HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Chairman Goss closed the pub., .,hearing.
Discussions among City Staff and the applicant concluded that a variance was not needed. Rather, the
applicant could work with the other tenants that did not utilize their maximum allowable signage.
Mr. Benn motioned to table the request. Ms. Whisenant seconded the motion, which passed
unopposed (5-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO: 6: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a
variance to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 7.1.H Height for 1113 Arizona Street,
Lots 8 & 9, Block 2, McCulloch Subdivision. (07-43)
Staff Planner Crissy Hartl presented the staff report and stated that the applicant is requesting the
variance to position a new multi-purpose building and required parking for an existing church on a
property adjacent to single-family.
Chairman Goss opened the public hearing.
Those speaking in favor of the variance request:
Joe Gattis, 2010 Moses Creek Court, College Station, Texas
Archie Clark, 1122 Arizona, College Station, Texas
Dana Hudson, 1112 Tyler Court, College Station, Texas
Timothy Campbell, 1204 Carolina, College Station, Texas
Kimmie Daily, 1203 Detroit, College Station, Texas
All speaking before the Board were sworn in by Chairman Goss.
Chairman Goss closed the public hearing.
Ms. Whisenant motioned to authorize the variance to the height requirement form the terms of this
Ordinance as it will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the following special conditions:
church height is like other structures in the neighborhood; and because a strict enforcement of the
provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship to this applicant being: a smaller
building will not help provide service to the neighborhood; and such that the spirit of this Ordinance
shall be observed and substantial justice done.
Chairman Goss amended the motion to add under special conditions that the building is needed
in the neighborhood and to add under limitations that the variance is for 4.5-feet.
Mr. Mather seconded the motion. The motion passed unopposed (5-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7. Consideration and possible action on future agenda items —A Zoning
Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be
limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
No items were discussed.