HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Review STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: CULPEPPER PLAZA ADDITION (FP-REPLAT) - 08-00500142
PLANNING
1. The 54-ft. access easement across 10A-R encroaches into the 15-ft. right-of-way dedication.
This portion of the easement will have to be abandoned before the right-of-way can be
accepted. Please provide evidence of the abandonment. / received your email this morning
re: the access easement and will be looking at this next week. 7-18-08
2. The requirement for a sidewalk may not be deferred to time of site plan. Please either
provide the appropriate sidewalk or request a variance to the Subdivision Regulations
Section 8-M.
3. I apologize, but after speaking with our Legal staff, the access easement across Lot 9 will
have to be filed before the plat is considered. Please submit the volume and page number.
We will not object to the easement being filed with a conditional granting clause.
4. Clarke &Wyndham, Inc. is the applicant for the final plat. Please include the information for
Clarke &Wyndham, Inc. in the title block.
5. Please adjust General Surveyor Notes #5 to identify Lots 10A-R and 10R-2 to be considered
a building plot.
Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: July 16, 2008
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
6. Our records indicate that Volume 2855, Page 149 is the correct recording information for the
original plat. Please verify.
7. Please submit construction documents for sidewalks.
Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: 7/18/08
Home of Texas A&M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: CULPEPPER PLAZA ADDITION (FP-REPLAT) - 08-00500142
PLANNING
1. The 54-ft. access easement across 10A-R encroaches into the 15-ft. right-of-way dedication.
This portion of the easement will have to be abandoned before the right-of-way can be
accepted. Please provide evidence of the abandonment. / received your email this morning
re: the access easement and will be looking at this next week. 7-18-08
2. The requirement for a sidewalk may not be deferred to time of site plan. Please either
provide the appropriate sidewalk or request a variance to the Subdivision Regulations
Section 8-M.
3. I apologize, but after speaking with our Legal staff, the access easement across Lot 9 will
have to be filed before the plat is considered. Please submit the volume and page number.
We will not object to the easement being filed with a conditional granting clause.
4. Clarke & Wyndham, Inc. is the applicant for the final plat. Please include the information for
Clarke &Wyndham, Inc. in the title block.
5. Please adjust General Surveyor Notes #5 to identify Lots 10A-R and 10R-2 to be considered
a building plot.
Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: July 16, 2008
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
6. Our records indicate that Volume 2855, Page 149 is the correct recording information for the
original plat. Please verify.
7. Please submit construction documents for sidewalks.
Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: 7/18/08
Home of Texas A&M University
cc: College Station Hospitality Corporation, via U.S. MailL
Kevin McClure, McClure & Browne, Inc., via fax 979.693.2554 a,'
Case file #08-00500142
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: CULPEPPER PLAZA ADDITION (FP-REPLAT) - 08-00500142
PLANNING
1. Provide the phone and fax numbers for the owner (not a duplicate of Clark and Wyndham).
2. Provide a corrected sheet 2 of the application with the number of lots per zoning district and
the acreage of floodplain. The chart should only show the proposed linear feet of public
streets and water, not existing linear feet.
3. Provide proof of the authority of Snehal Patel to sign the plat for College Station Hospitality
Coporation.
4. Please include the applicant's information in the title block of the plat.
5. The Original Plat should be shown as it is currently platted, including the name of the street
adjacent to Lot 10A(Kyle South).
6. The Replat should use "George Bush Drive East".
7. Please add a note to the plat (from the original plat) that Lot 10 & 1OR are considered a
single building plot in terms of signage access and parking. In addition, the two will be
considered a single building plot for Non-Residential Architectural Standards.
8. Please depict the adjacent access easement to the southwest of the property.
9. Provide Volume and Page number for the access easement. This easement must be filed
prior to the final plat as Lot 10B does not otherwise have access. The proposed access to
the lot will require site planning and reconfiguration of the improvements on Lot 9. As the
Applicant is the owner of Lot 9, both parties should be aware the development may not
proceed on Lot 10B until the appropriate site changes (in accordance with the Unified
Development Ordinance) have been approved by the City and issued a Certificate of
Completion.
10. Please rename the lots with an "R" to identify the lots as replated.
11. Section 8-M of the Subdivision Regulations requires sidewalks along all rights-of-way more
then 60 feet in width. Construction documents should be provided for a public sidewalk, or a
variance requested.
12. Right-of-way dedication of 15 feet is required as George Bush Drive East is a minor arterial
on the City's Thoroughfare Plan and requires a right-of-way width of 100 feet based on the
B/CS Design Guidelines for Streets.
13. PUEs are required on the rear of all lots in compliance with Section 8-I of the Subdivision
Regulations, or a variance requested. This needs to be addressed for Lot 10A.
14. Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City
of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your
plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will
constitute a completely new review.
15. The construction documents and reports are still under review and may affect the plat.
Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: June 30, 2008
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 3
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. Please provide ownership information for adjacent properties.
2. Please verify that the floodway/floodplain depicted on the plat is consistent with the recent
LOMR effective April 25, 2008.
Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: 6/30/08
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
1. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for electric lines.
2. If applicable, the following easements will be required:
If the transformer is located closer to the building, a 20' PUE will need to be granted
from the existing PUE on the SE side of the property to the transformer location.
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. Developer installs conduit per City specs and design.
2. City will provide drawings for conduit installation.
3. Developer to intercept existing conduit at designated transformer, switchgear, or other
existing electrical facility and extend as required.
4. If conduit does not exist at designated location, developer to furnish and install conduit as
shown on electrical layout.
5. Developer pours transformer pad(s) per City specs and design.
6. Developer installs pull boxes per City specs and design (pull boxes provided by the City).
7. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2000 or later version of plat and/or site plan. Email to:
sweido(a�cstx.gov/.
8. Developer provides load data for project.
9. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Sam Weido at
979.764.6314.
Reviewed by: Sam Weido Date: 6-24-08
SANITATION
1. Sanitation is okay with this project.
Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: June 24, 2008
FIRE
1)No Comments
Reviewed by: Jerry Duffey Deputy Fire Marshal Date: 24 June 2008
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. 3 of 3