HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc. 6606(
DESIGNATION REPORT
• Needs Map of District with Architectural Style.
• Can the report suggest other boundaries that make sense too given the statement of significance? While we
would want a typical designation report to focus only on the actual area being considered for the overlay,
this has become so controversial that we will need options to have any level of success. Or perhaps an
accompanying memo? We can discuss this further on Friday if you like.
\")°\'' \i\jfk-e-6
DESIGN GUIDELINES
General
• Is it necessary to have such reduced margins in sections 4-7? It works well for the graphics in section 3, but
few graphics are being provided in sections 4-7. My preference would be that there be more illustrations or
pictures as examples; but unless more graphics are used, I would rather the text take up more of the page
and work around the existing graphics to save paper. •
'�l\O— v 0-L>144, of`„`�9;,
Table of Contents *ot OI ,c)4) \
• Yes, I think it would be helpful to have a more detailed Table of Contents, with page numbers too. We
would like to have this document as user friendly to the residents as possible. -�
• Can sections 4, 5, &6 be subsetted under"Standards for Contributing Properties"?
• Can the non-contributing standards be pulled out of 5 and 6 so there is a stand-alone section of guidelines
for these properties? It might be a bit repetitive, but I think that may be better than having those that have
the least amount of regulation try to do the most deciphering.
• Can sections 5&6 be combined for consistency(standards for rehab and for non-contributing properties
have them together)?
06)
Introduction
• This will need to be slightly modified if the sections are altered as suggested above.
Section 2
Section 3
• Map by Architectural Style needed
Section 4
• There are some outline issues in several places that I'm chalking up to this being a draft at this point.
• Page 4-5: please clarify in the text that the line of sight is from 5 feet above grade—the "5" is a little difficult
to see in the graphic.
Section 5
• Page 5-1 and 2,Setbacks:yes, I think we should repeat that the NPO setbacks will apply and refer back to the
UDO for specifics(just in case the ordinance gets tweaked at some point). Also, I think it would be better to
have diagrams 5-1 and 5-2 shown next to their first reference on page-2.
• Building Height:the group initiating the study should provide the heights. In most areas,that will be the
property owners.
• Max lot coverage:yes, please refer to NPO.
• Garages, open air walkway question: please keep. Our CBOs say there won't be building code issues with
single family(there would be for commercial). Are you aware of something they're missing?
• Fence height: we require building permits for fences above 8 feet(and walls over 6). Maybe that's a good
limitation. They could always argue to the Landmark Commission why something over 8 feet would be
necessary and unobstrusive on their individual property.
Section 6-okay I ) �' L�.ti.� Lif,
Section 7-okay (! `-rr
Section 8
• Height: urn,yeah. We actually define it two different ways in the UDO. The NPO definition below is
probably the one we should use. -Lk) v �, 1,0
Building height refers to the vertical distance measured from the finished grade, or the base flood elevation
where applicable, and the following points:
a) The average height level between the eaves and ridge line of a gable, hip, or gambrel roof;
b) The highest point of a mansard roof; or
c) The highest point of the coping of a flat roof.
• Historic District:we don't have a definition in the UDO—we have a purpose statement. While nice, I'm not
sure we need it because the UDO only refers to the specific HP Overlay zoning district. Is it needed for
clarification in the Design Guidelines?
• No-Build Zone: if it won't be used, let's take it out. �' `U' \ I )1) 01-4-4-14-"1
• Ordinance Maintenance: our language says no change in design, material, or outt(ward appearance. t"-' (
• Replication: seems fine to me. Was there a question on this one?•it;4_,"1 `"' 1 4,.'1 f'L'" -o ('J 9
• Right-of-way: seems fine to me. We don't define a ROW in the UDO. I can dig into our Code of Ordinances
to see if we have an official definition. The guideline in Section 4 mentions the view from the opposite side
of the street. This would not be as restrictive a test than (,f we required it from the ROW line, but the ROW is
harder to locate. 'v\-) e v\(.
• Visibility from a public way: see above.
\ C�
Section 9
• No comment
V
('f
■ 7
,. .r r
mc
ci. II e.
quimby rnCcoy Ya_ .r jr,„?,it [p,,n
College Station Landmark Commission Training DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW
Outline (January 20, 2010)
I. Introduction (5 min)
Qualifications and Purpose of Meeting/Training
��na ,A II. Governance (45 min):
(\IA ' X3,.,4 o History of Design Preservation and Importance of Design review)
UJ Role of Commission, Role of Staff and Applicant
/' (1f c''- k- What governs the Commission? /
4.e. Enabling7) Ordinance/Secretaryof the Interior Standards and Quiz (interactive)
r District Ordinance - notgoing to talk about Oakwood here! ,At ,jP,,�use �° ^ f5 ��
Z 4
I11. Methodology(Step by Step Process for reviewing applications) (30 min)
k.. What is the proposed "Treatment" (Restoration, Rehabilitation, Preservation, Reconstruction)?
h What is the significance of the property (Designation Report; cultural, historic, architectural)?
Architectural Styles
A---) ;',' f :-`— What is "historic" in a property (character defining features)? 101c.ol, U d u, at , J -107
;-.' What is"appropriate" (overall perspective): � ,` 7,' 'l
u, U
Retaining, protecting and repairing historic fabric lu �� wmrk(n y
, z, �- Replacement of missing or damaged historic fabric J �� e i w•a-�- Zo
Additions and New Construction
Ware he Commis ion's find'ngs a d flow to present them? Break?
IV Defining the term "Appropriateness" (45 min)
For repair
For replacement
For additions
For new construction
The Good,the Bad and the Ugly
Dispelling of myths and misconceptions
V. Quiz—Sample Certificate of Appropriateness (30 minutes)
Team exercise to review a sample CofA (interactive) Break?
VI. Mock Commission (I hour)
Demonstration and participatory exercise to demonstrate the process of review for a CofA
'Bad' Commission example—
'Good' Commission example-
VII Conclusion (10 min)
Q&A will be possible after each section of the agenda 5-.wv,,\rint..ol \>c QA s uv,, 41/%11'I t Q At 4'
Review contents of binder/handouts and discuss continued training need and options
3200 Main Street 3.6 Dallas,Texas 75226 ph: 214 977-9118 fx: 214 977-9119 www.quimbymccoy.com
Exhibit "A"
Scope of Services
This Scope of Services(SOS) stipulates the consulting and other services to be provided by Quimby
McCoy Preservation Architects and defines the tasks and responsibilities to be carried out by the
Contractor and the City of College Station to provide the products outlined below. The Contractor is to
be involved for the full duration of the items described in this document.
Presently,the City of College Station celebrates historic homes and buildings through the local Historic
Marker program. While the program provides the property owners with social recognition and the public
with some historic educational benefits,the marker status does NOT offer property protection or
regulation. It is the intent of this contract to provide the city the survey information needed to enact its
preservation ordinance(currently in progress) in order to protect and regulate with regard to those
properties designated as having significant historical value.
I. Historic District and Landmark Enabling Ordinance Review
The City of College Station will prepare a historic preservation enabling ordinance("the
Ordinance")to be incorporated into its Unified Development Ordinance. QMc will review a draft
of this document and will provide comments regarding organization, effectiveness, etc. in
writing.
Task 1: Preparation: Obtain from the City the background as to the intent of the Ordinance and
the implementation process anticipated
Task 2: Ordinance Review
Task 3: Comment
Deliverable for Service 1:
1. One (1) written set of comments providing an analysis of the proposed ordinance in Word
file format.
II. Inventory and Resource Survey
QMc will prepare an inventory of extant structures,buildings,places and objects of architectural,
historical and cultural value in the City of College Station that are forty(40)years and older
within the study areas defined in this Scope of Services. This resource survey will encompass
two areas of the city as defined by map diagrams and referred to for the purposes of this project
as Eastgate and Southside(see Exhibit"B" Survey Areas). The survey will not encompass the
Texas A&M University(TAMU)campus or TAMU-owned property.
The City has existing documentation "Southside Historic District Resources, A Comprehensive
Plan" dated 1997,which includes maps and photographic slides. This work should not be
duplicated but should be updated and incorporated as appropriate in the inventory and survey.
The survey will utilize a survey form,prepared by QMc with input from the City,that will
provide the following information for each property within the survey area: Property address and
Page 8
CRC 3/16/00
Contract No. 07-89
mhlo:Ideve serlhistoric preservationlsurvey contracticonsulting contract.doc
1/25/08
Brazos CAD ID number(provided by the City),historic name(where applicable),photograph,
general architectural description,the presence of outbuildings, special site features, stories,
heated square footage(provided by the City), integrity, function, architect(where available),
approximate date of construction (where available), and whether the property includes additions
or significant alterations.National Register criteria, level of significance, and potential to be a
contributing structure within a potential historic district will be defined on the survey form.
. Task 1: Preparation
1.1 Start-up meeting with City
1.2 Collect data provided by the City;perform research
1.3 Conduct interviews
1.4 Obtain maps provided by the City; format for use
1.5 Create survey form as Excel document; import City provided information
Task 2: Survey
2.1 Orientation drive through
2.2 Survey Southside
2.3 Survey Eastgate
2.4 Meeting with City--review survey findings
2.5 Complete survey forms; coordinate photographic documentation
Deliverables for Service I1:
1. One (1) paper and one (1) electronic copy of the survey form for each property in the survey
areas. The survey form will reference any associated photograph. The electronic copy will
be in Excel and Word file format.
2. One (1) electronic copy of the photographs for each property in the survey area, referenced
to the associated property by QMc. The copy will be in Adobe *.jpeg format.
III. Defining of Potential Historic Districts and Documentation
The preparation of the Survey Report will include history, statements of significance and with
maps detailing those areas within the survey limits that best represent potential historic districts.
This report will detail the reasons for the suggested boundaries of each potential historic district
as well as the significance of the architectural, historical and cultural resources that make each
area a potential historic district.
Task 1 Define potential districts and landmarks
1.1 Define potential districts and landmarks
1.3 Meeting with City—review draft potential districts and landmarks
Task 2 Presentations/Public Meetings
2.1 Present findings at one public meeting; obtain citizen input
2.2 Brief or present survey report to City Council or other government body
Task 3 Prepare Survey Report
3.1 Prepare methodology, final survey, and photographic documentation
3.3 Prepare general history
3.4 Prepare contextual history
3.5 Prepare statements of significance
Page 9
CRC 3/16/00
Contract No. 07-89
mhloldeve serlhistoric preservationlsurvey contracticonsulting contract.doc
1/25/08
3.6 Prepare descriptions
3.7 Prepare graphic material (photographs)
3.8 Prepare recommendations for further preservation efforts
3.9 Deliver Draft Report
3.10 Meeting with City to review draft report
3.11 Edit Draft Report
3.12 Deliver Final Report
Deliverables for Service III will include:
1. One public meeting of stakeholders to provide an overview of the project, solicit input from
citizens, City staff, and the Historic Preservation Committee, and to discuss a schedule and
milestones. Preparations and notification of meeting to be provided by the City.
2. One presentation to City Council or another government body at the request of City staff.
3. One (1) paper copy of Draft report and one (1) electronic copy of Draft report for review
purposes.
4. One(1)paper and one (1)electronic copy of Survey Report.
Deliverables# 3 and 4 will be formatted as 8 '/2 x 11 inch documents and will be in Excel
and Word file format.
Page 10
CRC 3/16/00
Contract No. 07-89
mhlo:Ideve_serihistoric preservationlsurvey contracticonsulting contract.doc
1/25/08
D Provide the staff for all research and data collection and documentation unless noted otherwise in the
Scope.
D Plan and record meetings with the City at regularly scheduled times.
D Provide staff with contact information to reach the project manager as necessary.
D Provide monthly written progress reports to the City in a format that clearly indicated completion of
or significant interim steps in preparation for or toward completion of all project deliverables and
meetings specified in this work program. The reports will also indicate activities scheduled for the
next progress report period and document any project delays or difficulties encountered and
measures taken in coordination with City staff to overcome them.
D Provide the completed project and all deliverables within nine(9)months of start date.
D Project manager should be willing to answer questions of the media if required.
D Provide public meeting space, planning,handouts and accommodations for the Stakeholder/Public
Meeting.
D Provide city maps with address, square footage, and Brazos CAD ID number, and other documents
and resources relevant to the project.
D Assign a staff contact/liaison to work with the consultant's project manager.
D Provide electronic data associated with Brazos CAD.
D Provide photography of properties within survey area,where available.
D Perform Public Meeting notifications.
QMc proposes a team composed of QMc and Dr. David Woodcock,FAIA as a consulting architectural
historian and historic preservation specialist.
I
QMc proposes to complete the final survey document within nine(9)months of the Notice to Proceed.
The following schedule is anticipated:
I Historic District and Landmark Enabling Ordinance Review 1 month, or less
II Inventory and Resource Survey 3 months
III Defining of Potential Historic Districts and Documentation 3 months
Page 11
CRC 3/16/00
Contract No. 07-89
mhlo:Ideve serlhistoric preservationlsurvey contracticonsulting contract.doc
1/25/08
Exhibit "C"
Payment Terms
Payment is a fixed fee in the amount listed in Article II of this Contract. This amount shall be
payable by the City pursuant to the schedule listed below and upon completion of the services and
written acceptance by the City.
Payment shall be made pursuant to the percentage complete and written acceptance by the City for each
task listed below:
Service 1 Historic District/Landmark Enabling Ordinance Review $ 1,600(billed over 1 month)
Service II Inventory and Resource Survey $ 18,300
Reimbursable Expenses $ 4,300
Subtotal $23,600 (billed over 3 months)
Service III Defining of Potential Historic Districts/Documentation $ 22,700
Reimbursable Expenses $ 4,400
Subtotal $ 29,900 (billed over 3 months)
TOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEES $41,000
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES $ 8,700
TOTAL $49,700
Reimbursable Expenses: include direct costs associated with the production of the Inventory and
Survey, including printing of drafts, and final documents, plotting, reproduction, reproduction of
archival photographs,travel expenses such as mileage, car rental, lodging, mail, and courier fees.
Page 14
CRC 3/16/00
Contract No. 07-89
mhlo:Ideve_serlhistoric preservationlsurvey contracticonsulting contract.doc
1/25/08
(*ff" ‘14
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 010
December 19, 2007
Nancy McCoy
Quimby McCoy Preservation Architecture, LLC
3200 Main Street#3.6
Dallas, Texas 75226
Re: Letter of Authorization
Dear Ms. McCoy:
Please accept this letter as written authorization to commence work on the draft
ordinance review and historical inventory and resource survey as outlined in contract
number 07-89.
Feel free to contact me at 979.764.3741 should you have any questions or need additional
information.
Sincerely,
Molly Hitchcock, AICP
Planning Administrator
Planning & Development Services
the heart of the Research Valley
P.O.BOX 9960
1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION•TEXAS•77842
979.764.3510
www.cstx.aov
2%
September 9, 2008
Molly Hitchcock, AICP
Planning Administrator
Planning& Development Services,
City of College Station
1 101 Texas Ave.
College Station,Texas 77840
Re: Oakwood Subdivision
Proposal for Historic District Designation Report
Dear Molly:
Quimby McCoy Preservation Architecture is very pleased to provide you with a proposal for services
associated with the writing a designation report and preservation criteria for the Oakwood Subdivision in
College Station. These documents may be used as models by the City and neighborhood residence for the
development of other historic districts and preservation criteria tailored to suit the goals of that
neighborhood. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal for your consideration. We look
forward to continuing the relationship that we have developed with you through our work on the historic
resources survey of the Eastgate and Southside neighborhoods of College Station.
1.0 SCOPE
QMc will provide services to assist the City of College Station with developing a historic district
designation report and preservation criteria for the Oakwood Subdivision. The designation report and
preservation criteria will be written in accordance with the recent historic resources survey of the Eastgate
and Southside neighborhoods and will utilize the recommendations outlined therein. The models for the
designation report and preservation criteria will be those used by the City of Dallas; however, it is
proposed that a more user-friendly document beyond these models be created. This would be achieved by
including photographs and sketches to illustrate the important features of the neighborhood and provide a
more understandable document for neighborhood residents. The scope of the project will be based on
three primary tasks.
Designation Report
Preservation Criteria
Public Meetings and Training
2.0 SERVICES
QMc will provide following services:
2.1 Designation Report
2.1.1 History/Research
QMc will conduct additional research in addition to that already undertaken in conjunction with
the historic resources survey of the Southside and Eastgate neighborhoods. Additional
research will be concentrated on the Oakwood Subdivision, its developer, its evolution since it
was developed, and its historic significance. This research is expected to be conducted through
the physical and online resources of local libraries and archival repositories, the Brazos County
Clerk, and Project HOLD.
2.1.2 Individual Property Research
QMc will conduct limited research on individual properties to help define the boundaries of the
historic district and determine the significance of individual properties. Research is expected to
be conducted at the Brazos County Clerk, and the City of College Station Building
Department. This research will include:
a. Architect and builder, where possible
b. Identification of significant residents and/or owners (complete chains of title are not
included)
c. Original design and significant changes to the buildings
2.1.3 Determination of Contributing and Non-contributing Resources
QMc will determine which individual buildings within the Oakwood Subdivision are contributing
or not contributing to the historic district, according to guidelines set forth in the National
Register documents: How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation, How to Complete the
National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form, and Historic Residential Suburbs. This
determination will include:
a. assessing each property's presence or lack of historic integrity
b. assessing the general condition of each property from the street
2.1.4 Compile Designation Report
QMc will compile the information gathered during the tasks identified above into a designation
report. The general outline of the report will include:
a. general logistical and background information
b. classification (including ownership, category, contributing and non-contributing resources)
c. physical description, including illustrations of typical terms and examples in the
neighborhood
d. historical significance
e. bibliography
f. maps, including map of contributing and non-contributing resources (to be created with the
assistance of the City of College Station GIS staff)
g. photographs (photographs taken during the historic resources survey are to be utilized)
2.2 Development of Preservation Criteria
The Designation Report and the Preservation Criteria are inter-dependent; one cannot regulate the
district without the other. The documents combined provide the basis for designation, and the
criteria for protecting that designation. Both documents work under the umbrella of the enabling
ordinance.
QMc will develop preservation criteria in coordination with the Designation Report and the City of
College Station enabling ordinance, and with City staff. These criteria will serve to help manage
change within the neighborhood, while being sensitive to its historic character and significance. By
using illustrations and photographs to show such items as appropriate and inappropriate alterations
and materials, the document will be easily understandable to assist the neighborhood residents in
making informed decisions about their property.
With the assistance of the City of College Station, QMc will also identify neighborhood residents in
order to discuss the preservation criteria and the needs of the neighborhood. One meeting with
neighborhood residents and/or stakeholders will be held to discuss the goals of the criteria and the
level to which the neighborhood wants to manage change.
2.3 Public and Staff Training Meeting
QMc will conduct one public meeting, with support from the City of College Station, to present the
contents of the Designation Report and Preservation Criteria. In addition to this public meeting,
QMc will conduct one training session with City Staff, and neighborhood representatives, the
Landmark Commission, or others desired by the City. The training session will both present the
Designation Report and Preservation Criteria and will include sample projects and interactive training
to help describe how these documents are intended to control development in this historic district.
As part of that training, an overview of the Secretary of the Interior Standards will also be provided.
We think that this will provide some guidance and will help make the Designation Report and
Preservation Criteria a model for other neighborhoods.
3.0 DELIVERABLES
QMc will provide the following deliverables for the services outlined above:
a. one paper and one electronic copy of final designation report
b. one paper and one electronic copy of preservation criteria
c. presentation in ppt format for training
4.0 CONSULTANT TEAM
Quimby McCoy Preservation Architecture, LLP - (woman owned firm) will perform the work
associated with this proposal. Nancy McCoy, AIA and Nicky DeFreece Emery will provide the
services described herein.
5.0 SCHEDULE
Work shall be performed in accordance with the following schedule:
Designation Report I month
Preservation Criteria I month
Review and comment period I month
Presentation and Training (2 dates) I month
The entire project can be accomplished in four(4) months.
5.0 FEES
Quimby McCoy proposes a lump sum fee as follows:
Designation Report $ 8,500.00
Preservation Criteria $ 3,800.00
Public and Staff Training Meeting $ 3,500.00
Subtotal $15,800.00
Reimbursable Expenses $ 2,000.00
Total Fee $17,800.00
Expenses for local travel (within Dallas-Fort Worth), in-house copying, and phone calls are included
in this fee; reimbursable expenses are outlined below.
Reimbursable Expenses:
The following shall be considered reimbursable expenses and shall be invoiced in addition to the fee
noted above:
Printing of drafts and final documents
Archival reproduction
Mail and courier fees
Mileage
Lodging
Meals
We would be honored to work with the City of College Station on this project.
Respectively submitted:
Na4,4-etj 1
Nancy McCoy, AIA
Partner
Authorization:
Molly Hitchcock, AICP Date
To: Molly Hichcock, City of College Station
From: Nancy McCoy, Quimby McCoy Preservation Architecture, LLP
Date: September 23, 2008
Re: College Station Survey—Criteria for Historic District Designation
Quimby McCoy (QMc) was asked to define some criteria that could be used by the City of College
Station to determine which historic district should be a priority for designation and criteria. As
discussed, this is typically a political decision. A neighborhood itself can be the impetus or a
neighborhood where there is known political will to be designated is often the best first case.The idea is
to designate a neighborhood where there will be as little opposition as possible as your first historic
district.
Our recommendation is to select a neighborhood where the majority of the property owners want to
be designated a historic district. You will never get 100% buy-in, but it is important to have the
neighborhood's support for this zoning change. I can't say it enough — the best criteria is a
neighborhood that wants it (and has been determined by our survey to have the characteristics of a
historic district)
But, there is other more imperial criteria that is commonly used to make these decisions. You are in a
great position in that the City is being proactive about this. Some common criteria, and the pros and
cons of each are:
Endangered neighborhoods: where there is known development pressure or impending
demolition or new construction plans.
Pros: Saving the neighborhood or historic structures
Cons: There will likely be a fight from the development community and neighbors
anticipating increased property values due to new development; controversial.
2. Age or most historic neighborhoods: oldest neighborhood
Pros: Saving oldest neighborhood or historic structures; often also most significant and
public understands this criteria
Cons: May not have the most integrity or most significant structures
3. Historic or architectural significance: where there are the greatest number of individual
potential landmarks, important historic properties or known architectural masterpieces.
Pros: Public understands this criteria
Cons: May not have the most integrity or most significance; don't select 1950's ranch
houses because public does not necessarily understand that these are historic yet
4. Consistency of style or other characteristic: where there is a clear, unifying and easy to regulate
character
Pros: Easy to regulate, simpler preservation criteria
Cons: May not be obvious choice to the public
--r--,,St- -
* ,AR,
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
September 19, 2008
Re: Survey and Inventory of Historic Resources
Dear Neighbor,
This letter is to inform you that Quimby McCoy Preservation Architecture, LLP will be
presenting the findings of their survey and inventory of historic resources in the Eastgate and
South Side areas to the City Council next week for their acceptance. While this item is not
scheduled as a public hearing, the public is welcome to attend and hear about the
consultant's work and their recommendations of areas in Eastgate and South Side that may
have potential as historic districts.
With the assistance and support of many of you, on September 11 the City Council adopted
a historic preservation enabling ordinance that will allow for historic preservation through
zoning for districts over 40 years old and deemed to be historically, culturally, or
architecturally significant. Quimby McCoy's report, documenting their research and
recommendations, is the second part of this historic preservation initiative. Their information
will help the City focus historic district research. As the report and its appendices are large, a
copy of the draft will be available next week in the City Secretary's office for public review.
The consultant's report will be considered by the City Council during their meeting on
Thursday September 25, 2008, which will begin at 7 p.m. in the City of College Station
Council Chambers located at 1101 Texas Avenue.
For additional information please contact me in the Planning & Development Services
Department by telephone at 979.764.3570 or e-mail mhitchcock@cstx.gov. Thank you for
your interest.
Sincerely,
Molly Hitchcock, AICP
Planning Administrator
O7-25_3
To: Molly Hitchcock
City of College Station
Planning Administrator/Planning& Development Services
1 101 Texas Avenue
College Station,Texas 77842
From: Nicky DeFreece Emery, Architectural Conservator and Historian
Re: Project Number 2008-01, College Station Historic Resources Survey, Final Draft Deliverable
Date: July 7, 2008
Molly,
Please find enclosed three CDs containing data constituting our final draft deliverable for the College
Station Historic Resources Survey project. This data includes the draft report, photographs, and survey
data.
It is our pleasure to work with the City of College Station on this project, and we look forward to your
comments on this draft, and the next project phases.
Should you have any questions regarding the deliverable, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Regards,
Nicky DeFreece Emery
(k.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
June 2, 2008
Dear Neighbor,
To assist in the establishment of a historic preservation program in the city of College
Station, Quimby McCoy Preservation Architecture, LLP has been contracted to conduct
a survey of residential and commercial buildings in the older neighborhoods to the east
and south of the Texas A&M University campus. The purpose of this survey is to
record buildings in relation to the proposed Historic Preservation Overlay ordinance.
This survey is only to inventory resources in the older areas of town and make
preliminary analyses of their historical significance. This survey does not rezone
property.
The public is invited to attend a meeting with Quimby McCoy Preservation
Architecture where they will present their findings and obtain citizen input. The
meeting will be held at:
6:00 p.m.
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Council Chambers, College Station City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue.
We appreciate your interest in the history of College Station. Please contact me at
764.3570 or mhitchcock@cstx.gov cstx.gov if you have any questions.
Thank you!
Molly Hitchcock, AICP
Planning Administrator
the heart of the Research Valley
P.O.BOX 9960
1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION•TEXAS•77842
979.764.3510
www_cstx_aav
AGENDA
City of College Station Historic Resources Survey
Eastgate Neighborhood
City Hall, College Station, Texas
6:00 PM
Introductions
II Project Briefing by City
III Survey Status by QMc
III History Charrette
Items to discuss:
• Where did people in the neighborhood typically work? Now?
• Where did people in the neighborhood go to school? Now?
• Where did people in the neighborhood play? Now?
• How did people in the neighborhood get around? Now?
• Where did people in the neighborhood shop and eat? Now?
• What were the social and ethnic backgrounds of the people in the neighborhood?
Now?
• Were there any neighborhood traditions, i.e., parties, organizations? Now?
• Who went to these parties, clubs, etc.? Now?
• Did these associations change through time as the neighborhood aged?
• Who lives in the neighborhood now?
• What were the social and physical landmarks in the neighborhood? Now?
• Who are the important people who lived here? Why are they important (in local, state,
and national history)? Now?
• Were there people who didn't live here, but had influence on the neighborhood? Now?
• Did any important events happen in the neighborhood?
• What are the well-known or architecturally significant buildings in the neighborhood?
• Was there anything important in the neighborhood that is no longer there? What
happened to it?
• Are there any other people that need to be contacted?
• Are there private collections of materials that show the history of the neighborhood?
• Are there any other history sources that need to be explored?
Page 2 of 3
*
February 8 2008
Mr Kirk Bane
120 Haines
College Station TX 77840
Dear Mr Bane
The City of College Station is in the beginning stages of a survey of historic neighborhoods wi
areas of tne city The subjects of the City s efforts are the Eastgate and Southside neighborhoo
purpose of the survey is to gain knowledge about the history of these areas and individual buildin
them and to aid in the development of boundaries that may be used for future historic district
purposes The surveys are being conducted by Quimby McCoy Preservation Architecture 1,1,F
David Woodcock FAIA of College Station is consulting with QMc on this project
As part of the survey, the City and QMc will be holding one history criarrettehriforination
meeting for each study area These meetings are designed as a means of collecting knowiec
residents of the community You nave been identified by the City of College Station and inviteo t
this meeting because of your knowledge of College Station or neighborhood history This ireetir
an open or public meeting and attendance is by invitation only Professional architectural histor
lead the meeting Out neighborhood knowledge is essential to make the upcoming surveys succes
On behalf of the City of College Station, we respectfully request your attendance at the history (
for the Eastgate neighborhood The meeting will be held at
The 2" Floor Conference Room
City of College Station
City Hall
1101 Texas Ave
9.7& 3570
on
Tuesday,February 19, 2008 from 6:00—8:00 PM
This conference room is located at the north end of City Ha li across from the elevators on tne
Historians will be present to bear about life in the neighborhood developments and changes tr
occurred important people. significant places and individual buildings neighbortiocci landmai
important events that nave taken place throughout the history of the neighborhoods Photographii
newspaper clippings and stores are welcomed and encouraged
Please RSVP to Nicky DeFreece Emery at nickyaduimbereccoe corn or at 214-977-9118
February 1$ to let us know if you can attend what we hope to be a lively and engaging sessic
your city's history QMc and the City of College Station appreciate your assistance and hope
able to attend this meeting If you are riot able to attend we would like to contact'you by phone
Regards
Nicky DeFreece Emery
are•httrarti irm, reNr.rtor ?nritirr•hitittrql iri {-4(4...trAtin
file://C:\Documents and Settings\mhitchcock\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\47AC92CD... 9/26/2008
Page 2 of 3
m
m
March 24, 2008
Mrs Nancy Tinier
1008 S Dexter Dr
College Station TX. 77840
nrtiner@suddentink net
Dear Mrs liner,
The City of College Station is in the beginning stages of a survey of historic neightyarhcoos vn
areas of the city The subjects of the City s efforts are the Eastgate and Sokrthside neighborhoo
purpose of the survey is to gain knowledge about the history of these areas and individual buildinç
them and to aid in the development of boundaries that may be used for future historic district
purposes The surveys are being conducted by Quimby McCoy Preservation Architecture bt_li
David Woodcock FAIA of College Station is consulting with Oliftc on this project
As part of the survey the City and QMc wi be holding one history charrettehriformation g
meeting for each study area These meetings are designed as a means of collecting knowlec
residents of the community You have been identified by the City of College Station and invited t
this meeting because of your knowledge of College Station or neighborhood history This meet!!
an open or public meeting and attendance is by invitation only Professional architectural histor
lead the meeting but neighborhood knowledge is essential to make the upcoming sirrveys S'JGCA'S
On behalf of the City of College Station, we respectfully request your attendance at tie history
for the Southside neighborhood The meeting will be held a:
Room 10?
College Station Conference Center
1300 George Bush Drive
on
Monday, March 31, 2008 from 6:00—8:00 PM
Historians win be present to hear about life in the neighborhood developments and changes tr
occurred important people significant places and individual buildings neighborhood landmai
important events that have taken place throughout the history of the neighborhoods Photographi
newspaper clippings and stories are welcomed and encouraged
We realize that this meeting is coming to you with short notice but hope that you can atteno
RSVP to Nickii DePreece Emery at nickyfutrimt...i.yroccoy corn or at 214-077,9118 to let us kno
can attend what we hope to t a lively and engaging session about your city s history QMc and
of Co;lege Station appreciate your assistance and hope you are able to attend this meeting If
not able to attend, we would like to contact you by phor*
Regards,
Nicky DeF reece Emery
Gr,..5-10ta."4turir`r‘n<c)frnr/Arrhitarq,
file://C:\Documents and Settings\mhitchcock\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\47E799BC... 9/26/2008
?a`
� y
AGENDA
City of College Station Survey Kickoff Meeting
City of College Station, Planning and Development Services
January 25, 2008 9:00 a.m.
Introductions
11 Status Review of Project by Task
\ \
Task I — Enabling Ordinance
Task 2—Survey
Task 3 —Potential Districts/Survey Report
III Schedule Review
IV Project Needs
City to provide
• aerials of project areas (same scale as GIS maps previously provided)
• PDFs of aerials and GIS maps of project areas
• Excel spreadsheet containing CAD ID, Address, Street, CAD date, square footage, and
owner occupied status (QMc to provide initial template)
• input on desired photo numbering protocol
• access to Project HOLD paper files for research
• suggestions on potential interview candidates (i.e., neighborhood liaisons, etc.)
• list of historic preservation committee members (potential interview candidates)
• notification to residents of neighborhoods prior to survey, and handout describing
project for residents as survey is conducted
IV Next Steps
• orientation survey
• historic research
• input available data into Excel spreadsheet and into survey form
• schedule interviews
• begin surveys
• schedule implications
/e a L < I ; s fx 2 4 <;; `, ase. b
ILls 4 '4
`*p.,... tc..cti 11.0M øI
Survey Areas
The study areas(referred to as Southside and Eastgate)will he used to define the scope of services for this
project.
l'he Southside survey area will consist o properties within the boundaries shown fl n the inap below,
40400E' **re-, 112.5'
..... ..___,
.......,..„ .....
7.---- 1/41).;1174---42;
li:11:•,,,',;:rtiki
"..
• ; 't V 1 , . .'' ;or . 1/14,t,c14414.,
A "" 11....,,,, (3.„',. ..,-..,,,,....i' 7.,
1.
V ‘ 11 40:
.
vi\ co
-) z -.7xj./--'!!-e'-A,:L-,..;I,,.g!:-',i'„-.',.'.n-y:•,.,2. ,;-. / -'-/----,.^1,.ir-l•-,,l,,,',.,....,6,.
-- . ' , -,,,,„ ) . . , , ,,c/ ..,,. , -,—,
/ .;,•'' l r....itt..1.4.,:',.. '. '. — --t "`. ',. -'/'!, ',:-0.'r , :-..,,,.. .., Irv.'
; ::,.......,
, . „,-,•. .,T.,,,,r,,,a,,,,. ... • - - . ...,,.//..i . . .
,,„Kr ./..., .. '""."' .,,- .
_. .
;6* - '...44.,..,-, 4 , , ..'. ..i-`-' ii-1., , --A'.
. ..
61)4 ,...,,
I 9 it ti .
, .. ,,J,., ., - . .. .-, . -. -;.r... --,•,•,- 1 F-p.- .i. ; 1.06x?„54,1 ' . - ' •
'-* ''' ---, - . 1-Jrr3/4-, .,6y-; , ,..e, :•.,. -•-• .. :.1.7--4'.: ,c,-;--r. . vit.m..0e,-„`:-.'4 , .,,,,' ; . . ,,- ,'' ' •:-- - • ' , ' '-• .' ' /
_
lq.... _
' • , --- - -,-•- / ;,/!,„, : ., , , - . : ; ,,,,,- i --: , f,orri ,06 4. _
-------z -;;.4-.- t--,,-c---:, z :-, :,. ,- - ; ' '. ' ''' `''F'.;. ;'' : .' '• I 1 n
.. . ....,.... ..
, ;.-.,i./. I;/,-, -.,-- , ..4:',7*..-- .-..--,1:, .., q145"1!",•?•7 7- ,; ,,,•,.:.! z-- l
,.. •• ''-, - ' , 1 ....i;-..y•,., .• ',", • -• -• • • . .-• i . •, ' •, • (dir,c:7 5 rovvc,tkc,
twL '..- ''' '-'L'''....''''' ''''- 4.Ili it 7 : It'ItUlI';
- - 1 ----r,,,.- ---;-, - ! Ar...„,.., - 1... --, 4„ , . f ; -i • -- ''"- ' . -
.'f„. netdt., •P.
-1.
' . • :' - ' ,::_if,.:1: 1:1.' ' ':'..:',','"-ii .-.. .;1: 1L.--',-;,..'ir.-: . ' - . - ' ' ' 1441 0,,, , 3
:,..,,_ ,,i./.i-,.,...,,-z-.!...ti.. ....., :-„.. r J.. '..., ...i • ,..,,,,,,,. . „ .,... .,....,..,,„• , . --:-. . .
,,. ., „:,-..:,-,-.,. ,,........ 3,...-4,....,,..........„,...,:.„, .......„ ..,-,. , , .— .. , . ......
F4
,:i !,;..;. - ;::.1 ,
.;;; ..-7--..--.2.,--'-'.,.: .
',:.... , ...:: -
' ',11r,
;TIT,I 'I" j', :',-j,•J. ''.,I',-:--,1,j J 1),jj :,":, :j,i• • 1 J ' ' 3,,exygg- ,.---- ,
,
,--
;:.,,,T.,,,;,,,;.3 ,3, .3„; ,•; ..,-,;,---:;._:3. s; ,,,,- 1- ','I! , ; .1..., -. litiiiii„.„ 01514• ',,Q(..1.v,z
.,:•7-7, s,..,.. -,,,:,.i ..- '''.--; c'.-.6--
- ,i2f,' ,-,-;'‘ 'Jt,, '. ,--t-. -- - - 'i•-' , ,,,--;L,, 0
e,,(4. .e.1..• ,,,9-• ! ' ' --' - &.--4‘.cf., ... . ! - ' ' ' ' - N,-. .x.,.. 0 Mer Alt- ,t6r.
_ .: ..- '
r , _ i_a ..:.... , i . ' `•-ao,o,J.' i,f;,•-•• - . ,-'
• - -1„ . J
--,
lirkti
'4'1'•,'-,....,
j , , ,, , ,, J. ;-,-,, „--jj:',1,•„jj',,..:, j , „' J. ' It ‘4) . ..
. 7,43t, ----
or ;;?, it ,,, 0,- ev catcr-gtertem • 1- t) <9. YeAti-S
Page 12
CRC 3/16/00
Contract No. 07-89
-----__
011Aô.telor,ierthistoth-presemation;cortyruct 4:a.writrng conircradoe
i'1./.211/0 7
t nriti 11,15TO?Ir.”. 441164r411 4; tit
. .,. , tc41/41110 $474>rtl-if 11- -
,. .
t4)430 trvet4kivs trivermi_ tits-ptifitc, ots.Tr46-/-
liZtilg\f"r
11/#24 tP lif. 04 1,4914fh o1491
1
he Eastgate surs e ,itca v.ill inii of prcipertics vNitliiii the hounchiries 'Ilii on thu map ht,loyc,
—
A
1
— " i-----"Alr"
1/11 Lzu......5-
..
••0...'
,
VI C 4E51 I P,* ..?
i ' t" _,..*, ,,*,...,,,,,,„,..........40,40..." rivet/14E0J iffr
... ,
, i
i4142,
.....-•--
,---` Pi."""
il .. _
14‘41$41141$10.
... --
_,... --,..,_,-
-
PANEVASI 1411-1to
Iiverog4t ,o.,leirro.„, :
°4 .00/' , ' o rfirStetti ECt3r4
4" ' woo.,'` :: , . - Th' truPAistet*
, .
14 .. ,, „
awoke sdieldr ; ". .
, tl --,;'-1 * ':: a-------. 1414tirelt.43,rlar 5 G
il4C0 =, i - .....,„,.-• m*
--ietutoop ,
,,, ..... , , . ,,, • , . ‘
Star cskitriS ,„ 7., -„, ‘,., "UPI 7.,, , .. ACitel5t,114tO
.. . .,
, . .
, t
'glob
civ
000000,, i / , ...0 A ••••• . e. • 1 . 1 /
i ,„: ,,,,,,,ed. ,/,', .„,, .4';'-',. iii, -;,,, ,-,,,„ - ,[:.. .,, ,,•-*"""44-tete, 'fr),/,
,,,,„v •,./i----, ....14,„
4 i
30 •
4 0„ .... 1 v-, # , 4
• 4,f
r-.404, : ',-", • : ', ,Ato ,
CO(-4,6 C,•1" ---'-' frily, ,,,,,ot ,,,, , ,r, ,,... / ma irt izu lc iiti
- ''' ' ',1;-!'t dil '''''''' 1' V- • / 1 I
0,0
7
_.000041°
---•- A i•l"i''6',ig # ail, "}:" ' di ' ' ' '' - ' ' '
„ '' ••• • .' '" . t ...i , 4i .40're' ..e. -. ' ' ' ' -'
.~'".4.4'Ailkt5TrY 1 4 4:I
t,:',tti i..t.. ,'," ' • - ''.
••••
.c,tyy‘zteuyl „„,,,,6.4.,ute6r6 El"1 Lt S
Page 13
CRC 3/16/00
Contract Na 07-89
Inh,17.Idevr_seri/Iota.it'p ovnoriod,rovamciicrmsieboAR ea.lintct doe
/ /2/O 7
FP : ft,"trep 04 DiornarMS writ iti,411'RiC0 i Utt,(0F•1111 IA 01.4315ak)
k4) topic^res MeNT11.4, 411-417ric tytml-
beatkep pep lar,LeakT5s ..Ateleirea, ttriretriott, vttsrric, tx5r.
80/57/I
ooplavamoa Suyinswoo\pailuoo dalunsiuoynniasadd oidoispivas-anap\:oqui
68-LO •oNloriluoD
00/91/£ 3}13
£1 °B1°d
J V-,1.---i-1.-1-11411-1---1 tlfrtitt Iiii-1-11-41-1 H , j __1
// 1 i 11--
, •L..... ....„...,, ,:::::::,T_N,L,_,t. • ..t.. -,_::,....t........,..........J....1_J - 1......_-..--- ! 1 ''-'' I
--,--------, , 1 r...--,.,-:
tra I[ i
................. 1 AINIV4001 !---1"--- L I_ ; 1 dIFT..i''')/). -''
1-1-----r-r, , ,---ri f• • t__
1 J j....1 j 1
=.7...... ......1...1....L.L. ! .! ) ...1 1 I ......1....I ! I .1...... ' L-..-.) -..-.(-'1.----FIrrITTTTI-TTLIITTFLIT 1",....--)- : 1 k I ' ' ' , '' -ri Tr• ri, .-........,....:
i ...__..F.,..::.2-1F----Ei.7..... 1 .Ti..........7""—""ji . . I ./ • i_ j; • 7 \ fl ii III , 1 , , / , , .....'-ii., ii I : • I • , ,
) 1H-1
,,,, .... 1.........._ ....1 I. I i 1 L-1---'-!-1 ! I. \ I I 1 i ...i.j j___. -L 1....b\-,./.L.,: H9friti-45..)e.igA:) -----/ H ' Illi.j1......2 t,
—..-.-------- —
-L., .._1 ....... ..._1 • ,- r 1
----(7- ,--.! -- ' .1— i i ....)?•._......A.1 i . ! , -1/4/.',!'/ I! 'I
'!,!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ' A:27---11.1.../\,.;•.-'.)---.4 ''',.-i I i 1 i •
7'• • - ....i....2 L.--HT, , 1 1 . I '-•---t 1 7' I 1 I-Vi 11 1„rali 1 LLI ri._:_tqa•FITH 1 I 1
1i-- •I 1—h- 't — • '--.1 ' t•-•,---1-2//----, ._.
I I I , 1 .11.//, I 1,,..- --s•'",, ! I_ ,t ......., 'A. 1 1 1 1 •I \ n-! 1 I '
, A , _....... ....... ' iriosih-/ I IL I )1 • I --) 1
,:z...._ .1 1 .1....).),_ ) . •
...am ,
_ —
1 ' f,), in e- *.•
IMF s§..-647/_fill "In_
i: L....
–— — _
t Ili*NIB 119 ,,,4
— x
. I 1 I SIONt/2d
111ii, siTis 'SIR _ u.)
411.1 1 b—
... ... or,
, 1 MI[ \ i il u mi. Ton
IP °410.\ 111Mi 1111...1011 MP' r
si.0
Igo,/ am_ pi. 1 p /) _., _
t•-• 1 i 1, ( 1 ...._......!...._ -..„
j I 1 Lt.,....L_LI 1 .. ----------N7//C1.--1 • -if 0'1 2;.).---0 1
..-_.
i.._.,,,, 17,-,ninli,L,,,,1 , . _........ IF- —1 ---1- ---- , '-,'•--,.\,L 1 ' 1.-NM z• • V'i :L A
.,, LL i-L-.... /1)-'.•-,-. i .-,
r--- , -- --' > :-- '----ic)'--c--"\‘\`''
•
fill \ F
L HL-t-, \-,, 1 , - j1--- 1
‘ ....., , .--- 7 j.,-',----1,,\ , . 1 , \ \ c ,it• it t 1 .,. I
" ,' .- -- --- , .:v d-,-N:10-mal
—. --T./ immg r . TI..„ 1 /...1.1.w.p.i.j.igilv..11 ...,J! .. H r-h• ,,....
,c —
II 1 , 1 H , 1, ]F.7.. ,,,, ........= :-..„L:::.
I7 1........ '--.........11 L.,........
.:i]
I , .1
1 '',., `--------
. 1 'Li---ri 1 . _i
/ ,., ., .. ..ii III 1
. . , . i 2, r- I .., U.I
1-1
i'-,... --,------- --",-- II sr1-161tjt 11 4t(i13-11.1111111J....i.TTH t
I i -. „/. / /11---.....,------,-------,----1-,--.... ei:1J—t-..- .--,---- :u.,
, r1-11 r...- LH j 1/2117:A ..1
/ tlY. I..I..: in ........, 'T, i i -1-- 1
1.-../ 1.„‘ ,,, / I Tfl..1".= I- • _lii_L.i....„...,
, .----..."i .1
,
",„ --,„/ f.--) ---------1 .j.......I• ., 1 7...F..4....„. ,
1 -,.„ ----__..4. , 1 iiii.„1• , ,,-., ---IL_.._,....i ..,..t.a....IT., ! )
_.........._...
/I---„/ --------[----- 1 ]).111,...iri I f..1.1.1..."...p..*f
F.1 ... 1 1 i FT
1/1-71c7-12, -;//..- ;-. ,, , / / /- ''.--.7 r----,..._._1- i -.7.1-An )AINI1-,, !, -1 !
--- _....i ,_„ !: [
, :E1
:, ......,
r ,,
,....... _,,....:.......0 , !
I ''' />,</I\ --;,•.c.,1 I. i'‘, - \/\, ; --; \ .
1 ,/./ \
i ....._ ... .......--.. c ,
),--cr."TrWr''''\ /
'' ' \K '-'-' • '-,, '' '.',.-:s,1 I -; .„` ,,, , .1
ith1.,
i /\ •••••••••••••--
) 1J1 q\----_,A\ lifilf Mill]ii_iy i
, 1. \ • , ,\' 2, ,/,,,,,-,• 11 J IT . L .
i \ V c->\;<•/.\ 1 [ . i . I
\'''''/I:'-,C,A, II 1 Hill ITITITE\.20.):7 T' • 1 1 , 1 ---1---------; I. Tr:,
•Akoioq dew alp uo umoqs souepunoq alp un.mm so!uodoid Jo is!suoo mm UWE iconins alulsua au
, )
80/SZ/l
aop• alluoa8uillnsuoatlan.4luoa tarunstuopntuasaadauoisiy\.Ias anapt:oww
68-LO •oN lO1 Iuo3
00/9I/£ DND
Z1 32Pd
F,-- 1.......(..:3,_-:,-----1::::),/-4,----1/1:1-11-7 l/ 1_ Wit.
/ 1-4}
F
J '
, � � . — C 1 �LT�f tr-,:,--:::: r..
�' �� i• I _l.�_411 L� i
irit-
\,,
�\ 3 \!I \ \�; --1--„,•. \;,✓\` r l 1,--.4.;�;�j ,/ (- i t::7),- 11
L,-,4-„,„..::� r ( 1 11.L 1 I �.���
\ l r11_iii ��4 r •1A"-- C r�ryr T, � t40 _ i .�f- � 1� � (J�� -.IJ.'.11,d, ''i i/
- .._..._- \..... <f 11 / �',
1:. Y,�r �� . f 11r ,f �7 .1 ' , /•
T 7 t` - ( `•�\ a\; - i g�. i / , l )(- r%'^`r; 1/_ :.7'44-1 t7( r.,—.-.iii 1
r
T
i' , ,i t ._-1 1 ...i....: k �11..17-
e..1 .... 1- I- -r\,,\ _. ~.. �1, ,,,--91 1.,-"i ..,I r j t`4 .._. r.....__n I 1
F C t NHY73l1UH.'..
1 1\:. 1 1 . ii I 1 J .::. ?I kiviN t ill.1.!: T_ ,_.... )- 1--1 I ! J
jj r
(
l
{
o /
I--
I I
r•-;.:-::. j' F,-.111K-L.L. 1 . �.n--{„--r-{J-.'f!,i '-.....SCJ ;' f �' ( i' '
i
I 1 —
71/.
` �.� l•-L-11----1_1 ( IT fr
1 1I - ,I
r
fi i _ , _ L._ 1 It. 1 .. V I aba ..... o _ »r..,d rardl1.:�u1 .I:11
\�_,,'1.'.:1l-i-1_,_�_ I r -•I i `�I' r lI
I
\iti
iiIii
{ ,— {1\ ..... J{■ �J i' il_ I�A1...1P.
I J .. .."' r ‹ //'
1 [ 11 llltfir o
7 = l L.
//
1
. •LH
l � t ry�'< 'r` I: _ _
I . i ...1.74 1,-- -, .• r. _ -�
I.__..�.� ._:_l_. 1_;_i .f_i 1 ... I l 1 — ,_,;`' I I I I ;/f-y/,
� I ( _i I
•nnoiaq duw aw uo unnogs saunpunoq alp uryltnn sa►wadoid Jo Tsisuoa !pm-ease Xanins apisq;nos aqd,
loa cold siq
.ioj saolivas jo adoas 044 augap o4 pasn aq ijtnn(aluSIsug pui apisg4nos su oi.pauaja.I)sua.re 4Cpn1s aqi,
SVa.iy Ban.ans
„a„;igigx3
L 0/9Z/01
oorloailuo3 SuIJ/nsuoa\pvJ1uo \uo/Jvi.1aS2.l(IJIAOJSI('�AaS anap�:o�yiu
68L0 °N�a�a�uo3
00/9I/£ JWIJ
£I 32ucl
4,,i.. ,
.. T z L•.! i..�. • 1 r -
1 i E ii 13 t i _. .S= I�
( .
� � - ,I , t
71
„i„ i—t1711 I t ' - r ltii i -Ft-477,
t 1 I
t -_. _•1 i
[ r.,
C t
,Y
�+.�Nva3
Il '-- €
E
x r S - r __ _ ,_�_ t �-' is �_ _.._ _. ....
�� �4sirw
1m
r,, •
_.---,•;-!!!--•••,•••-.r.,•3 F..... .3 R ............ E „ N te.5NI.:E ,I,J; i-,....J•
_a.7 S i �. __.
.I
I u7
i E- ff''
I L
l
E j 0
i
_ v
,, _ ,
. I
i - _... --- ...._.
iu
n.if?:3:�IN11
II
a
•nnolaq duuz aqi.uo umogssaiaepunoq aq;ului!nn solpadoaddo;stsuoa 1IlM Haan Xonans ave2ls-e2 au
L 0/9Z/01
dop'lobaluoa 8u7J1nsuoJ 7analuoa uo(pnnlasall/auolsrt(tas asap:o tjw
68-LO oN�o�a�uo�
00/9 U£ JHIJ
ZI aUd
+--f
{ r x t5,�gtt lt -- -
E
r i
i 77.1 tpr r.;r
•
VI f Q- L-1---,-....://`-/-;urPw r ' a _ ¢ r'`
ilk x t (_ F i. 7 5) ,,, h 1._
s1
1 ti
77 � t
} ° s, 6 S i Nk'6 :T CMI t 3 C
�I P
•
t�.; ifi � J�31NS213-r
. � ,��
r 4� 1 r_ _
•
..,... , ',--T-1-•-dI .. "
j
(t -s.--•- - 21-3H1(71
1 _� , Z '{ i yams NaV ',f
j g
�> ila
�, r O
i.�
r .,
} � - e�naal��
17
� � �. ..
to i T 1. ff ,! C r_ .. t
• 3
•
MJ
k':
:
•nnoiaq deur alp uo uMogs saiaepunoq alpu!gnm so iado.id Jo lsisuoo Iiim nonXonans op►sglnos 31.1i,
iooload
slip a03 sao!naaS Jo adoos aq;augap ol.pasn oq II!"(ow5isn3 pun apisgpnos s$o;paaaojaa)snare Xpnis aqd,
snaJy/Canans
«l3» l!glgxa
a�`V--1, < AN.
w\exc,A
akaav4.6
4) \IN° C(‘" aWD A. Cr )0-; rzt.olJ6
�� � u\sbv�