HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence Laserfiche Agenda Manager for City of College Station Page 1 of 2
Laserfiche' Agenda Manage City of College Station
Welcome, Jennifer Reeves Viewing Meeting Type I Planning &Zoning Commission
Track Items /Submit Item V Approve Items I My Account 'elp I Log Out
* = re ired Save I Reset
Item
Item Details Item Fields Reports History
0 Item Details
Item Summary*
Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat - Residential fo]
Crossing PH.1 (FP) consisting of 37 of lots on 17.820 acres located at 2050 No]
Parkway.
Agenda Section Consent Agenda zj Submitted On 7/10/2006
Target Date 17/20/2006 717(Required) Submitted By Jennifer Reeves
Submitting Group P&Z Submitters Approval Status Rejected
1.1) Item Information
Attached Reports and Documents/Supporting Information
Add new report
Delete Report Name
lei !Staff Report
f2.1 !Small Area Map (SAM)and Aerial Map
r 'N !Application
aff
StReview Comments
E) History
Date and Time Action User Comments
7/10/2006 10:24 AM Created Jennifer
Reeves
Jennif
7/10/2006 10:24 AM Report Added Reeves Attached report: 'Staff Report'
7/10/2006 10:24 AM Assigned An approval task was created f
user Bridgette George.
7/10/2006 10:24 AM Assigned An approval task was created f
user Molly Hitchcock.
7/10/2006 10:24 AM Assigned An approval task was created f
user Lance Simms.
7/10/2006 10:24 AM Assigned An approval task was created f
user Carla Robinson.
7/10/2006 10:24 AM Report Added Jennifer Attached report: 'Small Area M;
Reeves (SAM) and Aerial Map'
http://lfweb.cstx.gov/amserver/ViewSubmitEditItem.asp?itemID=535 7/10/2006
Laserfiche Agenda Manager for City of College Station Page 2 of 2
7/10/2006 10:24 AM Report Added Jennifer Attached report: 'Application'
Reeves
7/10/2006 10:24 AM Report Added Jennifer Attached report: 'Staff Review
Reeves Comments'
'Y'2 "1. Staff RecommendationE
"(see Staff Review Comments
attachment)". 2. Comp Plan:
please include the density bein
proposed by the plat and if that
vifalls within the range of SF
Medium Density. 3. FYI: on mo
plats, the LUP, zoning, and
development of surrounding
properties aren't necessary. 4.
7/10/2006 5:23 PM Rejected Molly Hitchcock Comp Plan: please state if the
is in compliance with zoning an
subdivision regulations. 5. Plea
remove the extra blank line
between Comp Plan and Item
Background. 6. Item Backgrour
2nd sentence: "with the extentii
of Appomattox Drive with futurE
development to...". 7. Please
remove the extra blank line
between Item Background and
Related Board."
Save l Reset I
Powered by Laserfiche Agenda Manager Copyright 2005 Compulink Management Center, Inc.
http://lfweb.cstx.gov/amserver/ViewSubmitEditItem.asp?itemID=535 7/10/2006
APR, 26. 2006I 4r 1 PVl(AUr-�R HORTON- Summary - 4906-05-9743-01 No RECs O. 3067 F. 21of4
g7c1 69 3 -
acct
Darlene M Murphy
From: Harbour, Doug [DEHARBOUR@mactec.com]
'Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:47 PM
To: Darlene M Murphy
Subject: FW: Fojtik Property (AUS) Executive Summary-4906-05-9743-01 - No RECs
Douglas E. Harbour, C.E.T.
National Client Manager/Environmental Manager (Dallas, TX)
MACTEC, formerly Law Engineering
469.828.4100
469.828.4110, fax
469.828.4114, direct
214.566.0135. cell
This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary, privileged
and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the person'('sy to whoM-it is
addressed_ Any use, copying, retention or disclosure by any person other than the
intended recipient or the intended recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient or their designee, please notify the sender
immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies.
Original Message
From: Lampert,Jeremy
Sent: Tuesday,July 12, 2005 9:45 AM
To: Harbour, Doug
Subject: Fojtik Property (AUS) Executive Summary- 4906-05-9743-01 - No RECs
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Fojtik Property(AUS)
North Forest Parkway
College Station, Brazos County, Texas 77845
D.R. Horton, Inc. engaged MACTEC Engineering and Consulting,Inc. (MACTEC) to perform a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) of the above referenced property. This study was
authorized by Ms. Diane Czarnecki and confirmed by issue of MACTEC Project Order 9743010 on
May 26, 2005.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
1/4/2006Received Time Apr. 26. 3: 27PM
NPR. 26. 2006. 4: 41 PM(Ar ^R NORTON summary _ 4906-05-9743-r No RECs O. 3067 1P. 32 of
The subject property consists of 47.97 acres of land located along North Forest Parkway in College
Station, Brazos County, Texas. The subject property is reportedly being developed by an outside
contractor, with lots to be purchased by DIR. Horton upon completion of development.
The subject property, which is identified as the Fojtik Property (AUS), is located in the vicinity of the
latitude 30.61701 degrees north, and longitude—96.28455 degrees west.
SITE RECONNAISSANCE
The site and area reconnaissance was conducted by Mr.Andrew Sutton on June 7, 2005.
The subject property currently consists of undeveloped land with two dilapidated sheds and the remains
of natural gas well drilling site. The subject property is surrounded by residential development to the
north, a waste water treatment plant to the east, residences to the south across North Forest Parkway, a
church to the southwest and a commercial facility to the west.
MACTEC's site reconnaissance did not indicate recognized environmental conditions (RECs) to the
subject property.
HISTORICAL REVIEW
The 1960, 1979, and 1987 aerial photographs show the subject property as p-ri,Tr�s if undeveloped land, . --
with two small structures on the southern portion of the site, with a stream crossing the northern,
wooded portion of the property. The 1996 and 2004 aerial photographs the subject property as primarily
undeveloped land, with two small structures on the southern portion of the site, a stream crossing the
northern,wooded portion of the property, and a rectangular cleared area located on the eastern portion of
the property. Sanborn maps or city directories were not available for review for the subject property as
it has existed as undeveloped land. The 1960 aerial photograph shows the surrounding properties as
primarily undeveloped land to the north, east, south and west, with a utility easement along the
northeastern property border. The 1979 aerial photograph shows the surrounding properties as
residential to the north, a waste water treatment plant to the east, undeveloped land to the south and
west, with a utility easement along the northeastern property border. The 1987, 1996, and 2004 aerial
photographs showed the surrounding properties as residential to the north, a waste water treatment plant
to the east, residential to the south, a church to the southwest, a commercial facility to the west, and a
utility easement along the northeastern property border. Based on the history of the surrounding
properties, they are not considered RECs.
MACTEC discussed the condition of the subject property with Mr. Steve Arden, Representative for
Brazos Land Realty (Seller/Developer). Mr. Arden stated that he was not aware of conditions which
may pose an environmental concern for the subject property.
REGULATORY REVIEW
MACTEC's review of the regulatory agency information and area reconnaissance did not indicate
sources of environmental concern to the subject property.
ON-SITE CONDITIONS
1/4/2006Rece i ved Time Apr. 26. 3: 27PM
APR. 26. 2006, 4y41 PM(AU. R NORTON— Summary-4906-05-9743-0' No RECs NO. 3067 P. 43 of 4
During our site visit, MACTEC observed what appeared to be the remnants of a natural gas drilling
operation located on the eastern portion of the property. This area was identified in the aerial
photograph review as a rectangular, cleared area. Additionally, a small concrete pad, which may have
been a former generator mount, was observed on the subject property in this area. MACTEC reviewed
the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC) Well Location Map for the subject property. No wells were
indicated on the RRC map and no wells were located on the subject property in the regulatory report.
No evidence of drilling mud pits were observed on the subject property during the site visit, and no
visual staining or stressed vegetation resulting from the former drilling operation was observed during
the site visit. Mr. Arden confirmed the existence of the gas well site. However, Mr. Arden stated that
the he was not aware of environmental conditions which could represent a recognized environmental
condition for the subject property. As a result, the former natural gas well drilling site is not expected to
represent an environmental concern for the subject property. However, in the event that natural gas
wells are located on the subject property and are not intended for future use, MACTEC recommends that
they be properly plugged and abandoned in accordance with regulatory guidelines. MACTEC did not
observe on-site RECs to the subject property.
OFFSITE CONDITIONS
MACTEC did not observe off-site RECs to the subject property.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MACTEC performed thiF assessment in general conformance withthescope and limitations of
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E 1527-00 of the subject property identified above
to identify any RECs, in connection with the property, including the presence, or likely presence, of any
hazardous substances or petroleum products on the subject property under conditions that indicate an
existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release into the ground, groundwater, surface
water, or structures on the subject property, This assessment included an evaluation to the extent
practicable of the past and present land uses at the subject property and on adjacent properties.
The results of this assessment have identified no evidence of on-site or off-site RECs. The following
potential development issues were identified:
Natural gas pipelines were observed located along the northeastern property border and along the
southeastern property border during the site visit and during the aerial photograph review.
In the event that natural gas wells are located on the subject property and are not intended for future use,
MACTEC recommends that they be properly plugged and abandoned in accordance with regulatory
guidelines.
Two dilapidated sheds and a wooden fenced area were observed on the subject property during the site
visit. The sheds appeared to be primarily of wood and metal construction., with a small amount of
roofing shingle associated with the smaller of the two sheds. No hazardous materials were observed
associated with the sheds during the site visit. However, based on the age of the structures, the roofing
materials may potentially be asbestos containing material and should be removed and disposed of in
accordance with regulatory guidelines.
Based on MACTEC's review of the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map, one potential
jurisdictional wetland area was located on the wetlands map which was reviewed for the subject
property. This area is located on the western portion of the subject site and is listed as palustrine, open
1/4/2006Rece i ved Time Apr. 26. 3: 27PM
APR. 26. 2006 , 4:42PM �R NORTON NO. 3067 1P, 54 of4
1 YY .4.%./ 1.11�i 1vilVAeJ (AL �.,., �__. _ Summary - 4906-05-97430 No RECs
water,permanently flooded, and diked/impounded.
MACTEC requests notification for further discussion or evaluation of any new conditions discovered
during the development of the subject property.
This executive summary is presented for convenience only. While the executive summary is an integral
part of the report, it should not be used in lieu of reading the entire report, including the appendices.
Jeremy Lampert
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting,Inc.
Mobile:469-233-3421
Dallas Office:
16650 Westgrove Drive,Suite 600
Addison,TX 75001
Phone:489.828-4100,Fax:469-828-4110
Ft,Worth Office;
. ,. 2?00 Gravel Drive
Fort Worth,TX 76118-7123
Phone;817-284-7755,Fax:817-589-1420
1/4/2000ece ived Time Apr. 26. 3: 27PM