HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report Aggieland Pregnancy Outreach Rezoning
1. Corrected vote: 5-2 to approve
2. Consideration of a rezoning from R-1 to PDD at 124 Morgans
Lane, located off of Texas Avenue
3. Request made by reps of the Aggieland Pregnancy Outreach
for a future facility for the agency
4. Proposed PDD includes uses such as counseling offices,
community outreach center, group home, walking trails, and a
playground
5. Concept plan, also up for consideration, depicts placement of
these uses on the subject property as well as Dartmouth
extension
6. Purpose statement of the PDD in a letter from applicant can
I n D iret i via,v\ci
7. LUP currently reflects Planned Development, which indicates
vision for the area since 2818 Extension Study done in 1992
8. 2818 Extension Study identified area between SW Pkwy,
Texas Ave, and SH 6 as the "Golden Triangle"
9. Study called for a mix of uses within the area south of 2818
10. When comp plan adopted in 1997, subject area given a Mixed
Use designation, which encouraged the mixing of compatible
land uses in a way that allow each use to support the other
uses
11. Policies further stated that "the success of these mixed uses is
directly related to the sensitive master planning of the site
layout"
12.As a result of the Mixed Use Opportunities study in 2003, the
Mixed Use designation reclassified as Planned Development CYrt4" -
tishinvon
13. PD carries the same emphasis of the need to consolidate
properties and master plan to ensure proper placement of
various uses
14. Designation is especially appropriate for this request since the
larger area is owned by one property owner, who is also
owner of subject property
15.A master plan of the area is also encouraged due to the large
amounts of floodplain and the Dartmouth Street extension,
which is projected to be built through the larger area,
including on the subject property
16.The area between 2818, Texas Avenue and SH 6 presents an
opportunity for a master plan to ensure the proper placement
of various land uses
17. Staff recognizes that proposed development includes mix of
uses that could be a suitable development for the area, but
without master plan of surrounding uses, as directed in
policies adopted since 1992, compatibility of the development
is undetermined
18.Therefore, staff recommends denial
19. P&Z voted 5-2 to approve
20. Received no phone calls
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: 12-06-07
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 01-10-08
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
No registered neighborhood organizations in this vicinity
Property owner notices mailed: 4
Contacts in support: None as of date of staff report.
Contacts in opposition: None as of date of staff report.
Inquiry contacts: None as of date of staff report.
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North Planned Development P-MUD and R-1 Vacant
South Floodplains & Streams R-1 and C-1 Single-Family House
East Floodplains & Streams P-MUD and C-1 Vacant
West Planned Development and R-1 Vacant
Floodplains & Streams
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1969
Zoning: R-1 (1969)
Final Plat: 1945
Site development: Vacant, with 100-year floodplain
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: In 1992, the 2818 Extension Study was
adopted in anticipation of the extension of FM 2818 from Texas Avenue to the East
Bypass. This study recommended a mixture of uses for the subject property and
surrounding areas to include primarily residential with office, institutional, and a small
amount of retail. The Mixed Use land use designation was assigned to the area with the
adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 1997 to reflect the City's desire for future mix of
land uses. That designation was later reclassified as Planned Development according to
the recommendation Mixed Use Opportunity Study in 2003.
The Planned Development category emphasizes the need to consolidate properties and
master plan the area as a whole to ensure appropriate placement of different uses. While
the request may incorporate one of the recommended land uses of the 2818 Extension
Study, it does not meet the policies of the Comprehensive Plan as it is only one tract of the
larger area that is requesting a rezoning for future development.
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property
and with the character of the neighborhood: The surrounding properties are zoned
C-1, R-1 and P-MUD and with the exception of a single-family house to the south of the
subject property, the nearby properties are undeveloped. The proposed uses in the
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 4
Meeting date (December 6, 2007)
PDD include counseling offices, community outreach center, group home, walking trails
and a playground. These uses are relatively low-impact uses and would probably not
negatively impact the single-family house adjacent to the property.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The proposed
uses in the PDD would likely be suitable to the properties affected by the rezoning;
however, Staff strongly encourages a master plan of the area to determine the
placement of land uses while also accommodating the adjacent floodplains and the
Dartmouth Street extension that bisects the area.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
subject property is a part of a larger Planned Development area where a planned mixed
of land uses is encouraged. Additionally, the Thoroughfare Plan projects the Dartmouth
Street extension, a Minor Collector, to be built through this area, including on the subject
property. For these reasons, the subject property is not suitable for R-1 development
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
subject property and surrounding properties are designated as Planned Development by
several studies of the Comprehensive Plan. The policies of the Comprehensive Plan
encourage the consolidation of properties to be master planned as one development.
By zoning one lot in a Planned Development area void of a master plan and without
indication of the compatibility of this development with future developments, the
marketability of the surrounding properties will be decreased as opportunity to plan the
area as a whole will be lost.
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Development of this tract will
require construction of a public street from the end of the funeral home property to this
lot. Water will also need to be extended from current existing location to provide
required fire flow. There is an existing sanitary sewer line that transects the property.
Stormwater runoff is to the southeast towards Bee Creek Tributary A. Discharge from
the property shall be designed to Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Comprehensive Plan indicates that properties within the 2818 Extension Study should be
consolidated and planned for a mixture of land uses. Staff recognizes that the proposed
development includes a mix of uses on the subject property and that it could be a suitable
development for the area, but without a plan of land uses, the compatibility with future
developments within the area is undetermined. Staff strongly encourages a master plan of the
area to ensure that the land uses and their placements are appropriate with respect to the
floodplains and future Dartmouth Street extension; therefore, Staff recommends denial of the
request.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Concept Plan (provided in packet)
3. Rezoning map (provided in packet)
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 4
Meeting date (December 6, 2007)
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka Date: August 12, 2004
Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov
Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a rezoning of 12.49
acres, generally located near the southeast intersection of Harvey Mitchell
Parkway and the future Dartmouth Street extension, from R-1 Single Family
Residential to P-MUD Planned Mixed Use Development with the OV Overlay
District.
Applicant: Kenny Cotten, agent for Mr.Clint Bertrand, property owner
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the P-MUD zoning.
Item Summary: The applicant is requesting rezoning in order to develop the
property with a mix of uses, including a potential hotel, specialty retail shops, a
pavilion, pedestrian paths, and townhomes. P-MUD zoning requires that both
the residential component and non-residential component makes up at least 20
percent of the overall land uses within the development. Compliance with this
requirement will be determined at the time of Concept Plan approval.
Approximately 4.5 acres at the south end of the proposed rezoning area is within
the 100-year floodplain. This floodplain is shown as a priority 6 Greenway in the
Greenways Master Plan. The Greenways Program supports approval of the P-
MUD, with the 100-yr floodplain reserved as designated greenway on the
Concept Plan. This area should serve as an undeveloped suburban greenway,
for such functions as providing flood control, recreation, transportation, and
serving economic and aesthetic purposes, as stated in the Greenways Master
Plan.
A Concept Plan is required to be approved by the Design Review Board prior to
development of this property. The Parks & Recreation Board, the Greenways
Program Manager, and Development Services staff will review the Concept Plan
and make a recommendation to the Design Review Board.
Because of its proximity to the proposed City Center project, staff is
recommending that the property also be rezoned to apply the OV Overlay for
additional restrictions on color, signage, and setbacks. The purpose of the OV
Overlay district is to enhance the image of key entry points to the City by
maintaining a sense of openness and continuity. It should be pointed out that
with a recommendation for approval of applying the OV Overlay District, the
Commission has made a determination that the subject property is located along
a gateway or major corridor to the City.
IIDOCSERVERI VOL 11 GROUPIHTLTRIPZLTRIPRODI PZ20041P0009830.DOC
Created on 7/27/2004 7:38 AM
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates this
property as Planned Development and Floodplains/Streams. Planned
Development is shown on the plan where larger areas of land may develop with
a mix, or collection, of uses. The Planned Development category emphasizes
the need to consolidate properties and master plan the area to ensure
appropriate placement of different uses.
Harvey Mitchell Parkway is a major arterial and Dartmouth is designated as a
minor arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan.
The property to the northwest was recently rezoned for the development of the
Kenny Cotten's restaurant.
Item Background: Portions of the subject property were annexed in 1967, 1969,
and 1971, and were zoned R-1 as an interim designation that was assigned
upon annexation. The property has never been platted.
In 1992, the 2818 Extension Study was adopted in anticipation of the extension
of FM 2818 from Texas Avenue to the East Bypass. This study recommended a
mixture of uses in the proposed rezoning area, primarily residential with office,
institutional, and a small amount of retail. The subject property was requested to
be rezoned to C-1 as a part of a larger rezoning in 1993. Because of public
opposition to the proposed location of a big-box retailer, and because of the
support for the 2818 Extension Study, the applicant eventually withdrew the
rezoning.
The Land Use Plan was updated to reflect "Mixed Use" in the subject area in
1997 with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. A request for rezoning to C-
1 of just under 35 acres (that included this property) in 2002 was recommended
for denial by the Commission because of opposition from area residents,
inappropriate siting of a big-box retailer, and non- compliance with the mixed-use
land use designation on the property. The applicant withdrew his application
prior to the City Council meeting to explore his alternatives.
In 2003 the Land Use Plan was updated with the Mixed Use Study to show this
area as Planned Development.
Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body
on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council.
The Commission options are:
1. Recommend approval; iL cjpp�f-
2. Recommend denial; /J `I
3. Table indefinitely; or, A._ 10
4. Defer action to a specified date.
Supporting Materials: ilkaAjelit Piaitq
IIDOCSER VERT VOL 11GRO UPI HTLTRIPZLTRI PRODI PZ20041 P0009830.DOC
Created on 7/27/2004 7:38 AM
•
1. Location Map
2. Application
3. Aerial
4. Infrastructure and Facilities
IIDOCSER VERT VOL 11 GROUPWTLTRI PZLTRI PRODI PZ20041 P0009830.DOC
Created on 7/27/2004 7:38 AM
INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water: The site has access to an existing 24-in water main across
Harvey Mitchell Pkwy. This line size should be sufficient to meet
domestic and fire flow capacity for development under the requested
zoning.
Sewer: There is an existing 18-in sewer main along the southeast
property line. Depending on actual sewer flow line, building location and
site grading, the existing sewer should serve the site adequately.
Streets: The Thoroughfare Plan, a component of the Comprehensive
Plan, classifies Harvey Mitchell Parkway as a Minor Arterial. The
Thoroughfare Plan also shows Dartmouth to be extended across the
western corner of the subject property. The City Subdivision Regulations
require a property to be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan as a
condition of platting. In this case, Dartmouth will need to be addressed
at the time of platting. Oversize Participation (OP) may be available.
Off-site Easements: At this time it does not appear the site requires off-
site easements.
Drainage: Drainage is generally southeast across the property toward
Bee Creek Tributary A.
Flood Plain: The southeast portion of the property is within FEMA
designated 100-year floodplain.
Oversize request: OP may be requested for the construction of
Dartmouth.
Impact Fees: No impact fees established for this area.
NOTIFICATION:
Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle: 8-3-04 and 8-24-04
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 8-19-04
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 9-9-04
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 11
Response Received: None as of date of staff report
II DOCSERVERI V OL 11 GRO UPI HTL TRI PZLTRI PRODI PZ20041 P0009830.DOC
Created on 7/27/2004 7:38 AM
( ifor p, %soli%
CITYREZOOF COLLEGE TNING REQUEST
FOR
AGGIELAND PREGNANCY OUTREACH (PDD) (07-00500267)
REQUEST: R 1 Single Family Residential to PDD Planned Development and A-O
Agricultural Open
ACREAGE: 3.67 acres
LOCATION: 124 Morgans Lane; Lot 13 Lakeview Acres Subdivision
APPLICANT: Kim Schams, Aggieland Pregnancy Outreach, Inc.
PROJECT MANAGER: Crissy Hartl, Staff Planner
chart)@cstx.gov
i ' ' ''''' ' ' . ' s''
€aft \ \ \\\ ix
b ,�. '@ : e .a � \� � i a aiv •to
,,, t .. rl to a �\\ i�\\ 4� o 3 9° yi..
fig, R
It
y� �y \"'�@ �� ��A�,yt� �.\-,r;,,,,, ,,.:,,,,, , ,:.,
�e �f<\ , A"P 3 3 "42II."`u� Z4,.\.::::' ,.,4��
.,:'&1 ,f ,W:,..i. '
I£ S ✓� \`gyp � � , \'
��
z�✓ +. , ,.?
as ,, ,,,, ,,, — �, ` \\
:',f,,,,,, /.4.,:'y 1 ,, \ Yr' Z 1ti ' ajL 1.
/ � \ 1, � yyt*, k >i� Fes.
IL.,,,'
Zmurp Districts P 7 TownhWse C 3 Dot c tial WPC Wdf Pe,Creek D4¢Cgnld
R 1 Mum-F ly M-i Ligh dust el
NG-1 Core Nce
A O Hgrcukueoi Open R-s High Densly MWk-Family M-2 Heavy lndustnal NG-2 TrensmoO North 1
A-OR Rural Resddtliel Subdirtsion R-7 Manufedurod Hgne Park C-U College and University NG-J Resdentiel Nttlhgele
R-i Stogie Fanuy Resdenllel A-p AdnunisketiveFrdessionel R80 Research end DevNognent OV Cnntlar Oueday
R•lB Single Fanuly Residenhel C-1 General Cotnmardel P-MUD panned Mixed-Use Drreiopnent RDD Redevelopment psUid
RR Duplex Residential AC
C-2 Commercial-Intlustriel P00 Planned Development gstrkt KO Krend Tap Ovens
REZONING i 44111.: Case:
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AGGIELAND PREGNANCY OUTREACH ..
..-.-__..-.-_ 07.267
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 4
Meeting date (December 6, 2007)