The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutStaff Comments ()krII414 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning d Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570/ Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM February 11, 2008 TO: Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP, via vAmitchellandmorgan.com FROM: Jason Schubert & Matt Robinson, Staff Planners SUBJECT: CONGLETON CAR WASH PH. 3 (NRA) NRA Review 2 Staff reviewed the above-mentioned Non-Residential Architectural plans as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) revised set of elevation drawings Color and Material Samples If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised elevations, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments pc: Drew Congleton, c/o Gateway Fuels, LLC, via drewconq@aol.com Case file #07-00500330 -6g f • 0 • STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 CONGLETON CAR WASH PH. 3 (NRA) — NRA Review 07-00500330 PLANNING 1. Repeat Comment: Please define the architectural relief elements for the North Elevation. There are to be 2 different types of elements for every 60' section of façade. 2. Please provide the material and color percentages for the vacuum bay canopy. The canopy of the structure serves as the roof and should not be included in the material percentages. 3. Please provide color samples for the vacuum bay canopy. Reviewed by: Jason Schubert & Matt Robinson Date: January 28, 2008 lig CUMPTON AND ASSOCIATES,INC. •ARCHITECTS • 10770 SH30,STE. 100•COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS 77845 •(979)846-3771 February 20, 2008 To: The City of College Station From: J. Brett Cumpton — Cumpton and Associates _ Project: Congoleton Car Wash Staff Review Comments No. 1 (Dated January 28, 2008) 1. Repeat Comment: Please define the architectural relief elements for the North Elevation. There are to be 2 different types of elements for every 60'section of facade. Refer to Elevations for changes. See Drawings A 2.1 &A 2.2. 2. Please provide the materials and color percentages for the vacuum bay canopy. The canopy of the structure serves as the roof and should not be included in the material percentages. Refer to information on Drawings A 2.1 &A 2.2. 3. Please provide color samples for the vacuum bay canopy. All exposed metal on vacuum canopy will be painted red to match previously submitted red on the remainder of the building. Thank You. MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS C CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning d Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue,P.O. Box 9960 College Station,Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM February 11, 2008 TO: Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP, via v(c�mitchellandmorgan.com FROM: Jason Schubert & Matt Robinson, Staff Planners SUBJECT: CONGLETON CAR WASH PH. 3 (NRA) NRA Review 2 Staff reviewed the above-mentioned Non-Residential Architectural plans as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) revised set of elevation drawings Color and Material Samples If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised elevations, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments pc: Drew Congleton, c/o Gateway Fuels, LLC, via drewconqaol.com Case file #07-00500330 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 CONGLETON CAR WASH PH. 3 (NRA) — NRA Review 07-00500330 PLANNING 1. Repeat Comment: Please define the architectural relief elements for the North Elevation. There are to be 2 different types of elements for every 60' section of façade. 2. Please provide the material and color percentages for the vacuum bay canopy. The canopy of the structure serves as the roof and should not be included in the material percentages. 3. Please provide color samples for the vacuum bay canopy. Reviewed by: Jason Schubert & Matt Robinson Date: January 28, 2008 I 'ijVY C.)1 - 330 t1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 I Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 �lJ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MEMORANDUM January 14, 2007 TO: Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP, via v@mitchellandmorgan.com FROM: Jason Schubert, Staff Planner SUBJECT: CONGLETON CAR WASH PH. 3 (NRA) NRA Review Staff reviewed the above-mentioned Non-Residential Architectural plans as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) revised set of elevation drawings Color and Material Samples If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised elevations, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments pc: Drew Congleton, do Gateway Fuels, LLC, via drewcong(a�aol.com Case file #07-00500330 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 CONGLETON CAR WASH PH. 3 (NRA) — NRA Review 07-00500330 PLANNING 1. Within the legend of the building elevations, please provide the location and legal description of the lot in which the proposed building will be located. 2. It appears that the label for the South Elevation should reference the retail center with Winestyles instead of Cheddar's. Please revise. 3. The square feet and percentages of the Wall Finishes Listings for the North Elevation do not add to the total. Please revise. 4. Please define the architectural relief elements for the North and West Elevations. There are to be 2 different types of elements for every 60' section of façade. 5. Please provide elevations for the vacuum bay canopy. This structure must meet material and color requirements according to UDO Section 7.9, Non-Residential Architectural Standards. 6. Please provide a note that all signs are to be permitted separately. 7. Please provide a material/color samples for the 2 types of Split-Face CMU and the EIFS Finish on CMU. 8. The proposed development is within the Corridor Overlay (OV) district. As such, all colors are to be review and approved. Please provide a color sample for each item including roll-up doors, roofs, and canopies. Reviewed by: Jason Schubert& Matt Robinson Date: January 11, 2008 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 CONGLETON CAR WASH PH. 3 (NRA) — NRA Review 07-00500330 PLANNING 1. Within the legend of the building elevations, please provide the location and legal description of the lot in which the proposed building will be located. Please see the amended title block. Legal Description is 720 Earl Rudder FWY S, College Station; "Gateway Carwash Partners, Ltd., Lot 2RB, Block 1, Vol. 5931, Pg. 230, 0.418 Acres" 2. It appears that the label for the South Elevation should reference the retail center with Winestyles instead of Cheddar's. Please revise. Please see 04/A-2.1 and 05/A-2.2 for those changes. 3. The square feet and percentages of the Wall Finishes Listings for the North Elevation do not add to the total. Please revise. Please see 01/A-2.1, tabulation corrected. 4. Please define the architectural relief elements for the North and West Elevations. There are to be 2 different types of elements for every 60' section of façade. Please see clouded notes on 02/A-2.1, 03/A-2.1, and 04/A-2.1 calling out additional information to highlight the number of architectural features present in the multi- element, multi-structured elevations. 5. Please provide elevations for the vacuum bay canopy. This structure must meet material and color requirements according to UDO Section 7.9, Non-Residential Architectural Standards. Please see drawing A-2.2 6. Please provide a note that all signs are to be permitted separately. Please see notes on drawings A-2.1 and A-2.2. 7. Please provide a material/color samples for the 2 types of Split-Face CMU and the EIFS Finish on CMU. Samples already submitted under separate cover. 8. The proposed development is within the Corridor Overlay (OV) district. As such, all colors are to be review and approved. Please provide a color sample for each item including roll-up doors, roofs, and canopies. Samples submitted under separate cover. Reviewed by: Jason Schubert & Matt Robinson Date: January 11, 2008 • ffs.4,4 t1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 � Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MEMORANDUM January 14, 2007 TO: Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP, via vna mitchellandmorgan.com FROM: Jason Schubert, Staff Planner SUBJECT: CONGLETON CAR WASH PH. 3 (NRA) NRA Review Staff reviewed the above-mentioned Non-Residential Architectural plans as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) revised set of elevation drawings Color and Material Samples If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised elevations, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments pc: Drew Congleton, c/o Gateway Fuels, LLC, via drewconq(c�aol.com Case file #07-00500330 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 CONGLETON CAR WASH PH. 3 (NRA) — NRA Review 07-00500330 PLANNING 1. Within the legend of the building elevations, please provide the location and legal description of the lot in which the proposed building will be located. 2. It appears that the label for the South Elevation should reference the retail center with Winestyles instead of Cheddar's. Please revise. 3. The square feet and percentages of the Wall Finishes Listings for the North Elevation do not add to the total. Please revise. 4. Please define the architectural relief elements for the North and West Elevations. There are to be 2 different types of elements for every 60' section of façade. 5. Please provide elevations for the vacuum bay canopy. This structure must meet material and color requirements according to UDO Section 7.9, Non-Residential Architectural Standards. 6. Please provide a note that all signs are to be permitted separately. 7. Please provide a material/color samples for the 2 types of Split-Face CMU and the EIFS Finish on CMU. 8. The proposed development is within the Corridor Overlay (OV) district. As such, all colors are to be review and approved. Please provide a color sample for each item including roll-up doors, roofs, and canopies. Reviewed by: Jason Schubert & Matt Robinson Date: January 11, 2008