HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments if.„4-.444(0,_ 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570/Fax 979.764.3496
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
MEMORANDUM
June 25, 2007
TO: L.A. Berry, P.E., Berry Engineering Co, via berryenq(a�hotmail.com
FROM: Jason Schubert, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: THE PUMP (SP) — Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments
and submit the following information for further staff review:
One (1) revised site plan.
Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents.
Please note that the Easement Dedication Sheet and necessary documents are required prior
to the issuance of a building permit. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the
revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
pc: Case file #07-00500138
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your next transmittal
letter and"bubbled"on your plans.Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a
completely new review. Page 1 of 3
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: THE PUMP (SP)— 07-00500138
PLANNING
1. The North arrow is not in the correct direction. Please revise.
2. Provide the square feet of the existing building.
3. Provide the calculations for the required number of parking spaces on the site plan. The
ratio for a restaurant with a drive-thru is 1 parking spot per 100 square feet of building. If the
number of spots provided is deficient but within 10% of the required amount, submit an
Administrative Adjustment application for Staff's consideration. If more than 10%, a
variance must be obtained through the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
4. Illustrate the existing (new) curb recently placed with the redevelopment of the Culpepper
Plaza parking lot and show completion of curb through parking space 20 near Dominik Dr.
5. Please adjust parking space 13 so as not to have the offset due to the power pole.
6. Parking spaces are to be a minimum of 9' x 20' but could be reduced to a depth of 18' if
adjacent to a 6' sidewalk or 4' landscape island. It is noted that spaces at 45 degree should
be a depth of 21.1 feet. Please review the spaces to ensure conformity with this standard.
7. Can the parking spaces along either side of the lot be placed closer to the property lines to
allow greater drive aisle widths?
8. For health and safety purposes, end islands must be installed on each end of the parking
spaces provided at the front of the building.
9. Illustrate the ramp at the rear of the building.
10. Illustrate the extent of the 10' wide drive-thru lane.
11. Please convert parking space 16 to a parallel space and add another parallel space along
the eastern property line. This will allow more drive aisle width between the drive-thru and
the parking.
12. Illustrate the setbacks on the site plan associated with the C-1 zoning district.
13. Please verify that all utilities are going to be relocated so the power poles may be removed.
The City of College Station is only relocating electric, other utilities may exist. The dumpster
may not be located underneath overhead lines.
14. The interior dimensions of the dumpster show 12' x 12'. This dimension must be completely
clear. The illustration shows the placement of bollards within the enclosure, limiting the
depth to only 10'. Please revise.
15. Add a note to the site plan that signs are permitted separately.
16. Please note that the placement of the van accessible space at the front of the building will
require that an ADA accessible route, including sidewalk width, be provided to the public
entrance on the west side of the building.
Reviewed by: Jason Schubert Date: June 25, 2007
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. Please submit development permit application, supporting documentation, and fees.
2. It appears the scale on this drawing is not correct, please revise.
3. Please illustrate all existing public utility lines.
4. Please illustrate all existing private service lines.
5. Please verify that you will be utilizing the existing service taps, meters, etc. If not, we will
need detail of proposed meter locations, service taps, lines, etc.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your next transmittal
letter and"bubbled"on your plans.Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a
completely new review. Page 2 of 3
6. Is there any plan to do any improvements to the existing parking lot, drive isle or entrance
drive, besides striping. If so, please provide a description and detail of proposed
improvements. If improvements for the existing entrance drive are proposed, please provide
a copy of the appropriate BCS Construction Details (found at bcsunited.net).
7. Please provide the volume and page of the existing utility easements and verify their width.
It appears that the existing PUE is 10-ft and straddles the eastern property line. The
illustrated 20-ft PUE along the southern property line is actually a 10-ft PUE.
8. Please remove the 10-ft PUE illustrated along Dominik Dr. as it does not exist.
9. The 20-ft PUE illustrated along the western property line does not existing, however CSU
has requested that it be dedicated with this site plan, please illustrate accordingly. Please
submit the easement dedication application and supporting documentation for this
dedication.
10. Staff noticed that the dumpster is located on an easement. Please be aware of the following
and add a note to the site plan that states that if utilities need to be accessed within the
easement and the dumpster enclosure needs to be removed, that it will be the owner's
responsibility to repair or replace the structure. (UDO Section 7.7.C.1) Additionally, please
keep the structure at least 5-feet away from the manhole to provide a workspace.
Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: June 25, 2007
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. Developer installs conduit per City specs and design.
2. City will provide drawings for conduit installation.
3. Developer provides load data for project.
4. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please Sam Weido at 979.764.6314.
Reviewed by: Sam Weido Date: June 20, 2007
FIRE
1. No comments
Reviewed by: Jerry Duffey, Deputy Fire Marshal Date: June 20, 2007
SANITATION
1. Dumpster enclosure needs to have the 12'x12' inside dimensions.
Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: June 19, 2007
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your next transmittal
letter and"bubbled"on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a
completely new review. Page 3 of 3
_f 1 1101 Texas Avenue,P.O. Box 9960
College Station,Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
Cm OF COLLEGE STATION
MEMORANDUM
July 12, 2007
TO: L.A. Berry, P.E., Berry Engineering Co, via berryenqhotmail.com
FROM: Jason Schubert, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: THE PUMP (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third
and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the
next submittal, another $200 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of
three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information for
further staff review:
Nine (9) revised site plans (one set will be returned to you, please submit
additional copies if you want more than one approved set)
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a
letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
call me at 764-3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Habibah, property owner, via habibehf(c�gmail.com
Jacob Hill, via hard-copy pick-up
Case file #07-00500138
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: THE PUMP (SP) - 07-00500138
PLANNING
1. Revise parking space 13 so it is only 9 feet wide and has the correct depth.
2. Parallel parking spaces are to have a depth of 10 feet and length of 22 feet. Please
revise spaces 16 and 17 to reflect these dimensions.
3. Parking space 22 needs to be 20 feet in depth since it is not adjacent to a 6-foot wide
sidewalk. Please revise and show a wheelstop in the space.
4. Repeat Comment: Provide end islands beside the spaces in front of the building. If
desired, the curb may taper down to the sidewalk along the front of the building.
5. Provide striping in the parking lot between the transitions of different types of parking
spaces. Specifically, between spaces 3 & 4, 15 & 16, 17 & 18, and 21 & front curb.
6. Remove the "30' Front B.L." reference near the front of the property.
7. Repeat Comment: Illustrate the setbacks on the site plan associated with the C-1 zoning
district. These are 25' front setback, 7.5' side setback, and 15' rear setback.
8. Please revise the acronym in Note 3 from "USD" to "UDO".
9. From previous conversation, the parking lot will be resealed prior to being restriped. If
so, please provide that notation on the site plan.
10. FYI, the site plan shows that overhead lines over the proposed dumpster are being
removed. The overhead lines must be removed before a Certificate of Occupancy can
be issued.
11. It is staff's understanding that pavement/curb repair issues have been worked out
between the property owner and Central Station (former Culpepper Plaza).
Reviewed by: Jason Schubert Date: July 12, 2007
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
1. Please submit development permit application, supporting documentation, and fees.
2. The 20-ft PUE illustrated along the western property line does not exist, however CSU
has requested that it be dedicated. Please illustrate the easement as "proposed" and
work with CSU to have the easement documents executed and filed at the Courthouse.
Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: July 11, 2007