HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Gateway/Lamar Tract Rezoning : Part 2
(07-100)
1. Applicant requesting rezoning from R-1 Single Family
Residential to A-O Agricultural Open in order to comply with
the Comprehensive Plan
2. Application for rezoning made for subject property and
property to south, which were one tract of land at that time
(DRAW THE BOUNDS)
a. Rezone a portion from R-1 to C-1 (IDENTIFY)
b. Presented to P&Z on November 3, 2005
c. CC approved on November 22, 2005
3. LUP: Property that remained R-1, which is subject property,
was and is currently designated as FP&S on LUP
4. Typically, staff recommends that areas reflected as FP&S be
rezoned to A-O, the least intense zoning district
5. However, at the time of the rezoning staff recommended that
the FP&S areas remain R-1 because it did not meet minimum
lot size requirement of 5 acres that the A-0 zoning district
requires
6. Staff has since instituted a change in policy that will allow
FP&S portions to be zoned A-O regardless of size in order to
provide most protection to such areas
7. Property to the south is zoned C-1 and has received site plan
approval for NTB
8. Property annexed in 1971, subsequently zoned R-1, platted
as a part of the Gateway subdivision
9. Request is in compliance with Comp Plan
10. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning
11. Received no phone calls about the request
NOTES:
• Why the change? Staff has the ability to consider the LUP in
determining the buffer requirement when property is zoned A-O
Agricultural-Open. DO NOT MENTION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
• Why don't we want the buffer? A masonry wall would be required as a
part of the buffer which would place construction close to the
floodplain areas. By not requiring a buffer, it will lessen the impact on
those areas.