The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication FOR F CE`�LY CASE NO. 62 _7_ DATE SUBMITTED l _v (0,4 CrrY or CoLLEGE STATION 9:sodill Planning a Development S;ruin+ /' it'if • CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW FOR PDD / P-MUD &PDD ❑ P-MUD MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ✓ Application completed in full. ✓ $200.00 application fee. fe/ Ten (10) copies of the Concept Plan in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO. V Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is / applicable). ✓ Concept Plan Information sheet completed in full. Proof that the Greenways Manager has reviewed and approved your conceptual plan. lite Proof that th Parks and RecreatiofAd ory Board has reviewed and approved your conceptual plan. 4 idrwij,/ f rt.%,j__ Date of Required Preapplication Conference: t - 3 1 Z00`7 APPLICANT'S INFORM TION: Q S } cr Name(s) ►�^ — 11 ``�� l Street Address 7 1I c7 &\,,,A ` \ofluw City r G," State Zip Code 1 7 t b Z E-Mail Address 3;r') e°3-/-criy 9 m`'A: ( . co ~' Phone Number 11 ? - 6r r S Fax Number 17 (3 -47 4-1 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name(s) 1 Su,w,, •1- C r°S Sifh 5 1-i.-L //J r� 6 v\ Street Address 4-00 7-- 'r�S f)c v• l� City , 0 0 1 E-MailAddress '_ VcSta(+ 6kto , co`Y" State Zip Code 7 �� acv ; y Phone Number 1 b 6t ` 6 b 9, Fax Number 'it/4 - 960 This property was conveyed to owner by deed, dated ZOt/6 and recorded in Volume --1 S`t ( Page 2-Alk of the Brazos County Deed� Records. rr L General Location of Property: D r` Rix( 4- WGJT 6 F ( yy‘ I - O, Address of Property: t� SCD, 400( P---d-• Legal Description: ) . W - S c o-ti L C G / 4 Total Acreage: I D S. 3 4 Existing Zoning: PQ 0 Requested Zoning: PD 0 Present Use of Property: U ti`c o�-T Proposed Use of Property: 5 v,S<( lc,m1 1 y S( t i I i i 0/13/03 k 3 i CONCEPT PLAN INFORMATION Purpose and intent of proposed developm ent, as approved by the City Council as part of the PDD zoning: 'r k t..{— La;a be._ a k: k 66,-,c;74.1 rd:cto,4:,,_ ( eo r.n,u n : 1 w ) l It�I �.�w� o w� / j � ` ,t� `< P,°.�. �r c e rk chce c) C)uui. �1 aft! ' . Tk:f cLt-ic�......>< aW.c J� -T[e l �,� 1 cS e.,ire.-,doj A-v fAQ. Iro r ' Of0 , 7o)6o 14 neo , List and explanation of the land uses approved by the City Council as part of the PDD zoning: -TLC f�CI �Nf'� rl•dr• %c w%`I ►� 2-_Vv".�` F4 'A-4.J ciWc(I -S f 6vl ,V.Csi..,'elii� 1 1. r ib `c c,,J '-•%/--.1-u'..0s . 0/04-3•A�6-.t( 1dyi(�� \J� (Af Cc ,r,,( ,, !n 4f } 11 ,oc , n�� sr,,, r/ ,' NM GoIV, Of cc. 6✓ , FAN, ce-n`C. yct� c' r What is the range of future building heights: (S I -1-., 35- I Please provide a general statement regarding the proposed drainage: 54 /ee‘ Ic v a c- S.•) Oc.," k, . kJ -6 co \ t-'_ Xro<n� c -G,•.- f-\--k., 1r,,,Le .t 4,1 r-o�>a-z ,.4- t 1„GLS L, e t✓o�s� �� ,� .L L q-,..1,-+,,,...f ` , C`- 1 k /V^o1 I -.n'I" tr L:./k, Crc�•% e 'C'e r....\-.,�,,n Por�c�,J G-.-c� -�.� (�.Sc�c�l� List the general bulk or `dimensionaltvariations sought: d ck .,; c1 ov, rkv� .,. .,, \ 10l- S If variations are sought, please provide a list of community benefits and / or innovative design concepts to justify the request: O/)c (c` I p e Ck d.0-t_1-1 LAN- sh jrAc c rho ncc f-k Uc 50.:-4.c s p tIVie, �c.-5,(AQtkoc1 i,,.e • `1 cfc"--1 icn J fcc/I6_1 I'"l{o).��C v.,,-c< o1 ,_.)�G„r_IJ Fes` �(�o)w � 06� S. � � W't Ir/c� 0-1 G�. e -v rc<s,,,-A-- c(j-,,,,,,..7,..., rc 54 (:,A- 64=fid:—'2) 1.--t s , pay-it-2—) 0cc L c4- ,--( 51-<„Jc--c/ i (Please note that a "complete site plan" must be submitted to Development Services for a formal review after the "conceptual" plan has been approved by the Design Review Board prior to the issuance of a building permit—except for single-family development) The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached APPLICATION ANYONE THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY APOWER OF ATTORNEY ST A - ENT FROM THE O R. O O 1111_, NW APA,AtireAr.er.A A ._46, a-.0,1n7 Date Sig I: of owner or applica t (*11,44111 This checklist must be submitted with the application. All items must be checked off or a memo provided explaining why they are not. Gin'OF COLLEGE STATION !'1tnnin4 ti lMrlurnr,•nt Sen,ee, CONCEPTUAL PDD SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: t� 1. A key map (not necessarily to scale). �i 2. Title block to include: d Name, address, location, and legal description. Name, address, and telephone number of applicant QJ Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) Gr Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer(if differs from applicant) GI Date of submittal VI Total site area GI 3. North arrow. Li 4. 100-year floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there / is none on the site. lI 5. Show the approximate location of the following: Parking areas N 1 Pc I Building sites and an indication of their use Y1 Artificially lit areas 'j lk uI Open spaces/conservation areas Greenways Lar Streets and access G( Parks Schools N`s'� Trails Buffer areas (or a statement indicating buffering proposed) / I Other special features 6d' 6. Approximate accessways, pedestrian and bikeways. d7. Common and open space areas. r, PDD POLICY AS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 2001 The goal of the Planned Development District is to promote and encourage innovative development that is sensitive to surrounding land uses and to the natural environment. In order to justify varying from certain standards, the proposed development should demonstrate community benefits. To achieve this goal, the City of College Station has adopted the following policies: 1. CONCEPTS ONLY: A PDD should not be used to guarantee specific site or building characteristics within a development. A PDD should be submitted for multiple sites, and should not be used to apply additional development standards to a single site. 2. RELIANCE ON EXISTING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: A PDD should not be used to require buffering or other standards that are over and above existing district standards. If the existing buffering standards are deemed inadequate, the standards themselves should be reviewed and upgraded. 3. INNOVATIVE DESIGN: A PDD application should be encouraged where a development is to follow a modern trend style such as new urbanism, mixed use, or cluster, and that includes all or some of the following elements: ❑ Preservation of open space in prominent locations with good vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access ❑ Preservation of wetlands, ponds, or other natural resources ❑ Good connectivity within the development as well as connectivity to surrounding neighborhoods and thoroughfares ❑ Significant amenities located in highly visible locations with good vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access ❑ Preservation of significant tree stands ❑ Inclusion of neighborhood supporting uses such as workplaces, recreation, shopping, and personal services with orientation to the neighborhood and good pedestrian and bicycle access ❑ Incorporation of public transit waiting stations in pedestrian friendly areas ❑ Accommodation of the existing topography to minimize required grading ❑ A mix of residential densities and housing styles ❑ Inclusion of urban open spaces such as plazas or marketplaces ❑ Location of elementary school sites in areas easily accessible by pedestrians and cyclists ❑ Connectivity of natural areas within the development and to those in surrounding areas ❑ Avoidance of cul-de-sacs ❑ Traffic calming features ❑ Vistas ❑ Pedestrian and/or bicycle trails and paths ❑ Parking located such that it is screened or hidden from view ❑ Avoidance of a monotonous"superblock" ❑ A commercial frontage that is two or three stories, with architectural embellishments ❑ Street trees and peripheral landscaping ❑ Streetscape features 4. SENSITIVE AREAS: A PDD should be required in infill areas to assure similar residential densities to those of the surrounding area. ev loer may e to requst a PDD the proposed 5 result inOalteernati a bulk MODIFICATIONS: ds than cute P currently exist in the sCity of Colege Station fdevelopment development regulations. These may include variations such as: • Decreased lot size > Decreased lot dimensions • Decreased right-of-way and/or street widths • Alternative access to the public street requirements for lots, such as may be desired for traffic calming or to create vistas/views to internal or external amenities Reduction in standard buffering requirements or fencing requirements ▪ Increase in height restrictions • Alternative sidewalk requirements Alternative site landscaping requirements If the developer requests significant variations from the above list, the plans should also include a significant amount of elements from the first list of beneficial development elements.