Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEngineering Report CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr.KeithTinker Report Date: 7/27/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O.Box 9960 Report No.: 6 College Station,Texas 77842 Technician: David Requena PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1,PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT Date Sampled: June 29,2009 No.of Sets Cast: 1 of I Sample Represents: Curb&Gutter along Victoria Avenue at Station 4+50,Right of Centerline Required Compressive Strength at 28 Days,(psi): 3,500 LABORATORY TEST DATA Sample Date Age Cross-sectional Maximum Compressive Identification No. Tested (Days) Area(in2.) Load(lbf.) Strength(psi.) VAIE 01 07/06/09 7 12.57 64,845 5,160 VALE 02 07/27/09 28 12.57 79,915 6,360 VAIE 03 07/27/09 28 12.57 77,955 6,200 VAIE 04 ---- Reserve 12.57 Note: Some information on this report provided by others. Testing and reporting was conducted in general accordance with the following applicable ASTM methods: C 31,C 39,C 138,C 143,C 231,&C 1064. FIELD TEST DATA Supplier: Brazos Valley Services Time Batched: 1:56 PM Air Content,(%): 4.3 Truck No.: 36 Time Sampled: 2:43 PM Unit Weight,(pcf): ND Ticket No.: 1457 Concrete Temp,(°F): 88 Sample Type: Cylinder Mix No.: 3/8 Gravel Ambient Temp,(°F): 93 Sample Size: 4 in.dia. Accumulated Yards: 10 Slump(in.): 1.25 Water Added on Site,(gal): 10 Weather: Partly Cloudy Field Contact: Mr. Keith Tinker(City of College Station)was informed of field test results. Remarks: ND—Not Determined;NP—Not Provided;NA—Not Applicable Copies To: Mr.Josh Norton,City of College Station Mr.Ricky Palasota, Sr.,Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis,P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr.KeithTinker Report Date: 8/6/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O.Box 9960 Report No.: 7 College Station,Texas 77842 PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION;REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1,PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE SAMPLE Date: 8/4/09 Arrival Time: 7:50 AM Requested By: Mr.Keith Tinker,City of College Station Sample Obtained By: Kyle Rosenbaum Time Charge: 1.0 Hour No.of Samples Collected: 1 Sample No.: 1 of 1 Lab No.: 676 Location Sample was Obtained from: Victoria Avenue at Station 3+50,4'Right of Centerline(Windrow) Gradation Results of Flexible Base Material COMMENT (U.SSStA Standard Size) PERCENT RETAINED,(%)EVE SIZE ' B/CS Unified Specification No.320 t OR REMARK 13�" 0 0 Meets Requirements. 7/8" 25 10-35 Meets Requirements. 3/8" 49 30-50 Meets Requirements. No.4 62 45-65 Meets Requirements. No.40 80 70-85 Meets Requirements. Summary of Classification Tests for Flexible Base Material Classification or TXDOT Measured B/CS Unified Specification No.320 COMMENT P Material Test Test Results Result OR REMARK Liquid Limit: TEX-104-E 21 Maximum 35 Meets Requirements. Plastic Limit: TEX-105-E 15 N/A ---- Plasticity Index: TEX-106-E 6 Maximum 10 Meets Requirements. Sample meets project specifications. Comments: (See Report No.7-A for Proctor Curve) Note; 1. Test method used conformed to Texas Deptuiment of Trnnspoitation,Test Method Ter-I/0-E CME TESTING AND ENGINEERING INC. Victoria Avenue&Infrastructure Extension;Reatta Meadows,Section 1,Phase 2;College Station,Texas Report No.7—Laboratory Test Results August 6,2009 Copies To: Mr.Josh Norton,City of College Station Mr.Ricky Palasota,Sr.,Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis,P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. 2 COMPACTION TEST REPORT 132.0 129.5 1 - - II Vilik 27.0 - Q — c a; 124.5 I ilL �_ ..._... ■ 1 Will 122.0 -- ---- _. _._ - ZAV for Sp.G. _ 119.5 1 2.75 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 1557-07 Method C Modified Eiev/ Classification Nat. %> %< Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. LL PI 3/4 in. No.200 Windrow 21 6 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density= 129.8 pcf Tan Crushed Limestone Optimum moisture= 10.3 % Project No. 29073 Client: JLM DEVELOPMENT GROUP II,LLC Remarks: Project: VICTORIA AVENUE&INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION;REATTA Date Sampled:08/04/09 MEADOWS,SECT. 1,PM-COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS • Location: Victoria Avenue at Station 3+50,4'Right of Centerline Lab No.676 CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. College Station, Texas Report No. 7-A CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr. KeithTinker Report Date: 8/4/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O.Box 9960 Report No.: 8 College Station,Texas 77842 PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE &INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION I,PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS FIELD DENSITY TESTS & BACKFILL SOIL SAMPLE REPORT Date: 8/4/09 Arrival Time: 10:30 AM Time Charge: 2.0 Hours Technician: Anthony Muzny Requested By: Mr.Alfonso Guillen,Brazos Valley Services FIELD DENSITY TESTS Proctor Maximum Dry Optimum Material Moisture Compaction Reference Density,pef Moisture,% Test Method Description Specification Specification 1 104.6 18.9 ASTM D 698 Method A Gray Sandy Lean Clay Opt. to+4% 98% 2 93.5 24.9 ASTM D 698 Method A Brown&Tan Clayey Sand Opt. to+4% 98% FIELD MOISTURE&DENSITY TEST RESULTS Location of Proctor Test Thy Moisture Moisture Comp- Pass/ In-Place Test Reference Depth, in. Density,pcf Content,% Difference ' action,% Fail BACKFILL FOR WATER LINE'WA-1' Station 1+00, At Existing 2 6 90.7 23.5 -1.4 97 Fail Ground Surface Station 1+05, 1'Below 2 6 91.1 22.7 -2.2 97 Fail Existing Gound Surface Station 2+00,At Existing 2 6 79.4 23.3 -1.6 85 Fail Ground Surface Station 2+05, I'Below 2 6 62.6 31.5 6.6 67 Fail Existing Gound Surface Station 3+00,At Existing 2 6 87.8 24.6 -0.3 94 Fail Ground Surface Station 3+05, I'Below 2 6 73.8 28.5 3.6 79 Fail Existing Gound Surface Station 4+00,At Existing 1 6 84.0 17.9 -1.0 80 Fail Ground Surface Station 4+05, 1'Below 1 6 90.6 19.9 1.0 87 Fail Existing Gound Surface CME TESTING AND ENGINEERING INC. Victoria Avenue&Infrastructure Extension; Reatta Meadows,Section I,Phase 2;College Station,Texas Report No.8—Field Moisture-Densities and Laboratory Test Results August 4,2009 FIELD MOISTURE&DENSITY TEST RESULTS(CONTINUED) Location of Proctor Test Dry Moisture Moisture Comp- Pass/ In-Place Test Reference Depth, in. Density,pcf Content,% Difference' action,% Fail BACKFILL FOR WATER LINE'WA-1' Station 5+00,At Existing 2 6 83.2 23.0 -1.9 89 Fail Ground Surface Station 5+05, 1'Below 2 6 68.0 31.1 6.2 73 Fail Existing Gound Surface Notes: 1.Difference with respect to the optimum moisture content. General Notes: Some information on this test report provided by others. Testing and reporting was conducted in general accordance with the following applicable ASTM methods: D 2922 and D 3017. Remarks: Mr.Alfonso Guillen(Brazos Valley Services)was informed of field test results. • • 2 CME TESTING AND ENGINEERING INC. Victoria Avenue&Infrastructure Extension;Reatta Meadows,Section 1,Phase 2;College Station,Texas Report No.8—Field Moisture-Densities and Laboratory Test Results August 4,2009 BACKFILL SOIL SAMPLE Sample No.: 1 of 1 Lab No.: 678 Water Line"WA-1"at Station 2+05.The sample represents soils excavated from the Location Sample was Obtained from: existing ground surface.to a depth of approximately 1 ft.below the existing ground surface at this location. ounnents' „ See Report No.8-A for Proctor Curve. Copies To, Mr.Josh Norton,City of College Station Mr.Ricky Palasota,Sr.,Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis, P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. 3 COMPACTION TEST REPORT 97 95 93 U) ZAV for Sp.G. 2.70 91 89 87 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-07eI Method A Standard Elev/ Classification Nat. %> %< Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. LL PI No.4 No.200 0 to 12" CH 60 40 73.0 13.E.G.S. TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum thy density=94.9 pef Brown&Gray Fat Clay with Sand Optimum moisture=25.7% Project No. 29073 Client: JLM DEVELOPMENT GROUP II,LLC Remarks: Project: VICTORIA AVENUE&INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION;REATTA Date Sampled:8/4/09 MEADOWS,SECT. I,PH.2-COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS • Location: Water Line'WA-1'at Station 2+05 Lab No.678 CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. College Station, Texas Report No. 8-A CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr.KeithTinker Report Date: 8/7/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O.Box 9960 Report No.: 9 College Station,Texas 77842 PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE& INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1,PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS FIELD DENSITY TESTS REPORT Date: 8/7/09 Arrival Time: 4:25 PM Time Charge: 1.0 Hour Technician: Jerry Ellis Requested By: Mr.Alfonso Guillen,Brazos Valley Services Proctor Maximum Dry Optimum Material Moisture Compaction Reference Density,pcf Moisture,% Test Method Description Specification Specification , 1 129.8 10.3 ASTMD 1557 Method C Tan Crushed Limestone Opt. to+4% 95% FIELD MOISTURE&DENSITY TEST RESULTS Location of Proctor Test Dry Moisture Moisture Comp- Pass/ In-Place Test Reference Depth,in. Density,pcf Content,% Difference 1 action,% Fail BASE FOR VICTORIA AVENUE Station 0+50,12'Right of 1 6 126.2 10.6 0.3 97 Pass Centerline Station 2+50,10'Left of 1 6 125.0 9.5 -0.8 96 Fail Centerline Station 4+50,8'Right of 1 6 126.1 10.4 0.1 97 Pass Centerline Notes: 1.Difference with respect to the optimum moisture content. General Notes: Some information on this test report provided by others. Testing and reporting was conducted in general accordance with the following applicable ASTM methods: D 2922 and D 3017. Remarks: Mr.Francisco Herrera(Brazos Valley Services)was informed of field test results. Copies To: Mr.Josh Norton,City of College Station Mr. Ricky Palasota,Sr.,Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis,P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr.KeithTinker Report Date: 8/8/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O.Box 9960 Report No.: 10 College Station,Texas 77842 PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1,PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS FIELD DENSITY TESTS REPORT Date: 8/8/09 Arrival Time: 11:30 AM Time Charge: 1.0 Hour Technician: Jeny Ellis Requested By: Mr.Alfonso Guillen,Brazos Valley Services Proctor Maximum Dry Optimum Material Moisture Compaction Reference Density,pcf Moisture,% Test Method Description Specification Specification 1 129.8 10.3 ASTM D 1557 Method C Tan Crushed Limestone Opt. to+4% 95% FIELD MOISTURE&DENSITY TEST RESULTS Location of Proctor Test Dry Moisture Moisture Comp- Pass/ In-Place Test Reference Depth,in. Density,pcf Content,% Difference I action,% Fail BASE FOR VICTORIA AVENUE Station 2+50, 10'Left of 1 6 129.1 10.5 0.2 99 Pass Centerline (Retest) Notes: 1.Difference with respect to the optimum moisture content. General Notes: Some information on this test report provided by others. Testing and reporting was conducted in general accordance with the following applicable ASTM methods: D 2922 and D 3017. Remarks: Mr.Daniel Bareto(Brazos Valley Services)was informed of field test results. Copies To: Mr.Josh Norton,City of College Station Mr.Ricky Palasota,Sr.,Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis,P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr.KeithTinker Report Date: 8/11/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O.Box 9960 Report No.: 1 I College Station,Texas 77842 PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1,PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS • FIELD DENSITY TESTS REPORT Date: 8/11/09 Arrival Time: 11:00 AM Time Charge: 1.5 Hours Technician: Jerry Ellis Requested By: Mr.Alfonso Guillen,Brazos Valley Services Proctor Maximum Dry Optimum Material Moisture Compaction Reference Density,pcf Moisture,% Test Method Description Specification Specification 1 104.6 18.9 ASTM D 698 Method A Gray Sandy Lean Clay Opt. to+4% 98% 2 93.5 24.9 ASTM D 698 Method A Brown&Tan Clayey Sand Opt. to+4% 98% FIELD MOISTURE&DENSITY TEST RESULTS Location of Proctor Test Dry Moisture Moisture Comp- Pass/ In-Place Test Reference Depth,in. Density,pcf Content,% Difference r action,% Fail BACKFILL FOR WATER LINE'WA-1' Station 1+00,At Existing 2 6 95.6 25.1 0.2 102 Pass Ground Surface(Retest) Station 2+00,At Existing 2 6 85.6 25.9 1.0 92 Fail Ground Surface(Retest) Station 3+00,At Existing 2 6 85.9 27.4 2.5 92 Fail Ground Surface(Retest) Station 4+00,At Existing 1 6 102.7 19.1 0.2 98 Pass Ground Surface(Retest) Station 5+00,At Existing 2 6 93.5 25.0 0.1 100 Pass Ground Surface(Retest) Notes: 1.Difference with respect to the optimum moisture content. General Notes: Some information on this test report provided by others. Testing and reporting was conducted in general accordance with the following applicable ASTM methods: D 2922 and D 3017. GME Testing and Engineering,Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr. KeithTinker Report Date: 8/11/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O.Box 9960 Report No.: 12 College Station,Texas 77842 PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE &INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1,PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS FIELD DENSITY TESTS REPORT Date: 8/11/09 Arrival Time: 4:20 PM Time Charge: 1.0 Hour Technician: Jerry Ellis Requested By: Mr,Alfonso Guillen,Brazos Valley Services Proctor Maximum Dry Optimum Material Moisture Compaction Reference Density,pcf Moisture,% Test Method Description Specification Specification 1 93.5 24.9 ASTM D 698 Method A Brown&Tan Clayey Sand Opt. to+4% 98% FIELD MOISTURE&DENSITY TEST RESULTS Location of Proctor Test Dry Moisture Moisture Comp- Pass/ In-Place Test Reference Depth, in. Density,pcf Content,% Difference ' action,% Fail BACKFILL FOR WATER LINE'WA-I' Station 2+00, At Existing I 6 91.8 25.1 0.2 98 Pass G round Surface(Retest) Station 3+00,At Existing 1 6 93.7 25.5 0.6 100 Pass Ground Surface(Retest) Notes: 1.Difference with respect to the optimum moisture content. General Notes: Some information on this test report provided by others. Testing and reporting was conducted in general accordance with the following applicable ASTM methods: D 2922 and D 3017. Remarks: Mr.Alfonso Guillen(Brazos Valley Services)was informed of field test results. Copies To: Mr.Josh Norton,City of College Station Mr.Ricky Palasota, Sr.,Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis, P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr. KeithTinker Report Date: 8/12/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O. Box 9960 Report No.: 13 College Station,Texas 77842 PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE& INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1,PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS BASE DEPTH CHECKS REPORT Date: 8/12/09 Arrival Time: 2:45 PM Time Charge: 1.0 Hour Technician: Anthony Muzny Requested By: Mr.Alfonso Guillen,Brazos Valley Services VICTORIA AVENUE BASE DEPTH,(IN.) Station 0+50, 12' Right of Centerline 7 Station 2+50, 10'Left of Centerline 8 '/2 Station 4+50,8'Right of Centerline 8 Remarks: Mr.Alfonso Guillen(Brazos Valley Services)was informed of field test results. Copies To: Mr.Josh Norton,City of College Station Mr.Ricky Palasota, Sr.,Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis,P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. CME Testing aml Engineering,Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax (979)690-3668 Client: Mr. KeithTinker Report Date: 8/24/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O. Box 9960 Report No.: 14 College Station,Texas 77842 PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1, PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS Thursday,August 20,2009 At the request of Mr. Keith Tinker of the City of College Station, Mr, Kyle Rosenbaum of CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. (CME) traveled to the project site referred to as "Victoria Avenue & Infrastructure Extension; Reatta Meadows, Section 1, Phase 2" in College Station, Texas. Mr. Rosenbaum arrived on site at 10:30 a.m. on Thursday, August 20, 2009 to obtain a bulk sample of hot mix asphaltic concrete (HMAC) for laboratory analysis. The sample obtained by Mr. Rosenbaum represents the Type "D" IIMAC placed for Victoria Avenue at Station 5+00, 10' right of centerline. The results of the laboratory analysis are presented in Table I and in the attached Table H. Time Charge: Kyle Rosenbaum- 1.5 1-lours HOT MIX ASPHALTIC CONCRETE TEST REPORT Represents: Victoria Avenue at Station 5+00, 10' Right of Centerline Date Sampled: 7/20/09 Time Sampled: 11:20 AM Supplier: Brazos Valley Services Sample Location: Hopper of Laydown Machine Field Temp.of Sample (°F): 320 TABLE I. SIEVE ANALYSIS (GRADATION) OF HMAC AGGREGATE Lab No. 727 Job-Mix Formula B/CS Unified Specification No. 330 Individual Total L►dividual Total Ind. Tolerances for Individual Sieve Size %Retained %Passing %Retained %Passing Diff. %Retained 1/2" 0.3 99.7 0.1 99.9 0.2 Plus or Minus 5 3/8" 10.0 89.7 8.9 91.0 1.1 Plus or Minus 5 No.4 26.5 63.2 28.0 63.0 -1.5 Plus or Minus 5 No. 10 24.6 38.6 26.0 37.0 -1.4 Plus or Minus 5 No.40 21.4 17.2 21.0 16.0 0.4 Plus or Minus 3 No. 80 7.9 9.3 9.0 7.0 -1.1 Plus or Minus 3 No. 200 3.7 5.6 4.0 3.0 -0.3 Plus or Minus 3 r— CME TESTING ANb ENGINEERING INC. Victoria Avenue&Infrastructure Extension;Reatta Meadows,Section I,Phase 2;College Station,Texas Report No. 14—L.aboratoiy Test Results August 24,2009 TABLE II. HMAC MATERIAL PROPERTIES RESULTS Lab No. 598 Job-Mix Formula B/CS Unified Specification No. 330 Percent Asphalt (TEX-236-F): 5.9 5.7 Plus or Minus 0.5% Average Specimen Density(%): 97.4 96.0 Avg. HVEEM Stability HVEEM Stability Not Less (TEX-208-F): 36 Than 35 Avg. Bulk Specific Gravity(TEX-207-F): 2.324 Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (TEX-227-F): 2.385 Copies To: Mr.Josh Norton,City of College Station Mr. Ricky Palasota,Sr., Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis,P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. 2 CMB besting and Engineering, The. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr. KcithTinker Report Date: 8/24/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O. Box 9960 Report No.: 15 College Station,Texas 77842 PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1, PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS Thursday,August 20,2009 At the request of Mr. Keith Tinker of the City of College Station, Mr. Kyle Rosenbaum of CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. (CME) traveled to the project site referred to as "Victoria Avenue & Infrastructure Extension; Reatta Meadows, Section I, Phase 2" in College Station,Texas. Mr. Rosenbaum arrived on site at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday, August 20, 2009 to obtain a bulk sample of hot mix asphaltic concrete(I-LMAC) for laboratory analysis. The sample obtained by Mr. Rosenbaum represents the 'Type"D" HMAC placed for Victoria Avenue at Station 4+25, 4' lef} of centerline. The results of the laboratory analysis are presented in Table I and in the attached Table II. Time Charge: Kyle Rosenbaum- 1.5 Hours HOT MIX ASPHALTIC CONCRETE TEST REPORT Represents: Victoria Avenue at Station 4+25,4' Left of Centerline Date Sampled: 7/20/09 Time Sampled: 2:30 PM Supplier: Brazos Valley Services Sample Location: Hopper of Laydown Machine Field Temp. of Sample(°F): 335 TABLE I. SIEVE ANALYSIS (GRADATION) OF HMAC AGGREGATE Lab No. 730 Job-Mix Formula B/CS Unified Specification No, 330 Individual Total Individual Total Ind. Tolerances for Individual Sieve Size %Retained %Passing %Retained %Passing Diff. %Retained 1/2" 1.8 98.2 0.1 99.9 1.7 Plus or Minus 5 3/8" 8.6 89.6 8.9 91.0 -0.3 Plus or Minus 5 No.4 28.5 61.1 28.0 63.0 0.5 Plus or Minus 5 No. 10 22.1 39.0 26.0 37.0 -3.9 Plus or Minus 5 No. 40 20.2 18.8 21.0 16.0 -0.8 Plus or Minus 3 No. 80 8.4 10.4 9.0 7.0 -0.6 Plus or Minus 3 No. 200 6.4 4.0 4.0 3.0 2.4 Plus or Minus 3 CME TESTING ANb ENGINEERING INC. Victoria Avenue&htti'astntct ure Extension; Reatta Meadows,Section 1,Phase 2;College Station,Texas Report No. 15—Laboratory Test Results August 24,2009 TABLE II. HMAC MATERIAL PROPERTIES RESULTS Lab No. 730 Job-Mix Formula BRCS Unified Specification No. 330 Percent Asphalt (TEX-236-F): 6.2 5.7 Plus or Minus 0.5% Average Specimen Density(%): 97.3 96.0 Avg. I-IVEEM Stability HVEEM Stability Not Less (TEX-208-F): 46 Than 35 Avg.Bulk Specific Gravity(TEX-207-F): 2.304 Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (TEX-227-F): 2.367 Copies To: Mr. Josh Norton,City of College Station Mr. Ricky Palasota, Sr.,Brazos Valley Services Mr. Joe Gattis, P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. 2 CMB Testing and Engineering,Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr. KeithTinker Report Date: 8/27/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O. Box 9960 Report No.: 16 College Station,Texas 77842 PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1, PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS Tuesday,August 25,2009 At the request of Mr. Keith Tinker of the City of College Station, Mr. David Requena and Mr. Craig Moore of CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. (CME) traveled to the project site referred to as "Victoria Avenue & Infrastructure Extension; Reatta Meadows, Section 1, Phase 2" in College Station, Texas. Messrs. Requena and Moore arrived on site at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday,August 25, 2009 to obtain four(4)HMAC pavement cores from the constructed pavement sections of the roadway. All four core locations were selected by Mr. Tinker and are described in the attached Table 11. The HMAC cores were collected in accordance with ASTM D 5361. Each core sample was measured for thickness in accordance with ASTM D 3549 and tested to determine the percent air voids in accordance with ASTM D 3203. Percent air voids were computed based on the theoretical maximum density of the bulk samples collected on August 20, 2009 (Table I). The results of the laboratory analysis are presented in the attached Table I and Table II. Time Charge: David Requena— 1.0 Hour Craig Moore— 1.0 Hour Copies To: Mr.Josh Norton,City of College Station Mr. Ricky Palasota, Sr., Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis, P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. CME TESTING AND ENGINEERING INC. Victoria Avenue&infrastructure Extension;Reatta Meadows,Section I,Phase 2 Report No. 16—HMAC Core Testing August 27,2009 TABLE I. SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS CONDUCTED ON BULK I-IMAC SAMPLE Material Theoretical Max Theoretical Max Reference Date Paved Specific Gravity Density(ND Material Type A August 20, 2009 2.385 148.8 Type "D"(Fine-Graded Surface Course) B August 20, 2009 2.367 147.7 Type"D"(Fine-Graded Surface Course) TABLE IL SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS FOR HMAC CORES OBTAINED FROM CONSTRUCTED PAVEMENT SECTIONS Date Specimen Locations Avg. Specimen Material Density •Cored Street Station Location Thickness(in.) 2,4 Reference (pet) Air Voids(%) 'i 8/25/09 Victoria Avenue 0+70 8'Right of Centerline 2.20 A 138.9 6.7 8/25/09 Victoria Avenue 2+50 18'Left of Centerline 2.55 B 137.2 7.1 8/25/09 Victoria Avenue 4+30 5' Right of Centerline 2.20 A 141.6 4.8 8/25/09 Victoria Avenue 5+60 10'Left of Centerline 2.35 B 138.1 6.5 Notes: 1. Percent air voids based on theoretical maximum density of bulk samples collected on August 20,2009 2. Average specimen thickness was determined using calipers as specified in ASTM D 3549. 3. Per B/CS Unified Specification No. 330 compacted HMAC pavement should have between two percent (2%) and ten percent(10%)air voids. 4. Per project plans and specifications minimum of 2 inches of HMAC. 2 CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr.KeithTinker Report Date: 8/27/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O. Box 9960 Report No.: 17 College Station,Texas 77842 Technician: Kyle Rosenbaum Arrival Time: 9:00 AM Time Charge: 1.5 Hours Requested By: Alfonso Guillen (Brazos Valley Serviecs) PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1, PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS CONCRETE OBSERVATION & SAMPLING REPORT Date Sampled: August 26, 2009 No. of Sets Cast: I of 1 Sample Represents: Sidewalk along Victoria Avenue at Station 3+03, Right of Centerline Required Compressive Strength at 28 Days, (psi): 3,000 LABORATORY TEST DATA Sample Date Age Cross-sectional Maximum Compressive Identification No. Tested (Days) Area (in2.) Load(lbf.) Strength (psi.) VAIE 05 09/02/09 7 12.57 VAIE 06 09/23/09 28 12.57 VAIE 07 09/23/09 28 12.57 VAIE 08 Reserve 12.57 Note: Some information on this report provided by others. Testing and reporting was conducted in general accordance with the following applicable ASTM methods: C 31,C 39,C 138,C 143,C 231,&C 1064. FIELD TEST DATA Supplier: Brazos Valley Services Time Batched: 8:48 AM Air Content, (%): 4.2 Thick No.: 73 Time Sampled: 9:40 AM Unit Weight,(pct): ND Ticket No.: 3871 Concrete Temp,(°F): 86 Sample Type: Cylinder Mix No.: I"3000 Ambient Temp,(°F): 94 Sample Size: 4 in. dia. Accumulated Yards: 10 Slump(in.): 5.0 Water Added on Site, (gal): 0 Weather: Partly Cloudy Field Contact: Mr. Alfonso Guillen(Brazos Valley Services)was informed of field test results. Remarks: ND—Not Determined; NP—Not Provided; NA—Not Applicable Copies To: Mr.Josh Norton,City of College Station Mr. Ricky Palasota, Sr., Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis, P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. Aggirmommok CME besting and Engineering,Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr. KeithTinker Report Date: 9/1/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O. Box 9960 Report No.: 18 College Station,Texas 77842 Technician: Jimmy Ledford Arrival Time: 10:55 AM Time Charge: 1.0 Hour Requested By: Alfonso Guillen (Brazos Valley Serviecs) PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1, PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS CONCRETE OBSERVATION & SAMPLING REPORT Date Sampled: August 31, 2009 No. of Sets Cast: 1 of 1 Sample Represents: Sidewalk along Victoria Avenue at Station 2+50, Left of Centerline Required Compressive Strength at 28 Days, (psi): 3,000 LABORATORY TEST DATA Sample Date Age Cross-sectional Maximum Compressive Identification No. Tested (Days) Arca (in2.) Load(Ibf.) Strength (psi.) VALE 09 09/07/09 7 12.57 VAIE 10 09/28/09 28 12.57 VAIE 11 09/28/09 28 12.57 VAIE 12 Reserve 12.57 Note: Some information on this report provided by others. Testing and reporting was conducted in general accordance with the following applicable ASTM methods: C 31,C 39,C 138,C 143,C 231,R.C 1064. FIELD TEST DATA Supplier: Brazos Valley Services Time Batched: 10:28 AM Air Content, (%): 2.7 Truck No.: 72 Time Sampled: 11:10 AM Unit Weight,(pct): ND Ticket No.: 3927 Concrete Temp,(°F): 84 Sample Type: Cylinder Mix No.: 1"3000 Ambient Temp, (°F): 82 Sample Size: 4 in. dia. Accumulated Yards: 10 Slump(in.): 4.5 Water Added on Site, (gal): 0 Weather: Mostly Cloudy Field Contact: Mr. Alfonso Guillen(Brazos Valley Services) was informed of field test results. Remarks: ND—Not Determined; NP—Not Provided; NA—Not Applicable Copies To: Mr.Josh Norton,City of College Station Mr. Ricky Palasota, Sr.,Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis, P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax (979)690-3668 Client: Mr.KeithTinker Report Date: 9/2/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O. Box 9960 Report No.: 19 College Station,Texas 77842 Technician: Kyle Rosenbaum PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1, PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT Date Sampled: August 26, 2009 No. of Sets Cast: 1 of 1 Sample Represents: Sidewalk along Victoria Avenue at Station 3+03, Right of Centerline Required Compressive Strength at 28 Days, (psi): 3,000 LABORATORY TEST DATA Sample Date Age Cross-sectional Maximum Compressive Identification No. Tested (Days) Area(in2.) Load(lbf.) Strength (psi.) VAIE 05 09/02/09 7 12.57 31,755 2,530 VAIE 06 09/23/09 28 12.57 VAIE 07 09/23/09 28 12.57 VAIE 08 Reserve 12.57 Note: Some information on this report provided by others. Testing and reporting was conducted in general accordance with the following applicable ASTM methods: C 31,C 39,C 138,C 143,C 231,&C 1064. FIELD TEST DATA Supplier: Brazos Valley Services Time Batched: 8:48 AM Air Content,(%): 4.2 Truck No.: 73 Time Sampled: 9:40 AM Unit Weight,(pct): ND Ticket No.: 3871 Concrete Temp, (°F): 86 Sample Type: Cylinder Mix No.: 1"3000 Ambient Temp, (°F): 94 Sample Size: 4 in. dia. Accumulated Yards: 10 Slump(in.): 5.0 Water Added on Site, (gal): 0 Weather: Partly Cloudy Field Contact: Mr. Alfonso Guillen(Brazos Valley Services)was informed of field test results. Remarks: ND—Not Determined;NP—Not Provided; NA—Not Applicable Copies To: Ms. Carol Cotter,P.E.,City of College Station Mr. Ricky Palasota, Sr., Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis, P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. CMB Testing and Engineering,Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr.Keitlifinker Report Date: 9/7/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O. Box 9960 Report No.: 20 College Station,Texas 77842 Technician: Jimmy Ledford PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1, PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT Date Sampled: August 31, 2009 No. of Sets Cast: 1 of 1 Sample Represents: Sidewalk along Victoria Avenue at Station 2+50, Left of Centerline Required Compressive Strength at 28 Days, (psi): 3,000 LABORATORY TEST DATA Sample Date Age Cross-sectional Maximum Compressive Identification No. Tested (Days) Area(in2.) Load(lbf.) Strength (psi.) VAIE09 09/07/09 7 12.57 30,135 2,400 VALE 10 09/28/09 28 12.57 VA IE 11 09/28/09 28 12.57 VAIE 12 Reserve 12.57 Note: Some information on this report provided by others. Testing and reporting was conducted in general accordance with the following applicable ASTM methods: C 31,C 39,C 138,C 143,C 231,&C 1064. FIELD TEST DATA Supplier: Brazos Valley Services Time Batched: 10:28 AM Air Content,(%): 2.7 Truck No.: 72 Time Sampled: 11:10 AM Unit Weight,(pct): ND Ticket No.: 3927 Concrete Temp, (°F): 84 Sample Type: Cylinder Mix No.: 1"3000 Ambient Temp,(°F): 82 Sample Size: 4 in. dia. Accumulated Yards: 10 Slump(in.): 4.5 Water Added on Site, (gal): 0 Weather: Mostly Cloudy Field Contact: Mr.Alfonso Guillen(Brazos Valley Services)was informed of field test results. Remarks: ND— Not Determined; NP—Not Provided; NA—Not Applicable Copies To: Ms.Carol Cotter,P.E.,City of College Station Mr. Ricky Palasota, Sr., Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis,P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr.KeithTinker Report Date: 9/23/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O. Box 9960 Report No.: 21 College Station,Texas 77842 Technician: Kyle Rosenbaum PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1,PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT Date Sampled: August 26,2009 No. of Sets Cast: 1 of 1 Sample Represents: Sidewalk along Victoria Avenue at Station 3+03,Right of Centerline Required Compressive Strength at 28 Days,(psi): 3,000 LABORATORY TEST DATA Sample Date Age Cross-sectional Maximum Compressive Identification No. Tested (Days) _ Area(in2.) Load(lbf.) Strength(psi.) VAIE 05 09/02/09 7 12.57 31,755 2,530 VAIE 06 09/23/09 28 12.57 37,645 2,990 VAIE 07 09/23/09 28 12.57 37,975 3,020 VAIE 08 ---- Reserve 12.57 Note: Some information on this report provided by others. Testing and reporting was conducted in general accordance with the following applicable ASTM methods: C 31,C 39,C 138,C 143,C 231,&C 1064. FIELD TEST DATA Supplier: Brazos Valley Services Time Batched: 8:48 AM Air Content,(%): 4.2 Truck No.: 73 Time Sampled: 9:40 AM Unit Weight,(pct): ND Ticket No.: 3871 Concrete Temp,(°F): 86 Sample Type: Cylinder Mix No.: 1"3000 Ambient Temp,(°F): 94 Sample Size: 4 in.dia. Accumulated Yards: 10 Slump(in.): 5.0 Water Added on Site,(gal): 0 Weather: Partly Cloudy Field Contact: Mr.Alfonso Guillen(Brazos Valley Services)was informed of field test results. Remarks: ND—Not Determined;NP—Not Provided;NA—Not Applicable Copies To: Ms. Carol Cotter,P.E.,City of College Station Mr. Ricky Palasota,Sr., Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis,P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering, Inc. CME Testing and Engineering,Inc. 320 Graham Road College Station,Texas 77845 (979)690-3600 Fax(979)690-3668 Client: Mr.KeithTinker Report Date: 9/28/09 City of College Station Project No.: 29073 P.O.Box 9960 Report No.: 22 College Station,Texas 77842 Technician: Jimmy Ledford PROJECT: VICTORIA AVENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE EXTENSION; REATTA MEADOWS, SECTION 1,PHASE 2; COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT Date Sampled: August 31,2009 No. of Sets Cast: 1 of 1 Sample Represents: Sidewalk along Victoria Avenue at Station 2+50,Left of Centerline Required Compressive Strength at 28 Days,(psi): 3,000 LABORATORY TEST DATA Sample Date Age Cross-sectional Maximum Compressive Identification No. Tested (Days) Area(in2.) Load (lbf.) Strength (psi.) VAIE 09 09/07/09 7 12.57 30,135 2,400 VAIE 10 09/28/09 28 12.57 41,970 3,340 VAIE 11 09/28/09 28 12.57 39,540 3,150 VAIE 12 ---- Reserve 12.57 Note: Some information on this report provided by others. Testing and reporting was conducted in general accordance with the following applicable ASTM methods: C 31,C 39,C 138,C 143,C 231,&C 1064. FIELD TEST DATA Supplier: Brazos Valley Services Time Batched: 10:28 AM Air Content,(%): 2.7 Truck No.: 72 Time Sampled: 11:10 AM Unit Weight,(pcf): ND Ticket No.: 3927 Concrete Temp,(°F): 84 Sample Type: Cylinder Mix No.: 1"3000 Ambient Temp,(°F): 82 Sample Size: 4 in.dia. Accumulated Yards: 10 Slump(in.): 4.5 Water Added on Site,(gal): 0 Weather: Mostly Cloudy Field Contact: Mr.Alfonso Guillen(Brazos Valley Services)was informed of field test results. Remarks: ND—Not Determined;NP—Not Provided;NA—Not Applicable Copies To: Ms.Carol Cotter,P.E.,City of College Station Mr. Ricky Palasota, Sr.,Brazos Valley Services Mr.Joe Gattis,P.E.,Gattis Engineering CME Testing and Engineering,Inc.