HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Review STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: RAMADA INN (Concept Plan) - 07-00500134 & 07-00500130
PLANNING
1. The concept plan has not been reviewed for site plan compliance.
2. The concept plan should only include improvements proposed to the subject property -
Repeat Comment. To clarify, please remove proposed improvements that are not within
the boundary of the rezoning request. As previously discussed, the amenities that straddle
the rezoning line may be shown.
3. Please outline the rezoning area with a heavy line.
4. Please remove any notes that relate to development off-site of the subject property
(rezoning area).
5. Remove notes regarding specifics of parking garage (ie: height).
6. Please clarify the number of actual residential units (not just for a parking determination) on
the Concept Plan.
7. Staff does not support the proposed range of building heights as presented on the Concept
Plan and will recommend against it.
8. FYI - cross access to the current Jack in the Box site will be required at site plan.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: June 20, 2007
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 2
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: RAMADA INN (COMP & REZ) - 07-00500134 & 07-00500130
PLANNING
1. Based on recent direction by the Planning & Zoning Commission, any request to amend the
Floodplain & Streams designation on the Land Use Plan prior to the LOMR being approved
by FEMA will go forward with a negative recommendation from staff. Once the study is
approved by FEMA, staff will not support re-designating any property that is still within the
100-year floodplain.
2. As previously discussed, staffs recommendation will be that a P-MUD zoning be approved
to preserve more commercial property in this area.
3. The concept plan should only include improvements proposed to the subject property (do
not include proposed improvements on western property across Redmond). Please indicate
proposed off-site parking on by a note on the concept plan.
4. The concept plan must be reviewed by the Parks Board.
5. Proposed amenities are shown located in existing easements. Easements will have to be
abandoned and utilities relocated.
6. Is there a specific percentage that you are requesting to vary from the parking standards?
7. Is the driveway proposed to be relocated? Please provide proposed spacing.
8. What buffer is proposed?
9. Is there a specific percentage that you are requesting to vary from the landscape or
streetscape requirements?
10. Please provide a range of building heights on the concept plan.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: June 8, 2007
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans.Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed
out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 2