HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
1. Provide additional ROW for the creek crossing as the retaining wall appears to
be more apart of the roadway than a drainage system. You may also need to
adjust the PUEs in that area. Or redesign to stay within ROW.
2. The grate inlets seem like they would be a frequent maintenance problem since
the open ditches can carry a significant amount of debris. Have you considered
slots in the headwall with the flow dropping on to splash pads located in the
creek? Or any other alternative?
3. Provide more detail on the aerial crossing. The crossing should be supported by
piers. How will the suspended joint/hub be supported?
4. Add fire hydrant near the critical low point in the 10" water line.
5. Explain how you determined your flow rate in your water report.
6. It appears that the water line might be crossing the headwall near Station 55+52.
Show conflict. Can this be avoided?
7. Add culvert to the Headwall Cross-section detail.
8. Will Wellborn SUD allow their water line in the ROW?
9. Is the cross section provided for Channel 8 shown as "typical" or specific to
Cross-section A-A? Conflicting information is denoted.
10. What is the depth of the concrete ditch lining shown in the headwall cross-
section? Does the storm water stay within the lined portion?
11. Please label on the Plat the PUEs that are not "typical" in width.
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: July 17, 2006
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project:WILLIAMS CREEK PH 5 (FP) - 06-00500147
PLANNING
1. No comment.
Reviewed by:Jennifer Reeves Date:July 9,2006
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. Construction documents and reports still under review and may effect the plat.
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: July 10, 2006
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
1. Developer will coordinate with College Station Utilities (CSU) the lots to be served by CSU.
Lots on Block 6 to be served by CSU to include lot 4 and possibly lot 3.Lots on Block 7 to
be served by CSU to include lots 24, 23,22 and 21.
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design.
2. City will provide drawings for conduit installation.
3. Developer provides 30' of rigid or IMC conduit for riser poles. City installs riser.
4. Developer to intercept existing conduit at designated transformers and extend as required.
5. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer, developer to furnish and install conduit
as shown on electrical layout.
6. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2000 or later version of plat and/or site plan email to
gmartinez a,cstx.gov
7. Developer provides load data for project.
8. To discuss any of the above electrical comments,please contact Gilbert Martinez at
979.764.6255.
Reviewed by: Gilbert Martinez Date: 07-07-06
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained
in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans.Any additional changes on these plans that have not
been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. 2