Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence Obi /71 'a-1. DlD KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING q ate.. Consulting Engineers• Land Surveyors 4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A Email:stewart@klingeng.com P.O. Box 234 Bryan,Texas 77802 Tel. 979/846-6212 Bryan,Texas 77805 Fax 979/846-8252 TO: City of College Station DATE: August 21,2006 PROJECT NO.: PROJECT NAME: Final Plat- Right of Way Dedication Arrington Road and 80' Decatur Drive ATTENTION: REFERENCE: WE TRANSMIT: THE FOLLOWING: FOR: ❑ Under Separate Cover ❑ Prints d Your Review&Approval f Enclosed d Copies ❑Your Review&Comment 0 Originals 0 Your Review&Distribution VIA: 0 Plat ❑Your Review, Revision&Return ❑ Mail ❑ Field Notes ❑Your Signature & Return i Messenger 0 Plans ❑Your File and/or Use ❑ Federal Express ❑ Report ❑ Lone Star Overnight ❑ Estimate 0 As Requested By: ❑ UPS ❑ Cut Sheets ❑ Special Courier ❑ Computer Printout 0 Please Acknowledge Receipt of ❑ Picked Up By Your Office ❑ File Enclosures ❑ Contract ❑ Please Return Enclosures To ❑ Other 0 Copies Of This Letter Of Transmittal Sent To: NO. DESCRIPTION 1 application and filing fees and attached owner sheet 14 blueline 1 check list 4 paid tax certificates (4 owners) If Enclosures Are Not As Noted Please Notify Us At Once. Signed: S. M. Kling CITY OF C011 FGE STATION Planning d Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue,P.O. Box 9960 College Station,Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM September 8,2006 TO: Chuck Ellison,via fax 979-693-8819 FROM: Lindsay Boyer, Staff Planner SUBJECT: RIGHT OF WAY FOR ARRINGTON RD & DECATUR- Final Plat Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. When all of the comments have been addressed, your project will be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Two (2) 24"x36" copies of the revised final plat; Fifteen (15) 11"x17" copies of the revised final plat; Written documentation of approval from TxDOT and Texas Wildlife and Fisheries regarding Conservation Easement encroachment; One (1)Mylar original of the revised final plat;and One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to sgriffin@cstx.gov and awelsh@cstx.gov. Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning& Zoning meeting,your project will be considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that if all comments have not been addressed your project will not be scheduled for a Planning&Zoning Commission meeting.Your project may be placed on a future agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate fees paid. Once your item has been scheduled for the P&Z meeting, the agenda and staff report can be accessed at the following web site on Monday the week of the P&Z meeting. http://www.cstx.gov/home/index.asp?page=2481. If you have any questions or need additional information,please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Stewart Kling,Kling Engineering,via fax 979-846-8252 Spring Creek CS Development,LID,via mail College Station Marketplace,LP,via mail NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans.Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. 1 of 3 CITY OF COT.I FGE STATION Planning dr Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue,P.O. Box 9960 College Station,Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM August 28,2006 TO: Chuck Ellison,via fax 979-693-8819 FROM: Lindsay Boyer,Staff Planner SUBJECT: RIGHT OF WAY FOR ARRINGTON RD & DECATUR- Final Plat Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. If all comments have been addressed and the following information submitted by Monday,, 10:00 a.m.,your project will be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for, , 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue. Two (2) 24"x36" copies of the revised final plat; Fifteen (15) 11"x17"copies of the revised final plat; One (1) Mylar original of the revised final plat;and One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to sgriffin@cstx.gov and awelsh@cstx.gov. Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning& Zoning meeting, your project will be considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that if all comments have not been addressed your project will not be scheduled for a Planning&Zoning Commission meeting.Your project may be placed on a future agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate fees paid. Once your item has been scheduled for the P&Z meeting, the agenda and staff report can be accessed at the following web site on Monday the week of the P&Z meeting. http://www.cstx.gov/home/index.asp?page=2481. If you have any questions or need additional information,please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Stewart Kling,Kling Engineering,via fax 979-846-8252 Spring Creek CS Development,LID,via mail College Station Marketplace,LP,via mail Spring Creek Townhomes,via mail NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans.Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. 1 of 4 KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Consulting Engineers•Land Surveyors C w 81-1 1 4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A Email:stewart©klingeng.com P.O. Box 4234 Bryan,Texas 77802 Tel. 979/846-6212 Bryan,Texas 77805 Fax 979/846-8252 TO: City of College Station DATE: September 1,2006 PROJECT NO.: PROJECT NAME: Final Plat-Right of Way Dedication Arrington Road and 80' Decatur Drive ATTENTION: Lindsay Boyer REFERENCE: WE TRANSMIT: THE FOLLOWING: FOR: ❑ Under Separate Cover 0 Prints d Your Review&Approval I Enclosed I Copies 0 Your Review&Comment ❑ Originals 0 Your Review& Distribution VIA: 0 Plat 0 Your Review, Revision&Return ❑ Mail 0 Field Notes 0 Your Signature &Return d Messenger 0 Plans 0 Your File and/or Use ❑ Federal Express 0 Report ❑ Lone Star Overnight 0 Estimate 0 As Requested By: ❑ UPS 0 Cut Sheets ❑Special Courier ❑ Computer Printout 0 Please Acknowledge Receipt of ❑ Picked Up By Your Office 0 File Enclosures ❑ Contract 0 Please Return Enclosures To ❑ Other 0 Copies Of This Letter Of Transmittal Sent To: NO. DESCRIPTION 2 blueline - revised final plat per staff comments on August 28, 2006 1 mylar original of same If Enclosures Are Not As Noted Please Notify Us At Once. 1 attached sheet with staff comment responses 114*: 4416) Signed: S. M. Kling DSD fr1 K?4ING ENGINEERING& SURVEYING 7 ; ► v Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors U " 4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A Post Office Box 4234 Bryan, Texas 77802 Bryan, Texas 77805 Telephone 979/846-6212 Fax 979/846-8252 B.J. Kling, P.E., R.P.L.S. Email: S.M. Kling, R.P.L.S. stewart@klingeng.com September 1, 2006 PROJECT NAME: Final Plat - Right of Way Dedication Arrington Road and 80' Decatur Dr. Addressing staff comments of August 28, 2006 PLANNING: No staff comments. TxDOT: All comments seem to be for information only - no plat changes required. ENGINEERING: 1) The construction plans will be revised to reflect the current right-of-way. 2) •BTU subordination - Per Mark Smith and Craig Jordan, BTU will not require subordination to allow the right-of-way to encroach into the BTU easement. •Aquilla Southwest subordination -The developer is working with ETC (the current owner of the easement)to abandon this easement. The agreement should be finalized prior to filing. 3) Conservation easement encroachment - The agreement with TxDOT does provide for minor encroachments. The developer is pursuing a letter kohl TxDOT indicating approval. This approval will be provided prior to filing. 4) Slope encroachments into the conservation easement - Refer to item #3 above. • Slope easements on the development side-The project is currently under site design which will require filling the site to an elevation near the street grades, thus eliminating 0 the slope entirely. 5) Temporary construction easements-Since these are temporary in nature, we would prefer them to be created by separate instrument and not via the plat. 6) "Easement Unknown" - this issue has been addressed on the revised final plat. 7) 10'GTE easement and 20'Seminole Pipeline easement have been addressed on the revised final plat. 8) No plat changes required. From: Alan Gibbs To: Cotter, Carol; Gibbs, Alan; Jordan, Craig; Mosley, Bob; Public Works Conference Room; Smith, Mark Date: 8/24/2006 Time: 11:00:00 AM - 12:00:00 PM Subject: Arrington Decatur ROW Place: Public Works Conference Room I hoped to meet to discuss the following regarding this project as the associated ROW dedication has been subrr�,itted for review as a plat and is currently slated for the 9/21 P&Z Mtg. 4424 col/1442os, Encroachments: U •ROW proposal has pre-existing esmts (gas and BTU) 10' "parallel"encroachments along the western ROW boundary by the pond •ROW proposal has minor"triangle"encroachment into conservation esmt at roundabout*42.04.0 'Doe-Stir M cif •Construction Plans indicate 20'to 50'"slope"encroachments along majority of reach along conservation ' esmt and there may need to be additional temp esmts Options to consider: -Conservation Esmts appear to require additional approvals for such encroachments -Shifting the roundabout to the east-20' may avoid the"triangle"encroachment -Reducing the ROW from 80'to 70' along the Arrington by pond would avoid the"parallel"encroachments -The"slope"encroachments may be difficult to accommodate -ROW dedication by plat vs. separate instrument TxDOT: They will comment on the plat review to the general location of the proposed ROW which should be acceptable. I would think the AFA would be needed before construction plan bidding, but not before ROW dedication. Alan Gibbs, P.E. City of College Station Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works aim wrift trWir COW•441411, tdttsa foDvis (rt, wit) rd 4 cwt.( C /c • • From: Mark Smith To: Craig Jordan Date: 8/23/2006 5:59:35 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Comment on BTU and gas line easements Let me talk to Legal first. I have the letter from Vuong with his recommendaiton that we move forward with it as is. I personally think we can live with it. Mark Smith Interim Assistant City Manager 979-764-3639 >>> Craig Jordan 08/23/06 4:15 PM >>> Mark, I am about to tell Walter P. Moore that if they can not get the Utility companies to subordinate to second position their easements to the Ctiy of College Station if the easement is with our public ROW on Decatur or Arrington that they will have to move the road. They have not said they can not, but we doubt if BTU will subordinate. Any comments. Craig Craig Jordan, P.E. City of College Station Public Works-Engineering Division 2613 Texas Avenue P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Phone: (979)764-3816 Fax: (979) 764-5014 Email: cjordan@cstx.gov Web: www.cstx.gov CC: Alan Gibbs; Carol Cotter From: Craig Jordan To: Camilo Daza; Ted Vuong Date: 7/14/2006 5:30:46 PM Subject: Comment on BTU and gas line easements Ted, As we discussed on the phone, the City requires that any Utility Easement(BTU or gas line easement, etc)within the future Decatur-Arrington Road property lines shall take second position to the City and shall be so recorded on the Title Report. Thanks, Craig Craig Jordan, P.E. City of College Station Public Works-Engineering Division 2613 Texas Avenue P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Phone: (979) 764-3816 Fax: (979)764-5014 Email: cjordan@cstx.gov Web: www.cstx.gov CC: Bob Mosley From: Craig Jordan To: kevin Sullivan Date: 8/22/2006 11:14:42 AM Subject: Arrington Rd. 12"waterline connection to ex. 24"at Highway 40 Kevin, I am still not directing anyone on how to get the 12"waterline constructed along with the road, but thought I would give you a heads up about the utility permit from TxDOT that you are going to need when the waterline is constructed. It is my understanding that the existing 24"waterline along Highway 40 is in fact inside the TxDOT ROW and the City of College Station does not even have an easement for this waterline. You might confirm this. So, you will be on TxDOT's properly when the 12"waterline is connected to the existing 24"waterline. When the plans for the waterline are completed, the developer will need to process the information necessary for a utility permit to TxDOT that Ken Fogle will submit. Craig Craig Jordan, P.E. City of College Station Public Works-Engineering Division 2613 Texas Avenue P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Phone: (979) 764-3816 Fax: (979) 764-5014 Email: cjordan@cstx.gov Web: www.cstx.gov CC: Alan Gibbs; Mark Smith; Spencer Thompson; Ted Vuong From: Alan Gibbs To: Jordan, Craig Date: 8/17/2006 10:23:40 AM Subject: Re: Fwd: Arrington and Decatur Roads Mark addressed these issues. Alan Gibbs, P.E. City of College Station Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works >>> Craig Jordan 8/17/2006 9:50 AM >>> Alan, So Kevin said Why can we not get approvals from all of you and bid the waterline work separately? It seems to me we will get a more holistic review this way. Can we do it this way? I assume not. Craig Craig Jordan, P.E. City of College Station Public Works-Engineering Division 2613 Texas Avenue P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Phone: (979)764-3816 Fax: (979) 764-5014 Email: ciordanCa7cstx.gov Web: www.cstx.gov From: "Kevin Sullivan" <KSullivan@walterpmoore.com> To: "Craig Jordan" <Cjordan@cstx.gov> Date: 8/16/2006 7:49:33 AM Subject: Arrington and Decatur Roads Craig, Please let me know when we will get your comments back in our office so we can move forward with our construction documents. Also, please verify that we need to submit our waterline drawings to Development Services. These will be the sheets that pertain to the waterline out of the set you are reviewing to date. Are you not giving any comments on the waterline in your review?You told me last week that you, Alan, Spencer, Tony, and Carol are all reviewing the plans. Why can we not get approvals from all of you and bid the waterline work separately? It seems to me we will get a more holistic review this way. As we discussed, I will apply for a TXDOT roadway connection permit on behalf of Tim Crowley in conjunction with our final plat submittal in order to avoid the AFA. I spoke with Rick Conlin and he sent you the geotechnical report for the roadway. He has recommended 7" pavement, but we used 8" pavement as this is the minimum-please verify. The median opening location along Arrington Road nearest Highway 40 is acceptable, according to Mark Smith. Please let me know should you have any questions. Thanks, Kevin P. Sullivan Houston Civil Engineering Services WALTER P MOORE Walter P. Moore and Associates, Inc. 3131 Eastside, Second Floor Houston, Texas 77098 713.630.7330 713.630.7394 fax ksullivan@walterpmoore.com www.walterpmoore.com <http://www.walterpmoore.com/> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s)are confidential and the property of Walter P. Moore and Associates, Inc CC: "Ted Vuong" <TVuong@walterpmoore.com>, "Camilo Daza" <CDaza@walterpmoore.com> From: Mark Smith To: Alan Gibbs; Bob Mosley; Craig Jordan Date: 8/16/2006 5:01:18 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Arrington and Decatur Roads 1. So, tell me if the following scenario is happening or not. I am not submitting the City street plans to TxDOT. Therefore, I am taking the 40/Arrington apron in TxDOT's ROW off my CIP street plans. No. Don't take anything off the plans. This is being submitted to TxDOT as if the developer were platting and developing this property. They will submit the site development plan to Ken and then Ken will send it on to the State just as if they were platting and developing this site. 2. So,we agree that the waterline on my Arrington/Decatur Road plans shown as by others will not be constructed by anyone from that set of plans. I am not directing Walter P. Moore on anything about the waterline, but I am going to tell them that because the waterline is not on the CIP project's plans that the waterline construction drawings must be submitted to Development Services for approval and construction and will not be bid with the Decatur/Arrington road plans. You don't have to tell them anything about the waterline plans. They are part of their site development plans and they should go to Development Services because that is who reviews all site development plans. 3. I have no comment on the bidding scenario, but I assume we(the City)will give Walter P Moore/owner a list of the bidders. I have nothing to say about the waterline plans during my bidding process to the bidders. I also do not want to be the one to even tell Walter P. Moore about how to do this. Last but not least, I do not see how the attached scenario you mentioned keeps the contractors from sticking it to them. They could bid the street low and the waterline high, because they know the waterline has to be built. Also,what if one contractor is very low on the waterline and a different contractor is low on the street bid. I am going with the low bid for the street regardless of the waterline bid. We will award to the low bidder on the street project and will give no consideration to the waterline bid. I like your position on our just providing WP Moore with the bidders list and leaving it up to them to gather bids for the waterline. We don't need to include any discussion of the waterline in our pre-bid meeting. There is nothing really that will keep the contractors from sticking it to the developer on the waterline. Mark Smith Interim Assistant City Manager 979-764-3639 Craig Jordan- Comment on BTU and gas line easements No String Avai 1 From: Craig Jordan To: Camilo Daza; Ted Vuong Date: 7/14/2006 5:30 pm Subject: Comment on BTU and gas line easements CC: Bob Mosley Ted, As we discussed on the phone,the City requires that any Utility Easement(BTU or gas line easement, etc)within the future Decatur-Arrington Road property lines shall take second position to the City and shall be so recorded on the Title Report. Thanks, Craig Craig Jordan, P.E. City of College Station Public Works-Engineering Division 2613 Texas Avenue P.O. Box 9960 College Station,TX 77842 Phone: (979) 764-3816 Fax: (979) 764-5014 Email: cjordan@csbc.gov Web: www.csbc.gov / From: Alan Gibbs To: Cotter, Carol; Gibbs, Alan; Jordan, Craig; Mosley, Bob; Public Works Conference Room; Smith, Mark Date: 8/24/2006 Time: 11:00:00 AM - 12:00:00 PM Subject: Arrington Decatur ROW Place: Public Works Conference Room I hoped to meet to discuss the following regarding this project as the associated ROW dedication has been submitted for review as a plat and is currently slated for the 9/21 P&Z Mtg. Encroachments: -ROW proposal has pre-existing esmts (gas and BTU) 10' "parallel"encroachments along the western ROW boundary by the pond - ROW proposal has minor"triangle"encroachment into conservation esmt at roundabout— goW Po StJ l MATrif -Construction Plans indicate 20'to 50'"slope"encroachments along majority of reach along conservation ' esmt and there may need to be additional temp esmts Options to consider: -Conservation Esmts appear to require additional approvals for such encroachments -Shifting the roundabout to the east-20' may avoid the"triangle"encroachment -Reducing the ROW from 80'to 70' along the Arrington by pond would avoid the"parallel"encroachments -The"slope"encroachments may be difficult to accommodate -ROW dedication by plat vs. separate instrument TxDOT: They will comment on the plat review to the general location of the proposed ROW which should be acceptable. I would think the AFA would be needed before construction plan bidding, but not before ROW dedication. Alan Gibbs, P.E. City of College Station Sr. Asst. City Engineer, Public Works S WALTER P MOORE August 16, 2006 Mr. Mark Smith Director of Public Works City of College Station 2613 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77842 Re: Arrington Road & Decatur Road Infrastructure Development WPM Project: 23.06003.00 BTU Easement Dear Mark: In the conceptual stage of this project it was agreed by the City and Walter P Moore to match the alignment of existing Arrington Road and to avoid the detention pond to allow for a volume for volume pre/post construction exchange. It was also pointed out at this time that the 80' Right of Way(ROW)overlapped a 60' BTU easement and a 30' ETC easement. We pursued both companies shortly thereafter to form a basis for agreements. We are still in talks with the gas company (ETC), but have received written acceptance from BTU to put our proposed ROW and roadway improvements within their easement. I have enclosed this correspondence for your review. The following are the proposed areas of encroachment: • 10-feet of the roadway Right-of-Way encroaches into the BTU easement • The sidewalk, waterline, and sidewalk portion of the bridge will be within the easement • No other structures or utilities that run parallel to the overhead utilities are proposed within the easement • The typical horizontal clearance from the waterline to the utility poles is about 20' • At the roundabout intersection the clearance from the waterline to the face of pole is 10' • Both Arrington & Decatur Road cross underneath the transmission and distribution lines with adequate clearance In our opinion, BTU will not subordinate their easement, therefore we recommend moving forward on the project with BTU's aforementioned approval. Sincerely, WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Ted T. Vuong, LE`ED® AP Associate Enclosure 3131 EASTSIDE STREET, SECOND FLOOR HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098.1919 PHONE 713.630.7300 FAX-. 713.630.7386 HOUSTON DALLAS TAMPA ATLANTA ORLANDO KANSAS CITY AUSTIN LOS ANGELES LAS VEGAS www.WALT ER PMOORE.COM BTU - Survey and roadway clearar Page 1 of 3 Kevin Sullivan From: Pat Kasper [kasper@btutilities.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:52 PM To: Camilo Daza; Randy Trimble; Roy Trotter; Gary Samford Cc: Ted Vuong; Thusitha Silva; Kevin Sullivan Subject: BTU Transmission/distribution -Survey and roadway clearance Camilo, BTU has reviewed the items below and BTU is okay with your utility assessment and the proposed roadway improvements within the BTU 60' easement. Please proceed and keep BTU apprised of any potential conflicts. Thanks Pat From: Camilo Daza [mailto:CDaza@walterpmoore.com} Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 3:56 PM To: Pat Kasper; Randy Trimble; Roy Trotter; Gary Samford Cc: Ted Vuong; Thusitha Silva; Kevin Sullivan Subject: RE: [JSpamFilter] BTU - Survey and roadway clearance Pat, Per our discussion this afternoon: • We will contact the owner of the overhead line running along Highway 40 that will have a 19.4'vertical clearance to the proposed roadway. • 10-feet of the roadway Right-of-Way encroaches into your easement. • The sidewalk, waterline, and sidewalk portion of the bridge will be within the easement. • The typical horizontal clearance from the waterline to the utility poles is about 20'. • At the roundabout intersection the clearance from the waterline to the face of pole is 10'. • No other structures or utilities that run parallel to the overhead utilities are proposed within the easement. Please reply to this email with your approval once you have reviewed the summary of our discussion. If you should have any questions please feel free to contact me. Regards, Camilo Daza,PE Associate WALTER P MOORE Walter P.Moore and Associates,Inc. 3131 Eastside,Second Floor Houston,Texas 77098 713.630.7427 713.630.7394 fax cdaza@walterpmoore.com www.walterpmoore.com 8/16/2006 BTU - Survey and roadway clearar Page 2 of 3 The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s)are confidential and the property of Walter P.Moore and Associates,Inc. From: Pat Kasper [mailto:kasper@btutilities.com] Sent:Thursday, July 06, 2006 6:11 PM To: Camilo Daza; Randy Trimble; Roy Trotter; Gary Samford Cc: Ted Vuong; Thusitha Silva; Kevin Sullivan Subject: RE: [JSpamFilter] BTU - Survey and roadway clearance Camilo, BTU has reviewed the drawings that you provided and we are okay with the clearances as provided. The one clearance (19.36') is to a foreign utility cable and you will need to get with that utility for them to answer your clearance requst. BTU is okay with sidewalks within the easement area and street intersections. It is our understanding that there will be no structures (lights poles, signal light poles, etc)with the easement area. Let me know if this still true statement. Thanks Pat From: Camilo Daza [mailto:CDaza@walterpmoore.com] Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:48 PM To: Randy Trimble; Roy Trotter; Pat Kasper; Gary Samford Cc: Ted Vuong; Thusitha Silva; Kevin Sullivan Subject: [JSpamFilter] BTU - Survey and roadway clearance Gentlemen, Please find attached a Microstation file containing the survey of the overhead utilities and the proposed roadway. As discussed during our meeting on 6-19-06 we established a minimum vertical clearance of 22'from an overhead electric line to the crown of the roadway. This minimum vertical clearance is met at all three locations where the proposed road crosses under the utilities. At the existing HWY 40 tie-in however,we have a clearance of 19.4'from the lowest utility(possibly cable or fiber optic). have included of photo of this line for your use. Please indicate if this clearance is acceptable. Please let me know if you should have any questions. Regards, Camilo Daza,PE Associate WALTER P MOORE Walter P.Moore and Associates,Inc. 3131 Eastside,Second Floor Houston,Texas 77098 713.630.7427 713.630.7394 fax cdaza@walterpmoore.com www.walterpmoore.com 8/16/2006 BTU - Survey and roadway cleara• Page 3 of 3 The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s)are confidential and the property of Walter P.Moore and Associates,Inc. <<Picture 005.jpg>> <<BTU SURVEY.dgn>> 8/16/2006