HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes •
"(11;kr#
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning&Development Services
Minutes
Design Review Board
Friday, March 10, 2006
Administrative Conference Room
City Council Office
1101 Texas Avenue
11:00 AM
Board Members Present: Chairman Scott Shafer, Ward Wells, Alan King and Rick
Heaney
Board Members Absent: Hunter Goodwin and Nancy Sawtelle
Staff Present: Senior Staff Planner Trey Fletcher, Staff Planners Lindsay
Boyer and Crissy Hart! and Staff Assistant Jessica Kramer
Others Present: None
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order.
Scott Shafer called meeting to order at 11:00 am.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consider absence requests.
—Hunter Goodwin
—Nancy Sawtelle
Ward Wells motioned to approve the absence request, Mr. King seconded the motion,
which passed unopposed(4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve
meeting minutes for January 27,2006.
Mr. Heaney motioned to approve the meeting minutes,Mr. Wells seconded the motion,
which passed unopposed(4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Presentation, possible action and discussion on proposed
signage for Schotzis located at 205 University Drive in Northgate (CH 06-500027).
Staff Planner Crissy Hartl presented the staff report stating that the applicant is requesting
to paint a new sign on the front and side of the building. The previous sign was removed
and the applicant would like to paint a new sign on the front side of the building. The
sign proposed for the front of the building, facing University Drive, will be 32 square feet
and the proposed signage for the side of the building, facing Wellborn Road, measures at
36 square feet for a total signage area of 68 square feet. The sign will be painted on a
white background with green letters,highlighted in yellow.
Mr. Ward motioned to accept the proposed signage on front and on the west side for
Schotzis with the square footage to include background;Mr. King seconded the motion
which passed unopposed(4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Presentation, possible action and discussion on a variance
to the Non-Residential Architectural color palette for Popeye's Chicken located at
1842 Graham Road (CH 06-500033).
Staff Planner Crissy Hartl presented the staff report stating that the applicant is requesting
to implement a color scheme for each of the façades that are not on the approved color
palette.
Ms. Hartl explained that Popeye's Chicken is proposing to construct a new, freestanding
location near the corner of Graham Road and SH 6. As a part of the Non-Residential
Architectural Standards, the applicant is required to use colors from the approved color
palette. The proposed main color of the restaurant does not match an approved color;
therefore the applicant has requested a variance. The color scheme proposed has been
confirmed by staff to be the only color scheme used by the franchise. The proposed color
scheme would be applied to EIFS material on all facades.
Section 7.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance requires that"all building facades and
roofs shall consist of only colors from the color palette approved by the City Council as
amended by the Design Review Board".
The applicant is requesting an alternate color scheme that is consistent with the following
parameters:
1. The applicant is a franchised and/or chain restaurant to be developed as a single
detached building (not integrated into a multi-tenant building); and
2. The proposed colors/materials are part of its corporate branding; and
3. The applicant provides all of the alternative color/materials schemes the chain or
franchise has used.
The Design Review Board may grant a variance from the standards contained in Section
7.9 of up to 75% of the total percentage permitted.
Mr. King motioned to approve the variance as proposed; Mr. Heaney seconded the
motion which passed unopposed(4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO 6: Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A
Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not
been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing
policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the
subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
—Application Requirements
AGENDA ITEM NO 7: Adjourn
Mr. King motioned to adjourn the meeting,Mr. Heaney seconded the motion, which
passed unopposed(4-0).
APPROVED:
Scott Shafer, Chairman
ATTEST:
Mandi Alford, Staff Assistant
(Or,'151441
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning&Development Services
Minutes
Design Review Board
Friday, March 10, 2006
Administrative Conference Room
City Council Office
1101 Texas Avenue
11:00 AM
Board Members Present: Chairman Scott Shafer, Ward Wells, Alan King and Rick
Heaney
Board Members Absent: Hunter Goodwin and Nancy Sawtelle
Staff Present: Senior Staff Planner Trey Fletcher, Staff Planners Lindsay
Boyer and Crissy Hartl and Staff Assistant Jessica Kramer
Others Present: None
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order.
Scott Shafer called meeting to order at 11:00 am.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consider absence requests.
Hunter Goodwin
—Nancy Sawtelle
Ward Wells motioned to approve the absence request, Mr. King seconded the motion,
which passed unopposed(4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve
meeting minutes for January 27, 2006.
Mr. Heaney motioned to approve the meeting minutes,Mr. Wells seconded the motion,
which passed unopposed(4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Presentation, possible action and discussion on proposed
signage for Schotzis located at 205 University Drive in Northgate (CH 06-500027).
Staff Planner Crissy Hartl presented the staff report stating that the applicant is requesting
to paint a new sign on the front and side of the building. The previous sign was removed
and the applicant would like to paint a new sign on the front side of the building. The
sign proposed for the front of the building, facing University Drive, will be 32 square feet
and the proposed signage for the side of the building, facing Wellborn Road, measures at
36 square feet for a total signage area of 68 square feet. The sign will be painted on a
white background with green letters, highlighted in yellow.
Mr. Ward motioned to accept the proposed signage on front and on the west side for
Schotzis with the square footage to include background;Mr. King seconded the motion
which passed unopposed(4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Presentation, possible action and discussion on a variance
to the Non-Residential Architectural color palette for Popeye's Chicken located at
1842 Graham Road (CH 06-500033).
Staff Planner Crissy Hartl presented the staff report stating that the applicant is requesting
to implement a color scheme for each of the façades that are not on the approved color
palette.
Ms. Hartl explained that Popeye's Chicken is proposing to construct a new, freestanding
location near the corner of Graham Road and SH 6. As a part of the Non-Residential
Architectural Standards, the applicant is required to use colors from the approved color
palette. The proposed main color of the restaurant does not match an approved color;
therefore the applicant has requested a variance. The color scheme proposed has been
confirmed by staff to be the only color scheme used by the franchise. The proposed color
scheme would be applied to EIFS material on all facades.
Section 7.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance requires that "all building facades and
roofs shall consist of only colors from the color palette approved by the City Council as
amended by the Design Review Board".
The applicant is requesting an alternate color scheme that is consistent with the following
parameters:
1. The applicant is a franchised and/or chain restaurant to be developed as a single
detached building (not integrated into a multi-tenant building); and
2. The proposed colors/materials are part of its corporate branding; and
3. The applicant provides all of the alternative color/materials schemes the chain or
franchise has used.
The Design Review Board may grant a variance from the standards contained in Section
7.9 of up to 75% of the total percentage permitted.
Mr. King motioned to approve the variance as proposed; Mr. Heaney seconded the
motion which passed unopposed(4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO 6: Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A
Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not
been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing
policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the
subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Application Requirements
AGENDA ITEM NO 7: Adjourn
Mr. King motioned to adjourn the meeting,Mr. Heaney seconded the motion, which
passed unopposed(4-0).
APPROVED:
Scott Shafer, Chairman
ATTEST:
Mandi Alford, Staff Assistant