HomeMy WebLinkAboutstaff comments STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Planner Report Date: March 24, 2006
Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Meeting Date: April 4, 2006
Project Number: 06-00500019
APPLICANT: Terry Smith & Robert Smith
REQUEST: Rear Setback Variance
LOCATION: Proposed lots 3A, 4A and 5A, Block 2, Prairie View Heights
Subdivision
PURPOSE: To allow for a 15 foot rear setback for residential structures.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Status of Applicant: Property owners
Applicable Ordinance Section: 5.2 Residential Dimensional Standards requires
a 20 foot rear setback in R-1 Single-Family Residential.
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Zoning and Land Use of Subject Property and Surrounding Area: Zoned R-1
Single-Family Residential and developed as a single-family home.
Frontage & Access: 150 feet on Columbus Street
Topography & Vegetation: Relatively flat with some vegetation
Flood Plain: Not within a floodplain
VARIANCE INFORMATION
Background: The property was subdivided as Prairie View Heights prior to the
100 foot lot depth requirement for single-family properties. A variance was
granted in March 2006 to legitimize the existing 85 foot lot depth. Because of
the existing limited depth of the lot, the applicant is requesting a 5 foot rear
setback variance to increase the buildable area of the lots.
The Unified Development Ordinance requires a minimum front building setback
of 25 feet and a minimum rear building setback of 20 feet. On a standard single-
family lot (100' lot depth) the buildable depth is 55 feet. The subject property has
a buildable depth of 40 feet (see graphic below).
Home of Texas A&M University
Buildable Area
85'
100
50'
50'
The buildable area of the proposed lots is 1,400 square feet. The minimum
buildable area for a standard single-family lot is 1,925 square feet. The
proposed variance would create a buildable area of 1,575 square feet for each of
the lots.
ANALYSIS
Special Conditions: As a special condition the applicant states the following:
"Lot depths are only 85 feet." There is not an opportunity to capture more lot
depth to increase the buildable area.
Hardships: As a hardship the applicant states the following: "I will be unable to
use property similar to existing lots in area. All are 50 feet by 85 feet. There is
no way to capture 100 foot depth. Land doesn't exist."
Alternatives: There is no identified alternative to the rear setback variance
requested.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the 5 foot rear setback
variance request because of the 85 foot lot depth creates a smaller buildable
area than other standard R-1 Single-Family lots.
Home of Texas A&M University
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Ordinance Intent: The intent of setback requirements is to allow for some
degree of separation between adjacent uses for access to light and air, and for
the purpose of fire protection. These standards are typically justified on the
basis of the protection of property values. The Board must determine if the
intent of the ordinance is met by the request and should ensure that the request
is reasonable based on the special conditions and hardships.
Number of Property Owners Notified: 29
Responses Received: I have not received any inquiries on this case.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Small Area Map and Aerial Map
2. Application
3. Original Plat drawing (provided in packet)
Home of Texas A&M University
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Planner Report Date: February 28, 2006
Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Meeting Date: March 7, 2006
Project Number: 06-00500019
APPLICANT: Terry & Robert Smith
REQUEST: Lot depth variance
LOCATION: 617 Columbus Street
PURPOSE: To allow the property to legally re-subdivide.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Status of Applicant: Property owner
Applicable Ordinance Section: 5.2 Residential Dimensional Standards
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Zoning and Land Use of Subject Property and Surrounding Area: Zoned R-1
Single Family Residential and developed as single family housing.
Frontage & Access: 150 feet on Columbus Street
Topography & Vegetation: Relatively flat with some vegetation.
Flood Plain: Not within a floodplain.
VARIANCE INFORMATION
Background: The property was platted as Prairie View Heights prior to the
requirement to plat and prior to the 100 foot lot depth now required in single
family developments. In 1983, the applicants replatted Lots 3, 4, and 5 into Lots
A and B. Lot A is currently undeveloped. Lot B has an existing home that it
approximately 800 square feet in area. The applicants' intent is to remove the
existing home and develop the property as three single family homes. The
applicant requests this variance in order to return the property to its original
configuration, three 50 foot by 85 foot single family lots.
The existing lot depth is 85 feet; therefore a 15 foot lot depth variance is
requested.
ANALYSIS
Special Conditions: As a special condition the applicant states the following:
"Lot depths are only 85 feet."
Hardships: As a hardship the applicant states the following: "I will be unable to
divide the lots into 50 feet by 85 feet. I will be unable to use property similar to
existing lots in area. All are 50 feet by 85 feet. There is no way to capture 100
foot depth. Land doesn't exist."
Alternatives: There is no identified alternative to the lot depth variance
requested.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the lot depth variance request
because the depth currently exists and there is no foreseeable opportunity to
increase the lot depth.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Ordinance Intent: The intent of lot dimension requirements usually allow for
some degree of control over population density. These standards are typically
justified on the basis of the protection of property values. The Board must
determine if the intent of the ordinance is met by the request and should ensure
that the request is reasonable based on the special conditions and hardships.
Number of Property Owners Notified: 29
Responses Received: I have received one inquiry phone call. The caller was
not concerned with the variance request.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Small Area Map and Aerial Map
2. Application
3. Existing Plat (provided in packet)
4. Original Plat drawing (provided in packet)