Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence B Bleyl , & & Associates 1722 Broadmoor Suite 210 A Project Engineering & Management Bryan, TX 77802 July 14, 2008 City of College Station P O Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Attn: Alan Gibbs, P.E. City Engineer Jennifer Prochazka, AICP Senior Planner RE: Kyle View Estates Comments Below is a listing of the comments received June 25, 2008 regarding the site plan for the referenced project. Items specific to the Final Plat were identified during a meeting held on Friday, June 27th and were addressed in a submittal letter on Monday, June 30t. The comments included here along with our comments in italics below address all other items that were not addressed in the submittal letter from Monday, June 30t. All comments addressed in Monday's submittal letter are included but are listed in a lighter font. PLANNING 1) Please submit a mylar copy of the approved Preliminary Plat for our records. Mylar was submitted on July 3, 2008. 2) Please provide verification of signature authority for "Kyleview Estates, Ltd." Certificate of General Partner included with signature. 3) The application needs to be signed and dated. Was previously submitted; have included another. 4) An index sheet showing the entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger is required. Kerr Surveying to submit. 5) Please include the number of lots in the title block. Included on plat submittal. 6) The "private r.o.w." should be labeled as "H.O.A. common area." Private Alleys should be in H.O.A. common areas, as well. Included on plat submittal. 7) Is the rear lot width of Lot 38 correct? It doesn't seem to make sense. Please check all measurements. Corrected on plat. 8) Is this subdivision proposed to be gated? If so, please see Section 8-W of the Subdivision Regulations for application and design requirements. Section 8-W2 outlines several items needed by the City, Including the legal instrument establishing the H.O.A., the street maintenance agreement, information on the reserve fund to be approved by the City Engineer, and written permission for the City's access to the subdivision. These items will need to be approved by the City Attorney, per section 8-W.2(e). Yes it is gated. Included in the submittal are all of the H.Q.A. documents. All blanks will be filled in once plat is filed at the County. Documents include: 1) Certificate of Formation 2) Bryan Austin Conroe (979)-268-1125 (512)-328-7878 (979)-260-3849 (512)-328-7884 Fax (936)-441-7833 (936)-760-3833 Fax Management Certificate 3) Bylaws of H.O.A. 4) Deed without Warranty and 5) Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for H.O.A. 9) Please be aware that not all lots meet minimum R-1 Single Family Residential requirements. If you wish to rezone the property in the future, each lot would need to encompass a minimum of 5,000 s.f. and have a lot width (at the setback for cul-de-sac lots) of 50 feet and a depth of 100 feet along the side lot lines. Generally, a 50'x 100' rectangle should fit within each lot. Noted. 10)Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a completely new review. Noted. ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 1) Slope easement required on Boulder Court and Treeline Drive for slope supporting roadway. Easements placed on Plat submittal. 2) Preliminary plat Comment: Does the Wellborn Water Supply Corporation blanket easement cover the entire property? City of College Station requires first rights to PUEs. This blanket will need to be released prior to dedication of any PUEs. How was this resolved? Easement document was not a blanket and only covered existing lines. Wellborn Water Supply Corporation provided letter the removal of any blank easements when Final Plat is recorded. -1 3) Please note: Roadway fill shall be in accordance with BCS Technical Specifications ' (especially note Specs 302, 303, and 305, 310, and 312). — The comment has beenjjjj-o1• 1 - addressed within the plan set. 4) Clearly indicate limits of PUE at end of Denver Court. This has been clarified on the plat and in the plans. 5) Due to sanitary sewer depth located in Lot 3 of Block 2, 20' PUE width is required. This easement has been widened. 6) Provide lot grading plan for lots with cross-drainage. This has become a major issue with homeowners whose neighbors build high and block drainage. Our grading plan shows not only grading within the right of ways, but general drainage patterns within the lots. Since this is a private development where the Developer and the Home Builder are one in the same, it's to his advantage to assure positive drainage for each lot. Unlike most subdivisions, there are alleyways along the rear of each lot, so as our drainage plan shows, there are many lots where some water is taken to the front, and some to the back and into these alleys making grading much simpler. .1 7) Please provide elevations every 25-ft in all knuckles/cul-de-sacs. — The comment has been addressed within the plan set. "a) Provide curb return radii. — The comment has been addressed within the plan set. 9) Provide concrete apron at Treeline Drive intersection with Denver Court. — The comment has been addressed within the plan set. C'/10)Concrete aprons should be in compliance with standard detail. — Noted 11) s the gate on Treeline Drive exit only? How does someone "bail-out" that doesn't get '‘' in? Exit only. Throat depth was elongated to allow for entrance and exit option. \ >by 12)Provide street signage plan — The comment has been addressed within the plan set. 13)Verify that fire trucks can manipulate the grade changes along the secondary access route. — All secondary access routes have been reviewed. A design speed of 20 mph was used in determining the K values and vertical curve lengths for each vertical inflection. Based on the AASHTO design manual, the minimum K value for a crest and sag at 20 mph is, respectively, 7 and 17. lI k: _CA Only one secondary access route (end of Denver Court — Sheet 32) was found not in accordance to this standard. The route has been revised accordingly. 14)You may want adjust the storm sewer pipe proposed along property side lot lines. As proposed it could cause problems with fencing. — The comment has been addressed within the plan set. 15) Provide storm pipe and outfall velocities. — The storm pipe and outfall velocities are provided under the pipe report data sheet from Storm CAD attached to this comment list. Please remove the current pipe report data sheet for the drainage report and replace with the current pipe report data sheet. 16) Is there adequate cleaning velocity in the minimally sloped pipes? Is the appropriate surface treatment utilized for the velocities at out fall? Is velocity dissipation required? Based on the Bryan/College Station Unified Guidelines, the minimum velocity for conduits flowing full is 2.5 ft/sec. All slopes for conduit within Kyle View Estates are designed steep enough to allow for a velocity in excess of 2.5 ft/sec based on Manning's equation given that the pipe is flowing full. The pipe report data sheet from Storm CAD listing all velocities is attached to this comment sheet. Appropriate surface treatments are utilized at the outfalls of the storm sewer pipes. The design of the project calls for a rip rap lined treatment at the outfalls of SD 0-3, SD 0-4, SD 0- 5, and SD 0-6. The outfalls of SD 0-1 and SD 0-2 flow into a concrete lined pilot channel within the detention pond. The majority of outfalls are designed to flow out onto riprap as a source of velocity dissipation. 17)Why are you proposing to separate junction and inlet boxes at Treeline Drive and Boulder Court intersection? If the line is public the City would prefer one box. Separate inlet and junction boxes are proposed due to concerns with the hydraulic grade line. The original design of the storm sewer used one box; however, the results showed the HGL was coming through the inlets and was not in accordance with the B/CS Unified Guidelines. By designing the storm with a separate junction and inlet box, it allowed the HGL to be within the constraints of the B/CS Guidelines. 18) Headwall/inlet pipe to I-DA 17A and grate inlet/inlet pipe are outside ROW and PUE. Relocate or dedicate additional easement. — An additional easement has been dedicated. 19)FL IN listed at Outfall SD 0-3— The comment has been addressed within the plan set. 20)FL OUT missing on SD I-DA 18. — The comment has been addressed within the plan set. 21)Be aware that as you are designating the entire detention pond as a PUE, no structures are allowed in a PUE. —noted 22)What is depth of water in swale? Verify flow stays within drainage swale. What is velocity? Is it appropriately lined? The 24"pipe has been extended to the beginning of the rock rip-rap that armors the existing outfall swale. 2�Ultimately a copy of the filed 1.02-acre drainage easement is required. — Noted 24) Provide drainage design info for interim drainage/detention plans. — A revised copy of the Kyle View Estates Drainage Report is supplied with this comment list. Please remove the report from the 3-ring binder and replace with the revised drainage report. 25)Still waiting on a water design report. — The revised utility report with the supplied water design portion is supplied with this comment list. l (- 2'benote horizontal and vertical deflections of water line. Indicate deflection along barrel(,Li{ of pipe and not at joints. - The comment has been addressed withirj the plan set. 27)Elevations need to be provided at 100-foot stations. - noted �. ' 28)Show storm sewer conflict with water line (Sheet 48) - The comment has been addressed within the plan set. 29)Provide overall Utility Site Layout. - The comment has been addressed within the plan set. 30)Valves are required to be located one less than every leg of tee or cross connection. - The comment has been addressed within the plan set. 31)45-bend called out in profile. 11.25-bend in plan view. (sheet 50) - Both bends are called out on Sheet 50 as needed. The 11.25-bend is shown and called out on Sheet 50 but is split by a match line at station 107+50 in the plan view. 32)Denote TCEQ crossing requirements at water/sanitary crossing. - The comment has been addressed within the plan set. 33)Provide 12' minimum separation between water line and storm Sheet 53 of 81. Aren't there 2 storm pipes? - The comment has been addressed within the plan set. It is assumed that the comment was meant to be 12"minimum separation. There are in fact 2 storm pipes, and the plan set has been addressed to show both storm sewers. 34)Show proposed grade on water and sewer lines Sheet 53 of 81. Proposed grade stops at Sta 122+75. - The comment has been addressed within the plan set. 35)Water service wyes need to be centered on common property line. - The comment has been addressed within the plan set. All water service wyes that were not originally shown to be on the lot line were adjusted if possible. There were isolated instances in which the wye remained in the same location in order to avoid other conflicts. 36)90-bends shall be avoided. Sta 210+19.50 (Sheet 56 of 81). - The comment has been addressed within the plan set. 37)Avoid placement of valves in handicap ramps. - noted 38)Show water line conflict with storm Sheet 64 of 81. - The comment has been addressed within the plan set. The water line has been lowered along Treeline Dr. in order to not conflict with the storm sewer line. 39)Provide amended sanitary sewer report. - The revised utility report with the supplied water design portion is supplied with this comment list. 40)Sanitary sewer service wyes need to be centered on common property line. - The comment has been addressed within the plan set. All sewer service wyes that were not originally shown to be on the lot line were adjusted if possible. There were isolated instances in which the wye remained in the same location in order to avoid other conflicts. 41)Revised set of plans is missing the "Off-site" sanitary sewer line to the Lift Station. - The off-site sanitary sewer line is provided under the Westminster Lift Station and Force Main plan set. 42)Sewer depths greater than 14 feet require 30 feet PUEs. All sewer lines with a depth greater than 14 feet are located within 30 feet wide PUE's. 43)Why are you proposing 22" encasement on 8" line? - The encasement has been revised. The proposed encasement will be 16" 44)Specific dry bore on railroad and Wellborn Road crossings. - The comment has been addressed within the plan set. 45)Provide volume and page of existing easements the force main will be located in. The existing easements are shown on the Westminster Subdivision Phase I which was filed on 01/19/1994. Volume 2016, Page 61. 46)What is the force main pipe material? - The material will be 4" SDR 26 D-2241 PVC. The comment has been addressed within the plan set. 47) Provide additional encasement length for future width of Barron Road. — Additional encasement has been provided as shown on the plan set. Based on the May 2006 Thoroughfare Plan, Baron Road is planned to be a minor arterial. Because of this, we have increased the size of the encasement to 82'. We ask that the city please inform us if any change to the alignment has been made as the construction drawings assume that the alignment of Baron Road will remain as is. 48)Provide Railroad permit. Hard copies of the railroad permit are supplied with this comment list. 49)Waiting on TxDOT permit approval. Utility and driveway permits have been approved and are currently with the City. 50)CSU was forwarded the revised plans for their comments on sanitary sewer depth and the lift station. — CSU has agreed in principle to the sanitary sewer depths and lift station as mentioned in a meeting on the afternoon of June 27. FIRE 51)The alley off Treeline Drive between lot's 50 and 51, will be a Fire lane. This fire lane will need to be painted as such and conform to the Fire Apparatus radius template. The Fire lane will end at Denver Court. — Pavement striping has been added to the plan set and will be in accordance to the College Station Fire Prevention Division Construction & Development Guide. A detail of the striping is provided within the plan set. The alley has been adjusted to conform to the Fire Apparatus radius template. GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS 1) This plat is outside the College Station Utility electric service area. Customer will have to get with their electric supplier for this area to determine electric service specifications and requirements. Noted. SANITATION 1) Sanitation is okay with this project. Thank you. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions about this submittal. .ncerely, am J. mon, P.E. Project Engineer Cc: Paul Leventis File B Bleyl & Associates 1722 Broadmoor ilk& Suite 210 A Project Engineering & Management Bryan, TX 77802 June 30, 2008 Jennifer Prochazka,AICP Senior Planner City of College Station P O Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 RE: Kyle View Estates Final Plat Below is a listing of the comments received June 25, 2008 regarding the site plan for the referenced project. Items specific to the Final Plat were identified during a meeting held on Friday, June 27"'and attended by Mark Savarino from our office. These comments along with our comments in italics are below. Other comments that need to be addressed, but are not critical to the Final Plat are listed in a lighter font and will be addressed in the construction plan submittal later this week. PLANNING 1) Please submit a mylar copy of the approved Preliminary Plat for our records. Kerr Surveying to submit after Staff approval. 2) Please provide verification of signature authority for "Kyleview Estates, Ltd." Certificate of General Partner included with signature. 3) The application needs to be signed and dated. Was previously submitted, have included another. 4) An index sheet showing the entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger is required. Kerr Surveying to submit. 5) Please include the number of lots in the title block. Included on plat submittal. 6) The "private r.o.w." should be labeled as "H.O.A. common area." Private Alleys should be in H.O.A. common areas, as well. Included on plat submittal. 7) Is the rear lot width of Lot 38 correct? It doesn't seem to make sense. Please check all measurements. Corrected on plat. 8) Is this subdivision proposed to be gated? If so, please see Section 8-W of the Subdivision Regulations for application and design requirements. Section 8-W2 outlines several items needed by the City, Including the legal instrument establishing the H.O.A., the street maintenance agreement, information on the reserve fund to be approved by the City Engineer, and written permission for the City's access to the subdivision. These items will need to be approved by the City Attorney, per section 8-W.2(e). Yes it is gated. Included in the submittal are all of the H.O.A. documents. All blanks will be filled in once plat is filed at the County. Documents include: 1) Certificate of Formation 2) Management Certificate 3) Bylaws of H.O.A. 4) Deed without Warranty and 5) Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for H.O.A. Bryan Austin Conroe (979)-268-1125 (512)-328-7878 (936)-441-7833 (979)-260-3849 (512)-328-7884 Fax (936)-760-3833 Fax 9) Please be aware that not all lots meet minimum R-1 Single Family Residential requirements. If you wish to rezone the property in the future, each lot would need to encompass a minimum of 5,000 s.f. and have a lot width (at the setback for cul-de-sac lots) of 50 feet and a depth of 100 feet along the side lot lines. Generally, a 50'x 100' rectangle should fit within each lot. Noted. 10)Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a completely new review. Noted. ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 ✓1) Slope easement required on Boulder Court and Treeline Drive for slope supporting roadway. Easements placed on Plat submittal. 2) Preliminary plat Comment: Does the Wellborn Water Supply Corporation blanket easement cover the entire property? City of College Station requires first rights to PUEs. This blanket will need to be released prior to dedication of any PUEs. How was this resolved? Easement document was not a blanket and only covered existing lines. Wellborn Water Supply Corporation provided letter the removal of any blank easements when Final Plat is recorded. 3) Please note: Roadway fill shall be in accordance with BCS Technical Specifications (especially not Specs 302, 303, and 305, 310, and 312). V 4) Clearly indicate limits of PUE at end of Denver Court. This has been clarified on the plat and in the plans. 5) Due to sanitary sewer depth located in Lot 3 of Block 2, 20' PUE width is required. This easement has been widened. 6) Provide lot grading plan for lots with cross-drainage. This has become a major issue with homeowners whose neighbors build high and block drainage. 7) Please provide elevations every 25-ft in all knuckles/cul-de-sacs. 8) Provide curb return radii. 9) Provide concrete apron at Treeline Drive intersection with Denver Court. 10)Concrete aprons should be in compliance with standard detail. 11)Is the gate on Treeline Drive exit only? How does someone "bail-out" that doesn't get in? Exit only. Throat depth was elongated to allow for entrance and exit option. 12)Provide street signage plan 13)Verify that fire trucks can manipulate the grade changes along the secondary access route. 14)You may want adjust the storm sewer pipe proposed along property side lot lines. As proposed it could cause problems with fencing. 15)Provide storm pipe and outfall velocities. 16)Is there adequate cleaning velocity in the minimally sloped pipes? Is the appropriate surface treatment utilized for the velocities at out fall? Is velocity dissipation required? 17)Why are you proposing to separate junction and inlet boxes at Treeline Drive and Boulder Court intersection? If the line is public the City would prefer one box. 18)Headwall/inlet pipe to I-DA 17A and grate inlet/inlet pipe are outside ROW and PUE. Relocate or dedicate additional easement. 19)FL IN listed at Outfall SD 0-3 20)FL OUT missing on SD I-DA 18. 21)Be aware that as you are designating the entire detention pond as a PUE, no structures are allowed in a PUE. 22)What is depth of water in swale? Verify flow stays within drainage swale. What is velocity? Is it appropriately lined? 23)Ultimately a copy of the filed 1.02-acre drainage easement is required. 24)Provide drainage design info for interim drainage/detention plans. 25)Still waiting on a water design report. 26)Denote horizontal and vertical deflections of water line. Indicate deflection along barrel of pipe and not at joints. 27)Elevations need to be provided at 100-foot stations. 28)Show storm sewer conflict with water line (Sheet 48) 29)Provide overall Utility Site Layout. 30)Valves are required to be located one less than every leg of tee or cross connection. 31)45-bend called out in profile. 11.25-bend in plan view. (sheet 50) 32)Denote TCEQ crossing requirements at water/sanitary crossing. 33)Provide 12' minimum separation between water line and storm Sheet 53 of 81. Aren't there 2 storm pipes? 34)Show proposed grade on water and sewer lines Sheet 53 of 81. Proposed grade stops at Sta 122+75. 35)Water service wyes need to be centered on common property line. 36)90-bends shall be avoided. Sta 210+19.50 (Sheet 56 of 81). 37)Avoid placement of valves in handicap ramps. 38)Show water line conflict with storm Sheet 64 of 81. 39)Provide amended sanitary sewer report. 40)Sanitary sewer service wyes need to be centered on common property line. 41)Revised set of plans is missing the "Off-site" sanitary sewer line to the Lift Station. 42)Sewer depths greater than 14 feet require 30 feet PUEs. All sewer lines with a depth greater than 14 feet are located within 30 feet wide PUE's. 43)Why are you proposing 22" encasement on 8" line? 44)Specific dry bore on railroad and Wellborn Road crossings. 45) Provide volume and page of existing easements the force main will be located in. The existing easements are shown on the Westminster Subdivision Phase I which was filed on 01/19/1994. Volume 2016, Page 61. 46)What is the force main pipe material? 47)Provide additional encasement length for future width of Barron Road. 48)Provide Railroad permit. Railroad permit will arrive any day. Attached is correspondence with railroad on the bore. 49)Waiting on TxDOT permit approval. Permit has been approved and should be received today on boring and force main along Wellborn Road. 50)CSU was forwarded the revised plans for their comments on sanitary sewer depth and the lift station. FIRE 51)The alley off Treeline Drive between lot's 50 and 51, will be a Fire lane. This fire lane will need to be painted as such and conform to the Fire Aparatus radius template. The Fire lane will end at Denver Court. GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS 1) This plat is outside the College Station Utility electric service area. Customer will have to get with their electric supplier for this area to determine electric service specifications and requirements. Noted. SANITATION 1) Sanitation is okay with this project. Thank you. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions about this submittal. • cerely, 1 \. °11/14C. j Sam J. rnon, P.E. Project Engineer Cc: Paul Leventis File 6/25/2008 1:53 PM GWFAX -> 979 268 1125 Page /1 of 4 /•:0 4` Planning & Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 _ 1 2q /—r College Station, Texas 77842 CITY OF COT.i.FCF STATION Phone 979.764.3570/ Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM June 25, 2008 TO: Sam Vernon, Bleyl Engineering, via fax: 979.260.3849 FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: KYLE VIEW ESTATES (FP) - Final Plat Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed in order to complete the application for Final Plat. If all comments have been addressed and the following information submitted by • Monday, June 30th at 10:00 a.m., your project will be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for, July 171h at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue. ✓ One (1) 24"x36" copy of the revised final plat; ✓ Nineteen (19) 11"x17"copies of the revised final plat; u,0646rOne (1) Mylar original of the revised final plat(required after P&Z approval); and One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or to mtrevino@cstx.gov. Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project will be considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that if all comments have not been addressed your project will not be scheduled for a Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Your project may be placed on a future agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate fees paid. Once your item has been scheduled for the P&Z meeting, the agenda and staff report can be accessed at the following web site on Monday the week of the P&Z meeting. http://www.cstx.gov/homerindex.asp7page=2481 Please note that a Mylar original of the revised final plat will be required after P&Z approval and prior to the filing of the plat. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Paul Levintis, via: 979-774-2999 Case file#08-00500129 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. 1 of 4 13.0 k BBleY l & Associates 1722"- '.dmoor lik & / ite 210 Project Engineering & Management ?�► x 7780 T1)009).cd ,.. 0 it June 23, 2008 Alan Gibbs, P.E. Development Engineering City of College Station P 0 Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 RE: Kyle View Estates Subdivision and Westminster Lift Station Dear Alan: Submitted under this cover are the following documents for your review: • 2 sets of construction plans for the Kyle View Estates Subdivision • 1 sets of construction plans for the Westminster lift station and forcemain • 1 set of the final plat for Kyle View Estates Subdivision (3 5heeks) • 1 set of the metes and bounds description for the drainage easement within the Kyle View Estates Subdivision • 1 copy of the service area map (11"x17") Although no formal comments have been received, we have made the following changes as discussed in our meeting on Monday, June 16th and comments received by email: 1) Show sewer taps in profile and identify the extra depth services. 2) Shallowed sewer line so no portion is greater than 20' deep. 3) Re-routed sewer to keep from between houses. 4) General cleanup and added a more detailed legend to assist in your review. 5) Added final pond contours. 6) Added more detail on the outlet structures. 7) Electrical sheet added for lift station. Please contact me if you would like to meet, or if you have any other questions. Sincerely, 4/if( / Brett McCully, -. . Bryan Austin Conroe (979)-268-1125 (512)-328-7878 (936)-441-7833 (979)-260-3849 (512)-328-7884 Fax (936)-760-3833 Fax Page 1 of 2 Jennifer Prochazka Kyleview Estates From: Jennifer Prochazka To: Brett McCully Date: 2/10/2010 5:03 PM Subject: Kyleview Estates CC: Bob Cowell; Molly Hitchcock Brett, This email is in response to questions about Kyleview Estates posed at a Pre-Application Conference on Wednesday, February 3, 2010. The developer of Kyleview Estates submitted a Master Plan to the City on December 17, 2007, designating phases 4 &5 as office/townhome use and commercial use, respectively. At the time the Master Plan was submitted, the development was located in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The developer filed a Preliminary Plat application on March 27, 2008. Following the submittal of the Master Plan and Preliminary Plat, the development was annexed into the City on March 29, 2008 (however, annexation proceedings were initiated on January 10, 2008). The development, including phases 4 &5, was zoned A-O at the time of annexation. A Final Plat application was submitted to the City on June 6, 2008. The current property owner now indicates a desire to develop phases 4 &5 as single-family residential rather than office/townhome and commercial as depicted on the Master Plan. During the Pre-Application Conference, you asked if the property owner must seek a rezoning in order to develop phases 4 &5 of Kyleview Estates as single-family residential. A rezoning to R-1 or PDD would be required in order to develop phases 4 &5 as single-family residential. As indicated in the Pre-Application Conference, this use is consistent with the designation of the property in the Comprehensive Plan. However, the Comprehensive Plan is a 20-year planning document and must be used in that context. Because of the existing character of the area (primarily rural and at the edge of the City), it is staffs position that a rezoning to a high-density single-family would not be justified at this time. You also asked if the property owner must seek a rezoning in order to develop phases 4 &5 as office/townhome and commercial uses (as shown on the initial Master Plan and Preliminary Plat filed prior to annexation). As indicated during the platting process (via email to the owner of record at the time), we do recognize that the Master Plan vested the land uses (to the extent required by Local Government Code) as they were identified on the Master Plan. The property was zoned A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation and thus, although vested, the land uses are non-conforming and subject to the relevant provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. It was also conveyed that because the preliminary plat was submitted on March 27, 2008 prior to the date of annexation (March 29, 2008), the lot sizes and configuration would be vested to those shown on the Preliminary Plat, and the subsequent Final Plat would need to be in compliance with the approved Preliminary Plat. So, while the land uses are vested and a rezoning is not required in order to develop the land as such, a rezoning would need to be sought to realize the full potential of the uses by allowing lot sizes, densities, setbacks, etc. of the applicable districts.A-0 setbacks, density restrictions, and lot size restrictions are such that townhome development would be very difficult. Other uses not requiring replatting, such as the office and commercial identified on the Preliminary Plat, could proceed without rezoning or replatting, but would need to meet the dimensional standards of the applicable district(A-O), including all building setbacks. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thanks! Jennifer Prochazka, AICP Senior Planner file-//C:\Documents and Settings\jprochazka\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpWise\4B72E6D2... 2/10/2010 Page 2 of 2 Planning &Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station,TX 77842 Office: 979.764.3570 Fax: 979.764.3496 Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Website: www.cstx.gov City of College Station Home of Texas A&M University® file://C:\Documents and Settings\jprochazka\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4B72E6D2... 2/10/2010 E-mail Correspondence From: Bob Cowell To: rrtodds@aol.com CC: Celia Hernandez; COUNCIL; Glenn Brown; Hayden Migl; Jennifer Prochaz... Date: 10/6/2008 11:04 AM Subject: 3455 Capstone Drive Mr. and Mrs. Todd, At the request of the City Manager I offer the following in response to your recent e-mail regarding the development located on Capstone Drive approved as Kyleview Acres. After speaking with you this morning and since you spoke with Jennifer Prochazka of my office at length regarding this project I realize that some of this information will be repetitive. As you stated in your e-mail this project originated while the property was located outside of the city limits (in the ETJ). Texas state law severely limits city authority to regulate the development of property located in the ETJ. Essentially,the City of College Station is limited to ensuring that the plat (that is the arrangement of lots, roads, etc) conform to adopted engineering and surveying standards). The use of the land (typically regulated by zoning which is only authorized within City limits) is not subject to regulation by the city for projects located in the ETJ. Further state law protects or"vests"projects that meet the "rules of the day" from increased rules. Because of this vesting provision many of the increased protections and regulations afforded by location within the city are simply unable to be applied. In an effort to exercise what municipal authority it could (code enforcement, building inspections, law enforcement, etc.)the City required a petition for annexation of the property prior to agreeing to extend sewer service to the property. It is important to remember that without this step even these basic provisions of municipal authority could not be extended to the property. By ruling of state and federal courts a single family household is defined by a group of residents living as a family unit. That is they share common areas, common facilities, share the bills, etc. Court rulings have permitted local governments the ability to further define a single family household by the number of unrelated individuals permitted to compose the single family household. College Station has elected to set that number at four. Again, it is important to remember that no such restriction exists for property located in the ETJ. It is based on these regulations that properties housing four or fewer unrelated individuals in a single home are classified as single family residences. Unfortunately it is not uncommon for property developers to present information to the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council that may change in the future or is simply misleading. Staff goes to great lengths to caution the Commission and Council to base their decisions on the applicable ordinances and adopted policies and not on the promises of a person seeking to develop their property. In addition to the reasons stated above this is because issues such as architectural styles, home prices, owner versus renter occupancy, etc are generally beyond the authority of these bodies. I understand that you feel that you(as well as the City) were misled by Mr. Leventis when they approved his development project. However, the project was approved for development of single family homes (as defined above) as well as commercial activities at a high density while it was located in the ETJ and is thus vested. By annexing the property the City has taken the steps available allowing it to exert code enforcement, law enforcement, building inspections, etc. I realize that this response may be less than you had hoped for but I believe it to be an accurate portrayal of our current authority relative to the property in question. Should you have additional questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to contact Jennifer or me. From: Carol Cotter [mailto:Ccotter@cstx.gov] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 12:52 PM To: svernon@bleylengineering.com Cc: Alan Gibbs Subject: Kyle View Plans Sam- I reviewed the Kyle View Plans. As with the lift station and force main plans, more clearly define the type and limits of easements. Your slope easement and PUE defined with the same line type and only as "easement". This may be confusing to contractor and inspector if they encounter a conflict and need to relocate something. Also, show or define limits of structural backfill on plans. And lastly, the station equations I was requesting are for the utilities that are continuations of the same line but on differing streets. For example; your utilities on Treeline connect to those on Boulder. There should be a station equation to show were the lines meet; Sta ###+## Treeline Drive = Sta ###+## Boulder Court. The same for Aspen and Colorado, and Pikes and Treeline. Everything else looks like it was addressed. Thanks! Carol Carol L. Cotter, P.E. Development Engineer City of College Station, Public Works (979) 764-3570 Fax:(979) 764-3496 College Station. Heart of the Research Valley. From: "Sam Vernon" <svernon@bleylengineering.com> To: "'Carol Cotter" <Ccotter@cstx.gov> Date: 8/15/2008 1:54 PM Subject: RE: Kyle View Plans OK. I will make these changes and bring sets in for stamping. Thanks! Sam From: Carol Cotter To: Brett McCully; Paul Leventis; svernon@bleylengineering.com CC: Alan Gibbs; Jennifer Prochazka Date: 8/27/2008 3:42 PM Subject: Kyle View Attachments: Carol Cotter.vcf Although you did provide documents in response to Staff Review Comments No 1, Item 8 requesting documents listed in Section 8-W.2 of the Subdivision Regulations, we did not receive from you the value for the reserve fund for approval by the City Engineer nor the written permission for the City's access to the subdivision. Per the regulations, Section 8-W.2(e), these are required to be provided for approval by the City Attorney prior to Final Plat. You will need to provide an engineering estimate based on a proposed plan for repair and maintenance in determining the amount of the reserve fund. Carol Carol L. Cotter, P.E. Development Engineer City of College Station, Public Works (979) 764-3570 Fax:(979) 764-3496 >>> "Paul Leventis" <paull@brazostrace.com> 8/28/2008 2:56 PM >>> Carol, I have spoken with Gary Belmain and we are working on the estimate for the reserve fund. I have attached the Covenants and restrictions that cover the access to the property for the different utility entities which includes the City of College Station. This should work for the access permission. Please let me know if this will work? Thanks Paul From: Carol Cotter To: Paul Leventis CC: Alan Gibbs; Jennifer Prochazka Date: 8/29/2008 4:35 PM Subject: RE: Kyle View Attachments: Carol Cotter.vcf Paul- A note does need to be added to the plat granting the City permission to access the subdivision. While you do have language to this effect in your HOA documents, the Plat note has more significance. Carol Carol Carol L. Cotter, P.E. Development Engineer City of College Station, Public Works (979) 764-3570 Fax:(979) 764-3496 From: "Sam Vernon" <svernon@bleylengineering.com> To: "'Jason Schubert" <Jschubert@cstx.gov> Date: 3/17/2009 10:32 AM Subject: Followup on Kyle View Estates Question Good Morning Jason! Any more word on whether the secondary entrance gates off of Treeline Drive in Kyle View Estates will need to be motorized? Thanks, Sam J. Vernon, P.E. Bleyl &Associates 1722 Broadmoor, Ste. 210 Bryan, TX 77802 Tel. (979) 268-1125 Fax (979) 260-3849 svernon@bleylengineering.com From: Jason Schubert To: Vernon, Sam Date: 3/17/2009 12:08 PM Subject: Re: Followup on Kyle View Estates Question Sam, Yes, that section you mentioned to me on the phone yesterday about not requiring drivers to exit their vehicles will require the second access gate to be motorized. I guess it could be manual if there was an attendant at the gate but that doesn't fit this situation. I'll be out of the office this afternoon, but let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Jason Jason Schubert, AICP Staff Planner Planning & Development Services City of College Station tel: 979.764.3570 fax: 979.764.3496 www.cstx.gov From: "Sam Vernon" <svernon@bleylengineering.com> To: "'Jason Schubert" <Jschubert@cstx.gov> Date: 3/17/2009 1:36 PM Subject: RE: Followup on Kyle View Estates Question Jason, Where is the requirement saying there has to be more than one entrance and exit located in the UDO? I know that fire/emergency services need to have additional ingress/egress points (which they do), and there has to be a way to evacuate the subdivision (which there is). I don't see where there is a requirement for more than one entrance into the community. I have searched all relevant sections of the UDO and fire regs that I can think of, but do not see the answer to my question. Thanks, Sam From: Jason Schubert To: Vernon, Sam Date: 3/18/2009 7:07 PM Subject: RE: Followup on Kyle View Estates Question Sam, You are correct, I do not know of a requirement that specifies a required number of entrances to a development. However, the layout of streets in a subdivision is subject to block length requirements, projections to other property and other requirements when a plat is considered. In having 2 entrances and a desire to have the development gated, both entrances will need to be treated equally for gating and access. Jason Schubert, AICP Staff Planner Planning & Development Services City of College Station tel: 979.764.3570 fax: 979.764.3496 www.cstx.gov From: "Sam Vernon" <svernon@bleylengineering.com> To: "'Jason Schubert" <Jschubert@cstx.gov> CC: <dmercer@breckprop.net> Date: 3/19/2009 1:22 PM Subject: RE: Followup on Kyle View Estates Question I'll pass this along. Thanks, Sam Documents for Planning Item#8 Management Certificate Certificate of Formation Bylaws of Owners Associates Deed without Warranty (Common Area) Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions Page 1 of 2 Carol Cotter - Fwd: RE: Re: Street Light issue '.', 4= .,::—V.».'a,., „? ";r�.,*� ..Ci;;b>,,1MA'>,.; -0 .k awe.vqi. From: Carol Cotter To: chris@brazoslawyers.com Date: 6/4/2009 11:19 AM Subject: Fwd: RE: Re: Street Light issue CC: dmercer@breckprop.net Attachments: Carol Cotter.vcf; Carol Cotter.vcf Chris- I have not received copies of the documents establishing POA or other entity responsible for costs of illuminating the street lights on the public streets.There is no mention of this responsibility in the documents you submitted. I also need clarification on HOA documents for residential lots. Article X - 'The association shall maintain such private access easements including all private improvements thereon, including but not limited to irrigation and street lights." Does this include paying for electricity? Documents submitted do not speak directly to responsibility for illumination of street lights. Carol Carol L. Cotter, P.E. Development Engineer City of College Station, Public Works (979) 764-3570 Fax:(979) 764-3496 >>> Carol Cotter 4/3/2009 2:52 PM >>> Chris- Please confirm that the HOA documents were executed. The copy we reviewed was unsigned. I am a little unclear on how the HOA Covenants and Restrictions apply to the proposed non-residential lots and thus, the lighting on the public streets. Is a Property Owners Association more applicable for that section? We will need documentation of the service agreement(s) with BTU and the established entity(ies). Regarding the street light plan submitted, there were no streetlights proposed on the public street section of the subdivision. Street lights need to be added to the public streets in accordance with the standards previously provided. With the seven additional street lights shown in the plan, we will accept what is proposed for the private residential section, although minimum spacing requirements are not entirely met. Please call if you have any questions. Carol Carol L. Cotter, P.E. Development Engineer City of College Station, Public Works (979) 764-3570 Fax:(979) 764-3496 >>> "Chris Peterson" <chris@brazoslawyers.com> 4/2/2009 10:20 AM >>> The city previously reviewed the HOA documents prior to plat approval, so I assume everything is ok on that end. As for UDO requirements on street lights, my understanding is that a design was submitted to you by BTU a couple of weeks ago. Have you gotten a chance to look at those yet? We really need a response to be able to continue forward with construction. file://C:\Documents and Settings\ccotter\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4A27ADABCity ... 6/4/2009 Page 2 of 2 • Christopher W. Peterson Peterson Law Group Executive Office Plaza 3608 East 29th Street, Ste 112 Bryan, Texas 77802 (979) 703-7014 (979) 703-7031 fax PETERSON 6...P.A LAW GROUP BrazosLawyers.com Visit our website at http://www.BrazosLawyers.com Visit our blog at http://brazoslawyers.blogspot.com. IMPORTANT/CONFIDENT/AL: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message contains information from the Peterson Law Group which may be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee, or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,please notify us immediately at our telephone number above. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:This email is not intended or written by the sender to be used, and it cannot be used, by any recipient for the purposes of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed on the recipient by United States tax laws. Original Message---- From: Carol Cotter [mailto:ccotter@cstx.gov] Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:28 PM To: Chris Peterson Cc: Alan Gibbs; Bob Cowell Subject: Fwd: Re: Street Light issue Chris- Prior to acceptance of street lights, a Property Owners' Association or similar will need to be established to pay for the illumination of street lights on the public streets. I believe an HOA has already been set up for the residential section, and it will need to be responsible for illumination of the lights within the privately gated section. Carol Carol Cotter Engineering Services City of College Station (979) 764-3570 Fax: (979) 764-3496 ccotter@cstx.gov College Station- Home of Texas A&M University. file://C:\Documents and Settings\ccotter\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4A27ADABCity ... 6/4/2009 EXHIBIT "A" Doc Bk Vol Fs 01029501 OR 9107 16E DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY All that certain property described as Block 1, Lots 1 through 11 9, Common Area Amenity,to the City of College Station, HOA Common Area, KyleView Estates Subdivision, an addition Texas as described on Final Plat of KyleView Estates,recorded in Volume 8815, Page 238 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas Filed for Record in: BRAZOS COUNTY On: Diaz 2172009 at 05:06F As a Recordings Document Number: 01029501 Amount 91.00 Receipt Number - 366301 Bgt i r9sta.l Ocon STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS 1 hereby certify that this instrument was filed on the date and time stamped hereon by me and was duly recorded in the volume and Page of the Official Public records of: BRAZOS COUNTY as stamped hereon by me. Nay 21120 09 HONORABLE KAREN {MCS?UEEHr COUNTY CLERK BRAZOS COUNTY B ft* Bleyl & Associates 1722 Broadmoor & Suite 210 Project Engineering & Management Bryan, TX 77802 A x �. b September 5,2008 Carol Cotter, P.E. Planning&Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station,TX 77840 Re: Kyle View Estates HOA Street Maintenance Funds Dear Carol, At the request of Paul Leventis,we are providing the following information to establish the amount of the street maintenance reserve fund for the private roadways which will be the responsibility of the Home Owners Association. From my discussions with Gary Balmain, Street Maintenance Division Manager,we are anticipating a unit cost for routine roadway maintenance to be between $750 and $1000 per year, per lane mile of pavement. From the approved drawings,we measure the total pavement to be maintained by the HOA to be 1.58 lane miles. Therefore the fund reserve needed to cover a two-year period for this project should equal $3,160.00 As always, please let me know if you have any questions,comments or concerns. Thank you again for your help. Sincerely, Brett McCully, P.E. Sr. Engineer/Branch Manager Cc: Paul Leventis Bryan Austin Conroe (979)-268-1125 (512)-328-7878 (936)-441-7833 (979)-260-3849 (512)-328-7884 Fax (936)-760-3833 Fax Page 1 of 1 Carol Cotter - RE: Kyleview - Street Lights tona From: Carol Cotter To: dmercer@breckprop.net Date: 5/12/2009 4:59 PM Subject: RE: Kyleview - Street Lights CC: Alan Gibbs; Israel Koite; svernon@bleylengineering.com Attachments: Re: Kyleview - Street Lights; Carol Cotter.vcf David- Outstanding Items for Letter of Acceptance on infrastructure: 1)The items in the letter to Ricky Plalsota need to be addressed, 2) Vegetative cover is required on all disturbed areas. The mulch that was put on the Block 2 lots is not an approved material for final stabilization of the site required by the State, 3) It has been recently mentioned that some of the air void tests on the asphalt streets exceeded our maximum. I am currently trying to determine what those tests results were and their locations. Brett mentioned that he thought Ricky would be doing the required overlay. A reduction in payment to contractor is not an option on the streets, and 4) Items discussed in attached email. Carol Carol L. Cotter, P.E. Development Engineer City of College Station, Public Works (979) 764-3570 Fax:(979) 764-3496 file://C:\Documents and Settings\ccotter\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4A09AAEFCity ... 5/26/2009 Page 1 of 2 Carol Cotter - Re: Kyleview - Street Lights From: Carol Cotter To: dmercer@breckprop.net Date: 5/11/2009 4:11 PM Subject: Re: Kyleview - Street Lights CC: Alan Gibbs Yes, we are willing to work with you on this issue. But this only applies to the public, commercial area of the subdivision as it related to street lights. Conduit and related infrastructure needs to be there, but we can wait for poles to be delivered. We do need some idea of when delivery/installation is planned, as well as documentation of payment and agreement for the installation and service. We will require all other items be submitted, including the filed POA documentation establishing payment responsibility for illumination and maintenance of the lights. Carol >>> "David Mercer" <david@breckenridgebu.com> 5/11/2009 3:33 PM >>> Carol, Through conversations with various parties I have come to be under the assumption that I(Breckenridge) need to do the following in order for the City of College Station to accept the infrastructure at Kyleview Estates in regards to the street lighting of the subdivision. Breckenridge needs to pay BTU for the required street lights on the commercial portion of our property at Kyleview Estates and show receipt of such. Enter into an agreement with BTU to install and service said street lights. With items 1 &2 in place, having the street lights physically installed is not requirement for acceptance. Is this correct? David Mercer Regional Director file://C:\Documents and Settings\ccotter\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4A09AAEFCity ... 5/26/2009 Page 2 of 2 Breckenridge Group, LP 979-690-2775 (office) 979-690-8031 (fax) "Who said Rome couldn't be built in a day?" file://C:\Documents and Settings\ccotter\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4A09AAEFCity ... 5/26/2009 • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION March 31, 2009 Ricky Palasota Brazos Valley Services 6988 Raymond Stotzer Parkway College Station, Texas 77840 Mr. Palasota, The City of College Station is holding the Letter of Completion submitted for Kyle View Estates primarily due to downstream sanitary sewer construction. As stated from the onset of this project, the off-site, downstream sanitary sewer line, lift station and force main are required for formal completion of the subdivision project. Note, the water, sanitary sewer, streets, and drainage infrastructure within the subdivision have been inspected and any required testing performed to the satisfaction of our inspector. Outstanding items needing to be addressed are as follows; • Confirmation from BTU and Wellborn Water SUD that infrastructure is complete and service agreements are in place, • 2 copies of Red-lined Record Drawings for all Public Infrastructure with the following attestation: "1, , General Contractor for development, certify that the improvements shown on this sheet were actually built, and that said improvements are shown substantially hereon. 1 hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, that the materials of construction and sizes of manufactured items, if any are stated correctly hereon." General Contractor • 2 copies of Red-lined Record Drawings for all Public Drainage Infrastructure including Private Detention Facilities with the following attestations: "1 hereby attest that i am familiar with the approved drainage plan and associated construction drawings and furthermore, attest that the drainage facilities have been constructed within dimensional tolerances prescribed by the Bryan & College station Unified Storm water Design Guidelines and in accordance with the approved construction plans or amendments thereto approved by the City of College Station." (affix seal) Licensed Professional Engineer State of Texas No. the ii4aT4 of%bc Reican, 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE;3'TAFION- 1 LXAJ•77842 975,761..35 Ci www.csix.gov "I certify that the subdivision improvements shown on this sheet were actually built, and that said improvements are substantially as shown hereon. 1 further certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the materials of construction and sizes of manufactured items, if any, are stated correctly hereon." General Contractor • replacement of private street signs with appropriate private street color designation, • off-site drainage modifications slated for property located in path outfall, • installation of street lights on private and public streets, and • acceptance of downstream sanitary sewer system. The above listed items need to be completed prior to Letter of Completion being signed by City Engineer. Please call me at 979/764-3570 if you have any questions. Sincerely, „ i/' Carol Cotter, PE Senior Assistant City Engineer Cc: Sam Vernon, PE—Bleyl and Associates Alan Gibbs, PE-City of College Station Israel Koite—City of College Station file a Sam Vernon From: Sam Vernon [svernon@bleylengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:37 PM To: 'mcgross@up.com' Subject: FW: Folder Number 2500-84 Good Afternoon Mary! I agree that the casing should be 98 feet. Please make the necessary changes to our permit application. Thank you for your attention on this matter. Please respond to this email so that I am sure you've received it. Sam J.Vernon, P.E. Bleyl &Associates 1722 Broadmoor,Ste. 210 Bryan,TX 77802 Tel. (979) 268-1125 Fax (979) 260-3849 svernonPblevlengineering.com From: Sam Vernon [mailto:svernon@bleylengineering.com] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 10:02 AM To: 'mcgross@up.com' Subject: Folder Number 2500-84 Good Morning Mary! I got a phone message from you yesterday saying that the casing length on the sanitary sewer crossing would need to be 98 feet. Are you needing an updated drawing showing this additional length, or what specifically do I need to resubmit? Thanks for your help. Sam J.Vernon, P.E. Bleyl &Associates 1722 Broadmoor,Ste. 210 Bryan,TX 77802 Tel. (979) 268-1125 Fax (979) 260-3849 svernon@ bleylengineering.com 1 Sam Vernon From: Sam Vernon [svernon@bleylengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 7:36 AM To: 'mcgross@up.com' Subject: Application for Folder#2500-84 Attachments: AR-M355N_20080506_073400.pdf Mary, Here is the information you requested. Please call/email me if I you need further information. Thanks, Sam J.Vernon, P.E. Bleyl &Associates 1722 Broadmoor, Ste. 210 Bryan,TX 77802 Tel. (979) 268-1125 Fax(979) 260-3849 svernon@blevlengineering.com From: "Sam Vernon" <svernon@bleylengineering.com> To: "'Alan Gibbs" <Agibbs@cstx.gov> Date: 7/3/2008 10:27 AM Subject: FW: Folder Number 2500-84 FYI, I got this after our phone conversation yesterday. Sam Original Message From: MCGROSS@up.com [mailto:MCGROSS@up.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 7:22 PM To: Sam Vernon Subject: Re: Folder Number 2500-84 Hi Sam All I can say is sorry for the confusion and delay. Just too much! You will have it by email tomorrow! As"heads up", you and your contractor will have to provide Certificates of General Liability and the job itself will need Railroad Protective Liability Insurance listing Union Pacific as insured and the coverage must be$2/million per occurrence and $6/million aggregate, we do not care who provides this either the city or the contractor. The contractor's information does not have to be submitted at the same time, but if they will provide the RPL, I will need a note from you stating so. We can then exchange the signature page by email to get you scheduled. I cannot release the document until I have the required insurance and the one time fee. Hope this helps! Mary Mary C. Gross Manager- Utilities & Right of Entry Union Pacific Railroad Company 1400 Douglas Street STOP 1690 Omaha, NE 68179-1690 Office#402/544-8623 Fax#402/501-0340 Sam Vernon <svernon@ble ylengineerin To g.com> MCGROSS@up.com cc 07/02/2008 04:56 PM Subject Folder Number 2500-84 This message was submitted through the UP web site. Subject: Folder Number 2500-84 Name: Sam Vernon E-mail Address: svernon@bleylengineering.com Company: Bleyl &Associates Phone Number: 979 268-1125 Good Afternoon Mary! On April 25th I mailed a permit application for a gravity sewer line crossing in College Station, Texas (Brazos County). My initial submittal included Exhibit A, a location map, and a section view, but unfortunately I did not attach an application. I spoke to you by phone on May 6th, and filled out the required application and emailed it to you. On May 30th you called and left a message that our casing length needed to be 98 feet, rather than 60 feet shown on our cross-section. I was able to reach you by phone on June 11th and sent you a subsequent email as you requested agreeing that the casing length should be 90 feet in length. We have received all of our permits from TxDOT, the City of College Station, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, etc.with the last piece being our UPRC permit. My dilemma is that we have a contractual deadline approaching on July 17th and I am beginning to get nervous. Can you give me a status report on where our application is in the process? I would be very grateful for any information you can get me. Thank you in advance for your help. • • This message was sent at Wednesday, 07/02/2008 4:55:47 PM Central This message was generated from web site: www.up.com This message was sent from IP address: 208.180.231.197 The user's browser is: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648) [Microsoft Internet Explorer 7.0 Windows XP 5.1] This message was generated from: http://www.uprr.com/reus/contacts/mgrcontacts/searchResult.cfm?MG R_FUNC=Wire /Pipe/Prvt Roadway&mg r_st=TX&mgr_ct=Brazos This message and any attachments contain information from Union Pacific which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited by law. If you receive this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachments. B Bleyl & Associates 1722 Broadmoor & Suite 210 Project Engineering & Management Bryan, TX 77802 A June 30, 2008 Texas Department of Transportation Attn: Jay Page 2102 Tabor Road Bryan, TX 77803 RE: Driveway Permit for Westminster Lift Station in College Station (Driveway Access to FM 2154) Dear Mr. Page, Please find the following enclosed TxDOT Driveway Permit Application and attachments for the proposed driveway access to FM 2154 (Wellborn Road): • Permit to Construct Access Driveway Facilities • Aerial Location Photo • Driveway Culvert Exhibit/ Site Plan for Development for Access on FM 2154 • Culvert Capacity Calculations • Flood Insurance Rate Map (FM48041CO200C) Please review this submittal at your earliest convenience and return three signed copies of the permit for our distribution. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at (979)268-1125. You, \I I 4A/V\ 110/1/1 * am Vernon, .E. Project Manager Encl. Form 1058 (5 copies) Aerial Location Photo Driveway Culvert Exhibit/ Site Plan for Access on FM 2154 (5 copies) Culvert Capacity Calculations /Map (3 pages) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FM48041C0142C) Bryan Austin Conroe (979)-268-1125 (512)-328-7878 (936)-441-7833 (979)-260-3849 (512)-328-7884 Fax (936)-760-3833 Fax B Bleyl & Associates 1722 Broadmoor & Suite 210 Project Engineering & Management Bryan, TX 77802 fa d'93: July 1, 2008 Texas Department of Transportation Attn: Jay Page 2102 Tabor Road Bryan, TX 77803 RE: Driveway Permit for Westminster Lift Station in College Station (Driveway Access to FM 2154) Dear Mr. Page, Please find the following enclosed revision to the Driveway Culvert Exhibit and Site Plan for Development for Access on FM 2154. We have verified the grades of the ditch and found that the roadside ditch does slope toward Baron Cut-off Rd. Please let us know if you have any further questions or need any additional information. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at (979)268-1125. gankYc , am rnon, P.E. Project Manager Encl. Driveway Culvert Exhibit/ Site Plan for Access on FM 2154 (5 copies) Bryan Austin Conroe (979)-268-1125 (512)-328-7878 (936)-441-7833 (979)-260-3849 (512)-328-7884 Fax (936)-760-3833 Fax B Bleyl & Associates 1722 Broadmoor Suite 210 Project Engineering & Management Bryan, TX 77802 A isr?h Pr rr ;� BRYAN -0,51„._ it AREA OFFICE tis► o JUN 3 0 2008 494.CE IV et) Date: 6/30/2008 Job No. 7066 To: TxDOT Attention: Jay Page 2102 Tabor Rd. Re: Westminster Lift Station Bryan, TX 77803 Driveway Permit We are sending you: X Attached Under separate cover via: The following items: Shop drawings Prints X Plans Samples Copy of letter Change order Specifications Other: Copies Date No. Description 5 6/30/2008 7066 Driveway Permit 1 6/30/2008 7066 Aerial Photo 5 6/30/2008 7066 Driveway Culvert Exhibit 1 6/30/2008 7066 Culvert Capacity Calculations 1 6/30/2008 7066 Flood Insurance Rate Map These are transmitted as checked below: For approval For review and comment X For your use As requested For bids due: Remarks: Please let me know if you have any questions. Copy To File Signed Sam J. Vernon, E.I.T. Bryan Austin Conroe (979)-268-1125 (512)-328-7878 (936)-441-7833 (979)-260-3849 (512)-328-7884 Fax (936)-760-3833 Fax 9722786550 EXELLOGISTICS 12:50:30 p.m. 12-16-2008 1/2 . i WELLBORN SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT • FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET FROM: TO: Sam Vernon Stephen Cast COMPANY: DATE: December 16,2008 FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO.OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 260-3849 'L NOTES/COMMENTS: Following is the fire flow test"report form"you requested for Kyle View Estates. Stephen Cast Wellborn Special Utility District P.O.Box 250 Wellborn,Texas 77881 (979)690-9799 (979)690-1260 Fax wsudbb><,verizon.nct P.O. BOX 250 WELLBORN, TEXAS 77881 (979)690-9799 OFFICE (979) 690-1260 FAX 0 , ^1e\,e„� L-ides �`J ;A,V)8:1v\5too.J \Y,Sk\;3\L eS \14t,S CaL DI\eS C Q -''Ve OnclS lAke owe Ac-Ac . 1 we, vie ecJ -111 smite pts\( Vk htic 1084,\\, , i(ii, 028541* 1 / 50 i F .. ...._5....�..,....�........................ 250' // ,,,.'^”" �� 50' 250' 250' *VW 5 �/ 372'V 1 Ls - \ . 100' `> 1111 \� 2601,11‘ \ -3:iiiir„ 4 1 ' /I Imi ,,, dil 1<, � 1� -1.1111 I eXkj"'C'S(" / -, �, 272rital IIIII IIIL All MEL 405 EN 11111 NMI INN ..._...,..L,.., EN MI 326 1111 EN ME 11111 Mil 1E11 NE t\,(33,41/4., -- ‘1\--Q.d 6' Eirliii 110 VIII Mil_ mit , ,,,,,\k(),c., ----kiii 400. *, f 44R,Via i• all•w• Ell ifir 394 1 1040 KyleView Estates, LP 1722 Broadmoor Ste 212 DATE `44-7/6)1<?' 35 1054/1130 Bryan,TX 77802 _' 6)4` - 37100 !•:,r,-' ORD • �� ,,1e d,kK., I $ '/")6) `''� i) TO THE ORDER OF / �____- .' & J 'L`— {�CO DOLLARS @ oo.,oe.« rK: 13,:; Compass Bank _____\ / ---- , 71Iege St t1 n,Texas fFOR !' tet. r 'DO LDD" 1: LL30 /05471: 230L5293►i'