Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence Page 1 of 2 Carol Cotter-RE: Good morning '� ' do1 • • V -04 QV • From: "Jane Kee" <jkee@suddenlink.net> To: "'Carol Cotter' <Ccotter@cstx.gov> `O Date: 9/9/2010 4:03 PM Subject: RE: Good morning CC: "'Erika Bridges' <Ebridges@cstx.gov>, "'Joe Guerra' <Jguerra@cstx.gov>... OK,got it thanks all. From: Carol Cotter [mailto:Ccotter@cstx.gov] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 4:00 PM To: Jane Kee Cc: Erika Bridges; Joe Guerra; Lauren Hovde Subject: Re: Good morning Jane, Yes. Either scenario is okay. Our preference is one with the second drive located off Boyett. We were willing to consider the layout with both driveways on Cherry because it allowed for a little more off-street parking. In either layout, we believe that the left hand turning movements on all driveways should be restricted. However, since we had not previously indicated this restriction on the easternmost drive closest to Second Street, we will allow the unrestricted left turns. But, if a traffic safety issue results, modifications will be required post development. So there is not confusion later, I also want to mention that I have been discussing this with Joe Guerra only from an access/traffic safety issue for the driveway placement. Parking, on-site circulation, and any possible site plan requirements were not reviewed and are not inherently approved. Carol >>> Jane Kee <jkee@suddenlink.net> 9/9/2010 1:25 PM >>> So we can use either layout? If 2 on Cherry then one drive is limited and if we use the Boyett option then the one on Boyett Is limited?? Sorry if I'm being dense. Thx Jane Kee On Sep 9, 2010, at 10:58 AM, "Carol Cotter" <Ccotter@cstx.gov> wrote: Jane, Both driveways need to be right-in-right-out due to the collector designations and limited spacing from existing driveways and street intersections. However, we will allow the driveway on Cherry to be fully functional, but if traffic issues develop, modifications will have to be made to limit turning maneuvers to right-in-right out. Carol Carol L. Cotter, P.E. Senior Assistant City Engineer Public Works Department file://C:\Documents and Settings\ccotter\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C89056DCity of College Stati... 11/3/2010 Page 2 of 2 PO Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station,Texas 77842 Office: (979) 764-3570 Fax: (979) 764-3496 Email: ccotter@cstx.gov City of College Station Home of Texas A&M University >>> "Jane Kee" <jane@ipsgroup,us> 8/9/2010 11:45 AM >>> Attached are layouts for the Second St. project we discussed Thursday. I've also included the angled parking so you can see why we cannot use it - we lose too much parking. We did get the OK from Wally to go with the two dumpsters and not more. They also need a minimum 20 aisle, which is a moot point since we can't use the angled parking option. Please take a look at these two options with the 90 degree parking and let me know what I need to do formally to seek approval for the driveways. Do we need to wait until site plan submittal or is there enough her for you to tell use your preference and give an OK? We can also mark either scenario as one-way in and one-way out. How likely people will be to use them that way is another thing. Thanks Carol. I appreciate your help. Jane Kee IPS Group 511 University Dr. E. Suite 205 College Station,Texas 77840 979.846.9259 <Carol Cotter.vcf> file://C:\Documents and Settings\ccotter\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C89056DCity of College Stati... 11/3/2010 Page 1 of 1 Carol Cotter - Re: Good morning From: Carol Cotter To: Jane Kee; Nat Date: 8/24/2010 4:12 PM Subject: Re: Good morning CC: Erika Bridges; Joe Guerra; Lauren Hovde Hi Jane, As proposed, the 2 driveways on Cherry Street will be allowed; however, the western drive will have to be restricted to right-in- right out. Please call if you have any questions. Carol file://C:\Documents and Settings\ccotter\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C73EF68City of College Stati... 11/3/2010 Page 1 of 1 Lauren Hovde - 2nd St. From: John Logan To: Hovde, Lauren Date: 7/30/2009 7:56 AM Subject: 2nd St. Good Morning Lauren, the plan view shows a ribbed ramp but the details and the general notes are the most recent tdlr regs so they are in compliance and I inspected the setup so they are good. file://C:\Documents and Settings\lhovde\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4A71521ACity ... 7/30/2009 s f1Ii- rL age 1 of 1 r c II ' >% P r )aeon Schubert - Fwd: Second Street apartments i 2 , I .WWVAIIMINGEIR'.111111 From: Molly Hitchcockl 114_ K To: Jason Schubert ' (q 1 Z D• e: 7/28/2009 11:16 AMi•✓ object: Fwd: Second Street apartments >>> Jennifer Prochazka 7/23/2009 6:21 PM >>> Second Street will be looking for their CO next week while I am out. There shouldn't be anything unusual. I've b n by a few times recently and everything seems to be going fine. I talked to the contractors today and they se comfortable with the rest of the process and what we will be checking for at inspection. I have said that we uld issue a temp CO if the lot across the street(it was used for their job shack and laydown yard) isn't fully r stored to its previous state. I think that they are seeding, so a temp CO may be necessary. Thanks for your help!f> ,e? it.lc.:16 e.,,,i tt i4v._s A.Cer.... , ( M cam. \kr.t., -----7741-3, , --114itcl ‘;wadt(4k.. :4k1„ rE.4y- 19,-c4m2J c ... a7 ,e_e_okoctoc 4- 0,0,rt.tAlkot tnr. n© - • cc, oA,ON V\ ct 1 Yunn,eir too efi4r( Jr • . .... . 11.a I ....0. a 1..A t 4:3 rc. JS d A. 0(ts1. S r t..s K jui c.v. 4...3 s ) cAryic-vek, 00 A-y,0 ale (tot F6ts a afe-4:- 0 Mtp ,Rk- \teed, file//C:\Documents and Settings\jschubert\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\-1A6I;DE1 I Ci... 7/28/2009 Page 1 of 6 Lauren Hovde - FW: second street. From: Sam Vernon<SVernon@bleylengineering.com> To: Lauren Hovde <Lhovde@cstx.gov> Date: 7/29/2009 7:57 AM Subject: FW: second street. CC: Jane Kee <jane@ipsgroup.us> Attachments: AR-M355N_20090324_065408.pdf Good Morning Lauren! I understand that you called yesterday regarding the screening of the dumpster pad an( ans _-m_yrs. Jane Kee (IPS Group) spoke to Jennifer in March concerning the changes in the fence and we t-ub .ted reg ised drawing that was approved prior to construction of the fence. There were some tree issues in tt -ear .`the property that made it impossible to construct the concrete footings for the masonry wall. I've included a copy of the revision sent to Jennifer on March 24th and the email ch,;int t WE w th this requested and approved change. I'm thinking Second Street is working toward getting their CO this week. Is there ar ;ith: els( !ror t our end that P&D Services will need? Thanks for the call. Please call/email me if you need any other information. Sam J.Vernon, P.E. Bleyl &Associates TBPE: F-678 1722 Broadmoor, Ste. 210 Bryan,TX 77802 Tel. (979) 268-1125 Fax(979) 260-3849 svernon@bleylengineering.com BRYAN ' AUSTIN • CONROE From: "Jennifer Prochazka" <JProchazka@cstx.gov> Date: April 3, 2009 8:57:29 AM CDT To: "Jane Kee" <jane@ipsgroup.us> Subject: Re: second street. Jane, You are correct, the requirement is to screen from the right-of-way. So, unless this area can be seen from College Main or Cherry, you will be fine. Sorry for the confusion! Jennifer Prochazka, AICP f;to•//('•�Thnnmantc an.l cattinae\lhnvrle\T nog] Cettinac\Temn\XPurnwice\4A70001)BLitv .._ 7/29/2009 Page 3 of 6 Nat Natalie Thomas Ruiz, AICP IPS Group, Planning Solutions 511 University Drive,Suite 205 College Station,TX 77840 Office(979)846-9259 Mobile(979)229-6797 www.ipsgroup.us From: Jennifer Prochazka [mailto:JProchazkaCa�cstx.gov] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:55 PM To: Natalie Subject: RE: Second Street Apartments - Fence changes You are on my list! I will get back with you by the end of today. Thanks for following up! Jennifer Prochazka, AICP Senior Planner Dept. of Planning & Development Services City of College Station tel.: 979.764.3570 fax: 979.764.3496 www.cstx.gov >>> "Natalie" <natalie@ipsgroup.us> 4/1/2009 1:50 PM >>> Hey JP,just following up with you. Have you had a chance to look at the fenc.!ch •: ges' Nat Natalie Thomas Ruiz,AICP IPS Group, Planning Solutions 511 University Drive,Suite 205 College Station,TX 77840 Office(979)846-9259 Mobile(979)229-6797 www.ipsgroup.us From: Jennifer Prochazka [mailto:JProchazka@c lcstx.gov] Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 5:29 PM To: Natalie Subject: Re: Second Street Apartments - Fence changes Nat, I will take a look at this as soon as I can! >>> "Natalie" <nataliei ipsgroup.us> 3/24/2009 9:45 AM >>> Hey JP, Attached is the graphic that Jane discussed with you re: the Second Street AI>art r. :nts. ?he a is an existing tree that is on the property line making the construction of the footi -gs f ..the nas)nry wall almost impossible. We are proposing to modify the section of the fence to c. lar i .>te2:d of masonry. Please review and let me know if I need to submit anything else. ¢'nar: - JP! See you tonight at the Open House. Nat Natalie Thomas Ruiz, AICP IPS Group, Planning Solutions 511 University Drive,Suite 205 College Station,TX 77840 Office(979)846-9259 Mobile(979)229-6797 www.ipsgroup.us From: Sam Vernon [mailto:svernonCableylengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:01 AM ci... In rwal CPttinac\Temn\XPornwise\4A7O00DBC itV ... 7/29/2009 Page 5 of 6 IPS Group 511 University Drive Ste. 205 College Station, Texas 77840 979.846.9259 From: Jennifer Prochazka [mailto:JProchazka@acstx.gov] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:37 PM To: Jane Kee Subject: RE: Morning - Help I believe that you are correct. If you choose to do that, submit a revised plan (or portion of the plan) for our records and so there are no issues at time of CO. I never got an answer from Utilities about whether they will need to remove the tree; have you heard? Jennifer Prochazka, AICP Senior Planner Dept. of Planning & Development Services City of College Station tel.: 979.764.3570 fax: 979.764.3496 www.cstx.gov >>> "Jane Kee" <jane@ipsgroup.us> 3/16/2009 9:59 AM >>> From further reading I don't think, but am not sure,that anything other than a wood fence is required on the rear line but do let me know what you find out, please. Thanks Jane R. Kee, AICP IPS Group 511 University Drive Ste. 205 College Station, Texas 77840 979.846.9259 From: Jennifer Prochazka [mailto:JProchazka@ cstx.gov] Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:53 AM To: Jane Kee Subject: Re: Morning - Help Good morning, I will have to look into it. I am not familiar enough with the tree or utility issues. I'll let you know what I find. Thanks! >>> "Jane Kee" <jane@iipsgroup.us> 3/10/2009 10:38 AM >>> Question re: Second St. The dumpsters have a brick wall on three sides with gates on front. Along the rear PL there is a hackberry that is in the way. It's on the adjacent property and is also in the way for utilities. Can we put a wooden section of fence (about 10-12 feet or so)rather than brick wall at that point to avoid the hackberry? Or would electrical or wastewater get permission and take it down as a matter of course? fila•//C•\ lnc„mPntc and Renin,c\lhovde\T.nea1 Settinvs\Temn\XPgrnwise\4A7000DBCity ... 7/29/2009 /2009) Gina Southerland - Fwd: PAC Page 1 From: Bridgette George To: Gina Southerland Date: 4/16/2009 3:57 PM Subject: Fwd: PAC Can you please contact her and let her know.Thanks! >>> "Jane Kee" <iane@iipsgroup.us> 4/16/09 3:06 PM >>> Do you still have our application for the PAC that we cancelled for April8th(last week)? We're ready to get a slot so let me know if I need to resubmit info. Thanks. Jane R. Kee,AICP IPS Group 511 University Drive Ste. 205 \2) 1 College Station,Texas 77840 979.846.9259 wigOg-(o5 .r c,z� t D1 ' IA I I IPS Group iov 511 University Drive East. Suite 205 College Station, Texas 77840 (979)846-9259 MEMORANDUM June 9, 2008 TO: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, S- 'sr Planner FROM: Jane Kee,AICP, IPS Grou• t SUBJECT: SECOND STREET APART S (SP)- Site Plan Case file#08-00500065 Attached please find for your review: 1. $200 processing fee for the next round of three(3)staff reviews 2. Seven(7) complete sets of construction documents 3. Simplified elevation in response to Comment#1. 4. Two(2)revised site plans 5. One(1) landscaping plan 6. One(1) l 1 x 17 grading and erosion control plan / / fe 7. Easement description for the PUE to cover the FH.(d tccJ ` -,-11 �+a" PLANNING V. Please show me how the front elevation is meeting Section 5.6.B.4.c of the Unified Development Ordinance. I may be overlooking something on this elevation drawing. Here's a simplified elevation that may be easier to understand that denotes the architectural features that exist across the front. It should be clearer now that the UDO is being met in terms of visual interest. Concrete"is referred to in the materials chart provided. Where is this proposed? Is it painted?A sample was not provided. The concrete is painted as paint#2 on the material/color board. The color was noted on the elevation but the word "concrete"was left off. It is simply the narrow ba id that separates the parking area from the upper floors. 0 in GtiY- 'G' t,y. � _prune.)i r l Avyv,4''(/ri GL I f req U faryvenis deep are the recessions/projections on the facades? The recessions/ projections are about 1/2 foot change as you go from brick to stucco. ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 3 1. Provide cross-section detail of Drainage Trench 2. Verify that the structural integrity of the curb is not compromised. Please see attached detail.(N-r. a) 2. Is there still room for the 1" sand cushion between the 4"pipes and the pavers? Yes ter1 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MEMORANDUM June 2, 2008 TO: Jane Kee, IPS Group, via fax: 979.260.3564 •/ FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: SECOND STREET APARTMENTS (SP)- Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan application and determined it to be incomplete. The following is a preliminary list of items needed to complete the submittal and conduct a thorough review. Please submit the following information by any Monday at 10 a.m. for review that week: $200 processing fee for the next round of three (3) staff reviews Seven (7) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (one set will be returned to you, please submit additional copies if you want more than one approved set) Two (2) revised site plans One (1) landscaping plan One (1) 11x17 grading and erosion control plan Please note that the Easement Dedication Sheet and necessary documents are required prior to the issuance of a building permit. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments pc: Brett McCulley, P.E., Bleyl &Associates, via fax:979.260.3849 CS Second Street Apartments, LLC, via email: THerbelin@stoneleighcp.com UM Case file#08-00500065 • L 1) V NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. Page 1 of 2 1 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MEMORANDUM March 25, 2008 TO: Jane Kee, IPS Group, via fax: 979.260.35641 FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: SECOND STREET APARTMENTS (SP)- Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan application and determined it to be incomplete. The following is a preliminary list of items needed to complete the submittal and conduct a thorough review. Please submit the following information by any Monday at 10 a.m. for review that week: Cover memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the comment); One (1) revised site plan; One (1) landscaping plan; Building elevations, materials & colors; One (1) 11x17 grading and erosion control plan; PIP application and required documents; Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents (please allow 4 weeks to process); and $18,080 Parkland Dedication fees prior to issuance of a building permit. Please note that the Easement Dedication Sheet and necessary documents are required prior to the issuance of a building permit. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments Associates, pc: Brett McCulley, P.E., Bleyl & via fax:979.260.3849 I CS Second Street Apartments, LLC, via email: THerbelin@stoneleighcp.com Case file #08-00500065 *A6A Home of Texas A &M University Page 1 of 1 From: Deborah .....ace-Rosier To: therbelin@stoneleighhcp.com Date: 3/25/2008 4:48 PM Subject: Second Street Apts. (SP) 08-65 Comments (1) Attachments: "No matter how little money and how few possessions you own, having a dog makes you rich." Louis Sabin Deborah Grace Rosier Staff Assistant City of College Station Planning & Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77840 979-764-3570 Main 979-764-3784 Desk 979-764-3496 Fax dgrace@cstx.gov www.cstx.gov file://C:\Documents and Settings\dgrace.CSTX\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\47E92CC... 3/25/2008 /Sidewalks are required to brick pavers. OK 8�Please provide the volume and page of the easements (as platted or as filed). Plat filed t/ as v.8498, p.59. Note added to site plan sheet#1 j(All paved areas are required to be curbed. It doesn't look like there is curb around some of the islands or the interior sidewalk, etc. Revised on site plan sheet#1 Vi1. am not familiar with "greenfence." If this is what is proposed, please provide me with information. The landscape plan currently shows shrubs in front of the wrought iron fence. Screening will be accomplished with shrubs rather than greenfence. Throat depth does not meet minimum requirements. Approved as per staff 5-2-08 XThe driveway spacing does not meet minimum requirements. One driveway eliminated as per staff 5-2-08 The driveway widths were changed and no longer meet minimum width of 24'. See revised site plan sheet#1 ,14The street tree at the north end of the property should be located at back of curb. See I' landscape sheet#6 Transformer screening (as well as all other mechanical equipment and meter connection points) is also supposed to be coordinated with the building architecture and colors. See site plan sheet—wall extended around transformers as per staff 5-2-08 Is the irrigation proposed along the north property line possible with the shallow detention pipes in that area? Yes Details were removed from the site plan. Please include site plan details o a "site plan ) sheet 2 page if they don't fit on the plan. Done e plan is now showing far fewer end islands, and those shown are not meeting minimum requirements. Worked out as shown on site plan sheet as per mtg. with JP 5- 12-08 (island at rear with turn around space and island at front where driveway was closed) ,1 . Please see the structural soil details in the Design Guidelines. Essentially everything in (/ the right-of-way will need to be structural soil (we will grant an exception to the areas occupied by driveway). Revised see detail site sheet#2 V'2 . I found the following changes from the previous submittal (that were not requested), please let me know if there is anything else that I missed: site details removed from site plan, building foot print changed, pass through lane added, building articulation changed, transformers relocated, end islands removed, driveway widths changed, sidewalk ramps changed. J4 lease note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the VV City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Minor changes: removed some wheel stops, deleted gate pad, moved wrought iron fence forward on south (elevation called east) side of bldg. ,moved FDC in front of fence and placed on a separate post, added curbing in front of some interior spaces on the south side. Page 2 of 4 OLo6 A ‘o'•6 1' 03 --14 ,721 0/19 .,,,► IPS Group P`, Planning t, O 1 u t 1 0 n S 511 University Drive, Suite 205 College Station, Texas 77845 979.846.9259 ► I May 19, 2008 G TO: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Senior Planner Jrrv. 1 FROM: Jane Kee, IPS Group, Principal 30-1 SUBJECT: SECOND STREET APARTMENTS (SP)-Site Plan Case file#08-00500065 Attached please find written responses to all of Staff Review Comments #2 and the specific page that each comment was addressed on as well as: V One (1) revised site plan (sheets#1 and 2) One (1) landscaping and irrigation plan (sheet#6) ir One (1) whole set site and civil (9 sheets) kr DP andPlPfees CUM' ISOe°-Cr• Dm')Q ap • ;/ Responses to building elevation/dimension questions PLANNING 1. Please provide dimensioned elevations and the appropriate material calculations per façade. See revised elevations and Office Memo from Carrell Poole &Yost. 7 The materials provided were not labeled. See revised 8 1/2 sheet with notations. /Since minimum parking space requirements apply to non-structured parking, 18-foot parking spaces may not have wheel stops in them and a two foot overhang is required. Parking under bldg. is considered structured parking and other spaces meet minimum dimensions as shown on site plan sheet#1. ./ Areas between the required sidewalk and the parking area are required to be landscaped or streetscaped with one of the following: raised masonry planter boxes or pots, at-grade planting beds, seating benches, light features, decorative railings, masonry walls under 3' in height, decorative wrought iron fencing, additional pedestrian areas finished in brick pavers, etc. The landscape plan shows grass, your response sheet stated pavement. Areas are denoted as planting beds on landscape sheet#6. 1)(*. Please label the "gate pad" on the site plan. What is a gate pad? Will it require screening, is it above grade? Gate pad has been deleted. .The minimum clear dimensions for two 8-yar dumpsters are 12' X 24'. Revised on site plan sheet#1 � i sc, Page 1 of 4 MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double-Check Back Flow Device, and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. OK 2. All BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. OK FIRE 1. The footprint of the building is confusing. Not sure where the structure is.(sent elevation to Eric Dotson 4-2-08) 2. Is there a fire hydrant across Second Street? If so, please show on plans. Not one close enough to provide coverage. Will be added on site. 3. Because of the height, the structure can be no closer than 15 feet and no further than 30 feet from the road edge. (OK as is per Eric Dotson 4-2-08) 4. Knox switches are required on both of the security gates. OK 5. Knox box required on the main entrance&FDC plug as per Eric 4-2-08 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 1. Submit Development Permit application with associated fee and documents, including water design report,drainage report,and grading and erosion control plans. 2. Provide sealed civil plans for public infrastructure. 3. Water line crossing of Second Street shall be by bore,not open cut. 4. Additional comments may follow with submittal of documents requested above. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION 1. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes. (NA as per Brent Read 4-8-08) 2. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for electric lines(including street lights). OK 3. The proposed building is infringing on the majority of the existing 10' P.U.E. and 7.5' Utility Easement at the rear of this property. It is no longer encroaching. 4. The existing overhead electric line will not meet 2007 National Electric Safety Code (NESC) requirements for horizontal clearance from the proposed building. The NESC requires a minimum clearance of 7.5' from the building(NESC Table 234-1). OK 5. Due to lack of easements and the NESC clearance requirements, there will be a need for line relocation and/or burial. The developer is responsible for the cost of this work. OK GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS 1. Developer installs conduit per City specs and design. 2. City will provide drawings for conduit installation. 3. Developer provides 30' of rigid or IMC conduit for riser poles. City installs riser. 4. Developer to intercept existing conduit at designated transformers and extend as required. 5. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer, developer to furnish and install conduit as shown on electrical layout. 6. Developer pours transformer pad(s)per City specs and design. 7. Developer installs pull boxes and secondary pedestals as per City specs and design (pull boxes and secondary pedestals provided by the City). 8. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2000 or later version of plat and/or site plan. Email to bread@cstx.gov. 9. Developer provides load data for project. 10. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Brent Read at 979.764.5026. 6. Please provide detail (including colors and materials) of the security gates. Included on separate sheet. The gate is steel and is a motorized unit which slides to the left on one side and to the right on the other automatically. We will provide a man-door at each side depending on security and exiting requirements. This fence and gate system will be the same taupe color as the metal roof In 1your floodplain note,please state whether the property is outside of the floodplain.S 1 28. he proposed driveways do not meet minimum spacing requirements. The northern drive forms an intersection as per pg. 7-17 UDO. These driveways were reviewed by the former Transportation 1 ner and approved since th'e overall sit 'on i being improved from what • exists now. �j11` J y�o4t VGV1 '. Please dimension the distance to adjacent drives.S 145") 30 'lease dimension driveways at property line.S 1 0 2 1:1 7 .7. v." J 4111 ' at are the `empty' areas in front of the wrought iron fenci1 1?Pavement `u01443he _... . What is the line on the plan that is approximately 11 feet from e curb? Concrete edge and What . nts .. The water main must be completely within an easement.S 1 Survey is preparing documents elPlease provide the clear dimensions for the dumpster location.Si 16 11,‘ 'LI' N ( Z4f 5. Is the proposed stairwell in a PUE? NO '7j 1_ One dumpster is required for every 16 residential units. Wally at Sanitation approved 2 8 yd. dumpsters or one compactor. This was communicated to planning staff g rr�r.. . . Since the dumpster screening is proposed in a PUE, please add the following note to your plans: "Because the dumpster screening is located in a Public Utility Easement, the property owner is responsible for the replacement of the screens if it becomes necessary to remove them for utility construction and/or maintenance."S 1 4) at is the item that looks like a cassette to just north of t e most-n rt ern driveway? Gate pads tilt takciY � at are the rectangles on either side of the two driveways(in the empty white area).Benches � /Wooden fence is not an acceptable screen for the dumpsters. The screening must be of a terial predominantly used on the building and must be integrated with the building architecture.Screening will be a wall to complement building—brick masonry S 1 41 What screening is opose or the transformers and other mechanical equipment. 6' high 0 wooden fence 51 . , . VPlease note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not be made of aware of will constitute a completely new review. Drive pass-through under the building is a new addition. It is simply for the convenience of the residents so that if they drive in one side and there is no parking they can get to the other side without going b oto thest ai loS a . Does this plan show the new right-of-way/property line? Revised to show ROW line on site lan Sht 1 . Please show how you arrived at the required parking number (including the number of bedrooms per unit).S 1 1ease include the Floor-to-Area Ratio(FAR)on the site plan.S 1 ▪ Where are the bike racks proposed(20 spaces needed).Si • Please use the approved bike rack for Northgate (can be found in the Northgate section of the Pe Site Design Standards).S 3 10. •4 dewalks are required to be bric rs. S 1. arSIP May we consider using stamped ' concrete on top rather than the pavers. ....--...1, • e r 'lease includCtructuralj)l ander details(Site Design Standards).S 0,‘ ease include tree well/tree grate detail(Site Design Standards).S 5 A Public Access Easement is needed for the portion of the required sidewalk that lies outside of the public right-of-way.Sidewalk is contained within new ROW 11 .PIP application is needed for the trees&grates proposed in the right-of-way. Application is included. 4111 -e grates are required to be at back of curb.S 1 if.u., OY\0. tok TO ve'lease show the detail and location of the required bench(Site Design Standards).S 3 and S1 fany lighting proposed? Please provide details. See detail submitted separately with material oard Please include a written scale(in addition to the graphic scale)on the site plan.Done 19. 'lease include the volume and page of all existing easements. There are . ' easements on file. New 7.5 foot utility easement is on plat recently filed by City ol. 8498, Pg. W- .. 20. P urbing is required around all paved areas. It loot/ it proposed in �ac twpY parking spaces. OK 04,V4 �� adtiOgvcra) • ®'lease dimension distance from edge of pave t to the pro rtty 1 oil the south side of the property.Si ic 5 ..) Please include distance from edge of structure to prope lines.S 1 k> 4 ,Fe4.-, , r 0 rought iron fencing will not adequately screen the parking. "Greenfence' as approved 11- 8-07 in discussion with Lindsey Boyer as long as at time of CO screen is continuous and 3' high. If "Greenfence" is not used, then 3' high shrub planting will be placed in front of the P wrought iron fence. Note will be added to site plan. S 5 at parking screening is being used for parking abutting adjacent propertie Wood fence S diThe security gates do not meet the required throat depth. Previously approved by staff 11-28- 07. Since there are two drive entrances and such a small unit count, this queuing space was deemed sufficient. a ---iimorii pIPS Group PIanning '• olution ' 511 University Drive, Suite 205 College Station, Texas 77845 979.846.9259 979.260.3564 MEMORANDUM April 21,2008 TO: Jennifer Prochazka,AICP, Senior Planner / FROM: Jane Kee,AICP,IPS Group Princ.i.alit, SUBJECT: SECOND STREET APARTME 4 : ')-Site Plan Please receive the following information with this cover memo: -V One(1)revised site plan; One(1)landscaping plan; Building elevations,materials&colors; v" One(1) 11x17 grading and erosion control plan; PIP application and required documents; _NA_ Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents (please allow 4 weeks to process);and 77$18,080 Parkland Dedication fees prior to issuance of a building permit. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: SECOND STREET APARTMENTS(SP)—08-00500065 L ING We have not received a landscape plan, ' ri tion information uilding elevations, material samples or color samples. These are minimum submittal requirements. Landscape plan is S 5. Elevations, materials and color samples are included. .The site plan is somewhat confusing (location of parking vs. building, is it structured parking?). The elevations would help out a great deal. Interior parking is underneath the building. Residential units begin on the 2"d floor. Elevations are included 0 The posed parking is surface parking(as o''• =• • u -.' •" kin.),correct? If so, endr„s islands are requireinterior islands are not Minimum s arking space size :lsoa apply. V V� Revised on site plan Si. r0 CO r• , A. R S p Ct R 1 Is there a wall or other structure around the parking or is the dark line just curbing? - �_�`' g It is curbing S 1 i ,,,,,c t ' qt. 40 A-.e 1 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MEMORANDUM April 30, 2008 TO: Jane Kee, IPS Group, via fax: 979.260.3564 FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: SECOND STREET APARTMENTS (SP)- Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $200 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Cover memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the comment); One (1) revised site plan; One (1) landscaping plan; Building elevations; If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments pc: Brett McCulley, P.E., Bleyl & Associates, via fax:979.260.3849 CS Second Street Apartments, LLC, via email: THerbelin@stoneleighcp.com Case file #08-00500065 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans.Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. Page 1 of 4 Page 1 of 1 Jennifer Prochazka - Re: Northgate From: Jennifer Prochazka To: Jane Kee Date: 7/2/2007 11:11 AM Subject: Re: Northgate CC: Josh Norton Jane, Let me know if you would like the notes from the PAC meeting and I can fax them over. Below are answers to the planning questions that came up during the PAC meeting. Give me a call if you want to discuss any of them. I believe that Josh has already discussed the engineering related questions with Brett. 1 -Will the study count toward parking requirements? There is nothing in the UDO or in the IBC that clearly differentiates between a bedroom and study. Generally, we will look at the size of the room, how it is enclosed and whether it has a closet in it. 2 - Is right-of-way dedication required on Second Street? Dedication is required. 3 -Compactor information: The minimum inside dimension of the enclosure needs to be 29'x16' to accommodate a roll off compactor/dumpster. Wally is still looking at proposed location and potential service issues. 4-Are spaces still available for lease in the City's parking garage? Please contact Accounting at 764-3574 and ask to speak with Patricia Rosier. My understanding is that we are currently reviewing applications for renewal and should know how many spaces are available for lease very soon. 5-What is the minimum queuing required for a gated multi-family development in this area? Ken is evaluating it at this location, but it is unlikely that it will be able to be gated with your current configuration (ie: 1 car length before gate). 6- If the developer chooses to use landscaping to screen the parking rather than a wall, can he place a fence behind the landscaping? A fence that is located between the sidewalk and the structure/parking can be no more than 3' in height if masonry. If you wish for the fence to be higher, it must be decorative wrought iron -Section 5.6.B.9.b. 7 -Where is the sitting wall thing? I found where the parking has to be screened but it says a minimum 3 feet in height. Can someone build a 6 foot wall? 5.6.6.6.e -last sentence. Jennifer Prochazka, AICP Senior Planner Dept. of Planning & Development Services City of College Station tel.: 979.764.3570 fax: 979.764.3496 www.cstx.gov Talo•//C •\Tl, ,,,,,ar,*� ar,,1 C...1+inrte\irirn-havlra\T non] Cattincre\Tama\YPCrrnNAT;ce\dFRRTlTlSRC 7/7/7(1(17 (11/2812007)Lindsay Boyer- Re: Fwd: Northgate second street apts. Page 1 From: Wally Urrutia To: Lindsay Boyer Date: 11/28/2007 9:51 AM Subject: Re: Fwd: Northgate second street apts. CC: Rodney Harris This is not a good setup for us.We cant backup that far of a distance, plus that size of container on casters is just not a good idea.We wouldn't be able to provide that type of container. If they were to purchase and provide that type of container,they would be responsible to roll the containers out for the collection vehicles. At this point I don't see any other options other than placing a roll-off compactor somewhere in the area. Thanks, Wally >>> Lindsay Boyer 11/28/2007 8:21 am >>> Wally-See question 1 regarding sanitation issues.They held a PAC on this back in July but are having trouble accommodating the required dumpsters.Site plan is attached Thanks- Lindsay Lindsay B.Boyer,AICP Senior Planner City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue S. College Station,Texas 77840 (979)764-3570/(979)764-3496 Fax lbover(c�cstx.gov www.cstx.gov Wally Urrutia Sanitation Superintendent (979)764-3841 Fax(979)764-3822 >>> "Jane Kee" <jane@ipsaroup.us> 11/27/2007 2:26 PM >>> This is a draft site plan. Brett and I gave comments back to the architect yesterday so he will be making changes. I only send this so that you will have a reference for the following questions tomorrow.The floor plan is there to show the bedroom count and for Chris to answer a fire door question. QUESTIONS: 1.Providing room for 3 dumpsters that can be easily accessed at the rear is becoming a problem.Check to see if we can use two and have pick- up more often-treat it like commercial. Compactor is too noisy and not desired by owner.Since Northgate requires dumpster to be at rear,can trucks front end load and then back up? 2.Check fire doors and see if they are required at hallway ends. This is Type 2B non-combustible construction so do doors have to be wired into alarm system?Please have Chris take a look at the floor plan. 3.Can green screen fence be used as parking screen. See web site greenscreen.com.Parking is not adjacent to ROW but farther into the site. Green screen allows planting to cover the fence. 4.Check queuing space. There are two entrances and each can queue one vehicle.Unit count is down to 40 from 50. 5. Did the requirement for the 8'sidewalk change to a narrower walk? Thanks Lindsay. I'll see ya manana at 2.The plat was called W.C.Boyett. The original PAC was June 27th. P&Z meeting was Aug. 16 where variance was granted and plat approved. Also attached are my notes from the PAC meeting. I will also forward an email from JP responding to some questions we had. (11/28/2007) Lindsay Boyer- Re: Fwd: Northgate second street apts. Page 2 Jane R.Kee,AICP IPS Group 511 University Drive Ste.205 College Station,Texas 77840 979.846.9259