Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments C 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570/ Fax 979.764.3496 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MEMORANDUM November 13, 2007 TO: Kristy Walker, GHA Architects, via fax kwalker(a�gha-architects.com FROM: Jason Schubert, Staff Planner SUBJECT: RED LOBSTER - MDW CENTER (SP) — Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) complete set of construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached One (1) revised site plan One (1) revised landscaping plan Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents (please allow 4 weeks to process). If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments pc: Jack DeGagne, Darden Restaurants, via idegagnetc'i darden.com Jeffrey A. Tibbits, WD Partners, via fax 214.351.2095 Case file #07-00500272 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. Page 1 of 3 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: RED LOBSTER - MDW CENTER (SP)—07-00500272 PLANNING 1. The scale provided does not match the scale of the drawing. Please revise. 2. Please note that staff will not be able to verify that the newly proposed driveway has adequate spacing from existing driveways until the site plan is correctly scaled. Ideally, scale the site plan such that it is continuous with no match lines. 3. Please show all of Lot 2, Block 1 on the site plan with a phase line separating the developing area from the undeveloped area. 4. Please show the ownership and zoning of all abutting parcels on the site plan. 5. It appears that the "Adjacent Zoning" designations are not accurate. Please revise. 6. Please revise the "Site Acreage" to include the newly proposed driveway area. 7. Please revise the "Existing Zoning" to include the C-1, and OV(Corridor Overlay District). 8. Please revise the required Parking Data to reflect 109 parking spaces required as factional spaces are increased to the next whole number. 9. There appears to be 169 regular parking spaces (not 170). Please revise the totals. 10. The Landscape Plan cannot be partially revised. They are reviewed for compliance in relation to the entire site. Please submit a revised Landscape Plan that includes the entire site, though the phased area not being developed can be excluded. 11. Please note that the required 30' buffer area located on the western property line of Lot 2, Block 1, as per rezoning Ordinance #2242, will be inspected and verified for compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Reviewed by: Jason Schubert Date: November 13, 2007 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 1. It appears that with the construction of the proposed entrance there will be no future access possible to the undeveloped 2 acre tract, as the required throat depth to swing the new entrance toward this tract would put the drive isle in the detention pond. 2. Please verify that the proposed entrance meets the fire lane turning radius requirements: 33-ft radius for inside wheel and 48-ft radius for outside wheel. 3. The fill that was placed for the future construction of this proposed entrance is directly downstream from the detention pond inlet structure, what is going to protect this entrance from being undermined by drainage in the detention pond? 4. Was the fill that was placed for the future construction of this proposed entrance compacted properly to achieve structural stability? Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: November 13, 2007 ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION 1. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes. 2. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for electric lines 3. Submitted plan does not show easements currently needed to cover newly installed primary conduits. NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. Page 2 of 3 GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS 1. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Sam Weido at 979.764.6314. Reviewed by: Sam Weido Date: October 31, 2007 FIRE 1. Fire lanes are not depicted on the site plan, please provide information for fire lanes. Reviewed by: Jerry Duffey Date: November 1, 2007 SANITATION 1. Dumpster enclosure needs to have the 12'x24' inside dimension required by the City's UDO. 2. Access path to the dumpster enclosure does not meet sanitation standards. Need to have a clear maneuvering area of up to 65ft in front of enclosure. Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: October 31, 2007 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. Page 3 of 3 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning d'Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM November 14, 2007 TO: Kristy Walker, GHA Architects, via fax kwalker( qha-architects.com FROM: Jason Schubert, Staff Planner SUBJECT: Revised Comments for Red Lobster- MDW Center- Site Plan I forwarded the initial round of comments for the above-referenced site plan yesterday, November 13, 2007. There was one additional comment that was omitted from those comments that also needs to be addressed: • Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Section 7.2.D, End Islands, states that a raised island of at least 180 square feet is to be located at both ends of every parking row. As such, the proposed demolition of the end island near the dumpster enclosures cannot occur as submitted. understand our Sanitation department does not have the necessary clearance for service as currently constructed and will require some modification. As a result, the dumpster enclosures should be realigned so as to provide sufficient access for the sanitation vehicles and/or the end island will need to be moved and some parking spaces lost to accommodate them. I apologize for not including this in yesterday's correspondence. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. pc: )ack DeGagne, Darden Restaurants, via idegagne(c�darden.com Jeffrey A. Tibbits, WD Partners, via fax 214.351.2095 Case file #07-00500272 Home of Texas A&M University