Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-00500210 FOR OFFICE US47 CI- 1CASE NO.: ��!O DATE SUBMITTEDV 0 COLLI.` 'STATION . .LJ ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Filing Fee of$150.00. ___ Application completed in full. Additional materials may be required of the applicant such as site plans, elevation drawings, sign details and floor plans. The Zoning Official shall inform the applicant of any extra materials required. APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFO ION(Primary Contact for the Project): Name p�Y� C7 e(--\•- �ot 5e Ca i I f\�yn '{o COI F f r"• J l Mailing Address 1 Lt 0 3 I'�n c-, U T City ( u 1\1 z f e .S 1"i t.'0,1State I / Zip Code 776`f'O E-Mail Address ..-. ‘0e‘.L U Q, I C H , /ale T Phone Number 616 61 10 Fax Number PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name 3(ANY\ Q.)-e-(--L Mailing Address (it O 3 i---No L'5 Q . City (....0 Ile ._ S ;t.1 t-),--1 State T 7( Zip Code 7 7 8 9-3 E-Mail Address )e c_L A e tL GI n e 1 rr Phone Number b1 6-91 to Fax Number LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Address 1`t03 Fr ix L6 0r, Lot z 5y-1Block B Subdivision Co.r s (,�ro.-z Description if here is no Lot, Block and Subdivision Action Requested: (Circle One) ( cc )e Appeal of Zoning Official's Interpretation Parking Variance Special Exception Sign Variance Other Current Zoning of Subject Property le S'�k.t/ t;fki Applicable Ordinance Section GENERAL VARIANCE REQUEST Genvar.doc 12/10/2001 1 of 2 GENERAL VARIANCE REQUEST 1,s-c-k. ►\e-mAcfvk ` 4 S t 6 e Sbac‘c. Rev csk ©F 5-F e The following specific variation from the ordinance is requested: \./0 J\ \;. to E.Ic}.e,A ,n o Q`>-( 6�Lk 10' , T1-k-- \et.)%))z ,✓ct; bu^1-r \t Joi E t I9 7W 'Loy\ivv4 3t I- bk4V1.- 1,-n,,,.i5 e ikk. Ile QC:)-Q vi 1-1,.2 , ;,,e_., �,-z ;At to eA P4„,� 15 i ,,,-. A---\,eA---\,e_. -7 L . Se fi be,,L L l 5ez .14-.1_k,Aur3, SJs• A! ,� c \- -es cX'0P(2, e1 <,fri ,,ate) L This variance is necessary due to the following special conditions: CA 1J2,-.7 Pti}tm Special Condition Definition: To justify a variance, the difficulty must be due to unique circumstances involving the particular property. The unique circumstances must be related to a physical characteristic of the property itself, not to the owner's personal situation. This is because regardless of ownership, the variance will run with the land. Example: A creek bisecting a lot, a smaller buildable area than is seen on surrounding lots, specimen trees. Note: A cul-de-sac is a standard street layout in College Station. The shape of standard cul-de-sac lots are generally not special conditions. h o vjtz k.,—ot) h ;1 + Pvfe C of e co-1.),J, V.,,,,� 1..,1NQ, . \p-e. o.,-e A Olt , o•�'• r( °k". i �v.s \- - r‘'k-U A\-c. 5e+-)?A J,JL r 31,31-- Spa) e lCi-t,n ‘sv,) 'r 9.1((5V.k9 tv..h.n c-kkve , +-...r }'\2r it),:, LI, . The unnecessary hardship(s)involved by meeting the provisions of the ordinance other than financial hardship is/are: Hardship Definition: The inability to make reasonable use of the property in accord with the literal requirements of the law.The hardship must be a direct result of the special condition. Example: A hardship of a creek bisecting a lot could be the reduction of the buildable area on the lot, when compared to neighboring properties. The following alternatives to the requested variance are possible: This variance will not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the following facts: I , sS 1\of `1 11-0 �� LSo c,L\-- CA,^/ \ a '��-e. YeO.,b ;Suss r0 b\c,nom S x.,-t.t-`, , The applica has prepared this applicat. n and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached heret ret 'e, correct and comp l . S. ature and Title Date GENERAL VARIANCE REQUEST Genvar.doc 12/10/2001 2 of 2 . • To whom it may concern: , This letter is to inform you that, as the neighbors of 1403 Francis Dr, We do not have any problems with the proposed expansion of the house. We are aware that the expansion is in the 7.5 foot side setback line and do not see a problem with it, since the existing house is already in the setback area. We are also aware that the reason the house is in the setback area is because the setback laws went into effect . 'er the building of the house. Tiiiii k yojil W / d ii deett,_ 74 /7e 0Ii- k.. . -Ac 44... ,_& 6 (4_, and Bets McSpadden L O l 0 k \ 6 'L q° w ,II, 71r0 ' N., C)0 r L\;,' P m @ it'414 tit.. , 43piste P--,q- m o 0 :r‘... C10 d " 4\y ,L, ,,\ r ti ° #*1 b� ,om ,,c, rn 7. lik eii—% 6----- 4 W4r. Q �C\ a � � . 61Z i 7jzz Q,7 Ott" mc ";_ 4110 (A _10) 4fr ####2,,o, '''''' * *141'1414,' c) "44* *co I ',--,' ---- Ilik•-, m #AR4Illii o /0k� , % m e ' 0� X T; : ' p.,, bLp1 N bQ, ti • 8 ,,jlA„, O o ii 'C oP V+ ® c,J _ 10/6, 90 066 :IP_ ' CQ d trifi o m L:�� sT000 0 ��� — Glu �\ ® 7:1 ,4. (/��N ( \ Oat' ` 0 Rk1,.._, o r V O '' Y 4% V,14s -�i q �o o H:A♦ 0 o ti J o 7017 �" \CQ U Bl xi 4 �� 0 #6,zol :,,,, 6' 44+#4* iiV,i4 ,,,, � \ q°,v of c.., ti CA ---q.,'W*-- A-,—,06, �O � i) #4 Z may,, �'�' m �'A in o q\\ 4J` o 44. y°\ Ah. 900 _it IT R Q o1) • '}0 y°y``R �`\\ °\�I F c:,, °\ °\\ 01 - ': MI �\ o o , 7 , q°\\ ,--,'''*\, �\ ###' .0� �® LS a°L COy C°t�v ,�\, r11`0 1 �' °\c:,�"�°c„ �"'n°\ 1-,,,C,\ . ` 4 'v 0�'. r 6,> a y°y \oL\ 0 o n\\ 40\ Z_-, �O o` �0° y`,o\` °�' N-q.'d`�o -_ 'Pd ''-,-,\ E-,-, 0, sO '':'o 0 0 ,,,) -.,-. 0\ e'-, 4,3„44 w C) n —.%%-,-_, %% \4\/,'�\,a U z yot\6 ,°y` �'��S.T �0\\o a�>> -0"�r6, \\�, C�s\` .-,:`,•. ,.n a0 S `` 4>z1,,y1��\\(,,p BOJ tti N o y\ `,-,' ,EPt 414' °L\ ti q\�`a0 4\` . ' •• t°\ae� ° OnL, v�''r ,., sem, C fit\ 8�0 \\\ `ol0[1 -��a�, ®. -- '�`� .4 ,4<,, oq, , ,� 4 `� v Lv 6` 7, 0ti i U p'v ,. N \t` ,, \t\ J t°L ° o e,, ��� o U ,., tl` I y\ ,, tt\ oma ti xr, rn n ti »oz OS sO m p ti nt\Y�4\t` ••/�I q yJ t,4 �"' p �, �� ,,,,,.,t #1110• -IBOa, „ qvL�4, ,,, " ;�,•Y_6-a y° A o�� /ix °p %��' c-', FSG ' °Ly\ `opt\ `o do L c'' 'o, 0' 00 0 E6>,r) Z',Ltt\ tL o ,�,qt\n\ �O �,L ��`0 - - oOy\ \AO';7.111111r, dye 0 �y �t qAy` L,L� 1601 S�46\'\ \Q�p ray`v 10, .g a °yL c't\ og y A 0 /� .� \t y ,,/,p1O /a • A:1 1 � a 4Lti � � �, r�\• 1 � D � � �,\�-d N 1501 -lir I �-'' 0 co -, - f'l I D `1/W � 0 -a\'''ti ry s - a v yot o 444.53,?0,, �yc,0 6isgatitelkismi alii4isomil �7�7 u NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing to consider a side setback var- iance for 1403 Francis Street,portion of lot 1 and por- tion oflot 2,block B,Carter's Grove.;Applicant is John Beck. The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the Col- lege Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue at the 6:00 p.m. meeting of the Board on Tuesday, November 5, 2002. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call(979)784-3547 or(TDD)1- 800-735-2989. For additional information, please contact me at(979) 764-3570. �s i. 4``: k J xl .. tea=`' 'V LN=i .F re I •A *11111 -: - f , ., ,._.0,___,,,._.,..........,.._.;. .._.._____,...,,,. „ , 1 63 '-0 .0iirs111111N011111Wilir'--- re R �� k 2.),,,, A x }� MINUTES Zoning Board of Adjustment November 5,2002 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 6:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Sheffy, Richards, Birdwell, Rodgers& Alternate Allison. MEMBERS ABSENT: Chairman Hill. Alternates Goss& Whisenant (not needed). STAFF PRESENT: Staff Assistant Grace, Staff Planners Reeves & Hitchcock, City Attorney Robinson, Action Center Representative Kelly. AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order—Explanation of functions of the Board. Acting Chairman Birdwell called the meeting to order and explained the functions of the Board. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consider any absence request forms. Chairman Hill turned in an absent request. Mr. Lewis made the motion to approve and Mr. Richards seconded the motion,which passed unopposed (5-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consideration, discussion and possible action on approval of meeting minutes from September 17, 2002. Mr. Sheffy made the motion to approve the minutes. Mr. Richards seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (5-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Consideration, discussion and possible action on approval of meeting minutes from October 1, 2002. Mr. Lewis made the motion to approve the minutes. Mr. Sheffy seconded the motion which passed unopposed (5-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Consideration, discussion and possible action on a rear setback variance at 3805 Bridle Trials, lot 3-R, block 2, Bridlegate Estates Subdivision. Applicant is Oakwood Homes. (02-208). Staff Planner Reeves stepped before the Board and presented the staff report. Ms. Reeves told the Board that the applicant is requesting the variance to legitimize an error made during construction. This case involves an error made by the builder in establishing the rear 20-foot setback. Therefore, the applicant is requesting an 18-feet 4-inch rear setback variance. As a special condition the applicant states that the concrete sub-contractor pushed the structure too far back, which created the encroachment. As a hardship the applicant states that if he were required to remove or rebuild the existing structure or the part that encroaches, it would harm the structure or integrity of the design. The elevations would be unappealing to the public. ZBA Minutes November 5,2002 Page I of 3 Acting Chairman Birdwell opened the public hearing for those wanting to speak in favor of the request Mr. Alton Ofczarzak, the applicant, stepped before the Board and was sworn in by Acting Chairman Birdwell. Mr. Ofczarzak explained to the Board how the concrete sub-contractor made the error. Mr. Ofczarzak ended by giving the Board a list of 3 homeowners that had no objections to the variance. With no one else stepping forward to speak in favor or opposition, Acting Chairman Birdwell closed the public hearing. Acting Chairman Birdwell made the motion to approve a variance to the minimum setback from the terms of this ordinance as it will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the following special conditions: the encroachment is less than 10 sq. ft. out of 2100 sq. ft. in the back yard; and because a strict enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship of this applicant being: clouded title; and such that the spirit of this ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done subject to the following limitations: variance is limited to 1-foot 8 inches. Mr. Lewis seconded the motion, which passed (4-1). Mr. Richards voting against granting the variance. AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Consideration, discussion and possible action on a side setback variance for 1403 Francis, portion of lot 1 and portion of lot 2, block B, Carter's Grove Subdivision. Applicant is John Beck. (02-210). Staff Planner Reeves stepped before the Board and presented the staff report. Ms. Reeves told the Board that the applicant is requesting the variance to expand the existing structure. This case involves an existing structure that extends into the current side setback. The structure was built prior to the current College Station setback standards. The proposed home expansion would be flush with the existing sidewall of the home. This would result in the addition encroaching 2.5 feet into the current required setback; thus the applicant is requesting a 2.5-foot side setback variance. The applicant states as a special condition that the home was built before current setback requirements were in place. This property was annexed in 1958 and was platted in 1963. In 1940, the city adopted its first zoning ordinance, which required 5-foot side setbacks on interior residential lots. This property would have been subject to the 5-foot setback when it came into the city. The current standard of 7.5- feet was not adopted until 1972, then it was build in accordance with the regulations in place at the time. The applicant states no hardship and no alternatives. Acting Chairman Birdwell opened the public hearing. Mr. Beck, the homeowner, stepped before the Board and was sworn in by Acting Chairman Birdwell. Mr. Beck told the Board that what he is trying to do is expand the master bedroom back 10 feet to make it larger. Mr. Beck ended by telling the Board that the homeowner's on the side that the expansion would occur wrote a letter stating they are not opposed to the addition. With no one else stepping before the Board to speak in favor or opposition, Acting Chairman Birdwell closed the public hearing. ZBA Minutes November 5,2002 Page 2 of 3 Mr. Lewis made the motion to authorize a variance to the minimum setback from the terms of this ordinance as it will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the following special conditions: existing home is already at 5- feet based on previous requirements in place at time of construction in 1967; and because a strict enforcement of the provisions of this ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship to this applicant being: unable to expand home in reasonable way; and such that the spirit of this ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done. Mr. Richards seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (5-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 7: Consideration, discussion and possible action on future agenda items. Acting Chairman Birdwell asked that an item be added to discuss the volumous minutes that record what everybody says. He told the Board of a workshop he attended that the city gave. It was for HomeOwners Associations and they explained the taking of minutes. Acting Chairman Birdwell told the Board that they were told the only thing that needs to be in minutes is the action taken. AGEND ITEM NO. 8 Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned. APPR s VED: / AI, Mt Leslie Hill, Chairman ATTEST: Or fa Deborah Grace, Staff Assistant ?A Minutes November 5,2002 Page 3 of 3 GENERAL VARIANCE REQUEST 6- •1s ne-mc4c-f os r4 5-R', e S '''Regokj GSk F e e� . The following specific variation from the ordinance is requested: 1 \l'c? �! Jl ti\t tc3 _-1( jZ �1 \n v�' ,J��k 0 )Z1 ‘v,/C.1 J b \ � \.�- v i''`k� � \1rG 1 /�.� 1 t l� 5e 1`�t�/ ���rl.t✓5 p _ I1 0-1 1-1�e 5:s• t to ; S: i ke -J t S S e fi b etj L (5-et A-}'k;nLwJ .��v�27 u"ey i" � \'}i NVQ. P }}e) This variance is necessarydue to the following specialconditions: Special Condition Definition: To justify a variance, the difficulty must be due to unique circumstances involving the particular property. The unique circumstances must be related to a physical characteristic of the property itself, not to the owner's personal situation. This is because regardless of ownership, the variance will run with the land. Example: A creek bisecting a lot, a smaller buildable area than is seen on surrounding lots, specimen trees. Note: A cul-de-sac is a standard street layout in College Station. The shape of standard cul-de-sac lots are generally not special conditions. 14-0k) \A---c4)\\ 1-.)...:1 + & k r C.�+ v‘ e tL1� \r'o C�'1.1 c�I es\L4-0,4.1 :�.. :ice t ' ,s-' S LONZ„ v•-,`Z <70<70-Q 'A 1Q Oy?:tv,t7 Ckv\� �V����.Yl� 1� 1" � J , I The unnecessary hardship(s)involved by meeting the provisions of the ordinance other than financial hardship is/are: Hardship Definition: The inability to make reasonable use of the property in accord with the literal requirements of the law.The hardship must be a direct result of the special condition. Example: A hardship of a creek bisecting a lot could be the reduction of the buildable area on the lot, when compared to neighboring properties. The following alternatives to the requested variance are possible: This variance will not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the following facts: fo.k. -\\- CZF,Va(.\-44 ��,�,,� ,\ ��\;, u,��, �3 4 �e v'\e;5h hvS4 w v z ']v h,na2 J \ 5 t\. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached heret ret e, correct and compl Z �_ 7— )0 S' ature and Title Date /7 GENERAL VARIANCE REQUEST 2 of 2 Genvar.doc 12/10/2001 To whom it may concern: This letter is to inform you that,as the neighbors of 1403 Francis Dr,We do not have any problems with the proposed expansion of the house. We are aware that the expansion is in the 7.5 foot side setback line and do not see a problem with it, since the existing house is already in the setback area. We are also aware that the reason the house is in the setback area is because the setback laws went into effect �er the building of the house. T kyo� n and Bets McSpadden 1 k 1 Z' Case Overview: This case involves an existing structure that extends into the current side setback. The structure was built prior to the current College Station setback standards. The proposed home expansion would be flush with the existing side wall of the home. This would result in the addition encroaching 2.5 feet into the current required setback; thus the applicant is requesting a 2.5-foot side setback variance ANALYSIS Special Conditions: The applicant states as a special condition that the home was built before current setback requirements were in place. This property was annexed in 1958 and was platted in 1963. In 1940, the city adopted its first zoning ordinance, which required 5-foot side setbacks on interior residential lots. This property would have been subject to the 5-foot setback when it came into the city. The current standard of 7.5 feet was not adopted until 1972. If the existing structure was built before 1972, then it was built in accordance with the regulations in place at that time. Hardships: The applicant states no hardship. Alternatives: The applicant states no alternatives. SPECIAL INFORMATION Ordinance Intent: Building setback requirements usually allow for some degree of control over population density, access to light and air, and fire protection. These standards are typically justified on the basis of the protection of property values. Number of Property Owners Notified: Responses Received: As part of the application, a letter was submitted stating that a neighboring property does not oppose granting of the variance. ATTACHMENTS Application Location Map Site Plan Letter O:\group\deve_ser\stfrpt\zngstfrpt\honda.doc \>)1/ c vt • ;O :;' Y �U as , -J CO R� . .mooot C CC +�G ,.•. ,•• 'C� C3 CO o ,E °S),,\• + . ,',/'' A', } .. ,?G v' •o •m / . . ..9 tx / \ • a. .'�j0 `'tea/ae Q E" '- 43 AD 6o \ \ A.<1) L."\4:V% r,i M .. .g'5. 3 6/(S'< ,e i \ n. �� d UO °N. / . 1 \,-.? \ '., A:I....Z. 9/, ie' `9 ••.ax �•• ••Qo gyp/ /. S'2 \ifa W a \� 9v \ , Z , z • �0 .-- �mc s . . — ac�a x. �g _1 m N \ \ \ \ \ \ >, \ c o 13 ca x \ u E o c C0 .g t o c o il CC E s EE ,SCO 8i N: � � � p np ip n mi c." n � tGo n �. cno 13 dol Op N � N N 0O � � N Ow � N Orit � t, t) t3tno r o �Z f I�7 � C Cr1 Z 0 gr hh O rn z p r � N _m_� Lu �7 � � C�r1 � t" G� C� rz � 0 . m ° lb YC� H � � Hon � lb ty a' 0 y 'q ,� y0 (43 4 r OtTi p �z Z Z n '�- (�%qpn O . O X k p < z v r G7 `;3< tr7 .- CO r m co 0 ° 3 j cn �° ..„I I X M co m D6- a o i N w ccN N.1 w N 00Q OSI N w (n 2� N D P.' N 031 I n p z o w L-L1�_I 117 m 0 moc�gj O mf 1nxmpm �c k , A t+` n a N m O N � 'moi 4^ fn`2 d N 3 nZ °S ..` w o 0 3 m 3. co Zo E.,-2 � O.t*5DHN N d cil co I " '+; ^' fr ;,,,,,..),:.-t-._ S5 pL` 3'+�kP. $ msmI ta. w 2 oy17. n gsae sd ` *`A " ' „ s,e>..gpyaO • LI o CD .I' 3TOTog lt' I (b cu X—r ° oy m ^ YmT O( _. npmo % (A{7yys '''',7•"` N CQNN�x J3I V ��C» 'm pd I I ma3o rnn � wmNymcom > `o3 - vay 7wa3 cc, .- UO3 aylmmmi=mn» = ammr IN- 53 H 9. oaso- • SoAo3I C . IF m23-875;1 81 ,71a>>NaL 1H a eft !fIt1 fl LI q A �a �I _o ����� •% 4,0 mmiaoy � .rte '` ,'1171. l , /i —h co at~ g G i I 'va t 3 . _ — t I m 8 3 g m , _-r--_ - T L 7 �._- I w c y s�a� — j ilZ n — ro 0 tg 64 to 4. ,--t to o 8 = 2 � vN zpNotno t- nMty > ,GZpoZ � � co m of 9 V1 r" v H `�U G) tr1p tr7 � tr70 O 0 a co y! 5 oo › dP' 4 '3 01 p g --i . -r:2-,c1 M 9-3dbd I IvZ a � 0 7� cn ;� '"3 k �j y to ybn y o o m A .A V] pp f.r .� I �1 Rp M m T CO 0 IVI Z -1 CJ S N, m m = X m 8 n R- - a om -711 n < o co 0 2I y I 30 o n �" 3 m z T w E. 0 3 I y 63 CD"G EqlIT. v w LS II [—I LI m 0- I om i a' mJJ Fe F o a cg Cm 3 0 7 I I i m c7 3 aFg S a � rm (� O p o m. m P.13. mo � d �- i I _ - 0 w- a. c ( I . I I ` m g. < c o x �� d JJ"y w C nI N W 3 W 3 3'w V �J I I�j a p'^ag "? oI .jO1) g $ 2�D dN a 4 ) � yX^a' ST n0, 2cfgo, n3oO2.wN axe_ t 0,Ea,m m o _.m m - I - - x ?C o w 3 _o� c aaI _2 n3 vig �'-0 � 3y�o �m'I I I I n'b. `. m o s y-? al d N "' w m j _ .I w w 3 0 a m u, ..'tet-'"�, 1 I I I tC N w _.-• m I .r' . : 1' ,1' , K51- .. .. - . 7 . If , ii _, „,„„2 ,_,,_ o rigy nv on ow E S•�ni'' I I n 0 wa im,1wi •. • m I I N T mnw '. m I W N 0_ 0_.too m'8'�-- —. I --.�- - I _.----i +. - - ----� N ~ .‘Oi n 0 y w J o w 3 N z = y uw � o3n Paz z1j { F g'?...-22 -6 §1 H ILls ndwxd g C ill III m3- 1 `3 _ OD ,,> w a 0 • w 3yo � - IL-gj 1L L I _ o iii H m w( 1 1 1 1 .. n = x N O ~p 7 O O — r y " — C N TIcjf Hf flF HF fl ?HHiHL g )-3 — F; M r.I.1 c) on pia o r k x z4 y '.< (4 � 4rril rt � p g xi-11 k r a yb r �a0 at7r 0. CO r' � w J v k `�1 a r k `Jd O r o < Z g x � v tG u.• X CO 0 m n 3 O N N t� Z v t9 CO m 3 Cb wQ N CA 0 W O W V1 `� o c N RP Oz I, .< o co o s NCT 00 o-! •-. D y i tai _� Z gl IL HI LI LI N Icox 5 m oom O ml n ac4Z va N 0 3 N m y 0 13 3 6 o I 3 w w Q m N I I I D N C y-O N n E ' 6 ,1 7C I I H`13 N W a n O N U51 1 G W II m ofo0 • — �Ooo omc:o�m ' =O m 00 m E. ` a - roNs@ .6.- ,,,, E. ..= o cV �to m L� Doom3oy ' 3 m j Sow»o m- 3 h O o9m •Dm53o mIOCy � cX? ��Ov c (n' . a3oc - mav_N�m3 ^vwc)ro FAR -°WQgmI.,,, cao n=P ` Ncm J N� wnmw °'CA000 alm1yNz ymE»» d -� 3 c 3 m� I��I N03a1 `L a>> A, m m m m �� _ -- _;...� .��.�5 � I t '.•;i Q fir. 0 ,73.Z-- 8-. p a..-. ;. ,Tog C/. O o d " w 3 m -� ( � N 1M nQ�»<° 1 S'52:o-cno�2l- ,_1. -) o n o.' my . .- rn-rn _ No,1111600, .0 f n03o m . ^ten,y w `��I m c zr 1 @a2N _L1 w �Cymny �- I 7 d owo3a tti !Q i !,,, Ill 3gJ I 0ttyd � ` , m� 22- 1 + 1 I Na ..>1C c m o r7 U 0 41#‘ . •::m CL 0 0 co z e %.,• ....:::.. ,,.• .:....... .... N>) 10 t..r 0 S 4 •• ►. \ Dy a'iJ �` 6 a Dc0• � p4�ti, �4 y � � / '�64- o� W •?1 'S��c ;s • ►� \ 2 ,, in ': `1 O c • \ s a O uo o ,I.., .. 6"/"/ . C... \P ' kt tl.c. e3: .• j .o ►, o n � CX ;9 \o. \ z c OD to \c-%22s. s \� p !-- oo OoN cr�a Jm to cc\ \ \ \ \ \ \ .. y, \ c v \ u E o c x u I jII i N� � 7 � . ' To whom it may concern: This letter is to inform you that, as the neighbors of 1403 Francis Dr,We do not have any problems with the proposed expansion of the house. We are aware that the expansion is in the 7.5 foot side setback line and do not see a problem with it, since the existing house is already in the setback area. We are also aware that the reason the house is in the setback area is because the setback laws went into effect . ser the building of the house. TA, y/ d -7i ko66,_ 74 /7e ?--- 4 n and Bets McSpadden 1 0 , 0 k ' 6 Z October 23, 2002 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Re: Variance request for 1403 Francis NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This is to notify you that the City of College Station is considering a variance request for the following property: Applicant: JOHN BECK Subiect Property: 1403 Francis (See attached location map.) Proposed Variance: Side Setback The Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, November 5, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. to consider the request. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Council Room located at 1101 Texas Avenue South, College Station, Texas. All owners of the subject property and property owners within 200 feet of the subject property have received notification of this request. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. For additional information, contact the City Planning Office, (979) 764-3570. Jennifer Reeves Staff Planner 10/18/2002 11:45 FAX 979 774 0053 EAGLE 10002 NOTICE OF PUI: LIC HEARING: The College Station Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing to consider a side setback var- iance for 1403 Francis Street, portion of lot 1 and por- tion of lot 2, block B, Cartel's Grove. Applicant is John Beck. The hearing will be held in tie Council Room of the Col- lege Station City Hall, 110' Texas Avenue at the 6:00 p.m. meeting of the Board on Tuesday, November 5, 2002. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 488 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or(TDD) 1- 800-735-2989. For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-3570. Jennifer Reeves Staff Planer 10-23-02 5-i2t: 911Dm. /ir: .2.79 se s/ 5b49222 /� 4,41711.NO. DATE , j DEPT. INm LLS I 1 0 TAK �91�e � G� ❑SEND '6l/ !j' MO. /AY YR.771 014UAN.CLASS SCRIPTION UNIT COST ,AMpliNT .1E7 lit-4_,,t,frAl , ' #C-I--- CO II Vi94-14•44.0 rg...Ge•A • ; 0 — /0 - 1..3 -eZ 1 a r V .( TM Word rimed kWaal on h4bm41EAnWtllo pay riuncut short TOT& sus I x Ipromise b peg such WM poperir Will ayaher Mope do Noon)eagedban0 I _.._..._.._ 1-2 Inexadameevithewomen'wvadgriaadrimaid TOTAL �J/ 1 �'/v UJ OR HERE X -- TAX kit co• SALES SUP TOTAL kr - w�dea aeoer LEGAL NOTICE DATE TO BE PUBLISHED: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2002 ONLY Deborah Grace BILL TO: The City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 MasterCard#5478-9900-0018-2794 Expires March 2004 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing to consider a side setback variance for 1403 Francis Street, portion of lot 1 and portion of lot 2, block B, Carter's Grove. Applicant is John Beck. The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue at the 6:00 p.m. meeting of the Board on Tuesday,November 5, 2002. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-3570. Jennifer Reeves Staff Planer