" waterline required by the Master Utility Plan can be built with the site and that they were mis-
informed.
I've asked for Angela to join the meeting and provided this as background information.
The LIDO 3.3.F.4 and Sub Regs 6-D.5.4 discuss infrastructure being required to be constructed or bonded for
filing.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
Sr. Asst. City Engineer
City of College Station
file: //C: \Documents%20and%20 S ettings\agibbs\Local%20 S ettings\Temp\GW 100004. HTM 3/27/2006
C=FJ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
April 7, 2006
Mr. Larry Watkins
Project Manager
The Dovetail Companies
1550 Timothy Road
Suite 201
Athens, GA 30606
RE: The Woodlands of College Station
Dear Mr. Watkins:
E
Suite 320
9300 Wade Blvd,
Frisco, Texas 75035
972-335-3580
972-335-3779 - fax
Per your request we have reviewed the construction plans for The Woodlands of College Station
prepared by MDG with revisions dated February 16, 2006. The following are our concerns and
comments with the plans based on our 3 hour review:
1. Floodplain\Floodway — We did not see a floodplain reclamation plan for the existing
floodplain and floodway which allows for the filling of the floodplain/floodway for the
construction of buildings 10, 11, 36 to 39 and 46. Our experience indicates filling of the floodway
is not allowable and filling in the floodplain requires a CLOMR\LOMR submittal with the City
and FEMA. This process typically requires the developer to model the floodplain and show the
improvements will not create an increase in the upstream water surface elevation of more than .01
feet. Has a CLMR\LOMR been prepared for this project?
2. Bridges — Per our discussions there are three bridges to be constructed on the access
roads. The plans indicate one bridge crossing which lacks the detail needed to construct. We
assume the plans we will be preparing for the access road will address the remaining two bridges
from Southwest Parkway.
3. Grading — The grading for the project is incomplete and lacking finish contours and spot
elevations suitable for a contractor to construct. Also, per our calculations based on the limited
amount of information, about 92,000 cubic yards of fill we be needed to grade the site to the
elevations shown. We do not know if these grades take into account the floodplain reclamation.
The plan set lacks an overall grading plan. Grades are shown on a few of the sheets but in no
particular order.
4. Sanitary Sewer — The sanitary sewer system appears to be designed on average 3 to 5 feet
deeper than needed to serve the site. The design could incorporate drop manholes to the existing
mains to eliminate depth of the proposed construction. The Sanitary Sewer main alignments may
be reworked more efficiently to reduce the amount of pipe.
G:\65167000-%k?oodlamds-CS,Proj\Comes-Outl-etterslam Watkins 4-7-06.DOC
5. Storm Sewer — The plans to do not indicate any underground storm sewer for the project.
Since the grading plan is lacking sufficient detail to understand how the site is grading, we
question how a site this size and relatively flat would not have an underground storm sewer system
to convey run-off away from the buildings and parking areas. The grading plan does not indicate
swales or drainage courses for the run-off. Additionally, we found some areas that appeared to be
low points with the proper indication of run-off conveyance. We would anticipate there being
some type of storm drainage system for the project.
6. Drainage Area Map — The plans do not indicate where the different drainage areas outfall.
Also, there appears to be off-site drainage coming to the site from the north east corner not
accounted for in the design.
7. Water Distribution — The layout of the water distribution system does not appear to be
efficient. There may be other ways to align the water system to accomplish the fire and domestic
service needs and reduce the length of pipe.
8. Retaining Walls - We could not find grading information on the retaining walls. The plans
indicate walls but do not give wall elevations for the locations. The walls do not appear to tie into
proposed grades; they are drawn in an area not graded.
9. Ravin — The pavement sections are unclear as to where the three different sections are to
be constructed. What is the basis for the pavement design? Are these city standards or were they
based of a geotech report for the site?
10. Signaize and Markings — We did not see a plan indicating signage and marking of
pavement for stop signs, yield signs, etc. We note the plan indicates a fire lane.
11. Site Plan — There is not a site plan indicating parking counts, handicap spaces and
accessible sidewalks. The lack of a grading plan also hinders the ability to review the location of
handicap spaces for slope concerns. The site plan should also show building setbacks, distances
between buildings and other site related constraints.
12. Plat and/or Boundary Survey — The plans do not contain a plat or boundary survey
showing the limits of the project. Existing and proposed easements are not indicated clearly on the
drawings.
13. Demolition plan — There is not a demolition plan indicating areas to be removed such as
parts of Christine Lane.
14. Dimension Control Plan — There is not a dimension control plan providing the contractor
buildings corner and paving points for layout and construction of the site. We found some fire
lanes do not comply with Unified Fire Code of internal turning radius for fire trucks. Due to the
lack of dimension labels we could not established what radii complies with the codes.
15. Tree Mitigation — We did not see a tree mitigation plan or survey indicating the removal or
preservation of existing trees.
16. SWPPP - The plans contain an Erosion Control Plan but do not contain information
related to a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. For a site of this size siltation ponds are
typically required. We could not identify the location or the existence of siltation ponda. An area
has to be designated for topsoil and earthwork stockpiling with proper erosion control measures.
The plans appear to be missing information and lack the detail needed to construct the project.
The plans do state on the lower right hand corner that they should not be used for construction
purposes. Is there possibly another set of updated construction documents? The plans we
G'.65167000-Woodlvtds-CS1PrgllCor es-Out�LetteNsLarr>, Watkins 4-7-06 DOC
reviewed appear to be inefficient in many aspects and the concern of the floodplain reclamation is
an issue needing to be addressed immediately. The issues of most concern are:
Floodplain
Grading and Earthwork
Paving sections
Sanitary Sewer
Storm Sewer
Retaining walls
Recommendation:
Based on our review and experience with multifamily type projects, the site costs for this project
may be reduced through a redesign of the site. Our preliminary earthwork projections indicated
92,000 CY of fill needing to be imported to the site. If we assume $7.00 a CY, the cost of fill will
be $644,000. In addition, the sanitary sewer appears to be designed too deep and there is potential
cost savings in raising the mains and providing drop manholes at connections. Regarding the
paving, once the new geotech report is finalized there will better information of the paving
recommendation and associated cost. There also may be a way to eliminate some of the retaining
walls through re -grading the site. The wild card will be the effect of the CLOMR\LOMR related
to floodplain reclarnation. We remain concerned the site does not indicate storrn sewer
calculations. We believe some underground storm sewer will be required to carry the off-site
flows coming to the site and to address the on-site run-off in specific areas.
A redesign of the site would strive to eliminate the fill, revise the horizontal and vertical alignment
of the sanitary sewer, review the layout of the water main, reduce the amount of retaining walls and
incorporate storm sewer into the design for positive drainage.
We will overnight to you our comments on the plans for delivery to you Monday morning.
Please call me to discuss the project and options at your convenience.
Sincerely,
I\,,* ) �
Kevin S. Gaskey, PE
Senior Vice President
G968167000.N'oodia ds-CS\Proj\Corres-OutlLetters�,Larm• Watkins 4-7-06 DOC
0` Vic
1-2 84
ENCAc ,E vl CVr U Mi cf-r—
cnDJ tvNTt'Y-
tfV"�'
MR. ALAN GIBBS, P.E.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
F1
V. IVES ItJ P144(\/
RE: RESPONSE TO THE WOODLANDS REVIEW COMMENTS 5/31/2006
Mr. Gibbs:
Please find below our responses to your comments dated May 31, 2006. We have indicated the
City comment and our response.
For the Final Plat to be filed:
1 Provide surety such as Letter of Credit
Letter of credit will be provided by Mr. Larry Watkins of Dovetail.
For a Development Permit to be issued for Site Plan:
Provide the drive apron details such as the specific pavement tie-in detail for the decal
lane onto Southwest Parkway
A cross-section detail has been provided in sheet C-10 (Off-site Drive Plan A).
Provide note that retaining wall sealed plans will be provided to City
A note has been provided in the general notes section of the Site Plan (Sheet C-2)
Stating that "Retaining Wall sealed plans will be provided to the City"
1/3. All waterline construction plans need to be approved
Concur. Water plans and profiles have been included in this submittal per City of College
Station requirements.
v/4. Box Culvert B should berated C850 due to the cover
Box culvert classification has been noted on culvert profiles. (Sheet C-22)
bArC /
5. Provide revised landscape plan which will also include buffer yards requirements along
the east property line.
A reference note has been included in site plan stating that Landscape Plans comply with
this requirement. Please refer to Landscape plans for details.
6. Amend parking table to reflect phases
A note as been included in the Site Plan (Sheet C-2) stating that Developer to not begin
construction in regulatory floodplain areas of the site until FEMA has responded in
compliance with the MDG, Inc. LOMR submittal dated August 2005. A CL OMR will be
provided to the City of College Station to comply with FEMA regulations. As discussed
with Mr. Trey Fletcher
7. Provide table to indicate compliance with interior island requirements
A note has been included in the Site Data Summary table. (Sheet C-2)
8. Show interim parking lot plan to accommodate temporary second entrance location. An
inset box may be used to show this. Provide additional detail regarding the location,
dimensions, gate, knox box, etc. for this temporary access point.
A detail layout has been included in the Site Plan (Sheet C-2) depicting the temporary
access and Arelane layout. A note has been included on the number of parking spots to
be temporarily unavailable.
9. Show phase line for Phase 2 that includes area associated with pending floodplain issues.
See Note No. 6
10. FYI: A copy of our site plan check list is attached for reference.
Noted
11. Provide the following for stamping (we can stamp additional sets for you):
7 full sets (Site, Construction, and Landscaping)
2 site plan only
1 landscaping only
1 set of 11x17 grading and erosion control
4 engineers cost estimates for public infrastructure
Copies have been provided with this submittal.
Revise the engineer's estimate accordingly for the total public infrastructure to be built
(the provided engineer's estimate for the 12" waterline is adequate for initial bonding
purposes, as previously noted)
The engineers estimate (Opinion of Probable Cost) has will be provided with the letter of
credit noted above by Mr.Larry Watkins.
v-'2. Note the bore and line under FM 2818 is proposed - plan and profile is needed.
The Bore section has been approved on a separate submittal as discussed with Mr. Alan
/ Gibbs.
3. Remove "parallel" waterlines and extend the associated domestic services and fire
service/suppression line to the main - for all "Garden Units". The domestic services
should have no more than 3 meters off a single tap to the main. The domestic service
from the main to the meters is public should included in a PUE. The fire service line is
public and should be included in a PUE and extends from the main Y to 7' to an isolation
valve - beyond the isolation valve to the building is private. Similarly, depict/note fire
service line details including sizing, isolation valves, easements, clarify if fire services are
proposed to all townhome buildings as 2", fire services should connect in bends need to
be revised, and if fire service lines are to be provided separately in the future associated
building plans.
"Parallel" lines have been removed. A 2"or 3" main, which has been proMed as part of
the public improvements requirements, has been included where a tap is connected to
such main with 3 meters per tap. A 15' PUE will be included in the plat. An isolation valve
will be installed in all lire services as part of a standard Bre service assembly. The Are
service valve will be located within the 15' PUE being public no more than 7 LF. Fire
Services sizes have been verified and connection in bends revised, Final services location
will be depicted in recorded drawings
For a Development Permit to be issued for Construction Plans for the remaining Public Waterline:
1. Provide plan and profile for all public water lines (the 12" waterline is the associated
bonding is what is required for platting — the remainder of the public waterline is
obviously required for the site plan approval)
Water profiles have been included in Civil construction drawings. Water mains (public)
longer than 20 LF have been included in set.
Revise the engineer's estimate accordingly for the total public infrastructure to be built
Opinion of Probable costs will be provided once imminent approval for Development
permit is notified by the City to include all changes/edits/comments recommended by the
City.
3. Remove "parallel" waterlines and extend the associated domestic services and fire
service/suppression line to the main — for all "Garden Units". The domestic services
should have no more than 3 meters off a single tap to the main. The domestic service
from the main to the meters is public should included in a PUE. The fire service line is
public and should be included in a PUE and extends from the main 5' to T to an isolation
valve — beyond the isolation valve to the building is private. Similarly, depict/note fire
service line details including sizing, isolation valves, easements, clarify if fire services are
proposed to all townhome buildings as 2", fire services should connect in bends need to
be revised, and if fire service lines are to be provided separately in the future associated
building plans.
See Note 3 for Development Permit to be issued for construction plans for the 12" water
line.
PLANNING COMMENTS — MAY 31, 2006
1. Provide revised landscape plan which will also include buffer yards requirements along
the east property line.
2. Amend parking table to reflect phases
3. Provide table to indicate compliance with interior island requirements
4. Show interim parking lot plan to accommodate temporary second entrance location. An
inset box may be used to show this. Provide additional detail regarding the location,
dimensions, gate, knox box, etc. for this temporary access point.
5. Show phase line for Phase 2 that includes area associated with pending floodplain issues.
6. FYI: A copy of our site plan check list is attached for reference.
These comments were addressed above in the previous comments.
From: Alan Gibbs
To: Ellison, Chuck
Date: 6/19/2006 4:39:03 PM
Subject: The Woodlands of College Station
Chuck
In response to your inquiry to Deborah regarding the status of Final Plat, we are very close... We received
the Letter of Credit on 6/16. However, we still need the engineer's estimate to include the costs
associated with waterline bore and encasement at FM 2818 (which would appear to be approximately
$25,000) and have the estimate sealed as well. The Letter of Credit should be increased accordingly.
The Site Plan and Waterline Construction Plans are being stamped - simply awaiting Sheet LD.1 and
Letter of Credit resolved to release the Site Plans.
Sheet LD.1 which were omitted from the Landscape plans. This can be done by email to Trey simply
confirm the counts. Please provide this in 11x17 digital format.
Sewer Detail sheets were inadvertantly submitted, however I printed Water Details sheets to be included.
Additionally, notes regarding the LOMR submittal, additional required items such as valves, blowoffs, and
state permits I noted on the plans as well to avoid another resubmittal.
Please let me know how I can help further.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
Sr. Asst. City Engineer
City of College Station
>>> Alan Gibbs 6/15/2006 2:51:25 PM >>>
Chuck,
The attached estimate should include the bore at 2818 and should be sealed by an engineer. The
associated surety has not been provided to date. Btw, we discussed that in the absense of revising the
submitted plat, a future dedication or replat will be necessary to accommodate the revised northern drive
veering out of the access easement - the same is true on the southern drive to 2818.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
Sr. Asst. City Engineer
City of College Station
>>> "Chuck Ellison" <Chuck ellisonlaw.com> 6/13/2006 3:25 PM >>>
Alan
Here is the information that we discussed on the phone. I should have
the letter of credit soon. If you need anything else, please call me.
Thanks for your help!
Chuck
The Ellison Firm
302 Holleman Dr. East, Suite 76
College Station, TX 77840-7000
(979) 696-9889 ext. 106
(979) 693-8819(fax)
chuck(o)-ellisonlaw.com
From: hugo.morales(a)-kimley-horn.com[mai Ito: hugo.mora les(a)kimley-horn.coml
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 2:03 PM
To: Chuck Ellison
Cc: Kevin.Gaskey(cDkimley-horn.com; jbaker(cDwoodlandsofcollegestation.com
Subject: RE: College Station
Chuck,
Attached is the OPC (Opinion of Probable cost) for the Woodlands at
College Station water line (12")
and the Site Plan.
The site plan is a 24x36 exhibit.
Please let me know if you need me to send this to Kinkos or some other
place that you may know where they can print a 24x36 exhibit.
I'm copying Jerry Baker in case you cannot print a 24x36 site plan.
Please feel free to call us with any questions.
Thank you
Hugo Morales, EIT
KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES
9300 Wade Boulevard, Suite 320
Frisco, Texas 75035
P. 972-335-3580
F. 972-335-3779
The electronic data files ("Files") furnished by Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. to the intended receiver of the Files ("Receiving
Party")
are provided only for the convenience of Receiving Party and only for
its
sole use.
From: Gaskey, Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:42 AM
To: Morales, Hugo
Subject: FW: College Station
When you get back can you send this info to chuck? Probably will have
to send to Kinko's
Kevin
From: Chuck Ellison (mailto:Chuck(a)-ellisonlaw.comj
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 8:06 AM
To: James Snyder; Nora Thompson; Erika Lane; Gaskey, Kevin
Cc: Larry Watkins; Joseph Johnson; Stacey Smith
Subject: RE: College Station
I am available to assist in any way. I don't have the site plan or the
engineer's estimate. I have copied Kevin Gaskey on this e-mail.
Chuck
The Ellison Firm
302 Holleman Dr. East, Suite 76
College Station, TX 77840-7000
(979) 696-9889 ext. 106
(979) 693-8819(fax)
chucKD,ellisonlaw.com
From: James Snyder jmailto:Jamesa-thedovetailcompanies.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:34 AM
To: Nora Thompson; Erika Lane
Cc: Chuck Ellison; Larry Watkins; Joseph Johnson; Stacey Smith
Subject: College Station
Good Morning all,
Dave Mulkey will sign the letter of credit Doc.s this morning and return
them to Erika; Tom has signed.
I am operating under the presumption that once Nora has the LOC, someone
will take or provide the city with 3 things:
LOC
Site Plan
Engineer's opinion of Water system costs (to support LOC)
Best
James k Snyder
iames .thedovetailcompanies.com
706.357.9100 (main) * 706.227.6979 (direct) * 706.357.9101 (fax) "
706.255.6791 (cell)
Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 10 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination,
distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited.
Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error
and then delete it. Thank you.
CC: Fletcher, Trey; Grace, Deborah; hugo.morales@kimley-horn.com;
Kevin.Gaskey@kimley-horn.com; Smith, Mark
Date: 11/17/06
To:
Mr. Alan Gibbs
1101 Texas Avenue South
College Station, TX 77842
From:
Transmittal:
DOVETAIL BUILDERS
Jerry W. Baker Mobile Phone: 706 215-2397 & 832-347-2883
1725 Harvey Mitchell Pkwy. Jobsite Office: 979 694-1294
College Station, TX 77840 Fax Number 979 764-1374
Dear Mr. Gibbs
I am delivering by hand 8 sets of the Woodlands of College Station revised plans from
Kimley Horn , Sheets C-26, C28 and C-39 depicting the water line relocation to avoid the
power pole and braces and adding the water line to the proposed and now relocated fire
hydrant. We also added an irrigation meter at the entry drive off Harvey Mitchell
Parkway. These changes are responses to your comments in email of November 3, 2006
(copy attached for quick referral).
We are anxious to continue the work on the water line as quickly as your review is
complete.
Any questions to 706 215 -
Sincerely,
Jerry Baker
RF,: Woodlands
Jerry Baker
From: hugo.morales@kimley-horn.com
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:58 AM
To: Agibbs@cstx.gov
Cc: Kevin.Gaskey@kimley-horn.com
Subject: RE: Woodlands
Alan,
Please see our response below.
Please call us if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Hugo Morales FIT
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
9300 Wade Blvd., Suite 320
Frisco, TX 75035
P. 972-335-3580
F. 972-335-3779
hugo. morales@,kim ley -horn. com
-----Original Message -----
From: Alan Gibbs (mailto;Agibbs(i',cstx,gov]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:17 AM
To: Morales, Hugo; Jerry Baker
Cc: Lindsay Boyer
Subject: Fwd: Woodlands
Hugo/JerrY,
I have reviewed the resubmittal with the following comments:
Pagel of 3
1. Sheet C-2: The proposed fill west of the creek should encroach into the Hike and Bike easement. This easement should
be left in natural state and no vegetation removed.
We assume you meant "should not" encroach. The plat will be updated to accommodate the easement in the proper location.
3. Sheet C-2, and C-22: Due to the height of the headwalls at the two crossings, provide appropriate rails and a sidewalk for
pedestrian passage. Also, please clarify how the hike and bike pedestrian movements are to be accommodated. Additional,
hike and bike easement appears necessary as well as a structural modifications near each bridge/drive.
Guard rails have been provided on the crossing from Southwest. Guard rail and Handrails have been provided for the
Christine Lane crossing. The Hike and bike easement ends at Christine Lane. Also the plat will be updated to accommodate
the easement to connect with Christine Lane. Structural modifications will not be necessary once the easement is updated.
4. Waterline "F": Depict line on site plan, provide a 4" blow -off at end or relocate FH to end, provide a gate valve at Sta.
2+00.
11/15/2006
R.F.: Woodlands
4" blow -off and FH will be relocated.
Steve,
Response to attachment:
1. What is the status of the brigde design?
2. A zero -rise is required for the entire project.
3. It would be helpful to clarify in the report table and exhibits.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
City of College Station
Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works
>>> Alan Gibbs 10/6/2006 5:11 PM >>>
Jerry/Flugo-
Page 2 of 3
The associated ZBA variance for the bridge encroachment into the floodway was approved this last Tuesday (10-3-6). The
last set of plans did not have a bridge design included. Please provide the subject bridge design as well as the revisions stated
below for a new stamped sets.
The City will need additional copies for the revisions:
7 full sets (Site, Construction, and Landscaping)
2 site plans only
1 landscaping only (if altered)
1 set of 11 x 17 grading and erosion control plans
4 additional engineers cost estimates
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
City of College Station
Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works
>>> Alan Gibbs 9/25/2006 1 1:1 1 AM >>>
Jerry/Kevin/Hugo,
As discussed, the sizing of the RCI3Cs is acceptable. Specifically, 7— TxTs and 5— TxTs for the two drive crossings from
Southwest Parkway.
However, there are additional items below that should be revised before I stamp the plans:
11/15/2006
RE: Woodlands
Page 3 of")
1. Sheet C-2: The proposed fill west of the creek should encroach into the Hike and Bike easement. This easement should
be left in natural state and no vegetation removed.
2. Sheet C-25: Note in the typical blowups that the fire line from the main to the edge of the easement is to be 3" and a 3"
gate valve is to be placed just inside the easement. (Beyond the easement and valve is private and can be reduced down to 2
/z"•)
3. Sheet C-2, and C-22: Due to the height of the headwalls at the two crossings, provide appropriate rails and a sidewalk for
pedestrian passage. Also, please clarify how the hike and bike pedestrian movements are to be accommodated.
4. A public waterline will need to be extended to serve the hydrant proposed with the construction of the drive off Harvey
Mitchell Parkway.
5. FYI - FDCs are not depicted on the cottages or Building #13. The fire line and FDC do not appear to line up on Building
#39. Some of the specifics may be addressed with the Fire Marshall during construction.
FYI - TxDOT has approved this drive off Harvey Mitchell Parkway.
7. FYI - FEMA has responded again to the LOMB Case #06-06-B753P submitted by MDG, by letter dated September 5,
2006 stating that a fee of $4,400 is required. At Dovetail's request, I have subsequently left a voicemail with Dr. Saleem
Ashraf, P.E. (with Michael Baker for FEMA at 703/960-8800 x5229) to inform FEMA we wish this LOMR request be
rescinded - and that a separate study was forthcoming. Also, I have let MDG know that I was contacting FEMA on
Dovetail's behalf.
8. FYI - The ZBA variance associated with the floodway encroachment for the bridge with the drive from Harvey Mitchell
Parkway is scheduled for the October 3rd ZBA Meeting which begins at 6pm here at City Hall's Council Chambers.
Let me know if there are any questions.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
City of College Station
Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works
College Station. Heart of the Research Valley.
11/15/2006
Page 1 of 1
Lindsay Boyer - Woodlands Sign Application
From: Lindsay Boyer
To: pmazzone@thedovetailcompanies.com
Date: 6/13/2007 4:12 PM
Subject: Woodlands Sign Application
CC: Crissy Hard
MM
We are unable to approve the sign package that was submitted to our office this morning (Permit 07-1771). The
following is some detailed information about our sign regulations and what can be done within the confines of
the ordinances.
The property qualifies for one subdivision identification sign at each primary entrance for a total of two signs.
These may be 150 square feet, a maximum of 15 feet in height, and setback 10 feet from the ROW. The entry
signs that were submitted may work if they are revised to remove the commercial free standing portion and
meet the requirements of a subdivision sign otherwise. We cannot permit a commercial sign without an
approved site plan for a commercial project on those properties. Once that site plan has been approved we may
issue a permit for a freestanding sign, however in order have multiple signs the building plot must be over 25
acres and have 1000 feet of frontage on a road OR be 15 acres and have frontage on two sides on a minor
arterial or greater.
Apartment identification signs must be on property that is zoned R-4 and cannot be offsite of the apartment
property. The round -about features/sign are not on the lot for the apartment, nor are they in an area that is
zoned R-4, leaving them to be qualified under freestanding commercial signs. Which as stated above, cannot be
permitted on the site yet. Also, in order to qualify as an exempt sign under the visibility requirements, the sign
must be 900 feet from any road or property line to be considered non-visible. Options include putting non-visible
signs on the apartment property meeting the distance/font size requirements, and/or constructing the arbor and
round about features without any signage attached under a separate building permit for accessory structures.
Let me know if you have any questions. The ordinance I am referencing is the City of College Station Unified
Development Ordinance Section 7.4, Signs which can be accessed at the following site:
http:ljwww.cstx.gov/home[index.asp?page=418
Also, I will be out of town beginning on Thursday on a two week vacation. If you have any questions during that
time, please contact Crissy Hard. She is familiar with the application as well as City regulations.
Thanks -
Lindsay
Lindsay B. Boyer, AICP
Staff Planner
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue S.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3570 / (979) 764-3496 Fax
Iboyer@cstx.gov
www.cstx.gov
file://C:ADocuments and Settings\lboyer.CSTX\Local Settings\Temp\XPGrpWise\46701772... 7/6/2007
Lindsey,
Thanks so much for your help today on what 1 needed to get the permitting going. As I mentioned,
we are looking for an 8/1/07 completion date so I look forward to getting the permits soon. Please
call or email if there is anything I can help with.
Thanks,
Paul Mazzone
Purchasing Coordinator
706.357.9100 ... Ext. 3212 (main)
706.357.9101 (fax)
bmazzone(a).thedovetailcomuanies.com
C' 0 it s 1' A Ni 1 1. S
Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 10 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
retention, dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly
prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and
then delete it. Thank you.