Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-00500257 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY P&Z CASE NO.: -1 (iries44- DATE SUBMITTED: ' SITE PLAN APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Site plan application completed ini full. V $200.00 Application Fee. etc $200.00 Development Permit Application Fee. PA.) td i PVN (Ye V-e-Lria,cy-F pt,-,,,.'• fv do1/4:4:. t ✓$600.00 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee if applicable. (This fee is payable if construction of a public 1 waterline, sewerline, sidewalk, street or drainage facilities is involved.) tr Fourteen (14) folded copies of site plan 7 ✓One (1) folded copy of the landscape p lan. 111Vine (1) copy of building elevation for all buildings. , O list of building materials for all facades and screening for non-residential buildin9s. ? We" olor samples for all non-residential buildings. C., .4. 4-0 w.c.k-.1. Pnv:oas 6,)-:14:---f I ►' Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable for non-residential buildings). V/A copy of the attached site plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off. NIN Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). Date of Preapplication Conference: 2. `1 -t- NAME OF PROJECT ki0('+ f1'k #-e i f WM'figrx( PW & n- `'I qi' Z-- ADDRESS `-t, 66k wl g,,,,c .- Fr=ek.ie y LEGAL DESCRIPTION N c r )--V\ Fit-R.1.4- 5.C.A look/(J to,-% • 6/0(4 2-, LOS (4 -- ! E i APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name e-Q S c�,..�, k)---z (3 E r Street Address 2_ O > 3 \i aft VVI.S�U 5# 11` () • . rr� City Cc3 cp.' f`-i-`'�,�� State '+- Zip Code 1 14 0 E-Mail Address 'ttu!`� Cc11 6e5.con-7 6Phone Number / -C -/ '( �C 1 Fax Number 6 4 .17 7 S `r PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name 111\ticu VeroLe LLL - Ereei t9 [ . S t Street Address i.1 Li 8!(.....,:-0„c., city{CCl J 1 t Se 5r(4:0-- State ( 'f- Zip Code 17 8f 5 E-Mail Address jot,/I; c@ C o,(-:4rn1 .e cm, Phone Number l9 c) I - b3(,,i Fax Number Co 9 3 - 6?6 S ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: c P Name C .v , O e o frr%e; 1 t'-}'e) --n JOC F. Street Address Z-� 3 3 /f`'/�- AN.:f-J- -t I4-1 City C-A(ft e S State T - Zip Code Cl 7 YET Q E-Mail Address CPQ ('�1 10ES•cc),ti Phone Number -164-7/ 't 3 Fax Number 1 61t - 7 75.9 1 „ra OTHER CONTACTS (Please s ecify type of contact i.e. projRct manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.) Name Ore -- 12 - L. f G-pl.c A it iec, .i, ) Street Address I S a qt c`f City ( u'21 - State Zip Code 7 ? )4 5 E-Mail Address rpoyr e e rI pGyne Phone Number 6 '76 - 1 Z-7 Z Fax Number 6q6 ' C? (/4 1 CURRENT ZONING ^ Q PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY CD-4:c e PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED AND REASON(S) NcAe # OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED ISL # OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED Z l Z MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARKLAND DEDICATION Total Acreage #of Multi-Family Dwelling Units Floodplain Acreage X$452 = $ Housing Units #of acres in floodplain # of 1 Bedroom Units #of acres in detention # of 2 Bedroom Units # of acres in greenways # of 3 Bedroom Units date dedication approved by P arks Board # of 4 Bedroom Units COMMERCIAL FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY Total Acreage # Bedrooms = 132 sq. ft. Building Square Feet # Bedrooms < 132 sq. ft. Floodplain Acreage NOTE: Parkland Dedication fee is due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto a : true a . correct. It . to —f 'Z -07 Signature o Owner, a gent or App ant Date 2.4! .r 's SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT INFORMATION Application is hereby made for the fo o-lio ving development specific site/waterway alterations: S. . U; ( °.,.,' V + OiJ... CJJ e : -.NIA-1)v f..,,.......4 i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: I, S o Ta h 0_ 5 ,./k42 , design engineer/owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that: The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design Standards. As a condition of ap•roval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this applicatio .ccording to th e tii umi'n,. and the requirements of Chapter 13 of the College Station City Code. IS v-cc r 4-11."_ Contractor CERTIFICATIONS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas.) A.I, certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year storm. Engineer Date B. I, certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any basement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended. Engineer t n C...OFvh� Date C. I, k Se 11, \ 1 °°° that the alterations or development covered by this permit shall not diminish the floodcarrying clicijaq of ten/te0 Vining or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or development are consistent v�jBrLquire s of the of College Station City Code, Chapter 13 concerning encro chments off-11flo w.4. a /•:k g,.Pi .rryd', Tz 3 �W 65889s 7o -12 -. 07 to 414,:•G'iSTER�•'," Date D. I, ‘41k,., Al�I- certify that the proposed alterations do not raise the level of the 100 year flood above elevation established in the�fa est Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study. Engineer Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited i n city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 3 of 6 PIN SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS 40 LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 14 FOLDED COPIES 0 6� OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW (*lir 6A CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 1 1\ Planning 6-Development ment S'rvices ' OP SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MU T BE MET) �/ // INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: NJ ' }Street size -24" x 36" (minimum). d v 6,key map (not necessarily to scale). itle block to include: 2' 1. 3111 e, address, location, and legal description t e, , tee c e, aa , aa telephonelephonnunumbermber ofof developeappliant r/owner(if differs from applicant) Csi me, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) CV a of submittal CV otal site area rth arrow. ZS f c should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. C".. .'1CLOC�jjtv6wnership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. ❑NitY e total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project �i sit he density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. 1 The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If L-1:) - \. .8 different uses are to be located in a single buil ding, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection. Locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site: Designate between existi nq and proposed ,c). tr. P asing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to m eet ordinance requirements. 7 vsildings (Existing and Proposed). r ' , 4 ✓Setbacks according to UDO, Article 5. �— Building elevations, color samples, and materials for non-residential buildings. n icate ? placement of materials on facades according to UDO, Section 7.9. o Include the following dimensions: • Total vertical square footage minus openings (for each façade separately) • Total vertical square footage of each building m aterial (for each façade separately) • Total vertical square footage of each color (for each façade separately) graphy � ater courses. 1 1 e , tOr 100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site, \NO �I Please note if there is none on the site with confirming FEMA/FIRM map number. Existing topography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) N Proposed grading (1' max for proposed or spot elevati ons) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) 0,.. 41, i1 i . ' a \P"i't*5 L s.'04 of 6 v I 4 Streets, Parking, and Sidewalks Existing streets and sidewalks (R.O.W.). 1/1b VILGO L ( Existing Driveways, both opposite and adjacent to the site according to UDO, Section 7.3. 611-1 ( .l !L� Proposed drives. Minimum drive aisle width according to UDO, Section 7.3 1" --11-1- Indicate proposed driveway throat length according to UDO, Section 7.3. I' Proposed curb cuts. • For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. vCir Proposed curb and pavement detail. • A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include island, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, /' etc.) No exception will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking". �(/ ✓P posed medians. L7 /Proposed sidewalks (both public and private). 110-61V-ACV /p -9 lY Proposed pedestrian/bike circulation and facilities for non-residential buildings (UDO, Section V CC/ . txr.-- 7.9) Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dim ensioned. • Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. Handicap parking spaces. i_jik Parking Islands drawn and dimensioned with square footage calculated according to UDO, Section 7.2 or 7.9 for non-residential buildings. n�t Parking setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot as required. IVB' Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be conflict with pedestrian or bike facilities, handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts. 1l'r lSecurity gates, showing swing path and design specs with colors. (� vt� ' " Guardrails. Include design and colors. Traffic Impact Analysis for non-residential development(UDO, Section 7.9) o Please note if none is required. Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? Yes D' r `ciNo ❑ If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application._. prey i �ep,,,,.,,i Easements and Utilities III/ vi.Easements -clearly designate as existing or proposed and type (utility, access, etc.) L� V Utilities (noting size and designate as existing or proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets. Lt' ✓Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report (if applicable) -- Pie v:�.; L. s"y^" "04 Q4,se 1 Li' ,/Sewer Design Report(if applicable)s4tt 2 l� '^Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary. 1 e� – , C o I(—� `�``�" tk O' ,---Meter locations, existing and proposed (must be located in public R.O.W. or public utility easement). �Vrovide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include o Minimum water demands o Maximum water demands o Average water demands in gallons per minute, and z o� Maximum sewer loadings in gallons per day Ud' ✓Will there be any utilities in TxDOT R.O.W.? Yes ❑ No CY- If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application. be jetA 40 paw haeL . p'z' eI (\is . rAvm i ( 5 of 6 • Fire Protection al Show fire lanes. Fire lanes with a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a public street or highway. AIPI ' ' GV Show proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a r major street as a project, and shall be i n a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure 1 in any zoning district other than R-1, R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire lane. NOTE: Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and dr ives must have an all weather surface before a building permit can be issued. Will building be sprinkled? Yes No ❑ If the decision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted. ❑ If Yes, Show fire department connections. F DC's should be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case shall they be any further than 300' apart, and they shall be access ible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure. Landscaping Landscape plans as required in Section 7.5 or 7.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plans such as: Ia. required point calculations Er additional streetscape points required. Streetscape compliance is required on all streets. B" calculations for #of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total landscaping points.) ©" proposed new plantings w ith points earned Q proposed locations of new plantings screening of parking lots, 50% of all shrubs used for screening shall be evergreen. screening of dumpsters, concrete retaining walls, off street loading areas, utility connection points, or other areas potentially visually offensive. ❑' existing landscaping to remain ❑' show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are up before the first development permit is issued. Buffer as required in Section 7.6 of the Unified Development Ordinance. 1� e Show irrigation system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met tut prior to issuance of C.O.) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demand submitted by applicant and must include backflow prevention protection. Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W.? Yes ❑ No If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted at the time of application. Other ❑ Common open spaces sites ❑ NrLoading docks $ 0 ❑ Detention ponds POI :- _•.•.. Sites for solid waste containers with screening. Lo tions of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or residential areas. Gates a discouraged and visual screening is required. (Minimum 12 x 12 pad required.) £I '> IQ Are there impact fees associated with this development? Yes ❑ No LK NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately. Vr,or6 �c) 11' !'Wn IU: U CIVIL DEVELOPMENT Ltd. CIVIL ENGINEERING&DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES TRANSMITTAL Date: November 19, 2007 To: Jennifer Prochazka Development Services City of College Station From: Joe Schultz, P.E. Civil Developme , td. P.O. Box 11929 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone: (979) 764-7743 joe@cdlbcs.com Subject: Site Plan North Forest Professional Park—Phase 2 College Station, Texas Remarks: Attached are 2 copies of the revised site plan and 1 copy of the revised Landscape Plan. Also attached is our response to the staff review comments no. 2. An easement dedication is not needed since there is a blanket easement on the tract and a Re-Plat has been submitted to dedicate the easements. Let me know if you need anything else or have any questions. Response to STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: NORTH FOREST PROFESSIONAL PARK PH. 2 (SP — 07-00500257 PLANNING 1. Again, this site plan is for Phase II only. Please remove notes, etc. That specifically pertain to Phase I (ie: parking calculations for buildings D & H) These notes have been removed. 2. All phases need to meet minimum requirements on their own. Phase 3 does not meet minimum parking requirements. Once the phase line and area is revised, please revise the landscape plans and points accordingly. Phase 3 has been removed. The project will be done as one phase. 3. The site area shown in the site plan notes does not match the site areas given on the landscape plans. The site area has been revised to match the landscape area. 4. Please provide material or finish of retaining wall (can be included in the NRA review). The retaining wall finish will be stone that matches the building. 5. As a reminder, an application for Non-Residential Architectural standards review needs to be submitted. Noted. 6. Please add a note to the site plan that the maximum square footage that can be constructed in Phase 2 is 17,509 sf because the NRA standards that were met are for a site with less than 50,000 sf. This has been added in the notes. 7. Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a completely new review. Noted. LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER 1. 2" caliper trees earn only 75 points, not 150 points, as indicated. The tree size has been increased to 2.5"caliper, which are worth 150 points. 2. Please indicate that the minimum 1%2" caliper for non-canopy trees is for a single-cane. This has been added to the notes. 3. Streetscape points should also be included in Phase 3. The additional streetscape points have been added, along with appropriate landscaping to achieve the required number of points. 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570/Fax 979.764.3496 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MEMORANDUM November 8, 2007 TO: Joe Schultz, P.E., Civil Development, Ltd., via fax: 979.764.7759 FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: NORTH FOREST PROFESSIONAL PARK PH. 2 (SP- Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Two (2) revised site plans One (1) landscaping plan If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments pc: Muco Verde LLC - Fred Bayliss, via fax: 979.693.8365 Case file #07-00500257 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. Page 1 of 2 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: NORTH FOREST PROFESSIONAL PARK PH. 2 (SP —07-00500257 PLANNING 1. Again, this site plan is for Phase II only. Please remove notes, etc. that specifically pertain to Phase I (ie: parking calculations for buildings D & H). 2. All phases need to meet minimum requirements on their own. Phase 3 does not meet minimum parking requirements. Once the phase line and area is revised, please revise the landscape plans and points accordingly. 3. The site area shown in the site plan notes does not match the site areas given on the landscape plans. 4. Please provide material or finish of retaining wall (can be included in the NRA review). 5. As a reminder, an application for Non-Residential Architectural standards review needs to be submitted. 6. Please add a note to the site plan that the maximum square footage that can be constructed in Phase 2 is 17,509 s.f. because the NRA standards that were met are for a site with less than 50,000 s.f. 7. Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not be made of aware of will constitute a completely new review. Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: November 8, 2007 LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER 1. 2" caliper trees earn only 75 points, not 150 points, as indicated. 2. Please indicate that the minimum 1 1/2" caliper for non-canopy trees is for a single-cane. 3. Streetscape points should also be included for Phase 3. Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: November 8, 2007 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans.Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. Page 2 of 2 CiijeL30 O1, 1 CIVIL DEVELOPMENT, Ltd. CIVIL ENGINEERING&DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES TRANSMITTAL Date: November 5, 2007 To: Jennifer Prochazka Development Services City of College Station From: Joe Schultz, P.E. Civil Developmen , Ltd. P.O. Box 11929 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone: (979) 764-7743 joe@cdlbcs.com Subject: Site Plan North Forest Professional Park—Phase 2 & 3 College Station, Texas Remarks: Attached are 2 copies of the revised site plan, 1 copy of the revised Landscape Plan, 1 — 11"x 17"copy of the grading and erosion control plans and 2 copies of the revised construction drawings. Also attached are our response to the staff review comments, a fire flow water report and a cost estimate of the public infrastructure. An easement dedication is not needed since there is a blanket easement on the tract and a Re-Plat has been submitted to dedicate the easements. Let me know if you need anything else or have any questions. Response to STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: NORTH FOREST PROFESSIONAL PARK PH. 2 (SP — 07-00500257 INNING This site plan is for Phase II only. Please differentiate between Phase I (what is already co _ -: . _ (by line weight, etc.). Phase I lines should be the same as on the approved Phase I site plan. lit _ Phase I has been lightened to further differentiate. . The site plan should be further phased since no structures are currently proposed on Lot 1E-R. Site plan has been further phased. ve By including the parking, etc. surrounding Lot 1E-R in the same phase as the structure on Lot 1B and 1C, the Certificate of Occupancy for the structure will be tied to the site work on the other side of the site. Is this your intention? 140 . re)'1-a, ,,4/Please include labels instead of numbered notes on the site plan. I ."-ryLabels included. The Site Plan is on 2 sheets at 1"=30'so it is easier to review. _ L-. 196<Why are concrete pavers proposed at the end of the parking row on Lot 1 E-R It is anticipated that pedestrians would cut through the landscaping in this area. Please provide the inside clear dimensions of the new dumpster enclosure. Inside clear dimension has been added. The dum ster and screen walls will be added in the future with a Site Plan submittal for a s r re on Lot 1E-R. . 7. Please be aware that the structures that will be built on Lot 1-ER must conform to the height limitations in UDO Section 7.1.H Height. Noted.IPlease change note 9 to include the Non-Residential Architectural standards. Note has been revised. Since the North Forest Parkway right-of-way dedication occurred with the plat, it does not need to be shown on the site plan - only the new right-of-way line should be shown. Dedication area removed. „I S� ,) l3 4 z. 132_2g , ,_ Ls •P ease label all setbacks on the site plan (the lines are shown, but not labeled). All setbacks have been labeled. . Side setbacks on lots 1C and 1B do not need to be shown since they are under the same V ownership and a building is being proposed over the lot line. The side setbacks have been removed. v 2. Please label distance from single-family lots to the parking area. Currently it is shown as "> 10'." Please be specific. The distance has been labeled. VS. Please provide note related to floodplain on the property.jr. oodplain note added. are retaining walls located on site? (checked on checklist) Retaining wall labels have been added. See Sheet 4A of the construction drawings. Provide location and detail of required bicycle facility. The required bicycle facility location and detail have been ad ed .fir C�_( ,1,g. Please submit application for Non-Resi ntial Arc itectural standards revie ncluding V colors samples. Elevations a–fin —material lists have been provided. Comments on architectural compliance will be provided under separate memo. Color samples to be submitted separately. V(Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not be made of aware of will constitute a completely new review. Noted. LAN DSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER 1. Please submit a landscape plan for this phase (does not cover all of phase II). What area is the point calculation based on? The Landscape plan has been revised and is on 2 sheets. 1 for Phase 2 and 1 for Phase 3. 2. Title block should specifically state that this is for Phase II only. Please include phase lines. Must match site plan. The title block for each sheet refers to the Phase and the Phase lines match the revised site plan. 3. Gravel is not an approved ground cover. Noted. . Provide a general note that 100% coverage of groundcover, decorative paving, decorative rock, or a perennial grass is required in parking lot islands, swales and drainage areas, the parking lot setback, rights-of-way, and adjacent property disturbed during construction. This note was added to the plan. ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 Nir O.submit fire flow report for all proposed structures with this phase. ' - ow report is submitted. \(...., 2. It .'•ears the building height exceeds 30-ft; please provide the 26-ft aerial access fire lane pi -:.jacent to this building. • The height of the portion of the roof of the building that could be accessed is less than 30 (\Cl/ feet. This was discussed with Steve Smith at the PAC and he concurred with Robert Payne that aerial access was not needed. It appears that some of the private storm system — lines and inlets are in PUEs, please �/" remove. The private storm system was removed from the PUE. 'Please submit easement dedication form for all "proposed PUEs" with all appropriate supporting documentation. A Re-plat has been submitted and there is a blanket easement on the property. Please submit engineers cost estimate. Cost estimate for public infrastructure submitted. lease illustrate FDC connection. The FDC needs to be located within 150-ft from a fire hydrant and adjacent to fire lane. The FDC has been added in a parking island in front of the north end of the building. It is within 150'of the existing fire hydrant. (Sheet C6) Water Line W-4, after the tapping sleeve and valve on the main the only valve required after the meter is the "Ampro" isolation valve. The gate valve illustrated at Sta. 0+14 should be the isolation valve The waterline design has been revised as noted. FIRE 1. Needs to show fire hydrant(s) location and the fire department connection for the building. Fire department connection shall be within 100 ft of hydrant as the truck lays the hose. The FDC is shown and is within 100'of an existing fire hydrant. 2. Fire department connections will have knox lock caps. Show Knox box location at front entrance. This is noted on site plan. 3. Knox key switch for main electrical shut off to building, unless there is a manual disconnect provided. Noted on site plan. 4. Calculated fire flow information for the building provided to Josh Norton. Fire flow report provided. 5. The building height or portion of building to be no higher then 30 feet. Aerial access maybe required. As previously noted, aerial access is not required. SANITATION 1. Sanitation is ok with this project. Noted. Please note that Sheet C4A has been added to the construction documents to provide more details about the paving, grading and sidewalks around Building A. 1 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MEMORANDUM October 24, 2007 TO: Joe Schultz, P.E., Civil Development, Ltd., via fax: 979.764.7759 FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: NORTH FOREST PROFESSIONAL PARK PH. 2 NRA Review Staff reviewed the above-mentioned Non-Residential Architectural plans as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) revised set of elevation drawings (if applicable) Color Samples If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised elevations, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments pc: Muco Verde LLC - Fred Bayliss, via fax: 979.693.8365 Case file #07-00500257 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: NORTH FOREST PROFESSIONAL PARK PH. 2 NRA Review PLANNING 1. Please provide color samples for any non-masonry material. 2. What is the projection of the 'pilasters' on the west elevation? 3. Are the "recessed entries" recessed into the structure or just under a canopy? Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: October 24, 2007 1 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 0—rffCollege Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570/Fax 979.764.3496 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MEMORANDUM October 23, 2007 TO: Joe Schultz, P.E., Civil Development, Ltd., via fax: 979.764.7759 FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: NORTH FOREST PROFESSIONAL PARK PH. 2 (SP- Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Two (2) revised site plans One (1) landscaping plan One (1) 11x17 grading and erosion control plan Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents (please allow 4 weeks to process). Please note that the Easement Dedication Sheet and necessary documents are required prior to the issuance of a building permit. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments pc: Muco Verde LLC - Fred Bayliss, via fax: 979.693.8365 Case file #07-00500257 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans.Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. Page 1 of 3 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: NORTH FOREST PROFESSIONAL PARK PH. 2 (SP — 07-00500257 PLANNING 1. This site plan is for Phase II only. Please differentiate between Phase I (what is already constructed) and Phase II (by line weight, etc.). Phase I lines should be the same as on the approved Phase I site plan. 2. The site plan should be further phased since no structures are currently proposed on Lot 1E-R. 3. By including the parking, etc. surrounding Lot 1E-R in the same phase as the structure on Lot 1B and 10, the Certificate of Occupancy for the structure will be tied to the site work on the other side of the site. Is this your intention? 4. Please include labels instead of numbered notes on the site plan. 5. Why are concrete pavers proposed at the end of the parking row on Lot 1 E-R 6. Please provide the inside clear dimensions of the new dumpster enclosure. 7. Please be aware that the structures that will be built on Lot 1-ER must conform to the height limitations in UDO Section 7.1.H Height. 8. Please change note 9 to include the Non-Residential Architectural standards. 9. Since the North Forest Parkway right-of-way dedication occurred with the plat, it does not need to be shown on the site plan - only the new right-of-way line should be shown. 10. Please label all setbacks on the site plan (the lines are shown, but not labeled). 11. Side setbacks on lots 10 and 1B do not need to be shown since they are under the same ownership and a building is being proposed over the lot line. 12. Please label distance from single-family lots to the parking area. Currently it is shown as "> 10'." Please be specific. 13. Please provide note related to floodplain on the property. 14. Where are retaining walls located on site? (checked on checklist) 15. Provide location and detail of required bicycle facility. 16. Please submit an application for Non-Residential Architectural standards review, including colors samples. Elevations and material lists have been provided. Comments on architectural compliance will be provided under separate memo. 17. Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not be made of aware of will constitute a completely new review. Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: October 22, 2007 LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER 1. Please submit a landscape plan for this phase (does not cover all of phase II). What area is the point calculation based on? 2. Title block should specifically state that this is for Phase II only. Please include phase lines. Must match site plan. 3. Gravel is not an approved ground cover. 4. Provide a general note that 100% coverage of groundcover, decorative paving, decorative rock, or a perennial grass is required in parking lot islands, swales and drainage areas, the parking lot setback, rights-of-way, and adjacent property disturbed during construction. NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. Page 2 of 3 Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: October 22, 2007 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 1. Please submit fire flow report for all proposed structures with this phase. 2. It appears the building height exceeds 30-ft; please provide the 26-ft aerial access fire lane adjacent to this building. 3. It appears that some of the private storm system — lines and inlets are in PUEs, please remove. 4. Please submit easement dedication form for all "proposed PUEs" with all appropriate supporting documentation. 5. Please submit engineers cost estimate. 6. Please illustrate FDC connection. The FDC needs to be located within 150-ft from a fire hydrant and adjacent to fire lane. 7. (Sheet C6) Water Line W-4, after the tapping sleeve and valve on the main the only valve required after the meter is the "Ampro" isolation valve. The gate valve illustrated at Sta. 0+14 should be the isolation valve. Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: October 19, 2007 FIRE 1. Needs to show fire hydrant(s) location and the fire department connection for the building. Fire department connection shall be within 100 ft of hydrant as the truck lays the hose. 2. Fire department connections will have knox lock caps . Show Knox box location at front entrance. 3. Knox key switch for main electrical shut off to building, unless there is a manual disconnect provided. 4. Calculated fire flow information for the building provided to Josh Norton. 5. The building height or portion of building to be no higher then 30 feet. Aerial access maybe required. Reviewed by: Jerry Duffey, Deputy Fire Marshal Date: 17 October 2007 SANITATION 1. Sanitation is ok with this project. Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: October 23, 2007 ELECTRICAL 1. Plans still under review. NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station,must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. Page 3 of 3