HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors
4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A P.O. Box 4234
Bryan, Texas 77802 Tel. 979/846-6212 Bryan, Texas 77805
Fax 979/846-8252
TO: City of College Station - Development Services DATE: October 16, 2006
PROJECT NO.:
PROJECT NAME: Gateway Phase 4
Final Plat
ATTENTION: Bridgette George REFERENCE:
WE TRANSMIT: THE FOLLOWING: FOR:
❑ Under Separate Cover 0 Prints ❑Your Review&Approval
✓ Enclosed ❑ Copies ✓Your Review& Comment
O Originals /Your Review& Distribution
VIA: ✓ Plat ❑Your Review, Revision & Return
❑ Mail 0 Field Notes ❑ Your Signature & Return
✓ Messenger ❑ Plans ❑ Your File and/or Use
❑ Federal Express ❑ Report ❑ For Filing at the Courthouse
❑ Lone Star Overnight 0 Estimate
❑ UPS ❑ Cut Sheets 0 As Requested By:
❑ Special Courier ❑ Computer Printout ❑ Please Acknowledge Receipt of
❑ Picked Up By Your Office ❑ File Enclosures
❑ Contract ❑ Please Return Enclosures To
❑ Other- Invoice ❑ Copies Of This Letter Of Transmittal
Sent To:
NO. DESCRIPTION
14 Final Plat
1 Application + Check List
1 $1055.00 check ($400.00 Plat Application Fee, If Enclosures Are Not As Noted
$600.00 Infrastructure Insp. Fee* Please Notify Us At Once.
*Please Note: Infrastructure to the lot
is currently under Construction
This Fee is for the Site Infrastructure
which will be submitted as part of the
Signed: Fred Pai- - ".E.
site plans.
$55.00 County Filing Fee
1 Tax Certificate / ��
Final Plats
Infrastructure Accepted or Bonded A .\-
Parkland Dedication Paid 2 -''-AciNQ,
A 'A •C'C6. DO
Impact Fees Paid
Digital Filed
Tax Certificate 14
(*ffill111111
CITY OF COLLEGE STAFION
Planning d Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue,P.O. Box 9960
College Station,Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
October 25,2006
TO: David Scarmardo,via fax# 822.1763
FROM: Crissy Hard,Staff Planner
SUBJECT: GATEWAY PH 4(FP) - Final Plat
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review
comments detailing items that need to be addressed. If all comments have been addressed and the following
information submitted by Monday, October 31, 10:00 a.m., your project will be placed on the next available
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for, November 16, 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue.
Sixteen (16) 11"x17" copies of the revised final plat;
Parkland Dedication in the amount of$ must be submitted prior to the filing of the final
plat;
One (1) Mylar original of the revised final plat;and
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to sgriffin@cstx.gov and
awelsh@cstx.gov.
Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning& Zoning meeting,your project will be considered
formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that if all comments have not been addressed your
project will not be scheduled for a Planning&Zoning Commission meeting.Your project may be placed on a
future agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate fees paid. Once your item has been
scheduled for the P&Z meeting, the agenda and staff report can be accessed at the following web site on
Monday the week of the P&Z meeting.
http://www.cstx.gov/home/index.asp?page=2481.
If you have any questions or need additional information,please call me at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Kling Engineering&Surveying,via fax# 846.8252
Case file#06-00500223
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans.Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City,will constitute a completely new review. 1 of 2
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME : 10/25/2006 17:00
NAME :
FAX
TEL
SER.# : 000L5J596800
DATE,TIME 10/25 16: 59
FAX NO./NAME 98221763
DURATION 00: 00:25
PAGES) 02
RESULT OK
MODE STANDARD
ECM
yi...{;:,.rr
CITY or CSTATION
OLLEGE
l - .a
us'r ,... . Qaa=ag d' Servrcu .. ...,.M,;;�u{,.w
1101 Texas Avenue,P.O.Box 9960
College Station,Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570/ Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
October 25,2006
TO: David Scarxnardo,via fax# 822.1763
FROM: Crissy Harts,Staff Planner
SUBJECT: GATEWAY PH 4(FP)- Final Plat
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned Anal plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review
comments detailing items that need to be addressed. If all comments have been addressed and the following
information submitted by Monday, October 31, 10:00 a.m., your project will be placed on the next available
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for, November 16, 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue.
Sixteen (16) 11"x17" copies of the revised final plat;
Parkland Dedication in the amount of$ must be submitted prior to the filing of the final
plat;
One(1) Mylar original of the revised final plat;and
Onc (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to sgriffin@cstx.gov and
ncc7n1c1,./fThrets,tw r
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME : 10/25/2006 17: 01
NAME :
FAX .
TEL .
SER.# : 000L53596800
DATE,TIME 10/25 17:00
FAX NO./NAME 98468252
DURATION 00:00:26
PAGE(S) 02
RESULT OK
MODE STANDARD
ECM
I.sr i3;; i a;�;;Irlt!t;:5rtar:n„ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION :
3atil 1:.:i
'!'4i9rSi•i r.,..... PlanningPlanningDevdap>n�s+tt �a�rcri
1101 Texas Avenue,P.O. Box 9960
College Station,Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 /Fax 979.764.3496
MEMOF.A.NDUM
October 25,2006
TO: David Scarrnardo,via fax# 822.1763
FROM: Crissy Hard,Staff Planner
SUBJECT; GATEWAY PH 4(FP) -Final Plat
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review
comments detailing items that need to be addressed- If all comments have been addressed and the following
information subxiutted by Monday, October 31, 10:00 a.m., your project will be placed on the next available
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for, November 16, 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue.
Sixteen (16) 11"x1.7"copies of the revised final plat;
Parkland Dedication in the amount of $ must be submitted prior to the filing of the final
plat;
One (1)Mylar original of the revised final plat;and
Otic (1) copy of the digital filo of the final plat on diskette or c-mail to sgriffin@cstx-gov and
11/06/2006 04:30 979846P952 PAGE 01109
' - P
\\N
4,9
KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING \IC/
4101 Texas Ave., Suite A
Bryan, TX 77802
*Phone: (979)846-6212 *Fax: (979)848-8252 *Email: stewart@klingeng.com
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE: 0/ 06
Please deliv r the following pages to:
NAME: 1.-41) (.9;789c
FIRM: .
FAX NUMBER: I =f `�r2J'G' -
rte'
FROM: /2/tc
We are transmittin page(s), including this cover letter from our fax number
p,,Z .
listed above. If an pages are missing or incomplete, please contact sender.
Regarding: 6)14) /'-'t� -
11/0612006 04:15 9798468752 PAGE 01/03
klIbkolai
KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 1`10-
4101 Texas Ave., Suite A
Bryan, TX 77802
*Phone: (979)846-6212 *Fax: (979)846-8252 *Email: stewart@klingeng.com
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE: 7c6 0
Please deliv r the following pages to:
NAME: LAO I88
.5"
FIRM: De
FAX NUMBER:
FROM: / ?)
i I 5
We are transmitting page(s), including this cover letter from our fax number
listed above. if any pages are missing or incomplete, please contact sender.
Regarding: 614-') 1.-ii 4
11/4/2006 CrissyHartl - Re: Gateway4 Page 1
( )
From: Molly Hitchcock
To: Alan Gibbs; Crissy Hartl; Lance Simms
Date: 11/2/2006 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: Gateway 4
I'm okay with what you've proposed.
>>>Alan Gibbs 11/02/06 10:24 AM >>>
This apartment/condo project has proposed "site" public infrastructure but the lot is already served with
public utilities. So the plat does not require public infrastructure, however it does show the PUEs for the
site public infrastructure. I and the applicant do not want to file the plat until the site public infrastructure is
constructed to make sure that the PUEs on the plat are correct. We typically require the plat to be filed
before approving a site plan, however, I would suggest:
-the plat go through P&Z
-they sign and turn in the plat mylar, we hold the mylar
- approve construction plans and site plan, issue DP
-slab onlys may be appropriate
- public utilities accepted, letter of completion issued
- plat mylar(adjusted PUEs if neccessary) filed
- site determined adequate for combustibles
-full building permits issued
Let me know what yall think.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
City of College Station
Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works
KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors
4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A Post Office Box 4234
Bryan, Texas 77802 Bryan, Texas 77805
Telephone 979/846-6212
Fax 979/846-8252
B.J. Kling, P.E., R.P.L.S.
S.M. Kling, R.P.L.S.
Memo: October 30, 2006
To: City of College Station- Development Services
c/o Bridgette Geo e
From: Fred Paine, P.
Re: Gateway Phase 4 - Final Plat (City Case #06-00500223)
The following is in response to September 2005 Staff review:
Planning
1. Setback Removed
2. Acknowledged
En•ine_in!
Easement not necessary
2. Easement expired - refer to accompanying exhibit
`/3. GIS map is believed to be in error. Recent title commitment does not indicate an
easement in this area. Recording data(vol.3663, pg.313) is for Gateway Phase 1 Final
Plat filed in 1999.
4. Acknowledged
5. Acknowledged- Provided
6. Acknowledged-Provided
7. Provided with this submittal
8. To be provided when available
9. Acknowledged- Contacted
Electrical
1. Specific easements provided on plat in lieu of blanket- Confirmed with Sam Weido -
blanket not required at this time
2. Acknowledged
General Electrical Comments
All - Acknowledged
6/3670tv
6
3
KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 940
Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors (�n_,Rg3
4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A P.O. Box 4234`'
Bryan, Texas 77802 Tel. 979/846-6212 Bryan, Texas 77805
Fax 979/846-8252
TO: City of College Station - Development Services DATE: October 27, 2006
PROJECT NO.:
PROJECT NAME: Gateway Phase 4
Final Plat
ATTENTION: Bridgette George REFERENCE:
WE TRANSMIT: THE FOLLOWING: FOR:
❑ Under Separate Cover ❑ Prints ✓Your Review&Approval
✓ Enclosed ❑ Copies ❑Your Review& Comment
❑ Originals ✓Your Review& Distribution
VIA: ✓ Plat ❑Your Review, Revision & Return
❑ Mail ✓ Field Notes ❑ Your Signature & Return
✓ Messenger ❑ Plans ❑ Your File and/or Use
❑ Federal Express 0 Report ❑ For Filing at the Courthouse
❑ Lone Star Overnight 0 Estimate
❑ UPS ❑ Cut Sheets ❑As Requested By:
❑ Special Courier ❑ Computer Printout ❑ Please Acknowledge Receipt of
❑ Picked Up By Your Office 0 File Enclosures
❑ Contract ❑ Please Return Enclosures To
✓ Other- Esmt Application ❑ Copies Of This Letter Of Transmittal
Sent To:
NO. DESCRIPTION NAo p42_
16 11x17 copies of revised plat 0( I _ )67
1 Easement Dedication Sheet (2-PUE's on GW Ph3)
1 Easement Dedication Sheet (1-PUE on GW Ph2) If Enclosures Are Not As Noted
2 Response Memo's (1 for engineering/ 1 for planning) Please Notify Us At Once.
1 Exhibit -Gateway Phase 1 Final Plat (3663/313)
1 Exhibit-Gas Well Access Esmt
Signed: Fred Paine, P.E.
i1
KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors
4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A Post Office Box 4234
Bryan, Texas 77802 Bryan, Texas 77805
Telephone 979/846-6212
Fax 979/846-8252
B.J. Kling, P.E., R.P.L.S.
S.M. Kling, R.P.L.S.
Memo: October 30, 2006
To: City of College Station- Development Services
c/o Bridgette Ge
From: Fred Paine, P.E
Re: Gateway Phase 4 - Final Plat (City Case #06-00500223)
The following is in response to September 2005 Staff review:
Planning
1. Setback Removed
2. Acknowledged
Engineering
1. Easement not necessary
2. Easement expired - refer to accompanying exhibit
3. GIS map is believed to be in error. Recent title commitment does not indicate an
easement in this area. Recording data(vol.3663,pg.313) is for Gateway Phase 1 Final
Plat filed in 1999.
4. Acknowledged
5. Acknowledged - Provided
6. Acknowledged - Provided
7. Provided with this submittal
8. To be provided when available
9. Acknowledged - Contacted
Electrical
1. Specific easements provided on plat in lieu of blanket- Confirmed with Sam Weido -
blanket not required at this time
2. Acknowledged
General Electrical Comments
All - Acknowledged
From: Mark Smith
To: David Coleman
Date: 10/17/2006 3:54:09 PM
Subject: Scarmardo's Condos at Gateway
Dave,
Do you want the sewer lines to be public?
The sewer lines in the previous phase are public. I had communicated to Alan that we may want them to
be private. This based on the idea that I did not want the storm drains in the parking lot to be mine to
maintain so I asked for them to be private. We were also proposing that the sanitary sewer be private.
That is apparently a change in direction and it is a concern for Mr. Scarmardo.
What suits you operationally?
I need to let them know so we can move ahead with these plans.
Mark Smith
Director of Public Works
PO Box 9960
City of College Station, TX 77842
979-764-3639 -office
979-777-0679 -cel
CC: Alan Gibbs
From: Alan Gibbs
To: Balmain, Gary; Coleman, David; Mosley, Bob; Smith, Mark; Thompson, Spencer
Date: 10/16/2006 8:11:08 AM
Subject: Re: Public Sanitary and Storm
How about:
On this project, the portion of the storm that serves to convey offsite drainage should be designed,
constructed and dedicated as public infrastructure. The remaining storm and sanitary infrastructure that
only serves the site should be for private maintenance.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
City of College Station
Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works
>>> Mark Smith 10/13/2006 5:14 PM >>>
I understand where you are comming from with the statement but I am not comfortable with it being made
in the context of a policy statement when there is no ordinance to back it up. We need work with the
developer and our operations folks (w/ww&drainage)to find solutions that work on a case by case basis.
I am not comfortable taking an apartment complex's parking lot drainage on as public infrastructure. If I
am not mistaken, I don't think that I have to accept it that way regardless of the standards they build to.
Mark Smith
Director of Public Works
979-764-3639
>>>Alan Gibbs 10/13/06 4:15 PM >>>
We've recently discussed the project of the next phase of the Gateway Villas in the NW corner of the
property. This is being proposed as condos-single lot with multiple owners of buildings. I have told Fred
with Kling that all internal sanitary should be private. Fred indicated that the City has allowed such
sanitary to be dedicated as public-as in the initial phases of Gateway Villas -Carol and Spencer
confirmed this. Spencer also indicated that Utilities has experienced problems when such sanitary is
constructed as private and has vacillated on this topic in the past. At Fred's request, I was planning on
sending him a short email on this topic to the effect of:
Sanitary and storm utilities can only be accepted as public if built to public standards and serving multiple
lots. Sanitary and storm utilities entirely internal to apartments and condo properties do not meet these
requirements and cannot be accepted as public. Conversely, utilities serving multiple lots should be
designed, built, and dedicated as public.
Please let me know if there is additional input before I forward the above.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
City of College Station
Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works
CC: Cargill, Harvey
From: "Fred Paine" <fred@klingeng.com>
To: "Alan Gibbs" <Agibbs@cstx.gov>
Date: 10/12/2006 8:46:46 AM
Subject: Re: Gateway Ph. 4 ( S
That's great, but the sewer will be pretty deep- in some places >12'. If L 0
this, and the water&sewer services crossing into/out of/and back into the
PUE as they pass the 'private' gap are acceptable, we will proceed in that
direction.
Thank you for your quick response.
Best,
Fred Paine, P.E.
KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
Consulting Engineers . Land Surveyors
4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A
Bryan, Texas 77802
Telephone 979/846-6212
Fax 979/846-8252
0
Original Message
From: "Alan Gibbs" <Agibbs@cstx.gov>
To: "Fred Paine" <fred@klingeng.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: Gateway Ph. 4
> It appears that 15 ft eaesments covering water and sanitary would leave
> the private storm uncovered as I suggested.
>
>Alan Gibbs, P.E.
> City of College Station
> Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works
»» "Fred Paine" <fred@klingeng.com> 10/12/2006 8:25 AM »>
> Hi Alan,
> We are trying to avoid the easement fiasco created in Gateway Phase 2
> by
> depicting the wide PUE's. I am fine with the storm sewer being
> 'private' if
> it has to be but I am looking for a way to provide for that in a
> 'clean'
> manner.
> Can you recommend a width to remove from the public easement?
>Alternatively, could we do a "PIP" private installation in public
> easement?
>At the entrance to the project, if we remove PUE from covering the
> storm,
4 +
i
f
From: Alan Gibbs
To: Paine, Fred; Scarmardo, David
Date: 11/6/2006 5:08:42 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Gateway Phase 4 - Final Plat review comment#1
Yes-thanks.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
City of College Station
Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works
»> "Fred Paine" <fred@klingeng.com> 11/6/2006 5:03 PM »>
Thanks Alan,
I assume you are satisfied with the Sanitary Sewer easement issue?
Best,
Fred Paine, P.E.
KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
Consulting Engineers . Land Surveyors
4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A
Bryan, Texas 77802
Telephone 979/846-6212
Fax 979/846-8252
Original Message
From: "Alan Gibbs" <AgibbsCcr�cstx.gov>
To: <fredaklingeng.com>
Cc: "Crissy Hartl" <Chartl a cstx.gov>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 3:54 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: Gateway Phase 4 - Final Plat review comment#1
> Fred,
> Our intent is to send you a memo stating the 20' easement along the
> northern property line is required. The approval of the plat will be
> recommended to be conditional upon this requirement.
>Alan Gibbs, P.E.
> City of College Station
> Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works
»»Alan Gibbs 11/1/2006 2:49 PM »>
> Fred,
>We will require the 20' PUE along the back property lines. It may be
> allowable for you construct a retaining wall along the property line if
> it is by piers. This PUE will need to be added on the plat ASAP for the
> 11/16 P&Z meeting.
>Alan Gibbs, P.E.
> City of College Station
> Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works
>>>> "Fred Paine" <fredklinqenq.com> 10/27/2006 3:39:38 PM >>>
>Alan,
> Due to constructability issues discussed during the development of
> Gateway Phase 2, the ability to place continuous utilities along the
> north property line of the Gateway Development was determined to be not
> feasible. Reference the overhead electric which currently runs between
> Gateway Phase 1 &Gateway Phase 2, initially it was going to run along
> the said north property line. We are working with the public& private
> utility departments and are tailoring our easements to an exact route
> accommodating the proposed lines. No utilities will be placed along the
> north property line&as such, no utility easement on that property line
>will be platted.
> Please call or email should you have any questions.
>Thanks,
> Fred Paine, P.E.
> KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
> Consulting Engineers . Land Surveyors
>4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A
> Bryan, Texas 77802
> Telephone 979/846-6212
> Fax 979/846-8252
> College Station. Heart of the Research Valley.
>
CC: Hartl, Crissy
•
From: Alan Gibbs
To: Coleman, David; Michalsky, Tony; Thompson, Spencer
Date: 11/8/2006 4:44:33 PM
Subject: Fwd: Gateway Ph 4
This is last minute, but I hoped to get your feedback on the necessity of this easement as attached.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
City of College Station
Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works
>>>Alan Gibbs 11/8/2006 4:42 PM >>>
Fyi, we are requiring a 20 ' PUE along the boundary of this Final Plat as depicted on the attached in red.
Kling and Scamardo have had Ellison contact me for relief-and meeting is set up for tomorrow 11/9 at
11am at Planning. The urgency is the plat is scheduled for the 11/16 P&Z and the packets will be
distributed tommorrow.
The language in the sub regs to require it is in 8-1.2.4. It is required on almost all plats for the general
system and future needs of public and private utilities. Often the 20' is split 10 and 10 from the adjacent
subdivisions. In this case the adjacent property to the north is in Bryan and is there sewer treatment plant.
Chuck has indicated that this may not be proportional to the development per Local Government Code
212.904.
I have offered to work with them on accommodating their proposed site development constraints with a
retaining wall and dumpster by putting the wall on piers, shifting the easement, and/or possibly reducing it
to 15'.
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
City of College Station
Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works
' LAND USE & RELATED ACTIVITIES § 213.002
ion control § 212.903. Construction and Renovation Work on (c) A developer may appeal the determination of
cted by the County-Owned Buildings or Facili- the governing body.to,a county or district court of the
ide a provi- ties in Certain Counties county in which the development project is located
levelopment (a) This section applies only to a county with a within 30 days of the final determination by the
adding tern- population of 250,000 or more. governing body.
school cam- (d) A municipality may not require a developer to
(b) A municipality is not authorized to require a waive the right of appeal authorized by this section as
county to notify the municipality or obtain a building a condition of approval for a development project.
strict do not permit for any new construction or renovation work
th day after performed within the limits of the municipality by the (e) A developer who prevails in an appeal under
lyes the dis- county's personnel or by county personnel acting as this section is entitled to applicable costs and to
agreements general contractor on county-owned buildings or facili- reasonable attorney's fees, including expert witness
lity shall be ties. Such construction or renovation work shall be fees.
tppointed by inspected by a registered professional,engineer or (f) This section does not diminish the authority or
tion includes ,
architect in this state in accordance with any modify the procedures specified by Chapter 395.
after a hear- other applicable law. A municipality may require a Added by Acts 2006,'79th Leg., ch. 982, § 1, eff. June 18,
municipality building permit for construction or 'renovation work 2005,
agreements, performed on county-owned buildings or facilities by Section 2 of Acts 2005,79th Leg.,ch.982 provides:
fferences be- private general contractors. "The change in law made by this Act applies to the approval of a
pared by the development project that is not finally adjudicated before the effective
;on both the (c) This section does not exempt a county from date of this Act."
e cost of the complying with a municipality's building code stan-
lually by the dards when performing construction or renovation CHAPTER 213. MUNICIPAL
work. COMPREHENSIVE
Added by Acts: 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 271, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, PLANS
n agreement 1997. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 368, § 1, eff.
s the request, Section
Aug.30,1999. 213.001. Purpose.
commissioner F'
213.002. Comprehensive Plan.
ty period, the § 212.904. Apportionment of Municipal Infra- 213.003. Adoption or Amendment of Comprehensive Plan.
commissioner structure Costs 213.004. Effect on Other Municipal Plans.
the municipal- 213.005. Notation on Map of Comprehensive Plan.
status report (a) If a municipality requires as a condition of
u send to the approval for a property development project that the Another Chapter 213, Authority of Munic-
developer bear a portion of the costs of municipal ipalities to Establish Building Lines, added
t between the infrastructure improvements by the making of dedica- by Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 149, § 1, and
:tion. tions,the payment of fees,or the payment of construe- consisting of§§ 213.001 to 213.006, was re
et standards" tion costs,the developer's portion of the costs may not designated as Chapter 214, Subchapter D by
building set- exceed the amount required for infrastructure im- Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch 1420, § 12.002(4).
Iverage, water provements that are roughly proportionate to the § 213.001. Purpose
cent setbacks, proposed development as approved by a professional The powers granted under this chapter are for the
and driveway engineer who holds a license issued under Chapter
purpose of promoting sound development of munici-
1001, Occupations Code,and is retained by the munici-
palities and promoting public health, safety,'and wel-
t construed to pity' fare.
for fire, safety, (b) A developer who disputes the determination Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 459, § 1, eff. Sept. 1,
he municipality made under Subsection (a) may appeal to the govern- 1997. Renumbered from§ 219.001 by Acts 2001,77th Leg.,
1 buildings,nor ing body of the municipality. At the appeal, the ch.1420,§ 12.002(2),eff.Sept.1,2001. .
or modify any developer may present evidence and testimony under § 213.002. Comprehensive Plan
administration, procedures adopted by the governing body. After
or construction hearing any testimony and reviewing the evidence,the (a) The governing body of a municipality may adopt
governing body shall make the applicable determina- a comprehensive plan for the long-range development
ch. 1, § 3.18, eff. tion within 30 days following the final submission of of the municipality. A municipality may define the
any testimony or evidence by the developer. content and design of a comprehensive plan.
457
f
8-1.2.3 Where utility easements are not themselves straight within each block, or if the same
do not connect on a straight course with utility easements of adjoining blocks, then an
additional easement shall be provided for the placement of guy wires on lot division
lege lines in order to support poles set on curving or deviating rights-of-way or easements.
Tical
8-1.2.4 Utility easements may be required across parts of lots other than as described above
upon recommendation of the City Engineer. Where the proposed subdivision adjoins
an unplatted area, the full twenty foot (20') width of easement may be required along
the rear of lots adjoining the unplatted area.
8-1.2.5 Utility easements may be fenced if unlocked gates are provided to allow free
shall movement of excavating machines, maintenance equipment, and personnel
New throughout the full length of the easement.
8-1.2.6 Overhead easements required same as for alleys, see 8-H.5.
8-J Blocks
pur-
8-J.1 Blocks generally shall be platted to provide two (2) tiers of lots with a utility easement
or alley between them, with proper regard for drainage channels, wooded areas and
other topographical features lending themselves to attractive treatment.
y for 8-J.2 Block length shall not exceed one thousand two hundred feet (1,200') in single-family
residential areas and shall not exceed eight hundred feet (800') in other areas. In
blocks over eight hundred feet(800') in length, there may be required, near the center
of the block, an access way as hereafter defined. An access way may be required at
the end of a cul-de-sac to facilitate pedestrian traffic movement.
y be
8-K Lots
feet 8-K.1 Side lot lines which make acute angles with front lines shall be avoided where
practical. In general, an arrangement placing adjacent lots at right angles to each
other shall be avoided.
8-K.2 Lot size and setback lines shall be in accordance with zoning requirements. Lots
abutting on access ways shall be treated as corner lots.
88=L Access Way
Access ways, where required, shall have a ten foot (10') right-of-way, dedicated to the public.
A four foot (4') sidewalk shall be constructed in the center of the right-of-way conforming to
the City Engineering standards.
8-M Sidewalks
earn,
the 8-M.1 Sidewalks shall be required on both sides of all streets having a right-of-way width
lined equal to or greater than sixty feet (60'). A sidewalk shall be required on one (1) side
k the of all streets with a fifty foot(50') right-of-way with the exception of cul-de-sac streets.
nsid- A sidewalk may be required on cul-de-sac streets if needed to provide through
ming pedestrian access. Sidewalks shall be placed within the right-of-way as determined
by the City Engineer and when so specified.
(Ordinance No.1971 of August 27,1992)
utility 8-M.2 The subdivider shall construct all sidewalks according to one of the following
Hent. placement alternatives:
:h lot
i of a (a) sidewalks shall be placed against the back of curb and have a minimum
ge of paved width of six feet(6');
OR
(b) sidewalks shall be placed such that a minimum six foot (6') buffer/green
space is maintained between the back of curb and the inside edge of the sidewalk.
9-19
Rev. 05/06
Page 1 of 1
Deborah Grace - Brazos Gateway
ti
VON,9 ..q . e.,.„ opo IPBn b��="'' 9p@pWG ..�iSG�B xa ". "N�'NixP '' r^�.u.^.ou. _ FRRtl�kR ut 91ansulll�9 a
w�,.�...: �..... .o- .RAY ...
From:
To:
Date: 3/6/2007 9:59 AM
Subject: Brazos Gateway
RE: Brazos Gateway place Development, LTD
Deed of Trust recorded in the Official Records of Brazos County
Volume 5598, Page 34, dated September 8, 2003
Ms. Grace,
Please be advised that the loan secured by the above Deed of Trust has been paid in full. We are currently taking a look at a
Release of Lien to be filed but in any case wanted to let you and the City know that we are no longer lienholders on the subject
property.
I understand the property owners are currently preparing a replat of the property for the city's approval and our lien is still showing in
the title search. Please let me know if there is anything else you need from me to be able to proceed. I anticipate the release will
be filed shortly.
Thank you ....
Tim Jones, SVP
Regional Lending Manager
First Victoria National Bank(formerly Planters & Merchants State Bank)
O 979-680-5554
F 979-764-3049
NOTICE: This E-Mail, including attachments, is covered by
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 U.S.C. -2510 -2521;
it is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient, or an authorized agent, you are hereby notified
that any disclosure, retention, dissemination, distribution, copying,
or taking action in reliance of this communication is strictly prohibited.
Please reply to the sender of this error then delete this message.
file://C:\Documents and Settings\dgrace.CSTX\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\45ED3B6CCity of College ... 3/6/2007
KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING �.' �
Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors \O `
4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A P.O. Box 4234
Bryan, Texas 77802 Tel. 979/846-6212 Bryan, Texas 77805
Fax 979/846-8252
TO: City of College Station -Development Services DATE: February 28, 2007
PROJECT NO.:
PROJECT NAME: Gateway Phase 4
•
Final Plat-Mylar for Filing
ATTENTION: Deborah Grace REFERENCE:
WE TRANSMIT: THE FOLLOWING: FOR:
❑ Under Separate Cover 0 Prints 0 Your Review&Approval
✓ Enclosed 0 Copies 0 Your Review& Comment
❑ Originals 0 Your Review& Distribution
VIA: ✓ Plat 0 Your Review, Revision & Return
❑ Mail 0 Field Notes 0 Your Signature& Return
✓ Messenger 0 Plans 0 Your File and/or Use
❑ Federal Express 0 Report ✓ For Filing at the Courthouse
❑ Lone Star Overnight 0 Estimate
❑ UPS 0 Cut Sheets 0 As Requested By:
❑ Special Courier 0 Computer Printout 0 Please Acknowledge Receipt of
❑ Picked Up By Your Office 0 File Enclosures
0 Contract 0 Please Return Enclosures To
❑ Other- Invoice 0 Copies Of This Letter Of Transmittal
Sent To:
NO. DESCRIPTION
1 Final Plat- Mylar
If Enclosures Are Not As Noted
Please inform of recording information. Please Notify Us At Once.
Signed: Fred P_'• _ P.E.
r�
I`