Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication (41 FOR OF E USEAT Y P&Z CASE NO.: I I CITY OF COI LEGE STM ION DATE SUBMITTED: ' I'Ixtttmi� I)rr,rlopPe1 So es - 1 :47'1 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ✓Filing Fee of$400.00. / ariance Request to Subdivision Regulations - $100 (if applicable) ✓.Application completed in full. V Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) V One (1) copy of the approved Master Plan if applicable. ✓ A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. NirA Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed. A- Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). Date of Preapplication Conference: 0<5 NAME OF SUBDIVISION Sace C� c e45Ackd.s,% SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION W colk /GAJ 60`ci -S'-oust c J ei,6J Q,,€ z o s ���,..� — Cn 1 IeSc 45 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Prima Contact for the,Project): Name i L. 5ckek v, sac9r��e Creefc 1"G�Lncr5, I-#c) Street Address 4 4 '[ 3 ►'J e•`.k`^'tcck 'Q r` City C J ej'e State Zip Code 11 '� 5 E-Mail Address f i-Q Y 'L 5 - CL144-ibr00-.Art Phone Number 9-7 - 90-2 642 Fax Number 6 90 Z 79 3 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): n/� ilil + �j ` • p ) SeC •It-r—r icy 1rt`Sf avt_, 7cktk-. - �;, w,. DcodoDr, Name Street Address 4440 City 51-1-'` State 7 K Zip Code -7 g4 5 E-Mail Address /1\L e ms`s•ckileiaio$4.--4 (c Phone Number 2-( 4 Z Fax Number 6 9a •- z 19 3 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S\\ INFORMATION: Name )6e -\.\,N-'Z ( - C.IV : I 6� y-eic134nev41 Street Address 7_ °loci / )"%(r e 0 City Ctt rse Jf`4" State ( I-, Zip Code '71 8 45- E-Mail Address c e C cok 110C1 .C e""\ Phone Number g `1`� ' 764-7/43 Fax Number 3 � �4 ' 7759 I ,)I 4 Total Acres Of Subdivision 31 S ,41 1 R-O-W Acreage549T111 Total# Of Lots 2,6 3 Number Of Lots By Zoning District N)) Ar Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: •— FT J ,..�.^ 14- S; 7 A— Or- Floodplain Acreage 0 ) Parkland dedication by acreage or fee? N 11\ A statement addressing any differences be een the Preliminary Plat and approved Master Plan (if applicable) P�`1`"St- P►�. �� ll 2, 3 - k Requested variancesL 6 to subdivision regulations & reason for same 0/0c-A let /Z°I`-,. 2_ ,>cc G��e t �ll�cL� ( 7 -C J �"1( G "— Requested oversize participation NI 4- Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: #of Acres to be dedicated #of acres in floodplain #of acres in detention #of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: #of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above identified plat and attests that all respective owners have been identified on this application. >04:fryzal h Signature and Title Date SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 13 irier4 FOLDED COPIES OF PLAT FOR REVIEW CITY 01. COLLEGE S'I A"T`ION Pt iiu x; I)evcI rurte,tt.Si'o t%ii PRELIMINARY PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: j127 1. Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch or larger. Include the words "PRELIMINARY PLAT - NOT FOR RECORD" in letters 1/2" high. If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. I 2. Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow. [� 3. Title Block with the following information: Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. ,/ftr. Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos County 911.) (Replats need to retain original subdivision name.) ✓ID` Date of preparation. (INCLUDE DATE THE PLAT WAS SUBMITTED AND THE DATES OF ANY REVISIONS ON THE PLAT) E f Engineer's scale in feet. / 2" Total area intended to be developed. s/IV 4. North Arrow. ✓[./ 5. Location of current city limit lines and current zoning district boundary. Iry W 6. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. Boundary must include all of parent tract. [( 7. Descriptions by metes and bounds of the subdivision which shall close within accepted land survey standards. (Labeled on boundary lines, not separate metes and bounds description.) Ef 8. Primary control points or descriptions and ties to such control point, to which , later, all dimensions, angles, bearings, block numbers, and similar data shall be referred. The plat shall be located with respect to a corner of the survey or tract, or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part. ,/Ai 9. Name of contiguous subdivisions and names of owners of contiguous parcels of unsubdivided land, and an indication whether or not contiguous properties are platted. [ ' 10. Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and Floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available data. 11. Topographic information, including contours at two foot (2 ft.) intervals, wooded areas, and flowline elevation of streams. (j1Ctl 12. Proposed land uses (In compliance with Land Use Plan). N)� 13. Proposed zoning changes, if any, subm it formal rezoning request. Yr 14. The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision). Existing Proposed IV' [✓ Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp. turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. 1� R' Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) L' Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. ❑N/-E Alleys. [� EI' Well site locations. �V H Pipelines. If carrying flammable gas or fuel, also show size of line, design pressure and product transported through the line. Er Utility Services. (Water & Sanitary Sewer) All existing and proposed utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas. [r ©' Easements. Drainage Structures and improvements including underground storm sewer and all overland systems (flow line of existing watercourses) and showing where these will discharge. Proposed channel cross sections, if any. ▪ [t' A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block. ❑ PP- Greenbelt area/park linkages/parkland dedication ( All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board prior to P & Z Commission consideration.) ❑(/ � Public areas [' L ' Other public improvements, including but not limited to parks, schools and other public facilities ©! 15. Proposed phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements and infrastructure costs should be distributed evenly throughout the subdivision.. N/ Are there impact fees associated with this development? ❑ Yes ❑ No A47. If requesting oversize participation items, are the necessary impact studies included? ❑Yes ❑No N/A 0 I;1)Z 4x,1-1 Saddle Creek Subdivision Owners: John A. Malley Jennifer B. Todd 48644 Vista Palomino 6454 LeBlanc Place LaQuinta, CA 92253 Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Riverside County Los Angeles County Saddle Creek Subdivision Preliminary Plat — Requested Variances to Subdivision Regulations REQUESTED VARIANCE TO SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS & REASON FOR SAME: Section 12.K.2— Block Length This section requires that block length shall not exceed 1,500'in single-family rural residential subdivisions. The Developer requests a variance to this requirement to allow the block length to be increased to greater than 1,500' for the following blocks as shown on the Preliminary Plat. Block # Length Street Name Block 1 1597 ft Saddle Creek Drive Block 2 2054 ft Saddle Creek Drive Block 5 1697 ft Prairie Lane Block 6 2194 ft Vintage Oaks Drive & Court Block 6 1716 ft Saddle Creek Drive Block 8 2103 ft Ranch House Road Section 13.0— Lot Width This section requires the minimum lot width shall be one hundred feet as measured at the building setback line for the lot. The Developer requests a variance to this requirement. All lots meet the minimum lot width of 70 ft. at the street right-of-way line as required by the Brazos County Subdivision Regulations. This variance would be only for lots at the end of a cul-de-sac. The following lots do not meet the minimum lot width requirements. ROW Lot Width @ Lot Size Block# Lot# Frontage Front Bldg Setback (ac) 2 63 78.41 93.88 1.07 2 64 81.21 96.80 1.91 2 65 73.92 93.77 2.32 2 85 78.85 90.73 1 .36 2 86 70.56 84.35 1.62 2 87 74.78 91 .08 1.07 10 194 72.10 85.79 1.11 The lot width variance only applies to the lots listed above. Saddle Creek Subdivision Preliminary Plat Justification for Variance Section 12.K.2-Blocks This section requires that block length shall not exceed 1,500' in single-family rural residential subdivisions. The Developer requests a variance to this requirement. A.1 That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; The special circumstances are: Block 1 Saddle Creek Drive — The proposed block length only slightly exceeds the minimum length. Adding cul-de-sac streets or connector streets to break up the block length would be of no benefit to the Developer, Brazos County or the residents of the Subdivision. Block 2 Saddle Creek Drive Adding a cul-de-sac or connector street to Ranch House Court in order to reduce the block length would destroy additional wooded area that the developer is trying to save. Reducing the block length would be of no benefit to the developer, Brazos County or the residents of the subdivision. Block 5 Prairie Lane —The street connections shown are adequate since the adjacent property is a single tract and adding cul-de-sac streets or connector streets to break up the block length would be of no benefit to the Developer, Brazos County or the residents of the Subdivision. Block 6 Vintage Oaks Drive & Court — The block length only slightly exceeds the 2000 ft. maximum length requirement for cul-de-sacs and adding cul-de-sac streets or connector streets to break up the block length would be of no benefit to the Developer, Brazos County or the residents of the Subdivision. Block 6 Saddle Creek Drive—The block length only slightly exceeds the maximum. Block 8 Ranch House Road — Additional Street connections would be of little benefit to the adjoining tracts since the tracts already have access to Stousland Road, and the additional streets may never be extended. A.2 That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; In order to develop the Subdivision as planned this variance is necessary. A.3 That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; Granting this variance should not have any effect on the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area since the requested block lengths do not significantly exceed the maximum length requirement, and the subdivision will still have adequate connectivity to the surrounding property as it is planned. Pagc1of? A.4 That the granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The surrounding land will still be able to develop in any manner acceptable to the City of College Station. The granting of this variance will not prevent the orderly subdivision of other land. There are a total of six street connections proposed to the undeveloped tracts surrounding this development. All of the surrounding tracts have access to other public roads. Page 2 of 2 Saddle Creek Subdivision Preliminary Plat Justification for Variance Section 13-C-Lot Widths This section requires that the minimum lot width shall be one hundred feet in subdivisions located in the ETJ. The Developer requests a variance to this requirement. A.1 That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; Strict application of the ordinance would require extension of: • Prairie Court to increase the lot frontage for Lots 63, 64 and 65, • Ranch House Court to increase the frontage for Lots 85, 86 & 87, and • Shadow Canyon Court to increase the frontage for Lot 194. These lots are some of the larger lots in the subdivision even though the have the least lot frontage. It is typical to have larger lots at the ends of cul-de-sac streets which have a narrow lot width at the street right-of-way. A.2 That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; This exception is necessary to develop the property as proposed, unless it is determined that it is more desirable to have a longer cul-de-sac. A longer cul-de-sac would provide greater lot frontage, but it would result in increased costs to the developer and more road maintenance in the future with little benefit from the longer cul-de-sac. Extending the cul-de-sac would impact existing streams and/or heavily wooded areas. A.3 That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; The subdivision will be otherwise constructed in accordance with all other regulations and standards required by the City of College Station and Brazos County. This development is similar to many existing subdivisions and will not be detrimental to the public or other property in the area. A.4 That the granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The surrounding land will still be able to develop in any manner acceptable to the City of College Station. The granting of this variance will not prevent the orderly subdivision of other land. The lots which do not meet the lot width requirement are all on cul-de-sacs, which cannot be connected to any other land in the area.