Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY \/ P&Z CASE NO.: '.(19 - aaC- COLLEGE STATION DATE SUBMITTED: II' LP (X) PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION u The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: X Filing Fee of $400.00. N/A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations — $100 (if applicable) X Application completed in full. X Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) N/A One (1) copy of the approved Master Plan if applicable. X A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. N/A Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed. N/A Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). Date of Preapplication Conference: Unknown NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Villages of Indian Lakes Phase X SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: End of Indian Lakes Drive beyond Phase 8 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name: Travis Martinek Street Address: 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100 City: Bryan State: Texas Zip Code: 77802 E-Mail Address: travis©clarkewyndham.com Phone Number: (979) 846-4384 Fax Number: (979) 846-1461 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name: Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd. Street Address: 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100 City: Bryan State: Texas Zip Code: 77802 E-Mail Address: travis©clarkewyndham.com Phone Number: (979) 846-4384 Fax Number: (979) 846-1461 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name: McClure & Browne, Inc. Street Address: 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 City: College Station State: Texas Zip Code: 77845 E-Mail Address: mikem@mcclurebrowne.com Phone Number: (979) 693-3838 Fax Number: (979) 693-2554 6/13/03 I of 4 Total Acres Of Subdivision: 79./ , R-O-W Acreage: 9.90 Total # Of Lots: 40 Number Of Lots By Zoning District: N/A Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: N/A Floodplain Acreage: 0.00 Parkland dedication by acreage or fee? N/A A statement addressing any differences between the Preliminary Plat and approved Master Plan (if applicable) None Requested variances to subdivision regulations & reason for same: The Developer requested a Variance for Block Length in a previous submittal. The Variance was approved by P&Z in March 2006 Requested oversize participation: None Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of Acres to be dedicated # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above identified plat and attests that all respective owners have been identified on this application. It /6/06 Travis Martinek Date Design & Construction Manager 6/13/03 2 o1 4 SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 13 C_I FOLDED COPIES OF PLAT FOR REVIEW COLLEGE STATION PRELIMINARY PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: ® 1/Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch or larger. Include the words "PRELIMINARY PLAT - NOT FOR RECORD" in letters 1/2" high. If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. ® 2%/Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow. Z 3 Title Block with the following information: Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos County 911.) (Replats need to retain original subdivision name.) vEr Date of preparation. (INCLUDE DATE THE PLAT WAS SUBMITTED AND THE DATES OF ANY REVISIONS ON THE PLAT) AEngineer's scale in feet. ilET Total area intended to be developed. 79 , 7Z /-6.71 i ® 4. y N rth Arrow. ® 5. Location of current city limit lines and current zoning district boundary. ® 6.VSubdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines., Boundary must include all of parent tract. I65-"�ir Ct ill iqcd ® 7. ✓Descriptions by metes and bounds of the subdivision which shall close within accepted land survey standard (Labeled on boundary lines, not separate metes and bounds description.) Q-c n rit- G\ose '08. 8. ® Primary contro points or descriptions and ties to such control point, to which , later, all dimensions, angles, bearings, block numbers, and similar data shall be referred. The plat shall be located with respect to a corner of the survey or tract, or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part. ® h. Name of contiguous subdivisions and names of owners of contiguous parcels of unsubdivided land, and an indicatio w ether or not contiguous prop les re platted. U C 0 tni ett ayl +et ri iu, rr� ® 10. Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and Floodway, if applicable, according to th most recent available data. ® 11. Topographic information, including contours at two foot (2 ft.) intervals, wooded areas, and flo�yv fine_ elevation of streams. ® 12oposed land uses (In compliance with Land Use Plan). 6/13/03 3 of iA13. Proposed zoning changes, if any, submit formal rezoning request. ® 'V The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision). Existin Proposed Z Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp. turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. 141 ® Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) 1/6 ® Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. ® Alleys. �� ® ( N Reserve tracts. - 8` f • ® ® Well site locations. NA ® ® Pipelines. If carrying flammable gas or fuel, also show size of line, design pressure and product transported through the line. Cc .� ® Utility Services. (Water & Sanitary Sewer) All existing and proposed utilities of sufficient V� size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas. vE ® Easements. ® ® Drainage Structures and improvements including underground storm sewer and all overland systems (flow line of existing watercourses) and showing where these will discharge. Proposed channel cross sections, if any. ® A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block. NA ® Greenbelt area/park linkages/parkland dedication ( All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board prior to P & Z Commission consideration.) ® Public areas .J1` ® ® Other public improvements, including but not limited to parks, schools and other public facilities 144\lEr 15. Proposed phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements and infrastructure costs should be distributed evenly throughout the subdivision.. AZ 16. Are there impact fees associated with this development? ❑ Yes ® No 17. If requesting oversize participation items, are the necessary impact studies included? ❑Yes ❑No ZN/A 6/13/03 4 of4 INDIAN LAKES Ph„3E 10— PRELIMINARY PLAT VARIANCE REQUEST The Developer is requesting a Variance consideration for the following items: Maximum Block Length According to the Subdivision Regulations (Chapter 9, Section 12-K.2, Block Lengths), subdivisions are required to plat blocks with lengths not to exceed 1,500 LF. The Developer is requesting a Variance to the Subdivision Regulations to allow for a block length of 1,595 LF, or a 95 LF Variance along the west side of Matoska Ridge Drive. The Developer would like to note that the proposed street layout meets the requirements established by the Brazos County Subdivision Regulations. No Variance for block length is required by Brazos County. Response to Subdivision Regulations, Section 5,Variances: 5-A.1: The Developer is requesting the block length variance in order to adequately accommodate the following: • Geographic Conditions — The portion of Matoska Ridge Drive that is requiring this Variance is located along the west side of the street (refer to attached exhibit). The east side of the street will meet the block length requirements. The lots proposed along the west side of Matoska Ridge are bounded along the rear side by an unnamed stream and conservation buffer that is subject to the environmental mitigation and protection requirements imposed by the subdivision's United States Clean Water Act, Section 404 Water Quality Permit. The Developer, in their efforts to provide a lot configuration that maximizes buildable area, has positioned lots so as to allow the environmentally protected areas to be located in the rear of lots as much as possible. This arrangement not only allows for better environmental protection for the designated areas, but also allows lot owners to benefit from the additional separation from their back fence neighbors. In doing this, and maintaining the 1-acre plus lot size requirement for a rural subdivision, the Developer has been placed within a situation that requires a Variance to the existing block length requirements. The Developer is unable to provide relief and street access across the conservation buffer due to the constraints imposed on the property by the Section 404 Permit. Indian Lakes is a community that provides environmental conservation areas and limits the impact to the environment as much as possible. In order to accomplish these goals, Variances to traditional thinking will have to be taken. The Developer would appreciate the Commission's consideration on the unique nature of how Indian Lakes is being developed and allow the development the flexibility to meet the above-mentioned goals and uphold the standards set under the property's Section 404 Environmental Mitigation Plan. 5-A.2: The basis of any land use regulation is to provide a method to insure that the public good is met in every new development within the community. If a developer is willing to create a product that provides adequate streets and drainage in a manner that more appropriately addresses and utilizes the existing site conditions, and provides a suitable quality of life for its inhabitants, as is the case with the proposed subdivision, then the intent of land use regulations has been met. To deprive a developer, who wishes to meet the intent of land use regulation but in a way slightly different than standard procedure, of the ability to turn their vision into reality is a denial of the developer's "enjoyment of a substantial property right." 5-A.3: With the proposed development, the Developer intends to provide adequate streets, drainage, suitable access for emergency vehicles, provide a quality of life desirable to the inhabitants of the subdivision, and create a product consistent with the land use of the surrounding property. Based Page 1 of 2 INDIAN LAKES PH,—E 10– PRELIMINARY PLAT on this, the proposed subdivision "will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area." 5-A.4: The proposed development "will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of land in the area" primarily due to its location within a parent tract that has been previously subdivided into a land use type complimentary to the proposed development. Additional development within the area is currently being developed in an "orderly" fashion maintaining consistency with the residential land use type initially planned for the area. Page 2 of 2